Perspective Of Collaborative Governance Research Articles

The Government and Civil Society Collaboration against COVID-19 in South Korea: A Single or Multiple Actor Play?

AbstractThis study examines, from a collaborative governance perspective, the public policy process of South Korea in responding to the global health pandemic. In many countries, attention has been focused primarily on governmental capacity and political leadership in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. In South Korea, however, the role of civil society as a collaborative partner to government is especially important. To analyze the comprehensive and substantive nature of government-civil society collaboration, this study assesses the response to COVID-19 along two dimensions: the level of civil society involvement in governance, and the stage in public policy development. The study reveals that the South Korean government was a coordinator of multiple actors and multiple sectors of society, including civil society, and that all three facets of civil society as described by Edwards (2004), were involved: associational life, civility, and engagement in the public sphere.

Research on the Development of Youth Outdoor Education in China from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance

Research on the Development of Youth Outdoor Education in China from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance

Ideal Model in the Implementation of National Insight Policies for Handling Social Conflict in Pandeglang Regency

Pandeglang Regency is one of the regencies located in Banten Province which is a strategic area because it is close to the capital city of the Republic of Indonesia. Its proximity to the capital causes Pandegalang Regency to have the potential for high social conflict. This is supported by data showing that the number of conflicts in Pandeglang Regency was the highest in Banten Province in 2011 although there was a tendency to decrease in the following year. To suppress the occurrence of social conflicts in Pandeglang District, the local government has implemented a National Insight Policy with a collaborative governance perspective. The research describes the factors that influence the implementation of these policies and tries to formulate an ideal method that can be used in the application of a national insight policy. This study uses a qualitative approach so that in interpreting the conditions of the actors, it is further developed by means of triangulation analysis. The results of the study found that there were several factors that influenced the implementation of the national insight policy such as the insufficient capability of the national insight education center team, low community participation, limited budget. In this study, researchers also tried to design a model for implementing the national insight policy in social conflict management.

RECOMMENDATION FOR COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE MODEL IN WAJO DISTRICT REGIONAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES BUDGET FORMULATION

This article aims to explain the recommendations of the Collaborative Governance Model in the Formulation of the Wajo Regency APBD (Regional Revenue and Expenditures Budget). The method used in research is a qualitative approach. This study aims to describe and analyze various conditions and situations that are the object of research related to the Collaborative Governance Model in Wajo District Budget Formulation. The study recommends a new model in the preparation of the District APBD and finds a model in the perspective of collaborative governance, namely the cross-actor consensus collaborative model, which is a collaboration model that involves the role and participation of cross-stakeholders between the TAPD (Local Government Budget Team) as the local government, Banggar DPRD and community forums in the process of drafting APBD that emphasizes commitment and consensus in public decision making. Give a greater role to all stakeholders (local government, TAPD, DPRD (Regional People's Representative Council), and community forums or other non-governmental organizations) to collaborate in the preparation of APBD, both internally and externally.

Building local support for a coastal protected area: Collaborative governance in the Bigi Pan Multiple Use Management Area of Suriname

Bigi Pan Multiple Use Management Area (MUMA, IUCN category VI) is a coastal protected area situated in the Northwest Suriname between the Atlantic Ocean and the Nickerie River. The area is characterized by wetlands with mangrove forests, contains high biodiversity, and is of socio-economic, ecological and ornithological importance. However, the MUMA is overexploited and subject to competition between various income generating activities, including uncontrolled fisheries and unregulated tourism combined. Insufficient capacity of government agencies for enforcement and policy implementation and lack of communication between relevant government agencies has further contributed to unsustainable practices that diverge from ‘wise use’ and conservation. This article analyses the case of Bigi Pan MUMA from the perspective of collaborative governance. It explores how local communities address the conflicts, user pressure, and implementation gaps that lead to unsustainable practices in Bigi Pan MUMA. In addition, it explores the potential of stakeholder engagement with the local community and key user groups to provide meaningful and regular opportunities to actively participate in decision-making structures and to deliberate on management actions. The conclusion finally presents arguments on how collaborative governance can become more effective by including local communities and by strengthening local decision-making and management.

