Analysis of the F. Hershberger’s motivation theory has been made from the point of view of the subject-object approach to the personnel professionalization process.The research made has determined the fact that the «motivation theory» reflects only a special motivation profile of the individual chemical enterprise employees’. Besides, the F. Hershberger’s division of labor fac-tors into internal and external ones (hygienic and motivational) doesn’t ground on distinct criteria. The article presents analysis of the rather complex F. Hershberger’s interpretation of the inter-factors relations between motivation (the factors which do not always stir an individual) and satisfaction (which is not always caused by external motivators). The issue of the processes mutual influence (professional needs formation, professional satisfaction with the process of external motivation) is being considered in the article on the basis of the author’s personnel professional mobility structure.The conclusion made by F. Hershberger as for the hygienic factors on the one hand being very important (even automatic) in the process of motivation and on the other hand his idea that such factors presence doesn’t cause motivational effect on the individuals’ behavior because the factors mentioned above form favorable «healthy» labor conditions are considered not very logical by the author of the present article. The matter is that an employer can not practically apply the factors, which on the one hand are very closely connected and on the other hand do not cause employees’ motivation (besides, they are obligatory for an employer).The research made proves the fact that F. Hershberger’s motivation theory does not give adequate de-scription of the complex internal and external motivation processes which makes labor activity motivation too simple.The F. Hershberger’s theory simply states the individual case of the employees’ motivational intentions, motivational interests and motivational expectations of the individual manufacture with the harmful labor conditions.