Peritubular Capillary C4d Staining Research Articles

C4d Deposition without Rejection Correlates with Reduced Early Scarring in ABO-Incompatible Renal Allografts

C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries is a specific marker for the presence of antidonor antibodies in renal transplant recipients and is usually associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in conventional allografts. In ABO-incompatible grafts, however, peritubular capillary C4d is often present on protocol biopsies lacking histologic features of AMR; the significance of C4d in this setting remains unclear. For addressing this, data from 33 patients who received ABO-incompatible renal allografts (after desensitization) were retrospectively reviewed. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1 and/or 3 and 6 mo after transplantation in each recipient and at 12 mo in 28 recipients. Twenty-one patients (group A) had strong, diffuse peritubular capillary C4d staining without histologic evidence of AMR or cellular rejection on their initial protocol biopsies. The remaining 12 patients (group B) had negative or weak, focal peritubular capillary C4d staining. Three grafts (two in group B) were lost but not as a result of AMR. Excluding these three patients, serum creatinine levels were similar in the two groups at 6 and 12 mo after transplantation and at last follow-up; however, recipients in group A developed significantly fewer overall chronic changes, as scored by the sum of Banff chronic indices, than group B during the first year after transplantation. These results suggest that diffuse peritubular capillary C4d deposition without rejection is associated with a lower risk for scarring in ABO-incompatible renal allografts; the generalizability of these results to conventional allografts remains unknown.

Intérêt du monitoring du rejet aigu médié par anticorps post-transplantation ?

Anti-HLA antibodies formed de novo post-transplantation are involved in the development of acute humoral rejection also known as antibody-mediated rejection. This form of rejection is characterized by histological lesions, a positive C4d-staining of peritubular capillaries and anti-donor antibodies. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies indicates a poor prognosis as it is associated with a highly significant increase of graft loss risk, which might depend on antibody concentration. To prevent acute humoral rejection, antibodies must be systematically detected 3 months after transplantation with sensitive methods using recombinant HLA antigens that allow detecting anti-HLA antibodies by ELISA, flow cytometric panel-reactive antibodies test or immunobead flow cytometric assay, the intensity of fluorescence determining the concentration of anti-HLA antibodies. In case of acute graft dysfunction, antibody-mediated rejection must be treated by a combination of immunosuppressive drugs, antibodies, intra-venous immunoglobulins and/or plasmaphereses.

Renal allograft C4d deposition in Chinese: Hong Kong perspective

Acute rejection constitutes a significant proportion of renal allograft loss. Peritubular capillary deposition of C4d has been recognized as the footprint of humoral alloimmunity and proven to be a sensitive and specific marker for humoral rejection in the appropriate clinical context. Its presence in indication biopsies is the most important independent risk factor for graft failure. Data are, however, scarce among Chinese subjects. We retrospectively reviewed all renal graft biopsies performed from 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2006 for unexplained acute renal dysfunction or delayed graft function. Renal outcomes were assessed at the time of renal biopsy and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year afterwards. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to determine if C4d positivity is an independent risk factor for poor renal outcome. Fifty-two biopsies were included, of which 16 were positive for peritubular capillary C4d. Peritubular capillary C4d was associated with lower glomerular filtration rate and higher serum creatinine at 6 and 12 months after renal biopsies. The C4d-positive group fares worse in terms of death-censored graft failure, doubling of serum creatinine and reaching 50% of glomerular filtration rate at the end of the study. Peritubular capillary C4d deposition was the only significant risk factor that predicts graft failure in multivariate analysis. Our findings confirmed the independent prognostic value of peritubular capillary C4d staining on renal allograft survival in Chinese.

