Periprosthetic Joint Infection Research Articles

The role of tranexamic acid for infection prevention after fracture fixation

Despite the measures employed, fracture-related infections remain a concern after fracture fixation worldwide. Recently, the role of tranexamic acid as a protective drug against postsurgical infections in joint replacement and orthopedic trauma surgery has been proposed, where tranexamic acid has been associated with less surgical wounds complications and infectious complications including periprosthetic joint infection. The mechanism through which tranexamic acid exerts a protective effect against peri-implant infection is still the subject of debate. Although some authors hypothesize an indirect effect inhibiting the formation of postoperative hematoma, there are several studies that show a direct antibacterial effect of the drug against the capacity of bacterial aggregation, even avoiding biofilm formation, favoring the immune response of the host and the action of antibiotics. The purpose of this narrative review is to show the current role of tranexamic acid in orthopedic trauma, specifically its relationship with the prevention of infections related to implants.

Surgical Site Infection and Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Nonelective versus Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a treatment used for both elective (eg, osteoarthritis) and nonelective (eg, fracture) indications. Patients undergoing nonelective THA may not be able to undergo the same preoperative optimization protocols as those undergoing elective THA. We aimed to determine differences in 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year surgical site infection (SSI) rates; 90-day and 1-year periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)–related revision; and 90-day and 1-year PJI-related surgery (ie, revision or irrigation and débridement) between nonelective and elective THA status. Method: This retrospective cohort study using the Medicare Limited Data Set included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65+ years who underwent inpatient primary THA in 2017 to 2020. Propensity score matching (1:5, nonelective: elective) was used. We assessed differences in surgical site infection (SSI), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) outcomes by nonelective versus elective surgery status using mixed-effects logistic regression models, reporting adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: From a total of 433,326 patients, 88,940 (19,094 nonelective; 69,846 elective) were successfully matched. Nonelective surgery status was associated with markedly higher odds of 30-day SSI (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.92, P < 0.001), 90-day SSI (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.78, P < 0.001), and 1-year SSI (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.59, P < 0.001). Nonelective status was also associated with higher odds of 1-year PJI-related revision (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08-1.63, P = 0.006) but not 90-day PJI-related revision. Similarly, nonelective status was associated with higher odds of 1-year PJI-related surgery (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.62, P = 0.004) but not 90-day PJI-related surgery. Conclusion: Nonelective THA status was an independent risk factor for SSI throughout the first postoperative year and for 1-year PJI-related revision and PJI-related surgery. Additional research is necessary to elucidate the etiology of observed differences in infection risk between patients undergoing nonelective and elective THA and to define strategies to mitigate this difference in infection risk.

Clinically applicable optimized periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis via AI based pathology

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication after joint replacement surgery that demands precise diagnosis for effective treatment. We enhanced PJI diagnostic accuracy through three steps: (1) developing a self-supervised PJI model with DINO v2 to create a large dataset; (2) comparing multiple intelligent models to identify the best one; and (3) using the optimal model for visual analysis to refine diagnostic practices. The self-supervised model generated 27,724 training samples and achieved a perfect AUC of 1, indicating flawless case differentiation. EfficientNet v2-S outperformed CAMEL2 at the image level, while CAMEL2 was superior at the patient level. By using the weakly supervised PJI model to adjust diagnostic criteria, we reduced the required high-power field diagnoses per slide from five to three. These findings demonstrate AI’s potential to improve the accuracy and standardization of PJI pathology and have significant implications for infectious disease diagnostics.

Feasibility of mNGS in joint replacement patients exhibiting elevated ESR and CRP levels without an underlying diagnosis

