Periprosthetic Joint Infection In Patients Research Articles

What Is the Impact of Automated Synovial Cell Counting on Different Aseptic Causes and Periprosthetic Conditions Associated With Revision THA?

Studies have suggested that automated synovial cell counting may overestimate the white blood cell (WBC) count, resulting in false positive tests when evaluating patients for the possibility of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after THA. However, associations between WBC counts high enough to mimic PJI in patients whose arthroplasties are not infected but rather are experiencing a variety of aseptic problems-including but not limited to metallosis, polyethylene wear, and recurrent dislocation-have not, to our knowledge, been adequately addressed. In addition, there is a lack of analyses about the polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) when assessed by automated analyzers in this context. In the context of different indications for aseptic revision and different periprosthetic hip pathologic findings, we asked: (1) What were the synovial WBC count levels, and what proportion of values were above the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) cutoff (3000 cells/μL)? (2) What were the synovial PMN% levels, and what proportion of values were above the 2018 ICM (70%)? We retrospectively studied the preoperative cell count analyses of synovial fluid in patients who underwent revision THA for aseptic reasons at our tertiary referral arthroplasty center between January 2015 and December 2017. We considered all revisions performed on patients during that time potentially eligible, and after prespecified exclusions were applied (exclusions mainly included 15% [197 of 1306] sporadic missing data and 12% [155 of 1306] insufficient synovial fluid obtained in the aspirate), a total of 702 patients undergoing revision THA for aseptic reasons remained for the final analysis. As far as we know, no patients underwent re-revision for PJI at a mean follow-up of 46 ± 11 months, which tends to confirm our impression that indeed these hips did not have PJI. Cell count analyses were conducted using an automated analyzer. Clinical findings, preoperative radiographs, and surgical reports--confirmed by available histologic results--were used to establish diagnoses. We evaluated these hips considering the recommendations of the 2018 ICM (WBC count of 3000 cells/μL and PMN% of 70%) to see what proportion of them would have been characterized as likely having PJI on basis of those cutoff values. The mean WBC count for the entire cohort was 2120 ± 2395 cells/μL. The mean PMN% for the entire cohort was 36% ± 22%. Compared with aseptic loosening and recurrent dislocation, polyethylene wear had the highest mean WBC count (3817 ± 3711 cells/μL; p < 0.001). Of the investigated periprosthetic conditions, wear-induced synovitis had the highest value (4464 ± 3620 cells/μL; p < 0.001). Considering the ICM threshold, polyethylene wear showed the highest proportion of WBC counts above 3000 cells/μL among the indications for aseptic revision (60% [25 of 42]; p < 0.001). Of the periprosthetic conditions, wear-induced synovitis showed the highest proportion beyond the ICM cutoff (60% [50 of 83]; p < 0.001). The mean PMN% for aseptic causes ranged between 28% and 44% without differences among them (p = 0.12). Patients with metallosis had the highest mean PMN% of the periprosthetic conditions investigated (45% ± 25%; p = 0.007). Regarding the ICM threshold, metallosis resulted in the largest proportion of patients with a PMN% above 70% (21% [10 of 47]; p = 0.003), and that for wear-induced synovitis was 6% (5 of 83; p = 0.42) and for osteolysis was 3% (1 of 33; p = 0.51). There were no differences among aseptic loosening, recurrent dislocation, and polyethylene wear in terms of the proportion above 70% among the aseptic revision causes. Using automated cell counting, we found that WBC counts differ widely across indications for aseptic revision THA, and a high proportion of patients who underwent revision THA for aseptic reasons had WBC counts above the commonly used threshold of 3000 cells/μL. However, the PMN% was much less affected in several common indications for aseptic revision THA, making this measure more reliable for interpreting aspiration results using an automated analyzer. Based on the data distributions we observed, manual counting techniques might be considered in particular among patients with polyethylene wear, metal-on-metal bearing surfaces, or suspected metallosis. However, an elevated WBC count alone, observed using an automated analyzer in the context of polyethylene wear, should not be considered to be strongly suggestive of PJI, since that finding occurred so commonly among patients without infection. Level III, diagnostic study.

