entification of key ethical issues specifically applicable Internet newsgroup research. uggested resolutions to key ethical issues specifically pplicable to Internet newsgroup research. The potential of the Internet as a setting for the duct of health research; particularly into reported nt experiences has become of interest to both earchers and those who supervise research projects. ever, Haigh and Jones (2005) note that nurses have n slow to realize the potential of such research, possibly due to unfamiliarity with the attendant ethical issues. Consequently, they present an overview of the ethical implications for researchers (and their supervisors, particularly nurse educators) ‘‘in cyberspace’’ and present their ideas for further debate; suggesting that issues surrounding consent, privacy, identification verification and disguise are particularly problematic within Internet research. However, as those authors acknowledged, they were largely extrapolating existing guidance to this ‘‘new’’ domain; a common practice, not without drawbacks (Eynon et al., 2008). Sixsmith and Murray (2001), drawing on their own experience of running an Internet research project, suggest that there are particular problems for researchers to consider regarding the ethical conduct of Internet based health research that are complex and not always amenable to ‘‘straightforward answers’’ (p. 429). Consequently, Flicker et al. (2004) call for ongoing dialogue and debate as to ethical conduct of Internet research; a call echoed by Whitehead (2007). Holmes (2009) concludes that ‘‘ethical standards for Internet research are not yet well-developed’’ (p. 399). It would seem apposite, therefore, to present further consideration of the subject based upon our experience as nurses of conducting an Internet based health research project. Our reflections here arise from a general sense of sympathy and agreement with the above authors’ arguments, and are offered in the spirit of the called for ongoing dialogue; supplementing, rather than supplanting being the aim. The experience from which we derive these reflections comes from having developed and conducted a qualitative project in the area of Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) as graduate student (SB) and supervisor (BC); accessing and discursively investigating (discourse analysis/ narrative inquiry) accounts of personal mental health experiences to be found freely available and archived at ‘Google Groups’ (https://groups.google.com), focusing particularly on accounts of self-injury/suicide, voluntarily posted by young people to Internet newsgroup forums held on the ‘Google Groups’ archive and comparing/ contrasting them with the existing academic/professional T I C L E I N F O