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the viability of performing initial artificial joint replacement surgery in patients presenting with unexplained elevations in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.MethodsA cohort of 22 patients, comprising 11 cases each for knee and hip joint replacements, who underwent initial artificial joint replacement surgery between November 2020 and January 2022, was recruited. All patients exhibited elevated levels of ESR and CRP prior to surgery, the etiology of which remained undetermined. Intraoperatively, joint effusion and periarticular tissues were preserved for subsequent bacterial culture and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Postoperatively, a combination of intravenous and local antibiotics was administered for anti-infective management. In cases where bacterial culture and/or mNGS yielded positive results, patients were diagnosed with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and underwent one-stage revision; conversely, negative findings led to the discontinuation of intravenous and local antibiotics therapy.ResultsAmong the cohort of 22 patients, bacterial cultures yielded negative results, while mNGS identified bacterial infection in 14 patients (63.63%), viral infection in 1 patient (4.55%), and yielded negative results in 7 patients (31.82%). All surgical incisions achieved per primam. Subsequent follow-up assessments conducted for more than 1 year postoperatively revealed absence of PJI among the patients, all of whom exhibited satisfactory progress in their rehabilitation exercises. Notably, the Knee Society Score (KSS) for knee joint patients significantly improved from a preoperative mean of 48.7 ± 3.3 points to 84.3 ± 2.2 points postoperatively, whereas the Harris Hip Score for hip joint patients increased significantly from preoperative mean of 50.6 ± 3.6 points to 87.1 ± 1.6 points (P < 0.01).ConclusionIn cases where patients present with unexplained elevations in ESR and CRP levels, primary artificial joint replacement can be undertaken following a one-stage revision approach for PJI.

Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Postoperative Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment option for severe knee osteoarthritis. Understanding the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on postoperative outcomes is crucial for improving patient satisfaction after TKA. This study aimed to investigate the influence of DM on postoperative complications and mortality after TKA. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching relevant studies published before December 2023 in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science databases. The assessment included demographic data, comorbidities, and postoperative complications after primary TKA for both DM and non-DM patients. The odds ratio (OR) was used to represent the estimate of risk of a specific outcome. Results: Thirty-nine studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. Patients with DM had higher rates of periprosthetic joint infection (OR: 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46–2.00, p &lt; 0.01) and prosthesis revision (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.23–1.52, p &lt; 0.01). Moreover, patients with DM showed an elevated incidence of pneumonia (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.15–2.07, p &lt; 0.01), urinary tract infection (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.07–3.26, p = 0.02), and sepsis (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.46–1.78, p &lt; 0.01). Additionally, the postoperative risk of cardiovascular (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.50–4.17, p &lt; 0.01) and cerebrovascular (OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.48–3.81, p &lt; 0.01) events was notably higher in patients with DM. The presence of DM increased the risk of deep vein thrombosis (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.22–2.04, p &lt; 0.01), but did not lead to an increased risk of pulmonary embolism. Most importantly, DM was associated with a higher mortality rate within 30 days after TKA (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02–1.60, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with DM exhibited a higher rate of postoperative complications after TKA, and DM was associated with a higher mortality rate within 30 days after TKA. It is crucial to educate patients about the perioperative risk and develop evidence-based guidelines to prevent complications after TKA.

How Much Does Prosthetic Joint Infection and Its Successful Treatment Affect Patient-reported Quality of Life?

Uncomplicated joint replacement improves pain and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as joint function scores and quality-of-life measures. However, the overall impact of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and its successful treatment on PROMs is poorly defined. In this study, we describe quality-of-life scores using the 12-item Short Form survey, version 2 (SF-12v2), collected as part of a large, prospective, observational study of PJI. (1) Do patients with newly diagnosed PJI have lower quality-of-life scores than the general age-matched population? (2) Are lower quality-of-life scores for patients with PJI sustained for ≥ 12 months? (3) What factors are associated with a good functional outcome at 12 months, defined by achieving a physical component summary (PCS) score of > 50 on the SF-12v2 (that is, above the age-adjusted population mean) or an increase of > 8.9 or more from baseline? The PIANO (Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational study) cohort was a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study of 783 patients with newly diagnosed PJI recruited across 27 centers between July 2014 and December 2017. All participants were followed for 2 years. SF-12v2 scores were collected at diagnosis (baseline) and 3, 12, and 24 months after diagnosis. Treatment success was defined as being alive with no clinical or microbiological evidence of infection and no ongoing use of antibiotics for the index joint. After exclusion of 6.6% (52) who had died, 4.2% (33) with PJI of joints other than hips and knees, and those with incomplete data sets (200 [25.5%]), 498 patients had complete SF-12v2 data sets available. At baseline, the median (IQR) PCS score was 37 (30 to 46), which increased to 41 (34 to 49; p < 0.001) at 12 months. Both measures were lower than those for the general age-matched population norm. There was no further improvement in PCS scores between 12 and 24 months. By contrast, the median (IQR) mental component summary score of the SF-12v2 was similar to age-adjusted population norms (48 [37 to 57]) at baseline. Only 40% of patients with PJI achieved a good functional outcome at 12 months. After adjustment for other factors, treatment success of PJI increased the odds of a good functional outcome by 67% (95% CI 11% to 154%; p = 0.02). PJIs have a large effect on the PCS score of the SF-12v2 quality-of-life measure at baseline, which is sustained for at least 2 years. Successful treatment of PJI increases the likelihood of a good functional outcome. These data can be used to set expectations for patients presenting with PJI and can be used to inform future clinical studies in which quality-of-life measures are incorporated into clinical endpoints. Level II, therapeutic study.