The mildly decreased preoperative bilirubin level is a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty

BackgroundMany serologic markers are routinely tested prior to joint arthroplasty, but only few are commonly used to guide surgeons in determining patients most at risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The objective of this study was to investigate the association between preoperative bilirubin level and PJI after primary hip and knee arthroplasty.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing revision hip and knee arthroplasty at our hospital from January 2016 to December 2019. Laboratory biomarkers were collected before the primary arthroplasty, as well as general patient information. The association between the above serologic markers and postoperative PJI was analyzed.ResultsA total of 72 patients (30 hips/42 knees) were analyzed, including 39 patients with PJI and 33 patients without PJI. Except for total bilirubin (TB) and direct bilirubin (DB), there was no significant difference between the remaining laboratory biomarkers. The preoperative TB and DB in the PJI group were 10.84 ± 0.61 μmol/L and 3.07 ± 0.19 μmol/L, respectively, which were lower than those in the non-PJI group (14.68 ± 0.75 μmol/L and 4.70 ± 0.39 μmol/L, P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of preoperative TB to predict PJI was 0.755 (P < 0.001, cutoff = 11.55 μmol/L, sensitivity = 66.67%, specificity = 75.76%). Meanwhile, the AUC of preoperative DB was 0.760 (P < 0.001, cutoff = 4.00 μmol/L, sensitivity = 84.62%, specificity = 54.45%).ConclusionsThe serum levels of TB and DB before the primary arthroplasty were lower in PJI patients than in non-PJI patients, and the preoperative values lower than 11.55 μmol/L and 4.00 μmol/L could be considered as a risk factor for postoperative PJI.

Candida periprosthetic joint infections \u2014 risk factors and outcome between albicans and non-albicans strains

BackgroundDespite its scarcity, fungal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is of great clinical relevance as diagnosis and treatment are highly challenging. Previous analyses focused on the treatment rather than the role of the causative fungal agent on clinical outcome. This is the largest study of its kind to evaluate Candida strain–dependent differences in patients with fungal PJI.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 29 patients who underwent surgical intervention due to Candida hip or knee PJI in our department from 2010 to 2018. PJI was defined according to IDSA, recurrent PJI according to modified Delphi consensus criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test, chi-square test with Yates correction, and log rank test.ResultsBesides age and affected joint, no significant differences were found between Candida albicans and non-albicans PJI patients (75.83 versus 64.11 years, p = 0.012; 12 hip versus two knee cases, p = 0.013). Most patients received two- (27.59%) or three-stage exchange surgery (41.38%). There was a statistical trend towards an increase in surgery needed in non-albicans Candida PJI (2.92 versus 2.12; p = 0.103). After initial Candida PJI treatment, functional prosthesis implantation was achieved in 72.41% of all patients. At last follow-up, infection-free survival was at 26.79% in Candida albicans versus 72.00% in non-albicans PJI (p = 0.046).ConclusionsIn this study, we found infection-free survival rates to be significantly decreased in patients with albicans compared to non-albicans Candida PJI. While age and affected joint might play a confounding role, we speculate the causative pathogen to play a decisive role in disease progression.

Moderately elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with no clinical signs or symptoms of infection is not a contraindication for total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

Background: It is unclear whether patients with elevated preoperative levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) are more prone to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The authors aimed to determine how preoperative moderate elevation of ESR or CRP in patients without clinical signs or symptoms of infection is associated with the risk of PJI after TKA surgery. Methods: In a prospective study, 315 patients who were elected for unilateral TKA were included, including 237 patients with preoperative normal ESR and CRP, 46 patients with moderate preoperative elevation of ESR (less than 50 mm/hr), and 32 patients with moderate preoperative elevation of CRP (less than 24 mg/dL). Patients with both ESR and CRP elevation were not included in the study. Primary TKA was done using a standard medial parapatellar approach under general anesthesia. Results: Overall rate of infection was 0.3% (1 in 320 patients) at a mean follow-up period of 19±5.3 mo. This infection occurred in a patient with normal preoperative ESR and CRP (1 in 237 patients, 0.4%). No infection occurred in 78 patients in either the ESR-elevated or the CRP-elevated group. Accordingly, the rate of infection was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.83). Conclusions: Moderate preoperative elevations of ESR or CRP do not increase the rate of periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Machine learning models accurately predict recurrent infection following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection.