Collaborative Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Forum in Banyumas Regency

This research is motivated by the SATRIA CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) Forum in Banyumas Regency which involves various parties such as local governments, companies, academics, NGOs, and mass media that collaborate in supporting regional development through CSR. Therefore, this paper aims to describe in-depth the governance of the SATRIA CSR Forum in Banyumas Regency in the perspective of collaborative governance. This research uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach. The research location was in Banyumas Regency, with the target of the research consisting of government elements, private elements, mass media elements, NGOs, the community, and academics. The selection of informants was carried out using purposive sampling and snowball sampling techniques. The data analysis method used is the interactive analysis. The results found that the existence of internal and external dialogue was good initial progress in the governance of the SATRIA CSR Forum. Even so, there are still some aspects of CSR Forum governance that have not been maximized, such as stakeholder's commitment and the business community's understanding of CSR regulations. Therefore, efforts are needed to get the business community involved in the SATRIA CSR Forum. In this case, the role of local government is one of the keys for the business world to be involved, including by providing understanding to the business community regarding CSR regulations. The results of this study contribute to an understanding of the implementation of collaborative approaches in the context of CSR programs at the local level.

Multiple Pathways to Public-Private Partnerships for Urban Public Service Delivery: A Cross-City Comparison of Bicycle-Sharing Service in China

ABSTRACTAlthough extant studies have examined the factors affecting the formation of public–private partnerships (PPPs) for urban public service delivery, few have conducted case studies on how institutional and strategic complexities have been addressed in service PPPs that recur across a geographical area. This article applies a perspective of collaborative governance to studying Mobike bicycle-sharing services in four Chinese cities: Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Policy learning and regulations address two complexities. Four pathways to the formation of PPPs emerged from comparative case studies: spontaneous market-driven, regulation-driven, innovation-driven and active governance-driven. Shared value and trust, interaction, policy reinvention and joint actions are embedded in these pathways.

The Management of Danau Sipin as a Waterfront City Tourism with Collaborative Governance Approach

The growth of the tourism industry has significant increasingly on the international and national levels. The development of the tourism sector has to be done to fix the demand for tourist. The existence of a tourist attraction is to increase community income, tax contribution, and stimulate investment in a country. Increasing the income from tourism needs good governance based on collaborative governance perspective. This research aims to explore the collaborative process and actor mapping in the management of Danau Sipin as waterfront city tourism. The objective of collaborative is to gather the various issue and pattern of cooperation across stakeholders and resources. The collaboration requires the existence of partnerships between government and non-government. This study applies qualitative exploratory methods to understand the problems of tourism management. The data collected from informants are both formal and informal interviews. Then get data by observation and documentation, both primary and secondary sources. The results of this study find the main actors do not play an essential role in the management of the waterfront city as tourist attractions, but without key actors leads to the emergence of conflicts among government institutions. The collaboration process does not always start with a face to face dialogue involving stakeholders. If the community and the private sector that have collaborative initiatives, the process can implement following a mutual trust and strong commitment that emerges voluntarily.

Analysis of The Indonesian Government Initiative of The National Action Plan on Counter Violent Extremism that Lead to Terrorism

This article aims to determine the urgency of the government in this case BNPT in initiating the National Plan of Action on counter violent extremism that leads to terrorism. The growing spread of terrorism is evident in the massive nature of violent extremism. Currently the terrorist movement is growing and growing both domestically and at regional or international levels. Indonesia faces an increasingly dynamic and complex development of terrorism in line with changes in the international and regional strategic environment, as well as the changing mode of operation of terrorist attacks. The Collaborative Governance strategy can be used to analyze the urgency of the need for the preparation of the National Action Plan (NAP) where the NAP by BNPT is needed to address push factors and pull factors of terrorist acts in Indonesia. This strategy puts forward involvement together all stakeholders in co-operation and coordination to produce an integrated and comprehensive counterterrorism policy. From the perspective of Collaborative Governance, the establishment of the NAP can be expected to lead to decreased radicalism, increased prevention programs in ministries / institutions, strengthening inter-ministerial / institutional coordination, increasing partnerships between ministries / institutions / institutions civil society, and increased public participation in countering violent extremism leading to terrorism.

