ObjectivesAlcohol consumption is facilitated in university students by personal risk factors such as initiation with the substances at an early age, a low self-esteem, a lack of social aptitudes and heredity. Protective factors are characteristics of the personality like optimistic attitude towards the future, good coping strategies, good self-esteem and good capacity of resilience. The objective of our study consists in comparing the alcohol consumption of subjects between 18 and 25 years old within the Holy Spirit University of Kaslik in Beirut. We postulate that the alcohol consumption and the protection factors in the same university vary, as the students are seminarists or not. We tried to see if the seminarists students have lesser alcohol consumption (binge drinking, abuse, dependence) than none seminarists students and to see if they have personal psychological protection factors (optimism, high self-esteem, positive coping strategies to resolve the problems and resilience) higher than none seminarists students. Subjects and methodsOur study concern a Lebanese sample of 200 students of the Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Lebanese Francophone University, aged between 18 and 25 years, distributed on four faculties (theology, management, science and medicine) of 50 persons each one. The students were informed and agreed to pass two anonymous questionnaires: the first one help to detect subjects having alcohol drinking (binge drinking, abuse and dependence) whose a part corresponds to the test AUDIT measuring the alcoholic dependence; and the second allows evaluating personal psychological factors of protection (optimism, good self-esteem, positive coping strategies and resilience) whose a part concerning the self-esteem is the one of Rosenberg, the part relating to the coping strategies is inspired by the “Brief cope” scale of Carver; the part concerning the optimism is inspired by the LOT “Test Life orientation” of Schier and Carver and the part relating to the resilience is inspired by “the control and the self-resilience” scale. ResultsTheology students have personal factors of protection, which protect them from alcohol drinking: higher optimism than others, more positive coping strategies, a better resilience and a good self-esteem more than those in other faculties. This differentiates them from other students concerning the risk use and the “binge drinking” and did not significantly differentiate them concerning the abuse and the dependence. The binge drinking seems to be significantly higher at the students in management, sciences and medicine. Their search for domination, which accompanies the competition between each others, where it is socially “virile” to drink important quantities of alcohol around games, can influence their behavior. So, we can understand why such behaviors do not seem to interest the seminarists. The risk use on the test of the AUDIT seems to be significantly lower in seminarists students than in sciences and management. This can be explained by their less frequent use of substances to resolve their conflicts and their use of coping strategies such as prayers and by their vision in the life is based on the hope, faith and carrier of optimism. The major problem of Lebanese students remains the “binge drinking”. ConclusionIt would be interesting to propose interventions within the university. Talking groups could be settled to help them talking about their own consumption of alcohol.