This study aimed to develop and validate machine-learning models for the prediction of recurrent infection in patients following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. A total of 618 consecutive patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. The patient cohort included 165 patients with confirmed recurrent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Potential risk factors including patient demographics and surgical characteristics served as input to three machine-learning models which were developed to predict recurrent periprosthetic joint. The machine-learning models were assessed by discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis. The factors most significantly associated with recurrent PJI in patients following revision total knee arthroplasty for PJI included irrigation and debridement with/without modular component exchange (p < 0.001), > 4 prior open surgeries (p < 0.001), metastatic disease (p < 0.001), drug abuse (p < 0.001), HIV/AIDS (p < 0.01), presence of Enterococcus species (p < 0.01) and obesity (p < 0.01). The machine-learning models all achieved excellent performance across discrimination (AUC range 0.81-0.84). This study developed three machine-learning models for the prediction of recurrent infections in patients following revision total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. The strongest predictors were previous irrigation and debridement with or without modular component exchange and prior open surgeries. The study findings show excellent model performance, highlighting the potential of these computational tools in quantifying increased risks of recurrent PJI to optimize patient outcomes. IV.

Comparison study of patient demographics and risk factors for infections following primary total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.

While studies have shown favorable outcomes in the treatment of femoral neck fractures with the utilization of total hip arthroplasty (THA), adverse events, such as infections, can still occur. Therefore, the aims of this study were to 1) compare baseline demographics and 2) identify risk factors associated with developing either surgical site infections (SSIs) or peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary THA for femoral neck fractures were queried from the Medicare database. The inclusion criteria consisted of patients developing SSIs within 90days or PJIs within 3years following the index procedure. The query yielded 2502 patients who developed infections in the form of either SSIs (n = 987) or PJIs (n = 1515) out of 57,191 patients treated for femoral neck fractures with primary THA. Primary endpoints were to compare baseline demographic profiles and determine risk factors associated with developing infections. Multivariate binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the odds (OR) of developing infections. A p value less than 0.001 was considered to be statistically significant. Patients who developed either infections were found to be significantly different when compared to patients who did not develop infections. SSI (10 vs. 8, p < 0.0001) and PJI (9 vs. 5, p < 0.0001) patients both had significantly higher mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores compared to their counterparts. The regression model found the greatest risks for developing SSIs included hypertension (OR 1.63, p = 0.001), pathologic weight loss (OR 1.58, p < 0.0001), and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) (OR 1.48, p < 0.0001), whereas IDA (OR 2.14, p < 0.0001), pathologic weight loss (OR 1.75, p < 0.0001), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.57, p < 0.0001) increased the odds for PJIs. This study can be utilized by orthopedic surgeons and other healthcare professionals to adequately educate these patients of the complications which may occur following their surgery.

Plasma levels of D-dimer and fibrin degradation product are unreliable for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing re-revision arthroplasty

BackgroundThe preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing re-revision arthroplasty is crucial, so we evaluated whether plasma levels of D-dimer and fibrin degradation product (FDP) could aid such diagnosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data on patients who underwent re-revision hip or knee arthroplasty at our institute during 2008–2020. Patients were stratified into those who experienced PJI or not, based on 2013 International Consensus Meeting Criteria. Plasma levels of D-dimer and FDP as well as levels of the traditional inflammatory biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and interleukin-6 were compared between the groups. The ability of these biomarkers to diagnose PJI was assessed based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, for which predictive cut-offs were optimized based on the Youden index.ResultsBased on a cut-off of 0.80 mg/L, D-dimer gave an AUC of 0.595, high sensitivity of 85.7% but poor specificity of 47.8%. Based on a cut-off of 2.80 mg/L, FDP gave an AUC of 0.550, poor sensitivity of 56.5% and poor specificity of 52.9%. CRP, ESR and interleukin-6 showed much better diagnostic ability, with AUCs > 0.82. The combination of CRP and interleukin-6 gave an AUC of 0.877, high sensitivity of 91.7% and acceptable specificity of 78.3%.ConclusionsPlasma levels of D-dimer and FDP may be inappropriate for diagnosing PJI in patients undergoing re-revision arthroplasty, whereas the combination of serum CRP and interleukin-6 may be effective.