Government Collaboration in Empowerment? A Collaborative Framework for the Government in Empowering Coastal Communities

The pendulum of the development at the global level moves to the extent of collaborative work between government, society and third parties. Today, in Indonesia a collaboration model is also implemented with the aim of presenting long-standing welfare in coastal areas. The poverty that surrounds coastal communities is an anomaly in the midst of the abundance of wealth stored in the sea of Indonesia. The Regional Government of Tangerang Regency encourages to collaborate with external parties to resolve the troubles. This article tries to use the modified Triple-Helix model as an analytical framework, which is useful for knowing the role of actors involved in creating development innovation. This study uses qualitative methods to see and find out how political, social, and academic actors interact and integrate into overcoming public problems that arise from the perspective of collaborative governance. The findings of the study found, first, collaborative work is useful to improve governance, second, to provide opportunities for actors to find effective solutions, and thirdly, to increase trust between government and citizens. This article argues that the success of collaborative work depends on the synergy between actors and the extent to which each program can demonstrate its sustainability.

The Development Path of China's Bicycle Sharing from Collaborative Governance Perspective

In Recent years, bicycle sharing has become mission of solving problem of the last kilometer as one of most representative achievements of +. Bicycle sharing has been favored by public with its characteristics of stopand- go, economic and environmental protection. But over time, it also brings a series of management problems, which brings a new challenge to urban governance in Internet era. Through questionnaire, interviews, participatory observation and literature research, this article analyzes governance dilemma of shared bicycle, and puts forward some suggestions from perspective of collaborative governance.

Governança colaborativa: implantação de parques tecnológicos pelo governo de MG

A implantação de Parques Tecnológicos é uma iniciativa que envolve variados atores públicos e privados, e, por esse motivo, acredita-se que a prática do modelo de gestão adequado é crucial para reunir os interesses variados em torno deles. O estudo procura responder como o projeto estratégico de implantação de Parques Tecnológicos concebido pelo governo do Estado de Minas Gerais pode ser compreendido sob a ótica da Governança Colaborativa. A metodologia utilizada foi o estudo de caso do projeto de implantação de parques tecnológicos de MG. As técnicas de coleta de dados utilizadas envolveram a aplicação de entrevistas e de questionários com atores-chave e a análise documental. Os resultados demonstraram que a Governança Colaborativa é útil para compreender as relações entre os atores, especialmente as limitações encontradas e as possibilidades de melhoria da qualidade da gestão colaborativa.Palavras-chave: Gestão de Políticas Públicas, deliberação inclusiva, confiança mútua, atores sociais.

Challenges of collaborative governance in the sharing economy: The case of free-floating bike sharing in Shanghai

Abstract Most sharing mobility business models promise green and affordable transport in cities. However, their rapid scale-up processes have often caused significant disruption and stresses to urban governance. Free-floating bike sharing (FFBS) is highly-touted in Shanghai as a means to bring biking habits back to an overly car-congested city. Despite substantially changing the behaviour of Shanghai citizens to adopt shared bikes within a short period of time (2016–2017), the FFBS has hit a threshold of oversupply, under-distribution and user misbehaviour problems, which endanger the environmental and social sustainability of innovative urban mobility schemes. In this paper, we focus on the FFBS case study and examine how commercial, political and social actors interact in addressing the emerging public problems in the FFBS scale-up process from a collaborative governance perspective. We find that the lack of recognition and integration of new social actors, such as user groups, as agents in the scheme are key obstacles to a fully-functioning government-business-society collaborative regime. We argue that this hindrance is a function of the existing socio-economic relations within the city. Our results suggest that the city's government needs to be more agile to accommodate, nurture and integrate emerging social actors as governance partners in the sharing economy, in order to ensure its efficacy, resilience and sustainability. We propose an alternative governance model to improve the effectiveness of the collaborative governance regime towards urban sustainability through engaging the society in better and smarter ways in the sharing economy.