Urinary C4d Does Not Correlate With C4d-Staining in Peritubular Capillaries But Reflects Nonspecific Glomerular Injury

C4d-staining in peritubular capillaries (PTC) in allograft biopsies is a hallmark of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This study investigated whether urinary C4d correlates with C4d-staining in PTC, allowing for a noninvasive screening procedure. Urine samples from 34 patients with diffuse C4d-staining in PTC (C4d-pos group) and 68 urine samples from patients with negative C4d-staining in PTC (C4d-negative group) matched 1:2 according to proteinuria and time posttransplant were compared regarding urinary C4d-levels. Overall, urinary C4d/creatinine-ratios (C4d/C) were not different between the C4d-positive and the C4d-negative group (P=0.55). Urinary C4d/C strongly correlated with total protein/creatinine-ratios (P/C) (r2=0.53; P<0.0001) and albumin/creatinine-ratios (r2=0.52; P<0.0001). C4d/C were not different between C4d-pos and C4d-negative patients with P/C>50 mg/mmol (P=0.57) and P/C<50 mg/mmol (P=0.65), respectively. However, in both the C4d-positive and the C4d-negative group urinary C4d/C were significantly higher in patients with P/C>50 mg/mmol than in patients with P/C<50 mg/mmol (P<or=0.005). Furthermore, longitudinal analysis in 3 patients with distinct clinico-pathological courses demonstrated that urinary C4d/C closely followed P/C regardless of C4d-staining in PTC. Urinary C4d does not correlate with C4d-staining in PTC but reflects nonspecific glomerular injury. Therefore, urinary C4d is likely not a useful biomarker for non-invasive screening and monitoring of AMR.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection With a Striking Interstitial Monocyte/Macrophage Infiltration in a Renal Allograft Under FTY720 Treatment

FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, causes rapid temporary depletion of peripheral-blood lymphocytes, inducing their sequestration in secondary lymphoid organs. FTY720 is effective in animal models of transplantation and is under evaluation for use in human transplantation. We report a 48-year-old renal transplant recipient who developed acute antibody-mediated rejection under a high-dose FTY720 (5 mg/d), low-dose cyclosporine A, and prednisone treatment protocol. A T-cell antihuman globulin and National Institutes of Health extended B-cell cross-match with donor cells were negative before transplantation. At 10 weeks posttransplantation, serum creatinine level increased and a renal biopsy showed a striking interstitial CD68(+) monocyte/macrophage infiltration with C4d staining of peritubular capillaries. Flow panel reactive antibody levels were positive in the recipient's serum for class I (9%) and class II (75%). The positive panel reactive antibody levels and presence of C4d in peritubular capillaries justified the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. However, the presence of macrophage-rich interstitial infiltrate suggested a contribution of cellular rejection. The morphological characteristic of rejection with a striking interstitial CD68(+) monocyte/macrophage infiltration with paucity of T cells is very unusual and may reflect a unique effect of FTY720 therapy.

53-P: Urinary C4d-containing complement components correlate with glomerular proteinuria but not with C4d-staining of peritubular capillaries

53-P: Urinary C4d-containing complement components correlate with glomerular proteinuria but not with C4d-staining of peritubular capillaries

Peritubular capillary C4d staining in late acute renal allograft rejection - is it relevant?

In the early post-transplant period, renal allograft rejection with diffuse peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition predicts poor graft survival. In the late post-transplant setting, that is, one or more yr after transplantation, the implication of diffuse PTC C4d deposition is still a topic of debate. The purpose of our study was to see if diffuse PTC C4d deposition, in late acute rejection (LAR), occurring more than one yr post-transplant, has any impact on graft survival and function. We selected cases, both cadaveric as well as living donor renal transplant recipients, in whom acute rejection with PTC C4d deposition was first detected after the first year post-transplant. Recipients with multiple acute rejection episodes during the first year post-transplant were excluded from the study. The first biopsy diagnosed with LAR was considered the index biopsy (n = 40). We formed two groups: group 1, C4d-positive LAR (n = 20), and group 2, C4d-negative LAR (n = 20). Groups were matched for maintenance and post-rejection immunosuppressive therapy, baseline serum creatinine levels before the time of the index biopsy, time from transplant to index biopsy, as well as chronic allograft damage index (CADI) score in the index biopsies. We compared the rate of graft loss, and the graft function of the surviving grafts at the end of the study period, as well as histologic parameters in the index biopsy specimens between the two groups. The mean follow-up period was 20 months. No significant differences in the rate of graft loss or graft function were found between groups 1 and 2 at the end of the follow-up period. Histologically, PTC margination and transplant glomerulopathy were more common in the C4d-positive group, and this difference was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the degree of plasma cell infiltrates. Unlike in the acute setting, the presence or absence of PTC C4d staining in renal allografts with LAR may not have a predictive value regarding graft outcome.