Evidence for osteocyte-mediated bone-matrix degradation associated with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)

Osteomyelitis associated with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) signals a chronic infection and the need for revision surgery. An osteomyelitic bone exhibits distinct morphological features, including evidence for osteolysis and an accelerated bone remodelling into poorly organised, poor-quality bone. In addition to immune cells, various bone cell-types have been implicated in the pathology. The present study sought to determine the types of bone-cell activities in human PJI bones. Acetabular biopsies from peri-implant bone from patients undergoing revision total hip replacement (THR) for chronic PJI (with several identified pathogens) as well as control bone from the same patients and from patients undergoing primary THR were analysed. Histological analysis confirmed that PJI bone presented increased osteoclastic activity compared to control bone. Analysis of osteocyte parameters showed no differences in osteocyte lacunar area between the acetabular bone taken from PJI patients or primary THR controls. Analysis of bone matrix composition using Masson's trichrome staining and second-harmonic generation microscopy revealed widespread lack of mature collagen, commonly surrounding osteocytes, in PJI bone. Increased expression of known collagenases, such as matrix metallopeptidase (MMP) 13, MMP1 and cathepsin K (CTSK), was measured in infected bone compared to non-infected bone. Human bone and cultured osteocyte-like cells experimentally exposed to Staphylococcus aureus exhibited strongly upregulated expression of MMP1, MMP3 and MMP13 compared to non-exposed controls. In conclusion, the study identified previously unrecognised bone-matrix changes in PJI caused by multiple organisms deriving from osteocytes. Histological examination of bone collagen composition may provide a useful adjunct diagnostic measure of PJI.

Возможности выявления латентной ППИ при ревизионном эндопротезировании коленного сустава

Abstract. Introduction The paper presents a comparative analysis of routine screening methods and the EBJIS 2021 algorithm in detection of latent periprosthetic joint infection in patients admitted for revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening and after spacer implantation. Materials and methods Group 1 included 49 patients who underwent revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening, group 2 were 47 patients with PJI after spacer implantation. Results and discussion There were no significant differences between patient groups in terms of age, gender, and preoperative ESR and CRP levels. In 62.2 % of all cases, the aspirate was inappropriate for cytological examination; this fact limited its diagnostic value. The most frequently intraoperatively isolated pathogen in both groups was coagulase-negative staphylococci. However, in 70 % of cases these results were not diagnostically significant, and infection was diagnosed only in 8.2 % of cases in group 1 and 12.8 % in group 2. Moreover, the chances of isolating the pathogen from tissue biopsies were 5.6 times higher than from intraoperative aspirate (OR = 5.6, 95 % CI = 1.2-26.4). In case of negative preoperative aspirate, in almost 25 % of cases, pathogens were isolated from intraoperative tissues, 40.9 % of them were diagnostically significant. The chances of its detection increased 4.7 times in combined increase in ESR and CRP blood level (OR = 4.686, 95 % CI = 0.765-28.700). Using EBJIS 2021 criteria, infection was confirmed in more than 10 % of cases in each group, and the diagnostic significance of the criteria exceeded the significance of using routine screening methods. At a follow-up period of more than 2 years, the effectiveness of treatment was 95.3 %, while signs of infection were detected in 4.7 % of cases, regardless of the group. Conclusion EBJIS 2021 criteria are characterized by high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and enable to identify periprosthetic joint infection in knee revision cases even in its latent form and to correct treatment tactics in patients without a history of PJI.

The concordance between preoperative aspiration and intraoperative synovial fluid culture results: intraoperative synovial fluid re-cultures are necessary whether the preoperative aspiration culture is positive or not

AimsPreoperative aspiration culture and intraoperative cultures play pivotal roles in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis and pathogen identification. But the discordance between preoperative aspiration culture and intraoperative synovial fluid culture remains unknown. We aim to determine (1) the discordance between preoperative and intraoperative synovial fluid (SF) culture and. (2) compared to intraoperative synovial fluid cultures, the sensitivity of preoperative aspiration fluid culture. Then the following question is tried to be answered: Are intraoperative synovial fluid re-cultures necessary if the preoperative aspiration culture is positive?Materials and methodsBetween 2015 and 2019, 187 PJI patients managed with surgeries were included in this study. Compared to intraoperative synovial fluid culture, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of preoperative aspiration culture were calculated. Then, the discordance between preoperative aspiration culture and intraoperative SF culture was analyzed.ResultsThe sensitivity of preoperative aspiration culture was 81.29% compared to intraoperative synovial fluid cultures. Concordance was identified in 147 PJI (78.61%) patients and culture discordance occurred in 40 patients (21.39%). In these discordant PJI patients, 24 patients (60%) were polymicrobial and no intraoperative synovial fluid culture growth was found in 16 PJI cases (40%). Preoperative monomicrobial staphylococcus results had a sensitivity of and a specificity of 80.43% and 83.16%, respectively. Preoperative polymicrobial results had the lowest sensitivity.ConclusionsThe intraoperative synovial fluid re-cultures are necessary if the preoperative aspiration culture is positive and the discordance between preoperative aspiration culture and intraoperative synovial fluid culture should be noted especially when Streptococcus spp. and more than one pathogen was revealed by preoperative aspiration culture.Level of evidence: Level III.