Predicting periprosthetic joint infection: external validation of preoperative prediction models.

Introduction: Prediction models for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are gaining interest due to their potential to improve clinical decision-making. However, their external validity across various settings remains uncertain. This study aimed to externally validate promising preoperative PJI prediction models in a recent multinational European cohort. Methods: Three preoperative PJI prediction models - by Tan et al.(2018), Del Toro et al.(2019), and Bülow et al.(2022) - that have previously demonstrated high levels of accuracy were selected for validation. A retrospective observational analysis of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at centers in the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain between January2020 and December2021 was conducted. Patient characteristics were compared between our cohort and those used to develop the models. Performance was assessed through discrimination and calibration. Results: The study included 2684 patients, 60 of whom developed a PJI (2.2 %). Our cohort differed from the models' original cohorts with respect to demographic variables, procedural variables, and comorbidity prevalence. The overall accuracies of the models, measured with the statistic, were 0.72, 0.69, and 0.72 for the Tan, Del Toro, and Bülow models, respectively. Calibration was reasonable, but the PJI risk estimates were most accurate for predicted infection risks below 3 %-4 %. The Tan model overestimated PJI risk above 4 %, whereas the Del Toro model underestimated PJI risk above 3 %. Conclusions: The Tan, Del Toro, and Bülow PJI prediction models were externally validated in this multinational cohort, demonstrating potential for clinical application in identifying high-risk patients and enhancing preoperative counseling and prevention strategies.

The Use of a Novel Surgical Irrigant May Be Associated with Decreased Incidence of Surgical Site Infections

Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents a formidable challenge to patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This investigation evaluated a novel antimicrobial surgical irrigation solution, XPerience (XP) (Next Science LLC, Jacksonville, FL), with proven high &amp; persistent in-vivo efficacy against planktonic bacteria and biofilm. The primary objective of this investigation was to compare the incidence of PJI following TKA performed with use of XP versus a standard control rinse (povidone-iodine). The secondary outcome was an all-cause return to operating room (OR) rate. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 824 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA/TKA from 12/1/2019 - 11/30/2021 treated using povidone-iodine solution and 471 consecutive patients undergoing primary THA/TKA from 12/1/2021 - 12/30/2022 treated with XP at a single institution by the senior author. All surgeries in both groups followed largely identical preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative protocols. A total of 1,295 cases were analyzed. The groups shared largely analogous background characteristics pertaining to age, sex, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Results The overall SSI rate was 0% (0/471) in the XP group and 0.49% (4/824) in the control group (P = 0.3). The overall return to OR rate was 0.21% (1/471) in the XP group and 0.85% (7/824) in the control group (P = 0.3). Control group cases returned to the OR for hematoma debridements, periprosthetic fracture fixation, and PJI revisions. Conclusion This investigation is the first to remark on the clinical efficacy of a novel surgical irrigant. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of PJI or return to OR with the irrigant versus without, though a trend towards lower rates was observed in the context of a low baseline infection rate. Limitations pertaining to a single-center experience and sample size may be addressed by further studies incorporating broader enrollments.

Risk of orthopaedic implant infection during bacteraemia.

Orthopaedic implant material can get infected via haematogenous spread from a distant source at any point after implantation. The sources of haematogenous orthopaedic implant infections have been studied only for prosthetic joints. The most common source of infection has varied, but it can be, for example from the skin and soft tissues, cardiovascular system and dental infections. The risk for developing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) during bacteraemia is dependent on the pathogen: it is highest for Staphylococcus aureus and beta-haemolytic streptococci, but low for gram-negative bacteria. The risk for developing a (PJI) during Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) has varied between 12 and 41%; the risk for developing an infection in any orthopaedic implant in the extremities during SAB is probably almost the same as for prosthetic joints, but data are very limited. The risk of developing an infection in spinal implants during bacteraemia is not known, as it has not been studied. Especially in the case of SAB, infected orthopaedic implants are usually symptomatic, so asymptomatic implants do not routinely require further diagnostic work-up, such as synovial fluid aspiration.