PEMBENTUKAN KEBIJAKAN PARTISIPATIF DALAM PERSPEKTIF PEMERINTAHAN KOLABORATIF DI KABUPATEN SAMBAS PROVINSI KALIMANTAN BARAT

Convensional model of public policy makings in Sambas district, West Borneo Province, so far rely more on the strength of institutional structures and elites with less open processes. The impact in many case of planning has failed to identify and accommodate governance issues. This research uses qualitative explorative methods which are assisted with soft system methodology as suggester by Checkland (1999). Analysis of research uses collaborative governance theory in looking at the process of preparation of regional medium term development plan (RPJMD) of 2016-2021. Result of this research illustrates that the failure in the preparation of planning for this is caused by access to stakeholder involvement that is limited, the role of the government is very dominant so that RPJMD is not considered as a shared commitment and responsibility, the implication of each party working independently in accordance with their respective interest. It is also apparent that the process of preparing planning has not been sufficient to meet accessability and drivers in the form of citizen's education and lack of seriousness in the implementation of bureaucratic reform to become an implementative reference for the formation of participatory policy making according to the perspective of collaborative governance in regions with similar characteristics.

베트남 신농촌운동(2010~2015) 추진구조 : 정부조직간 협력적 거버넌스 관점을 중심으로

본 연구는 베트남 정부조직간 협력적 거버넌스의 관점에서 신농촌운동의 추진구조를 분석 및 평가하고 베트남정부의 농촌농업개발전략의 특성을 파악하는 데에 목적을 두고 있다. 구체적으로, 본 연구는 공공부문의 신농촌운동 정책수립, 집행, 평가 · 환류를 위한 거버넌스 구조와 민간부문의 마을수준에서의 주민참여와 주민의 정치사회단체들의 거버넌스 구조를 중심 분석대상으로 삼고자한다. 그리고 베트남에서의 신농촌운동을 성공적으로 이끌기 위한 몇 가지 방안을 결론과 제언 부분에 제시할 것이다.BR 특히 본 연구는 베트남 정부가 역점을 두고 추진하고 있는 신농촌운동의 1단계(2010~2015) 농촌개발사업의 19개 평가지표를 중심으로 그 동안을 사업실적을 분석하였다. 분석결과 몇몇 수치상 실적을 제외하고는 베트남 신농촌운동은 정부주도형이면서 주민의 참여가 부족한 위로부터 접근하는 하향식방식을 특징으로 하고 있었다. 끝으로 본 연구는 주민의 참여를 이끌어낼 수 있는 지도자의 양성, 민관 협력 체계의 구축, 지역의 실정을 반영할 수 있는 사업운영체계 구축 등을 제언하고 있다.BR 본 연구는 사회주의 체제를 기본으로 하고 있는 베트남의 농촌개발의 가장 큰 특징은 강력한 수직적, 하향식 접근의 정책집행과 일률적인 평가지표의 적용을 통한 통일된 정책집행을 하고 있음을 발견할 수 있었다. 그리고 거버넌스 측면에서 베트남 공산당의 막강한 권한은 사업추진의 수월성은 확보할 수 있으나 이해관계자들의 창의성이 반영되거나 지역의 특성 등이 반영되기 어려운 환경을 제공하는 것으로 나타났다.

Spurring Vaccine Development for the Developing World: A Collaborative Governance Perspective on Product Development Partnerships

ABSTRACTCollaborative governance has emerged recently as an alternative to the traditional sector-based, single-actor approaches for addressing complex governance challenges. However, previous research has given little attention to collaborative governance within international policy contexts. To address this gap, an integrative collaborative governance framework is used to analyze product development partnerships (PDPs) that seek to develop vaccines to prevent the spread of devastating diseases within the developing world. The analysis indicates that PDPs are helping address acute governance challenges and are emblematic of the increasing importance of nonprofit organizations in collaborative governance regimes. Implications for research on collaborative governance are also discussed.

Issues and challenges of public service procurement in China: a collaborative governance perspective

As a form of collaborative governance, government procurement of public services from non-governmental organisations (NGOs) has become a major channel for public service delivery. Different from the relative mature practices of public service procurement in Western countries, China is attempting to adopt this mechanism in recent years, calling for more research in sense making the issues and challenges in the procurement process. This paper discusses six major issues in Chinese Government procurement of public services from the perspective of collaborative governance theory, analyses the reasons that lead to these six challenges, and proposes some important solutions to these issues.

Issues and challenges of public service procurement in China: a collaborative governance perspective

Issues and challenges of public service procurement in China: a collaborative governance perspective

An Analysis of the Case of Mass Transportation System Reform in Seoul Metropolitan Area through a Collaborative Governance Perspective

An Analysis of the Case of Mass Transportation System Reform in Seoul Metropolitan Area through a Collaborative Governance Perspective