The work stresses of women VDT-cum-telephone operators ( N=136), including the effects of permanent (day, evening and night) and rotating shifts on the behavioral responses and health disturbances were examined. The operators responded to an ergonomics checklist on work system analysis (e.g., job characteristics, physical and psychosocial stresses of work, workplace constraints, musculo-skeletal and visual strains, environmental hazards, and operator–VDT and telecommunication equipment interaction). The effects of shift schedules on health and well being were examined using questionnaires on sleep quality and quantity, physical health symptoms, chronic fatigue, cognitive and somatic anxiety, social and domestic disruption, composite morningness score, circadian type inventory (languidness and flexibility) and Eysenck personality inventory. The principal component factor analysis of the ergonomics checkpoints yielded five aspects of work. Factor 1 (organizational) describes job design needs, workplace interventions and constraints of VDT workstations. Factor 2 (environmental) covers illumination, climate and noise-related hazards. Factor 3 (mechanistic) refers to job specialization, pace of work, information handling, etc. Factor 4 (perceptual and motor) describes visual and auditory displays and controls. Factor 5 (motivational) refers to personal job characteristics and core dimensions, such as job autonomy, task significance and recognition. Factors 1–3 represented 45% of the total variance; Factors 4 and 5 represented 19% of the total variance. Long hours of seated work resulted in musculo-skeletal strains, however, the evening and night shift operators had highest back-related complaints (45–48%), compared to those in the day (28%) and rotating shifts (34%). The operators in the rotating and permanent night shifts had higher prevalence of visual strain. The loading of the work stressors explained in Factors 1–3 appeared autonomous, irrespective of the shift schedules. ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test indicated that the operators in the rotating shift had greater sensitivity to the stressors related to Factor 4. While the day shift operators responded greater to the stressors related to the core job dimensions that reflect growth needs (Factor 5), the night shift operators were less responsive to those dimensions. The scores on sleep disturbance, flexibility to sleeping habits and personality dimension (neuroticism) were negatively correlated to Factor 1. The digestive problems, social and domestic disruption and languidity dimensions were positively correlated to Factors 4 and 5. As noted in case of the rotating shift, the increased demand in the perceptual and motor, and the motivational aspects of work caused greater negative influence on physical health symptoms, and social and domestic disruption. The somatic anxiety was greater among women in night work. Findings of the multiple aspects of work supported that the behavioural response to the work stressors, and health and well-being dimensions did vary with the shift schedules. The job design interventions tailoring to the type of work and workplace ergonomics might improve the work stressors. The overlapping schedules of the rotating shift, including night work are the documented risk factors. Delayed morning shift for the operators in the rotating shift and adjustment of shift length based on the work and climatic load (e.g., reduce work hours in the evening shift to avoid peak workload, extend work hours in the day shift during the extremely hot summer months) might alleviate work stresses and enhance health and well-being. Relevance to industry Macroergonomic analysis of work in the telecommunication sector elucidates the multiple aspects of work stressors, including the shift schedules. In the light of cumulative health effects of the women VDT-cum-telephone operators, the study explores intervention and management of work to alleviate work stresses and enhance health and well being of the people involved.