Joint Injection or Aspiration before Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does it Increase the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

Background Injections are a common preoperative treatment for patients who eventually undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, recent studies have shown a relationship between preoperative injections and adverse outcomes following surgery. The purpose of this study was to characterize the type of intra-articular procedure patients receive in the acute period prior to surgery and determine their association with postoperative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) Methods An observational cohort study was conducted using the Merative MarketScan databases. Patients who underwent primary TKA between April 1, 2019, and July 4, 2021, were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to the type of intra-articular procedure they received in the 90-day period prior to TKA: (i) intra-articular hyaluronic (IA-HA), (ii) intra-articular corticosteroid (IA-CS), (iii) aspiration, and (iv) no drug injections or aspirations. The primary outcome was the postoperative 180-day PJI rate. Results 43,219 patients were included in the study. 11.8% of patients were found to have received at least one injection or aspiration in the 90 days prior to their TKA. The most common injection performed was IA-CS (78.3%), followed by aspiration (13.0%) and IA-HA (8.7%). No image guidance was performed for 92.3% of injections, with most being administered between 61-90 days before surgery (93.6%). 180-day PJI rates were similar between patients with and without injections (OR 1.11, p=.569). Neither drug type nor image guidance had an effect on overall postoperative PJI rate. Conclusion Injections performed prior to TKA do not increase the risk of developing postoperative.

A Scoping Review of 'Smart' Dressings for Diagnosing Surgical Site Infection: A Focus on Arthroplasty.

Early diagnosis and treatment of surgical wound infection can be challenging. This is especially relevant in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: early detection is key to success and reducing morbidity, mortality and resource use. 'Smart' dressings have been developed to detect parameters suggestive of infection. This scoping review investigates the current status of the field, limited to devices tested in animal models and/or humans, with a focus on their application to arthroplasty. The literature was searched using MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases from 2000 to 2023. Original articles assessing external sensing methods for the detection of wound infection in animal models or human participants were included. Sixteen articles were eligible. The results were broadly divided by sensing method: colorimetric, electrochemical and fluorescence/photothermal responses. Six of the devices detected more than one parameter (multimodal), while the rest were unimodal. The most common parameters examined were temperature and pH. Most 'smart' dressings focused on diagnosing infection in chronic wounds, and none were tested in humans with wound infections. There is limited late-stage research into using dressing sensors to diagnose wound infection in post-surgical patients. Future research should explore this to enable inpatient and remote outpatient monitoring of post-operative wounds to detect wound infection.

Treatment of patients with periprosthetic infection and management of Paprosky type 2C cavitary defects at the stage of articulating spacer installation

Introduction Due to the constant increase in the number of primary and revision hip arthroplasties, the incidence of complications has been also increasing. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most common and dangerous complication in joint arthroplasty, including PJI with cavitary defects of the acetabulum (Paprosky type 2C).The purpose of the work was to demonstrate successful results of managing acetabular defects in patients with periprosthetic infection at the stage of installing an articulating spacer.Materials and methods The patients underwent surgical management of cavitary defects of the acetabulum with allobone plastic material at the stage of installation of an articulating spacer impregnated with antibacterial drugs. A clinical and functional assessment of the effectiveness of treatment of patients with PJI of the hip joint, who underwent bone grafting of acetabular defects at the first stage of two-stage revision arthroplasty, was carried out. Remission of the infectious process was assessed according to the ICM 2013 (International Consensus Meeting), and the function of the affected limb was assessed according to the HHS (Harris Hip Score).Results At a 6-month follow-up after implantation, there were no clinical and laboratory manifestations of PJI and radiological signs of instability of the implant components. Bone grafting was evaluated to be satisfactory; the function of the affected joint restored to 80–90 to HHS points. Remission of the infectious process according to ICM was achieved.Discussion Clinical cases studied demonstrate a positive result of treatin PJI with plastic surgery of cavitary defects of the acetabular bottom at the stage of articulating spacer installation. Filling acetabular defects at the sanitizing stage (implantation of a spacer) subsequently provides improvement of primary fixation and osseointegration of the acetabular component when converting the spacer to a permanent implant. This is due to an increase in the contact area of the acetabular component with bone tissue (native bone and remodeled allobone material).Conclusion The treatment of the first clinical case improved joint function from 24 to 85 HHS points, and in the second from 27 to 76 HHS points. The use of defect filling techniques enabled to stop the infection and improve functional results.

