Persistent Rectal Prolapse Research Articles

An innovative surgical treatment method in persistent rectal prolapse: Ventral abdomino-rectosigmoidopexy through tube sigmoidostomy combined with Ekehorn's rectopexy.

Herein, the results of the cases, who underwent surgical repair with or without ventral abdomino-rectosigmoidopexy through tube sigmoidostomy combined with Ekehorn's rectopexy due to recurrent rectal prolapse, were discussed. The demographic characteristics, surgical technique, and results of children who were operated in the department of Pediatric Surgery for rectal prolapse between 2004 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. In 18 years, six pediatric cases (2 females [33%] and 4 males [67%]) were operated for persistent rectal prolapse. The mean operative age of the patients was 7.5 years (2.1-17), and all had severe rectal prolapse. Some of these patients were followed up in other centers and their rectal prolapse continued despite diet changes, toilet behavior training, and the treatment of sclerosing agents. Rectal trimming was applied to one of the first two patients who were operated for anal atresia and recurrence did not occur. In the second case who underwent laparoscopic colon pull-through, Ekehorn rectopexy was performed alone and no recurrence was observed also in this case. Considering that rectosigmoid colon adhesions formed on the anterior abdominal wall due to colostomy opening-closing may provide ventral sigmoidopexy, it was decided to offer the option of applying both methods together. Three of the next four cases were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis. All four underwent ventral abdomino-rectosigmoidopexy through tube sigmoidostomy combined with Ekehorn's rectopexy. Ekehorn's butterfly sutures were removed on 15th day and Foley catheters on 21st day. Three cases with cystic fibrosis were uneventful. However, a 14-year-old girl with a history of sexual abuse relapsed 6 months later. Ventral abdomino-rectosigmoidopexy through tube sigmoidostomy combined with Ekehorn's rectopexy is a successful and unique method in terms of providing intestinal fixation. It may be the primary option for definitive surgical treatment of persistent rectal prolapse.

Rectal Sclerotherapy in Children: An Author’s Experience with a Sclerosant

Background: Rectal prolapse in children is mainly managed by conservative treatment, especially in those aged <3 years; however, intervention is indicated in cases with persistent and recurrent prolapse that is resistant to conservative treatment. Objective: To determine the efficacy of sclerotherapy using sodium tetradecyl sulphate as a sclerosant in treating rectal prolapse in children. Design: A retrospective chart review. Settings: The study was conducted in a tertiary care pediatric center in Bengaluru, Karnataka. Patients (Material) and Methods: Children aged ≥1 year with persistent rectal prolapse were included in this study, which was conducted from January 2013 to December 2021. The median follow-up period was 1 year. Main Outcome Measure: Resolution of the rectal prolapse. Sample Size: Three hundred and eighty-seven patients. Results: The success rate was 93.5% (43/46) after sclerotherapy treatment. Recurrence was noted in 6.5% of the patients who required a second dose of sclerotherapy or surgery. The median follow-up period was 8 months. There were no remarkable complications or mortality. Conclusion: Rectal sclerotherapy injection is a safe, low-cost procedure with low recurrence rate in children. Limitations: Ours was a retrospective, single-center study, and no control group was utilized. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Laparoscopic Suture versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children: A Comparative Randomized Study.

Purpose To compare laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Patients and Methods. The prospective study was conducted at Pediatric Surgery Department, Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt between Feb 2010 and Jan 2015. Seventy-eight children with persistent complete rectal prolapse were subjected to laparoscopic rectopexy. Fourteen parents refused to participate. All patients received initial conservative treatment for more than one year. The remaining 64 patients were randomized divided into two equal groups. Group A; 32 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh rectopexy and group B, 32 underwent laparoscopic suture rectopexy. The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group. Results Sixty-four cases presented with persistent complete rectal prolapse were the material of this study. They were 40 males and 24 females. Mean age at operation was 8 (5–12) years. All cases were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time in laparoscopic suture rectopexy was shorter than laparoscopic mesh rectopexy group. No early post-operative complications were encountered. No cases of recurrence with mesh rectopexy group while in suture rectopexy group it was 4 cases (14.2%). Post-operative constipation occurred in one case (3.57%) in suture rectopexy group and occurred in one case (3.3%) in mesh rectopexy group. Fecal incontinence improved in 26/28 cases (92.8%) in suture rectopexy while in mesh rectopexy it was improved in 30/30 cases (100%) of cases. Conclusion Both laparoscopic mesh and suture rectopexy are feasible and reliable methods for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse in children. However, no recurrence, low incidence of constipation and high improvement of incontinence at follow up more than 36 months with mesh rectopexy accordingly, we considered mesh rectopexy to be the procedure of choice in treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Simplified Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Idiopathic Rectal Prolapse In Children: Technique and Results