Putative Antibody-Mediated Rejection With C4d Deposition in HLA-Identical, ABO-Compatible Renal Allografts

We sought evidence for non-MHC antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts by a systematic study of rejected HLA-identical sibling renal allografts. Among 162 recipients of HLA-identical, ABO-compatible sibling donor kidneys transplanted at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 1964 to 2005, we identified 15 grafts that were lost from rejection and two additional grafts with reversible acute rejection, which provided 30 samples for study. All samples were stained for C4d by immunofluorescence in frozen tissue ( n = 7) or by immunohistochemistry in paraffin embedded tissues ( n = 10). We found that two of 17 grafts had positive C4d staining of peritubular capillaries. Histology revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection in one and acute cellular rejection type 1 in the other. Both grafts were matched at HLA-A, B, and C loci and had a nonreactive mixed lymphocyte response. Genotyping and serological analysis were not available. Compared with a published series, C4d+ irreversible rejection was more common in HLA nonidentical than HLA-identical grafts (75% vs 6.7%, respectively, P < .002). We conclude that antibody-mediated rejection, presumably due to non-MHC antigens other than ABO-blood groups does occur, but infrequently. This may account for some of the HLA antibody negative cases that develop antibody-mediated rejection.

C4d and C3d Staining in Biopsies of ABO- and HLA-Incompatible Renal Allografts: Correlation with Histologic Findings

Biopsies of ABO-incompatible and positive crossmatch (HLA-incompatible) renal allografts were retrospectively examined to compare results of C4d and C3d staining, and the correlation between such staining and histologic findings suggestive of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). A total of 75 biopsies (55 protocol, 17 for graft dysfunction, 3 for other indications) of 24 ABO-incompatible grafts and 244 biopsies (103 protocol, 129 for graft dysfunction, 12 for other indications) of 66 HLA-incompatible grafts were examined; all were stained for C4d and approximately 40% for C3d. In ABO-incompatible grafts, 80% of protocol biopsies and 59% performed for graft dysfunction showed C4d staining in peritubular capillaries (PTC); this staining was not correlated with neutrophil margination in PTC. In HLA-incompatible grafts, PTC C4d was present in 26% of protocol biopsies and 60% of biopsies for graft dysfunction; 92% of biopsies with >1+ (0-4+ scale), diffuse PTC C4d had > or =1+ margination and/or thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), compared with 12% of C4d-negative biopsies. C3d was somewhat more predictive of margination than C4d in ABO-incompatible, but not HLA-incompatible, grafts. In summary, while PTC C4d deposition indicates probable AMR in biopsies of HLA-incompatible grafts, including protocol biopsies, there is no histologic evidence that C4d deposition is correlated with injury in most ABO-incompatible grafts.