Can "LITE" Procedure Combined With a Short Course Antibiotic Treatment Be Effective in Treating the Chronic PJI?-A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

The prevailing treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a two-stage exchange, yet the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy following this procedure remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to determine whether a short course of postoperative antibiotic therapy can maintain infection control rates following a long interval two-stage exchange (LITE) for PJI. We conducted a prospective study enrolling patients with chronic PJI who underwent the LITE procedure at our institution from April 2018 to November 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a long course (12 weeks) or short course (2 weeks) of postoperative antibiotics. The pathogens, antibiotics, inflammatory markers, antibiotic-related complications, cases of reinfection, or re-operation were recorded. Continuous variables were analyzed using the two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare infection control rates. A total of 60 patients with chronic PJI who completed the LITE procedure were included in the study (30 patients per group). All patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months (mean 39.2 ± 13.0 months). We observed that the infection control rate in the short-course group was not inferior to that in the long-course group (96.7% vs. 96.7%, p = 1.000). For patients with chronic PJI undergoing the LITE procedure, a 2-week course of postoperative antibiotics suffices to maintain infection control rates. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900027089.

Optimizing revision arthroplasty: the role of customized articulating spacers

Introduction The advancement of surgery is set against a backdrop of continuous development and surgical innovations have transformed the way clinical care is delivered. Revision surgery might be required to address complications of primary arthroplasty. The first stage of revision arthroplasty would involve removal of an implant and placement of an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer to maintain the joint space and stability, prevent soft tissue retraction, provide local antibiotic release and preserve bone tissue for revision implantation at the final stage of revision. Custom-made articulating spacers are a promising tool for optimizing the first stage of revision arthroplasty.The objective was to summarize the current data and present comprehensive information about spacers used in two-stage revision arthroplasty including manufacturing techniques, physical and chemical properties, clinical applications, the possibility of customization within the first stage of revision arthroplasty, current and promising directions for research.Material and methods The original literature search was conducted on key resources including Scientific Electronic Library (www.elibrary.ru), the National Library of Medicine (www.pubmed.org), the Cochraine Library (www.cochranelibrary.com) between 2018 and 2023 using search words and phrases: total arthroplasty, complications, revision arthroplasty, articulating spacer, periprosthetic joint infection, additive manufacturing, 3D printing.Results A comparative analysis of factory supplied, home-made, dynamic and static spacer models showed that the choice of articulating spacers for revision arthroplasty of major joints is of great relevance. Advantages of factory-made spacers include standardized range of sizes, the reliability and availability for medical institutions. They are characterized by limited use in repair of severe bone defects.Discussion Custom-made articulating spacers enable specific tailoring to accommodate individual defects. Despite high expectations from custom-made spacers, development of optimal technologies for rapid prototyping is essential. Investments in research and development in this area have the potential to create innovative solutions that can significantly improve the results of revision arthroplasty.Conclusion The paper explores the importance of systemization of knowledge about spacers and the role of new research in improving the design and functionality. Progress in the field of materials science, additive technologies and a personalized approach to spacer manufacturing can expand possibilities of revision arthroplasty and the effectiveness. Personalized approaches and improved methods of local drug delivery that provide controlled release of antibiotics can improve the results of treatment of periprosthetic joint infections.

Preoperative, Intraoperative & Postoperative Concepts to Prevent Infection for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication that occurs in less than 1% of patients after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Though infrequent, it may potentially lead to revision while placing a significant financial burden on the healthcare system. Pre-operative, intra-operative, and postoperative strategies should be implemented to minimize the risk of PJI. Patient optimization prior to surgery can help to identify patients at risk for PJI and also maximize the health of the patient prior to surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative strategies can also mitigate the risk of postoperative infection. This article will summarize the evidence for preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative strategies to prevent PJI in UKA. This will include topics on malnutrition and obesity, staphylococcus aureus, smoking, human immunodeficiency virus, rheumatoid arthritis, as well as skin preparation, laminar air flow, preoperative antibiotic administration anti-microbial incision drapes, pulsatile lavage, vancomycin powder, wound closure method, thromboprophylactic agents, and closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings.