BackgroundLaparoscopic suture rectopexy is safe and effective treatment option for pediatric rectal prolapse. We performed this study to compare the outcome of modified laparoscopic suture rectopexy (MLSR) versus Classical Laparoscopic suture rectopexy (CLSR). Material and methodsThe study was conducted between June 2015 to May 2019 including all the patients with persistent rectal prolapse who underwent surgery managed by either MLSR (Group A) or CLSR (Group B). The groups were compared for constipation, operative time, blood loss, length of stay, postoperative complications. Results19 patients from MLSR and 22 patients from CLSR were evaluated. The mean operative time in MLSR group was 41.5 ± 6.2 min which was significantly lesser than CLSR group with a mean operative time of 78.6 ± 14.2 (p = 0.001). The blood loss was also less in MLSR group compared to CLSR group (p = 0.013). At three months of follow up, the constipation was less in MLSR group compared to CLSR group (p = 0.041). ConclusionThe modification makes the procedure technically easy, minimizes the chances of complications and retaining all the advantages of suture rectopexy. Level OF EvidenceLevel II.

IPEG 2019 The 28th Annual Congress for Endosurgery in Children March 20-22, 2019, Santiago, Chile.

IPEG 2019 The 28th Annual Congress for Endosurgery in Children March 20-22, 2019, Santiago, Chile.

Posterior sagittal rectopexy in the management of persistent and recurrent complete rectal prolapse in children

Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional results of posterior sagittal rectopexy (PSR) in children with persistent and recurrent rectal prolapse. Patients and methods All patients with recurrent rectal prolapse after injection sclerotherapy or previous anal cerclage and patients with prolonged persistent prolapse needing surgery were subjected to PSR. Follow-up extended in the outpatient clinic for 6 months, and the patients were observed for any change in bowel habits, continence, and postoperative complication (incontinence and bleeding). Results This study included 12 patients with persistent rectal prolapse not responding to conservative treatment for 1 year and eight patients with recurrent rectal prolapse. Their ages at the operation ranged from 3 to 10 years. The mean operative time was 60 min (range, 40–80 min). Early postoperative complications include wound infection in four cases, which responded to antibiotics and daily dressings, and four patients with temporary constipation responding to laxatives and regulation of diet habits. Recurrence occurred in one patient in the form of partial mucosal prolapse. Conclusion PSR is a safe and effective procedure for persistent and recurrent rectal prolapse in children with excellent clinical and functional results.

Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Persistent Rectal Prolapse in Children: Is It a Safe and Effective First-Line Intervention?

Several techniques have been described for the surgical correction of rectal prolapse without any clear advantage for one technique over the other. We evaluated the use of laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSRP) as a modality of treatment for rectal prolapse in children. Prospective data were collected for all children who presented to our center between 2011 and 2014 and required surgery for rectal prolapse. All children underwent LSRP with fixation of the mobilized rectum to the sacral promontory with multiple nonabsorbable sutures. The median follow-up period was 14 months (range, 6-29 months). The operative time, operative complications, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Seventy-four patients presented with rectal prolapse during this period. Twenty patients (27%) required LSRP. Their median age at surgery was 4.4 years (range, 2-11 years), median operative time was 77.5 minutes (range, 30-150 minutes), and the median length of hospital stay was 1 day (range, 1-4 days). Only 1 patient had full-thickness recurrence that required redo surgery, and another had mucosal prolapse, which spontaneously resolved. LSRP is a safe and effective technique for treating children with full-thickness rectal prolapse with the benefits of being minimally invasive, a short hospital stay, early recovery, and low recurrence rate.

Postoperative complications after reconstructive surgery for cloacal malformations: a systematic review.