Focal peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute rejection

Diffuse peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition has been shown to be associated with relatively poor graft outcome. The significance of focal PTC C4d staining in the early post-transplant period is uncertain. Sixty-five biopsies from 53 patients with acute rejection were graded (Banff '97 criteria), stained for C4d, monocytes and T cells, and divided into three groups according to PTC C4d: (i) focal C4d (F) (14 biopsies, 14 patients), (ii) diffuse C4d (D) (23 biopsies, 15 patients) and (iii) no C4d (N) (28 biopsies, 24 patients). The three groups were compared with respect to a variety of biopsy and clinical parameters including outcome. The incidence of transplant glomerulitis and glomerular monocyte infiltration were significantly greater in F (64% and 2.0+/-2.0) and D (57% and 3.4+/-2.0) than in N (11% and 0.2+/-0.2). A significantly higher proportion of F (93%) demonstrated acute cellular rejection (Banff '97 grade > or = 1A) than did D (35%). The F and D groups included significantly more females (50 and 67%, respectively) than did N (21%). The percentage of patients with a second or third transplant was higher in F (29%) and D (40%) than in N (8%) (P = 0.0589). The proportion of patients with glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min at 12, 24 and 48 months was higher in the D and F groups than in the N, and there was a statistically significant increasing trend in odds of this outcome occurring at 48 months across the three groups (D > F > N group) (P = 0.0416). The results suggest that the biopsy findings and clinical course in patients with focal PTC C4d staining are similar to those associated with diffuse C4d.

Therapy With Plasmapheresis and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Acute Humoral Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Background Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is characterized by acute graft dysfunction associated with de novo production of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) and C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries of the renal allograft. It has been reported the combination of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG) as effective rescue therapy for established AHR. Methods Between 1999 and 2004, seven kidney allografts recipients suffered from AHR diagnosed by severe rejection and C4d staining in peritubular capillaries. All patients had a negative cross-match before renal transplantation. Results All patients were treated with daily sessions of PP and in four cases IVIG was added after the last PP session. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were employed as maintenance immunosuppressive regimen. In one case, rituximab was added to PP and IVIG owing to refractory humoral rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 100%, allograft survival was 70%, and the mean serum creatinine was 201 μmol/L. Conclusions AHR is a severe form of rejection associated with a poor prognosis, but its early diagnosis and treatment with PP and IVIG allows reversal of AHR reaching a 70% graft survival at 1 year.

Comparative study for the detection of peritubular capillary C4d deposition in human renal allografts using different methodologies

Detection of peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition in tissue sections of renal allograft biopsies became an important aid in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. Pathologists in many major transplant centers now routinely stain renal allograft biopsies for C4d. Currently, there are 3 commercially available antibodies. Two of these antibodies are monoclonal and are usually used with either a 3- or a 2-step indirect immunofluorescence (IF) methodology on frozen sections. A polyclonal antibody is used on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue section with an immunoperoxidase detection system. The goal of our study was to compare these antibodies and methodologies in our renal allograft biopsy material. Twenty renal allograft biopsies with diffuse or focal PTC C4d staining, using immunofluorescence methods on frozen sections, were selected for this study. These biopsies were tested with the 3 commercially available anti-C4d antibodies (Biogenesis, Brentwood, Calif, cat no. 222-8004; Quidel Corporation, Santa Clara, Calif, cat no. A213; and ALPCO Diagnostic, Windham, NH, cat no. 004-BI-RC4D). Both monoclonal antibodies (Biogenesis and Quidel) were tested with a 3- and a 2-step indirect IF method on frozen sections. The polyclonal antibody (ALPCO) was applied to formalin-fixed paraffin sections using immunoperoxidase methodology. In selected cases, the polyclonal antibody was tested on frozen sections with a 3-step indirect IF method. To exclude possible false-negative staining with the IF method, we selected 10 additional biopsies that showed PTC margination of inflammatory cells, but were C4d-negative or only focally positive, and tested them with the ALPCO antibody on paraffin sections. We have found that all methodologies and antibodies tested provided adequate results with only minor differences between them. Perhaps the most sensitive method is the 3-step indirect IF on frozen sections using one of the monoclonal antibodies. We prefer the 2-step indirect IF method with the Quidel monoclonal antibody because of its simplicity, quick turnaround time, and relatively low cost. The advantages and disadvantages of the individual methodologies are discussed.