Efficacy of Intraarticular Vancomycin in Preventing Infection in Patients Undergoing Hip Hemiarthroplasty

Background: Hip fractures are among the top ten causes of disability in adults worldwide. Patients with hip fracture are at significant risk of mortality and morbidity and reduced quality of life. This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of intra-articular vancomycin in preventing infection in patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty. Materials and Methods: This double-blind controlled clinical trial study was conducted on 48 patients with femoral neck fracture candidates for hip hemiarthroplasty hemiarthroplasty in Orthopedic clinic of Golestan and Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz, Iran between June and November 2023. Eligible patients were divided into two equal groups. The intervention group received 1gram vancomycin intra-articularly during the operation before closure of fascia, and the control group did not receive vancomycin. The patients were followed up for 6 months after the operation, and the rate of superficial infection, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and wound complications were compared in two groups. The obtained data were statistically analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 for Windows. Results: The vancomycin group and the control group had no significant difference in the incidence of overall infection. The PJI in vancomycin and control groups were 4.16% and 8.33%, respectively. This difference was not statistically considerable (P=0.55). The results showed the incidence of superficial estimated 8.33% in vancomycin group and 4.16% in control group with no considerable difference in infection (P=0.52). Moreover, there was no meaningful difference in side effects between the two groups (P=0.63). There was no significant difference in wound complications between the two groups (P=0.3). . Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of 1gram of vancomycin suspension did not reduce the overall, superficial and deep infection after surgery. It is suggested that more clinical trial studies with higher sample size be conducted.

Is Dexamethasone Administration During Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Safe in Diabetic Patients?

Dexamethasone is used extensively during total hip and knee arthroplasty total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to control pain and decrease the risk of nausea and vomiting. However, the safety of dexamethasone utilization in diabetic patients is poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate complications associated with perioperative dexamethasone administration during primary TJA in diabetic patients. The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for all patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent primary elective TJA from 2015 to 2020. Patients who received intravenous dexamethasone on the day of surgery were compared with those who did not. Patient characteristics, hospital factors, and rates of medical comorbidities were assessed and compared between the cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression was done to assess the 90-day risk of infectious and noninfectious postoperative complications. Overall, 261,474 diabetic patients were included for analysis, 122,631 (46.9%) of whom received dexamethasone. The two cohorts were similar in patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and comorbidity burden (absolute range of differences: 0.00 to 2.33%). Diabetic patients who received dexamethasone had decreased odds of periprosthetic joint infection (adjusted odds ratio 0.82, 95%-CI: 0.75 to 0.90, P < 0.001) and sepsis (aOR: 0.80, 95%-CI: 0.72 to 0.89, P < 0.001) compared with those who did not. Patients who received dexamethasone had shorter length of stay compared with those who did not (1.87 ± 1.60 days vs. 2.27 ± 1.88 days, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds of postoperative hyperglycemia were markedly higher in the dexamethasone group (aOR: 1.14, 95%-CI: 1.10 to 1.18, P < 0.001). Use of perioperative dexamethasone was not associated with the increased risk of infectious complications among diabetic patients undergoing TJA, supporting its safety in this high-risk population.

Arthroscopy Within Three Months Prior to Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With an Increased Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BackgroundArthroscopy remains a commonly performed procedure in patients who have meniscal or other osteochondral pathology prior to ultimately being indicated for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to examine the timing of knee arthroscopy prior to UKA and its association with 2-year periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates and medical and surgical complications. MethodsPatients undergoing UKA who had history of ipsilateral arthroscopy within 2 years prior to the UKA were identified in a national insurance database. A control cohort of propensity matched patients who did not have a history of arthroscopy was identified. Study cohorts were established based on timing of the arthroscopic procedure: 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to12, and 12 to 24 months prior to UKA. Patients were included if they had 2-year postoperative follow-up after UKA. The 90-day rates of postoperative medical and 2-year surgical complications were recorded. Multivariate analysis was conducted to account for confounding variables and covariates. ResultsA final cohort of 3,471 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients undergoing UKA within three months of the arthroscopic procedure demonstrated a higher incidence of PJI when compared to the control cohort (3.30 versus 1.12%, P = 0.012). In addition, there was an increased rate of periprosthetic fracture observed in those undergoing UKA within three months of arthroscopy when compared to the control (1.10 versus 0.20%, P = 0.010). ConclusionsPatients undergoing ipsilateral arthroscopy within three months of a UKA demonstrated a nearly 3-fold increased incidence of PJI when compared to the control. There was no increased incidence of PJI when UKA was staged greater than three months after arthroscopy. These findings provide insight for preoperative considerations for arthroplasty surgeons in this patient population. Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.