The repair of cloacal malformations is most often performed using a posterior sagittal anorecto-vagino-urethroplasty (PSARVUP) or total urogenital mobilization (TUM) with or without laparotomy. The aim of this study was to systematically review the frequency and type of postoperative complication seen after cloacal repair as reported in the literature. A systematic literature search was conducted according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA). Eight records were eligible for this study which were qualitatively analyzed according to the Rangel score. Overall complication rates reported in included studies ranged from 0 to 57 %. After meta-analysis of data, postoperative complications were seen in 99 of 327 patients (30 %). The most common reported complications were recurrent or persistent fistula (n = 29, 10 %) and rectal prolapse (n = 27, 10 %). In the PSARVUP group, the complication rate was 40 % and in the TUM group 30 % (p = 0.205). This systematic review shows that postoperative complications after cloacal repair are seen in 30 % of the patients. The complication rates after PSARVUP and TUM were not significantly different. Standardization in reporting of surgical complications would inform further development of surgical approaches. Other techniques aiming to lower postoperative complication rates may also deserve consideration.

Laparoscopic Rectopexy; Is It Useful for Persistent Rectal Prolapse in Children?

Introduction: Rectal prolapse is a relatively common, usually self-limiting illness in children. Peak incidence is between 1 and 3 years. The intervention is required for the persistent rectal prolapse (PRP). Only scanty experience is available with laparoscopic rectopexy in children. There is no available work using both mesh and suture laparoscopic rectopexy in literature. This work is unique that it presents our clinical experience with both mesh and suture laparoscopic rectopexy in children. This is a prospective clinical study for the outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy (LRP) by both mesh and suture technique in children with persistent rectal prolapse (PRP). Materials and Methods: Fourteen cases of PRP were managed with LRP from February 2008 to August 2012. Results: Of the 14 children, 10 (71.42%) were males and 4 (28.57%) were females. Male to female ratio was 2:1. The mean age of presentation was 5 years (range 3 - 8 years). The presenting complaints were mass descending per rectum along with bleeding per rectum lasting from 1 to 3 years. All had rectal prolapse of 5 - 7 cm in length. 12 out of 14 children had recurrence even after sclerotherapy before referral to laparoscopic rectpexy. The mean duration of surgery was 30 minutes (range 20 - 60 minutes). No intraoperative complications were reported; only one case got constipation and was managed conservatively and no recurrence. Conclusion: LRP is safe, feasible in children and gives satisfactory results after failure of all conservative even sclerotherapy injection.

Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse in children: a new simplified technique

Rectal prolapse in children without underlying conditions is usually a self-limiting problem and requires no surgical treatment. For children with persistent rectal prolapse, a variety of surgical procedures have been described with success. Recently, there are many reports addressing the successful use of different laparoscopic approaches for complete rectal prolapse. We present a novel simplified laparoscopic technique for management of those patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results that can be achieved by using this technique in management of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children. We reviewed the reports of 680 patients with primary complete and partial rectal prolapse over the period from August 2000 to August 2008. Fifty-two patients with complete primary rectal prolapse refractory to medical treatment for 2 years underwent a novel simplified technique for laparoscopic mesh rectopexy. Conservative management was successful with no recurrences in 628 patients (92.4%) while 52 (7.6%) patients did not respond to conservative management at a median follow-up period of 2 years. They were 35 males and 17 females. Their ages ranged from 2 to 14 years (mean 6). All patients were subjected to laparoscopic mesh rectopexy successfully without any conversion. The mean duration of surgery was 40 min. No intraoperative complications were reported, but one patient developed postoperative constipation that responded well to conservative treatment. The mean postoperative hospitalization was 2 days. Two cases were lost to follow-up, while the others were available for 36 months. There was no recurrence. Laparoscopy mesh rectopexy is safe, rapid, effective technique. It improved functional outcome without recurrence. It is associated with minimal postoperative pain and short hospital stay with excellent cosmoses.

An unusual pediatric case of chronic constipation and rectosigmoid prolapse diagnosed by video defecography

Rectal prolapse is a relatively common, benign condition in the pediatric population. Conservative management usually results in resolution of the problem. Persistent rectal prolapse with chronic constipation suggests more serious underlying pathologic condition that may be challenging to diagnose. We present a case of severe recurrent rectal prolapse with chronic constipation in a 13-year-old boy. Using video defecography, an unusual radiographic modality in children, a functional sigmoid obstruction was observed that was not found on more routine imaging studies. Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy provided an excellent outcome in this patient who previously had a lifestyle-limiting, chronic condition.