Transplant: immunology and treatment of rejection

Transplant: immunology and treatment of rejection

Histologic Findings of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in ABO Blood-Group-Incompatible Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation

The purpose of this study was to characterize the histology of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in ABO blood-group-incompatible (ABOI) kidney transplants as well as on protocol biopsies performed at the time of stable allograft function. Between 5/99 and 1/02, we performed 32 ABOI kidney transplants (13 A2, 19 non-A2 blood-group living donors). Nineteen biopsies were performed for allograft dysfunction, and 127 protocol biopsies were performed 0, 3, 7, 14, 28 days and 3 and 12 months post transplant. Twenty-five of 32 patients have functioning allografts (mean 585 days post transplant). Nine of 32 (28%) developed clinical AMR. Biopsy revealed glomerular thrombi (78%), mesangiolysis (78%), peritubular capillary C4d staining (56%) and neutrophil infiltration (67%), interstitial hemorrhage and necrosis (56%) and arteriolar thrombi (33%). Subclinical AMR was diagnosed by protocol biopsies in four patients. Findings consisted of glomerular thrombi (100%), mesangiolysis (25%), and C4d staining (100%). In late protocol biopsies performed 214–420 days post transplant, mild mesangiolysis was seen in 2/17 (11.7%), and C4d immunostaining was detected in 3/12 (25%). AMR is characterized by glomerular thrombi, mesangiolysis, peritubular capillary neutrophil infiltration interstitial hemorrhage, necrosis, and C4d deposition. Glomerular thrombi appear early in AMR and may appear prior to graft dysfunction.

Peritubular Capillary C4d Deposition in Chronic Allograft Dysfunction

Peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d staining represents a marker for acute humoral rejection, however, the impact of positive staining on chronic allograft dysfunction has received little attention. Ninety-three renal allograft biopsies from 93 patients were selected from a total of 174 renal allograft biopsies, which were obtained 6 months or more after transplantation (median: 89 months). Fresh frozen renal tissue was stained with monoclonal antibody against C4d. Sixteen of 93 biopsies showed C4d staining in PTC. C4d staining was positive in 40% of acute rejection cases (n=15) and 21% of chronic rejection cases (n=24). When the samples were divided according to C4d positivity, the C4d (+) group had a higher proportion of acute rejection than the C4d (-) group. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the prevalence of chronic rejection. Degrees of histological injury including tubulitis, interstitial inflammation and interstitial fibrosis were not significantly different between C4d (+) and C4d (-) groups. However, the 2-year graft survival rate after biopsy was lower in the C4d (+) group than in the C4d (-) group (24.8% versus 59.0%, p=0.1255). C4d staining in PTC is associated with late acute rejection, but not with chronic rejection based on conventional morphologic criteria in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction.

Monocytes and peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute renal allograft rejection

Peritubular capillary (PTC) deposition of complement split factor C4d in renal allografts has been shown to be closely associated with circulating antidonor antibodies and a marker for relatively poor graft survival. Monocyte/macrophage (MO) infiltration of renal allografts has been shown to adversely affect graft survival. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the two phenomena are related. Twenty-three biopsies (from 15 patients) demonstrated diffuse strong staining of PTC for C4d (C4d+ group) and acute tubular injury with or without significant cellular rejection, while 28 biopsies (with acute rejection) but negative for PTC C4d served as controls (C4d- group). The C4d+ group demonstrated significantly greater glomerular and interstitial MO infiltration than did the C4d- group [3.4 +/- 2.0 vs. 0.2 +/- 0.3 MO/glomerulus, P < 0.0001; 12.9 +/- 9.2 vs. 6.5 +/- 5.0 MO/high power field (hpf), P = 0.0030]. Neutrophilic (PMN) infiltration of glomeruli and PTC was also significantly greater in the C4d+ group than in the C4d- one (0.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.3 PMN/glomerulus, P = 0.0003; 0.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 0.4 +/- 0.3 PTC PMN/hpf, P = 0.0035). The results indicate a close association between PTC C4d deposition and MO infiltration, particularly glomerular, and confirm previous observations regarding the correlation of PTC C4d staining and PMN infiltration.