Superficial mycosis, at the site or distant to the surgical site, appears to predispose patients to bacterial periprosthetic joint infections.

It is traditionally believed that presence of fungal infection in the nail or skin of patients is a risk factor for subsequent infection. The literature is devoid of any evidence to confirm or refute this belief. This study examined a possible relationship between the presence of superficial skin or nail mycoses and subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This is a single-centre, retrospective study of patients who underwent primary TJA between 2000 and 2018. 55 patients with superficial mycoses of skin or nail, at the time of arthroplasty were identified and a variable number matching with up to a 1:5 ratio was performed with 182 patients undergoing TJA who had no superficial mycosis. The groups were further divided into knee and hip TJA. The outcome of TJA in the cohorts was compared. Preoperative demographics were similar between the 2 groups. The incidence of PJI in patients undergoing TKA within a year was significantly higher in patients with superficial mycosis at 8.6% (3/35) compared to 0% (0/120) in patients without mycosis. However, all infections were caused by bacterial species and none were fungal. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of superficial mycosis had a strong correlation with development of PJI postoperatively in our TKA cohort. Identification of fungal infection (mycosis) of skin and nail in patients awaiting TJA is important. These patients appear to have a higher risk for developing bacterial PJI than those without fungal infections. Further study is needed to determine if treatment of these patients prior to arthroplasty stands to reverse the high risk for PJI that these patients carry.

Comparative analysis of pathogen structure in patients with PJI after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Microbiological profile of pathogens causing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty varies in different regions, clinics and even departments. The objective of this study was to analyze the pathogen structure in patients with PJI after primary THA and TKA and its influence on the effectiveness of the infection eradication after two-stage reimplantation. We collected the retrospective data of 364 patients-161 with PJI after primary TKA (113 treated in two stages 48 with failure after spacer implantation) and 203 patients with infected THA (127 after successful two-stage reimplantation and 76 with PJI recurrence after the first stage) within the time period from January 2012 to December 2017, treated with two-stage protocol in the single center. A comparative analysis of pathogen structure was performed between cohorts of patients with hip and knee PJI. A subanalysis was made between the subsets comprised from patients with successful two-stage treatment and the subsets with failure to treat the infection. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most commonly identified pathogen in the full hip and knee cohorts: 30.1% and 32.5%, respectively. However, the percentage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) among all S. epidermidis isolates was higher in the hip cohort-50% compared with 35% in the knee cohort (p = 0.073). Other coagulase-negative Staphylococci were more common to patients with PJI after primary TKA-10.3% compared with 5% (p < 0.02). Streptococcus sp. caused hip PJI in a larger percentage of cases than in knee PJI (p < 0.01)-7% and 2%, respectively (p < 0.01). Polymicrobial associations were significantly more common in hip PJI compared to knee PJI: 45.3% and 14% of cases, respectively (p < 0.001). The presence of polymicrobial infection significantly raised the risk of PJI recurrence [OR 2 (95% CI from 1.24 to 3.24)] in knee PJI patients and reduced the effectiveness of infection eradication from 73.9% to 47.8%. Comparative analysis showed significant differences in the structure of PJI pathogens in the hip and knee. These findings are useful when choosing treatment strategies and empirical antibiotics regimens, in the management of patients with PJIs after primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

Comparison study of patient demographics and risk factors for infections following primary total elbow arthroplasty