Laparoscopic management of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children

Background Rectal prolapse is a relatively common condition in children. The multiplicity of surgical approaches used for rectal prolapse indicates that there is no single approach universally accepted and applicable to all cases. The laparoscopic approach promises to become the criterion standard for the management of full-thickness rectal prolapse in children. The aim of this study was to review our experience over the last 5 years and to evaluate the results that can be achieved by using laparoscopy in management of complete rectal prolapse in children. Patients and Methods Forty patients presented with complete rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence grades (3-4) according to Rintala scale (37 secondary to prolapse and 3 neuropathic) had been operated upon laparoscopically from August 2003 to August 2008. They were subjected to clinical examination, investigations, pre- and postoperative electromyogram activities for external sphincter, puborectalis, and pelvic floor muscles. The pathophysiologic changes for each case was identified and dealt with laparoscopically (laparoscopic suture rectopexy, laparoscopic mesh rectopexy, laparoscopic resection rectopexy, and laparoscopic levatorplasty). Results Among the 40 children with complete rectal prolapse, 22 were males and 18 females. Their median age was 9 years (range, 4-14 years). All cases (n = 40) showed a redundant rectosigmoid junction. Additional laxity of the pelvic floor was present in 32, rectoanal intussusception in 27, anterior wall rectoanal intussusception in 3, and rectosacral hernia in 5 cases. All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The median duration of surgery was 60 minutes (range, 50-70 minutes) for suture rectopexy, 90 minutes (range, 60-110 minutes) for mesh rectopexy, 110 minutes (range, 95-160 minutes) for resection rectopexy, and 120 minutes (range, 100-150 minutes) for laparoscopic levatorplasty. No intraoperative complications occurred in this study. Median postoperative hospitalization was 3 days (range, 2-5 days). Electromyogram studies showed statistically significant improvement during rest, minimal volition, and squeezing in all cases except those children with spina bifida and meningomyelocele. The only complications were postoperative constipation and external colonic fistula. Significant improvement of the continence score was achieved in all cases. The average follow-up time was 36 months. There were no recurrences. Conclusion The use of laparoscopy in the management of complete rectal prolapse is safe, effective, and associated with improved functional outcome. It saved the patients multiple operations and is associated with minimal postoperative pain and short hospital stay.

Rectal prolapse in children: Laparoscopic suture rectopexy is a suitable alternative

Aim:To study the clinical outcome of laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSRP) in children with persistent rectal prolapse (PRP).Materials and Methods:Nineteen cases of PRP were managed with LSRP from February 2005 to August 2009.Results:All were followed up for an average duration of 6 months. Only one child had recurrence and was managed with sclerotherapy.Conclusions:LSRP is safe, feasible in children and gives satisfactory results.

Laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of persisting rectal prolapse in children

The repair of choice for persistent rectal prolapse (PRP) in children is disputed. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSRP) is effective in adults, but its usefulness in pediatric PRP is unknown. We compared LSRP with posterosagittal rectopexy (PSRP). Sixteen children, with a median age of 6.5 years (range, 0.8-16.8) and duration of symptoms of 2.8 years (range, 0.5-10.2), underwent surgery for PRP. Eight (1991-2000) had PSRP, and eight (2002-2005) had LSRP. Three patients with LSRP were healthy; the others had mental retardation and epilepsy (n = 1), cerebral palsy (n = 1), Aspeger's syndrome (n = 1), meningomyelocele (n = 1), and bladder extrophy (n = 1). Preoperative cologram (n = 6), sigmoideoscopy (n = 3), and anorectal manometry (n = 2) were normal in patients with LSRP. In LSRP, the rectum was mobilized and sutured to the sacral periosteum. Median operation time for LSRP was 80 min (range, 62-90) and for PSRP 40 min (range, 25-70) (p < 0.05); median hospital time was 6 days (range, 3-8) for LSRP and 6 days (range, 3-9) for PSRP (not significant). Six patients with LSRP had a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 4-24). None have had recurrences, and two patients (33%) require laxatives. Of the patients with PSRP, two (25%) had recurrence and underwent abdominal rectopexy with sigmoid resection. Medium-term results indicate that LSPR is effective in pediatric PRP. Constipation is the only postoperative problem in a significant proportion of patients.