The Association of Glycemic Control Medication Regimens and Preoperative Fructosamine Among Total Joint Artrhoplasty Patients.

Although glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) has classically been used for glycemic control screening before surgery, fructosamine, a short-term glucose variability indicator, has been reported to be a more accurate predictor of postoperative periprosthetic joint infection among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the variability of diabetic medication management, this study aims to identify the associated effect of glycemic control medication regimen (GCMR) on the incidence rate and associated odds of abnormal preoperative fructosamine levels among diabetic primary total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty patients. Between 2017 and 2018, consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients were identified, and the final cohort included only diabetic patients. All patients reported preoperative HbA1c and fructosamine levels. GCMR categories included insulin, metformin, and other. Independent risk of GCMR and abnormal fructosamine levels (>293 µmol/L) were identified using multivariable logistic regression, while controlling for preoperative baseline factors including HbA1C. Among 420 patients, 15.7% (66/420) were diabetic, of whom 22.7% (15/66) reported an abnormal fructosamine level. Among patients requiring GCMR, 24.0% (18/75), 56.0% (42/75), and 77.7% (58/75) reported using insulin, other, and metformin, respectively. Multivariable logistic regressions demonstrated that insulin-dependent patients with DM reported a 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.096 to 30.213, P = 0.716) increased odds of abnormal fructosamine levels compared with nonactive GCMR patients, whereas patients managed with metformin and other glycemic control medications reported a protective 0.48 (95% CI, 0.418 to 5.407, P = 0.549) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.216 to 4.508, P = 0.393) decreased odds of abnormal fructosamine levels, respectively. In this study, insulin and other GCMR medications exhibited a trend for increased and decreased odds of having abnormal preoperative fructosamine levels while controlling for baseline HbA1c level compared with patients with DM without active GCMR. This association may be explained by multifactorial short-term glucose variability in insulin users, indicating the continued need and optimization of short-term glycemic variations instead of HbA1c.

Intraoperative 'space suits' do not reduce periprosthetic joint infections in shoulder arthroplasty.

Body exhaust suits or surgical helmet systems (colloquially, 'space suits') are frequently used in many forms of arthroplasty, with the aim of providing personal protection to surgeons and, perhaps, reducing periprosthetic joint infections, although this has not consistently been borne out in systematic reviews and registry studies. To date, no large-scale study has investigated whether this is applicable to shoulder arthroplasty. We used the New Zealand Joint Registry to assess whether the use of surgical helmet systems was associated with lower all-cause revision or revision for deep infection in primary shoulder arthroplasties. We analyzed 16,000 shoulder arthroplasties (hemiarthroplasties, anatomical, and reverse geometry prostheses) recorded on the New Zealand Joint Registry from its inception in 2000 to the present day. We assessed patient factors including age, BMI, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, as well as whether or not the operation took place in a laminar flow operating theatre. A total of 2,728 operations (17%) took place using surgical helmet systems. Patient cohorts were broadly similar in terms of indication for surgery (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fractures) and medical comorbidities (age and sex). There were 842 revisions (5% of cases) with just 98 for deep infection (0.6% of all cases or 11.6% of the revisions). There were no differences in all-cause revisions or revision for deep infection between the surgical helmet systems and conventional gowns (p = 0.893 and p = 0.911, respectively). We found no evidence that wearing a surgical helmet system reduces the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection in any kind of primary shoulder arthroplasty. We acknowledge the limitations of this registry study and accept that there may be other benefits in terms of personal protection, comfort, or visibility. However, given their financial and ecological footprint, they should be used judiciously in shoulder surgery.