C4d staining of perioperative renal transplant biopsies1

Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) has been shown to be a sensitive marker for antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection in renal transplant biopsies. Some studies also suggest that C4d in PTCs is specific for humoral rejection or, at least, for the presence of donor-specific antibodies. However, in other studies, PTC C4d deposits were noted in more than 40% of renal transplant biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and capillary C4d deposition in heart transplants may result from ischemic injury. To test the specificity of C4d staining as a marker for acute humoral rejection ACR in renal allografts, indirect immunofluorescence using a monoclonal anti-C4d antibody and a fluorescein-isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody was performed on cryostat sections of 90 renal transplant biopsies, including 35 pairs of preimplantation and 1-hr postreperfusion biopsies of the same graft, postreperfusion biopsies of 12 additional grafts, and 8 positive controls (biopsies with known C4d-positive AHR). Eighteen grafts were cadaveric, 17 grafts were liviing-related, and 12 grafts were living-unrelated (excluding controls). Included in these grafts were 13 grafts that developed AHR 3 to 34 days posttransplantation. Only 2 of 82 perioperative biopsies showed C4d staining in PTCs. Both perioperative biopsies were postreperfusion biopsies of grafts diagnosed with AHR 5 and 34 days posttransplantation, respectively, and, in each case, the recipient had been treated with plasmapheresis before transplantation because of a positive crossmatch (cytotoxic and flow cytometric) and continued to have a weakly positive flow crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In one biopsy, C4d staining was focal, and in the other biopsy, it was diffuse; in both biopsies, C4d staining was relatively mild (1+ on a 0-4+ scale). No C4d staining was noted on preimplantation biopsies of each graft. All biopsies that contained glomeruli showed linear capillary loop or blotchy mesangial staining, or both, which was similar in prereperfusion and postreperfusion biopsies. All positive controls showed diffuse C4d staining in PTCs. C4d staining in PTCs may be seen as early as 1 hr posttransplantation in some recipients with low levels of antidonor antibodies. However, this was not observed as a feature of ischemic or ischemia-reperfusion injury in perioperative renal transplant biopsies, including those of cadaveric grafts with cold ischemia times of as long as 41 hr.

Capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: a specific marker of alloantibody-dependent graft injury.

Capillary deposition of the complement split product C4d has been discussed as a marker for antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection. The relationship between C4d staining and posttransplant alloantibody detection remains to be thoroughly investigated, however. In this study, C4d staining in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and the incidence of alloantibody formation, as detected with sensitive techniques, were evaluated among a cohort of transplant recipients who had undergone biopsies and had not been selected for a specific histologic diagnosis. One hundred thirteen biopsies, obtained from 58 cadaveric kidney transplant recipients, were tested. Serum samples obtained at the time of biopsy were evaluated by flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) testing and FlowPRA (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) analysis of anti-HLA panel reactivity. Most biopsies with C4d deposits in PTC (C4d(PTC)(+), n = 21 of 24) were associated with positive posttransplant FCXM results (T and/or B cell FCXM) and/or > or =5% FlowPRA (anti-HLA class I and/or II) reactivity. Approximately 50% of the C4d(PTC)(-) biopsies were observed to be associated with donor-specific alloantibodies. Accordingly, high specificity (93%) but low sensitivity (31%) were calculated for capillary C4d staining (with FCXM testing as the standard method). For clinical evaluation, three patient groups were defined, i.e., a group of recipients with positive C4d staining in at least one allograft biopsy (C4d(PTC)(+), n = 16) and two C4d(PTC)(-) groups, which were discriminated on the basis of posttransplant FCXM results as C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) (n = 22) and C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(-) (n = 20) groups. Univariate analyses revealed significant differences between these groups with respect to serum creatinine levels at 12 mo [median, 2.83 mg/dl (interquartile range, 1.93 to 4.2 mg/dl) versus 1.78 mg/dl (1.47 to 2.24 mg/dl) versus 1.59 mg/dl (1.2 to 1.71 mg/dl), P < 0.001]. Of the five immunologic graft losses, four occurred in the C4d(PTC)(+) group and one occurred in the C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) group. In a multivariate analysis, C4d positivity was observed to have an independent predictive value for inferior 12-mo graft function (P = 0.02), whereas the observed moderate difference between C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) and C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(-) recipients did not achieve significance. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that positive C4d staining, which is an independent predictor of kidney graft dysfunction, represents a reliable specific marker for antibody-dependent graft injury.

Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification.

The incidence of acute humoral rejection (AHR) in renal allograft biopsies has been difficult to determine because widely accepted diagnostic criteria have not been established. C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC) of renal allografts has been proposed as a useful marker for AHR. This study was designed to test the relative value of C4d staining, histology, and serology in the diagnosis of AHR. Of 232 consecutive kidney transplants performed at a single institution from July 1995 to July 1999, all patients (n = 67) who developed acute rejection within the first 3 mo and had a renal biopsy with available frozen tissue at acute rejection onset, as well as posttransplant sera within 30 d of the biopsy, were included in this study. Hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff stained sections were scored for glomerular, vascular, and tubulointerstitial pathology. C4d staining of cryostat sections was done by a sensitive three-layer immunofluorescence method. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in posttransplant recipient sera using antihuman-globulin-enhanced T cell and B cell cytotoxicity assays and/or flow cytometry. Widespread C4d staining in PTC was present in 30% (20 of 67) of all acute rejection biopsies. The initial histologic diagnoses of the C4d(+) acute rejection cases were as follows: AHR only, 30%; acute cellular rejection (ACR) and AHR, 45%; ACR (CCTT types 1 or 2) alone, 15%; and acute tubular injury (ATI), 10%. The distinguishing morphologic features in C4d(+) versus C4d(-) acute rejection cases included the following: neutrophils in PTC, 65% versus 9%; neutrophilic glomerulitis, 55% versus 4%; neutrophilic tubulitis, 55% versus 9%; severe ATI, 75% versus 9%; and fibrinoid necrosis in glomeruli, 20% versus 0%, or arteries, 25% versus 0%; all P < 0.01. Mononuclear cell tubulitis was more common in the C4d(-) group (70% versus 100%; P < 0.01). No significant difference between C4d(+) and C4d(-) acute rejection was noted for endarteritis, 25% versus 32%; interstitial inflammation (mean % cortex), 27.2 +/- 27% versus 38 +/- 21%; interstitial hemorrhage, 25% versus 15%; or infarcts, 5% versus 2%. DSA were present in 90% (18 of 20) of the C4d(+) cases compared with 2% (1 of 47) in the C4d(-) acute rejection cases (P < 0.001). The pathology of the C4d(+) but DSA(-) cases was not distinguishable from the C4d(+), DSA(+) cases. The C4d(+) DSA(-) cases may be due to non-HLA antibodies or subthreshold levels of DSA. The sensitivity of C4d staining is 95% in the diagnosis of AHR compared with the donor-specific antibody test (90%). Overall, eight grafts were lost to acute rejection in the first year, of which 75% (6 of 8) had AHR. The 1-yr graft failure rate was 27% (4 of 15) for those AHR cases with only capillary neutrophils versus 40% (2 of 5) for those who also had fibrinoid necrosis of arteries. In comparison, the 1-yr graft failure rates were 3% and 7%, respectively, in ACR 1 (Banff/CCTT type 1) and ACR 2 (Banff/CCTT type 2) C4d(-) groups. A substantial fraction (30%) of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes have a component of AHR as judged by C4d staining; most (90%), but not all, have detectable DSA. AHR may be overlooked in the presence of ACR or ATI by histology or negative serology, arguing for routine C4d staining of renal allograft biopsies. Because AHR has a distinct therapy and prognosis, we propose that it should be classified separately from ACR, with further sub-classification into AHR 1 (neutrophilic capillary involvement) and AHR 2 (arterial fibrinoid necrosis).