Persistent rectal prolapse in children: sclerotherapy and surgical management

Persistent rectal prolapse is an uncommon but distressing condition in children. Significant controversy exists regarding its surgical management. The aim of this study was to identify a successful management strategy for persistent rectal prolapse in the paediatric population. Records of all children with rectal prolapse treated surgically at Birmingham Children's Hospital between 1995 and 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, clinical presentation, investigations, treatment modality, complications, and outcome were recorded. Inclusion criteria for the study were failure of conservative management leading to operative treatment. An exclusion criterion was cystic fibrosis. A total of 24 patients with persistent rectal prolapse were identified. Two children with cystic fibrosis were excluded from the analysis. Children below the age of 5 years, group I (n=17), were successfully managed by submucous hypertonic saline injections. Eighty-three percent (14/17) were cured by injection sclerotherapy in this group, 12/14 (71%) requiring one injection and 2/14 requiring a second injection. In the three (17.6%) children in group I in whom sclerotherapy failed, cow's milk protein (CMP) allergy was identified as the causative factor. Children older than 5, group II (n=5), either had behavioural problems (n=3) or were autistic (n=2). This group of children with adult-type, full-thickness rectal prolapse were found to be refractory to initial attempts of injection sclerotherapy. All five children were successfully managed with surgical correction. We conclude that rectal submucous hypertonic saline injections are highly effective for managing early-onset idiopathic childhood rectal prolapse. CMP allergy should be considered in young children with recurrent rectal prolapse. We recommend early definitive corrective surgery in older children with persistent rectal prolapse, as they do not respond to conservative measures or injection sclerotherapy.

Closed rectosacropexy for rectal prolapse in children.

This report describes a simple, effective, and permanent surgical solution for persistent rectal prolapse (RP). The technique simply involves passing multiple U-shaped sutures through the stab incisions made in the skin posterior to the anus, into the sacral fascia, then into the wall of rectum, down to the anal canal, and out through the stab incisions. The strands of the suture are tied subcutaneously through the stab incisions. This operation was successfully performed in 42 children (mean age, 3.5 years) who had suffered from recurrent RP for 3-5 months. None of the children experienced any further recurrence or specific complications during follow-up ranging from 1 to 3 years. Thus, I believe that closed rectosacropexy offers a simple, minimally invasive, and effective method of treating complete RP in children.

Injection sclerotherapy in the treatment of rectal prolapse in infants and children

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of injection sclerotherapy as treatment for persistent rectal prolapse. Methods: The records of 28 patients with rectal prolapse treated with injection sclerotherapy over a 16-year period were reviewed. Initial management included assessment and correction of predisposin factors. If rectal prolapse persisted or if the prolapse required repeat emergency or operating room reduction, injection sclerotherapy was performed. The sclerosing agent included D50W in 21 patients (sole agent in 15, combined with ethanolamine oleate in four, and with phenol 5% in two). Phenol 5% alone was used in six patients, and 25% saline was used in one patient. Number of injections, recurrences, and complications were reviewed. Results: Two patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient was curred once a polyp was recognized and removed. Of the remaining 25 patients, 21 were cured. Sixteen required one injection, three required two injections, and two required three injections (64% cure rate after one injection, 84% cure rate after three injections). There were 4 of 25 failures: two went on to low anterior resection after having failed two injections each; one patient was treated with Thiersch cerclage and injection after two failed injections; and one patient did not respond after three injections but had less severe prolapses. Of those injected with D50W alone, 13 of 14 were cured with injection sclerotherapy. Nine received one injection, two received two injections, and two received three injections (64% cure rate after one injection, 93% cure rate after three injections). The only complication was excessive oozing at the injection site in one patient. He was simply observed in hospital overnight. Follow-up averaged 33 months. The only significant underlying abnormality in our patient population was spina bifida in one patient. This patient was cured with injection therapy. Cystic fibrosis was ruled out by clinical examination and sweat chloride test in all patients. Constipation was the most common condition identified with the onset of rectal prolapse (15 of 28). Conclusions: Injection sclerotherapy is simple and should be considered as the first line treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse after failure of conservative measures. D50W is effective, easily available, inexpensive, and associated with few complications.

The injection treatment of rectal prolapse

The injection of 5% phenol in oil into the rectal submucosa cured persistent rectal prolapse in 91 of 100 young children. This result supports the view that the common form of rectal prolapse in otherwise-healthy children primarily involves the mucosa and the muscular wall is only secondarily involved.