BackgroundInfections are a feared complication following primary total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Studies comparing baseline demographic profiles and identifying risk factors associated with developing surgical site infections (SSIs) or peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), following primary TEA are limited. This study was therefore aimed to: (1) compare patient demographics; and (2) identify patient-related risk factors for the development of infections following a primary TEA. MethodsPatients who underwent primary TEA from January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2014 were identified in an administrative claims database. The study group consisted of all patients who developed either SSIs within 90-days or PJIs within 2-years following the index procedure, respectively. A total of 23,134 primary TEAs were identified between 2005 and 2014, of which 757 (3.3%) were coded as being infected. Primary outcomes that were assessed included comparing baseline patient demographics and identifying patient-related risk factors for developing PJIs. Pearson's chi-square analyses were used to compare study group demographics to their counterparts. Welch's t-test was used to compare mean Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index scores between the cohorts. Multivariate binomial logistics regression was used to calculate odds-ratios (OR) for patient-related risk factors. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsPatients who developed infections were significantly different compared to their counterparts with respect to the variables analyzed. Patients developing infections were found to have a higher prevalence of comorbidities as measured by mean Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index scores in patients who developed SSIs (7 vs. 5, P < .0001) or PJIs (7 vs. 5, P < .0001) compared to their respective counterparts. The greatest risk factors for SSIs within 90-days following primary TEA were rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.80, P < .0001), being male (OR: 1.53, P = .009), and depressive disorders (OR: 1.52, P = .004), whereas iron deficiency anemia (OR: 2.04, P < .0001), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.78, P < .0001), and pathologic weight loss (OR: 1.73, P < .0001) were associated with an increased odd of PJIs. ConclusionThis study demonstrated statistically significant differences between patients who developed and did not develop infections following primary TEA and identified a myriad of risk factors associated with these adverse events. The results from this study can help identify high risk patients by orthopedic surgeon in order to potentially mitigate the incidence of either SSIs or PJIs in patients undergoing TEA. Level of EvidenceLevel III; Database Study, Retrospective Case-Control Prognosis Study

Is There a Difference in Microbiological Epidemiology and Effective Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy Comparing Fracture-Related Infection and Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Retrospective Comparative Study.

This study aims to investigate (1) microbial patterns in fracture-related infections (FRIs) in comparison to microbiological patterns of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), (2) the identification of effective empiric antibiotic therapy for FRIs and PJIs and (3) analysis of difficult-to-treat (DTT) pathogens. Patients treated for FRIs or PJIs from 2017 to 2020 were evaluated for pathogens detected during treatment. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles were examined with respect to broadly used antibiotics and antibiotic combinations. Resistance rates to rifampicin or fluoroquinolone were determined. A total of 81 patients with PJI and 86 with FRI were included in the study. For FRIs Staphylococcus aureus was the most common infection-causing pathogen (37.4% vs. 27.9% for PJI). Overall, there was no statistical difference in pathogen distribution (p = 0.254). For FRIs, combinations of gentamicin + vancomycin (93.2%), co-amoxiclav + glycopeptide and meropenem + vancomycin (91.9% each) would have been effective for empiric therapy, similar to PJIs. Difficult to treat pathogens were more frequently detectable in PJIs (11.6% vs. 2.3%). Empiric therapy combinations such as gentamicin + vancomycin, co-amoxiclav + glycopeptide or meropenem + vancomycin, are effective antibiotic strategies for both FRI and PJI patients. More DTT pathogens were detectable in PJIs compared to FRIs.

Comparison study of patient demographics and patient-related risk factors for peri-prosthetic joint infections following primary total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundWhile studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes in utilization of primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), adverse events such as infections can still occur. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are associated with worse outcomes and patient morbidity. The purpose of this study was to: (1) compare patient demographics amongst TSA patients with and without PJIs following primary TSA; and (2) identify patient-related risk factors for PJIs following primary TSA. MethodsPatients undergoing primary TSA for the treatment of glenohumeral OA were identified using the Mariner administrative claims database by CPT code 23,472. Laterality modifiers were utilized to ensure PJIs were developing in the correct laterality as those patients undergoing primary TSA. Inclusion for the study group consisted of patients who developed PJIs within 2-years after the index procedure, whereas patients who did not develop PJIs served as the comparison cohort. Primary outcomes analyzed included patient demographics and patient-related risk factors for PJIs following primary TSA. A stepwise backwards elimination multivariate binomial logistic regression analyses was performed to determine the odds (OR) of PJIs in patients undergoing primary TSA. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsThe query yielded 15,396 patients who underwent primary TSA for glenohumeral OA, of which 191 patients developed PJIs and 15,205 did not develop PJIs. The study found statistically significant differences amongst patients who did and did not develop PJIs following primary TSA with respect to age, sex, and presence of comorbid conditions. Risk factors associated with developing PJIs following primary TSA included: pathologic weight loss (OR: 2.06, P < .0001), obesity (OR: 1.56, P = .0001), male sex (OR: 1.52, P = .007), and peripheral vascular disease (OR: 1.46, P = .022). ConclusionAs the number of primary TSAs for the treatment of glenohumeral OA increase worldwide, identifying modifiable risk-factors to reduce the incidence of infection is critical. The study found various modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with developing PJIs following primary TSA. This study is valuable to orthopedists in order to identify and risk-stratify patients with regard to PJI in the setting of primary TSA for OA. Level of EvidenceLevel III; Case-Control Study

Could intermittent change of conventional dressing affect risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary total joint arthroplasty?

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most dreaded and challenging complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of keeping the dressing without change on the occurrence of PJI in patients undergoing TJA. 4877 Patients with a minimum follow-up of 90days were included to investigate the effect of dressing on the PJI occurring within 3months of surgery. Patients were divided into two consecutive groups as the intermittent change of traditional dressing (group 1-before 2019) and keeping dressing for 5days without change (group 2-after 2019). A backward stepwise logistic regression model was used to estimate independent risk factors for PJI. Group 1 and group 2 consisted of 4172 and 705 patients, and the numbers of diagnosed PJI cases in the groups were 40 (1.0%) and 10 (1.4%), respectively (p = 0.1). The backward stepwise logistic regression model analysis revealed that keeping the dressing unchanged and removing it after the first week postoperatively was not an independent risk factor for the occurrence of PJI. Older age, diabetes mellitus and coronary artery diseases were independent risk factors for PJI (p < 0.05). Our study results present, that intermittent change of conventional dressing is unnecessary, because it does not decrease the risk of PJI after TJA. Level III Therapeutic.

Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Septic Arthritis of the Native Knee

Septic arthritis of the native knee often results in irreversible joint damage leading to the need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to examine the intermediate-term risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic revision, and reoperation following primary TKA in patients with a history of septic arthritis of the native knee as compared with primary TKA performed for the treatment of osteoarthritis. We retrospectively identified 215 primary TKAs performed from 1971 to 2016 at a single institution in patients with a history of septic arthritis of the native knee. Each case was matched 1:1 based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and surgical year to a TKA for osteoarthritis. The mean age and BMI were 63 years and 30 kg/m2, respectively. The mean duration of follow-up was 9 years. Survivorships free of PJI at 10 years were 90% and 99% for the septic arthritis and osteoarthritis groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.1; p < 0.01). Ten-year survivorships free of any aseptic revisions were 83% and 93% (HR = 2.5; p < 0.01), and survivorships free of any reoperation were 61% and 84% (HR = 2.9; p < 0.01) for the septic arthritis and osteoarthritis groups, respectively. In addition, as time from the diagnosis of native knee septic arthritis to TKA increased, the relative risk of subsequent infection decreased. Preoperative and 2-year postoperative Knee Society scores were similar between the groups (p = 0.16 and p = 0.19, respectively). There was a 6.1-fold increased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA with a history of native knee septic arthritis when compared with controls undergoing TKA for the treatment of osteoarthritis, with a cumulative incidence of 9% at 10 years. Subgroup analysis of the septic arthritis cohort revealed a higher risk of any infection in patients who underwent TKA within the first 5 to 7 years after the diagnosis of septic arthritis as compared with those with a greater duration. Moreover, the 10-year rates of survival free of aseptic revision, any revision, and any reoperation were significantly worse in the native knee septic arthritis cohort. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A break-even analysis of tranexamic acid for prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty

PurposeDespite the commonplace use of tranexamic acid in total joint arthroplasty, much of the current data regarding its cost-effectiveness examines savings directly related to its hemostatic properties, without considering its protective effect against periprosthetic joint infections. Using break-even economic modeling, we calculated the cost-effectiveness of routine tranexamic acid administration for infection prevention in total joint arthroplasty. Materials and methodsThe cost of intraoperative intravenous tranexamic acid, the cost of revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections, and the baseline rates of periprosthetic joint infections in patients who did not receive intraoperative tranexamic acid were obtained from the literature and institutional purchasing records. Break-even economic modeling incorporating these variables was performed to determine the absolute risk reduction in infection rate to make routine intraoperative tranexamic acid use economically justified. The number needed to treat was calculated from the absolute risk reduction. ResultsRoutine use of intraoperative tranexamic acid is economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 3125 total joint arthroplasties (absolute risk reduction = 0.032%). Cost-effectiveness was maintained with varying costs of tranexamic acid, infection rates, and periprosthetic joint infection costs. ConclusionThe routine use of intraoperative tranexamic acid is a highly cost-effective practice for infection prevention in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. The use of tranexamic acid is warranted across a wide range of costs of tranexamic acid, initial infection rates, and costs of periprosthetic joint infection treatment.

Globulin, the albumin-to-globulin ratio, and fibrinogen perform well in the diagnosis of Periprosthetic joint infection

BackgroundAlthough periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), the diagnosis of PJI remains challenging. Albumin (ALB), globulin (GLB), the albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), and fibrinogen could be indicators of the body’s inflammatory state. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of these biomarkers with that of other inflammatory biomarkers in PJI patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study that included a consecutive series of patients undergoing debridement antibiotic irrigation and implant retention (DAIR), one-stage or the first stage of a two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for acute (n = 31) or chronic (n = 51) PJI, or revision TKA or THA for aseptic failures (n = 139) between January 2017 and December 2019 in our hospital. The 2013 criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (2013 MSIS) were used as the reference standard for the diagnosis of PJI. The preoperative ALB, GLB, AGR, fibrinogen, D-dimer, platelet count, fibrin degradation product (FDP), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PVR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), sensitivity, and specificity were utilized to compare different biomarkers.ResultsCompared with the aseptic patients, the GLB, D-dimer, fibrinogen, FDP, platelet count, PVR, PLR, NLR, ESR, and CRP levels of PJI patients were significantly higher (P < 0.01); however, the ALB and AGR levels were significantly lower (P < 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were 0.774, 67.50, 77.54% for ALB; 0.820, 57.50, 89.86% for GLB; 0.845, 66.25, 93.48% for AGR; 0.832, 78.48, 78.95% for fibrinogen; 0.877, 81.48, 85.07% for ESR; 0.909, 83.95, 88.89% for CRP; 0.683, 55.22, 75.83% for D-dimer; 0.664, 38.81, 88.33% for FDP; 0.678, 52.44, 79.86% for platelet count; 0.707, 48.78, 86.33% for PVR; 0.700, 51.22, 80.58% for PLR; and 0.678, 52.44, 81.30% for NLR, respectively. In the clinic, GLB, AGR and fibrinogen could be used for diagnosis of patients suspected of having PJI.ConclusionOur study demonstrated that GLB, AGR, and fibrinogen were promising biomarkers in the diagnosis of PJI.

Two-stage exchange Arthroplasty for knee Periprosthetic joint infection exhibit high infection recurrence rate in patients with chronic viral hepatitis

BackgroundCurrently, there is little evidence about the outcome of two-stage exchange arthroplasty for the treatment of knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. To evaluate it, we set the primary outcome as infection recurrence, and the secondary outcome as the difference between patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus.Patients and methodsBetween June, 2010 and December, 2016, 172 patients with knee PJIs were treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty at our institute. Treatment success was defined using Delphi-based consensus. These patients were further divided into groups with or without chronic hepatitis. Variables were analyzed, including age, sex, comorbidities, microbiology, and operative methods. Minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean, 35 months; range, 12-85 months).ResultsOf the 172 knee PJI patients, 25 were identified with chronic hepatitis. The infection recurrence rate in the hepatitis group (28%, 7 in 25) was significantly higher than that in the non-hepatitis group (9.5%, 14 in 147), p = 0.017. However, there was no significant difference in the infection recurrence rates between patients with HBV (24%, 4 in 16) and HCV (33.3%, 3 in 9). Regarding the outcomes of patients with infection recurrence, 4 of the non-hepatitis patients were treated with the debridement, antibiotic treatment, irrigation, and retention of prosthesis (DAIR) procedure, with a success rate of 75%. The other 17 patients (7 with hepatitis and 10 without) were treated with repeated two-stage exchange arthroplasty with 100% infection elimination rate until the final follow-up.ConclusionsKnee PJI patients with chronic hepatitis have higher infection recurrence rate after two-stage exchange arthroplasty (28%).