Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures Research Articles

Low Rate of Early Periprosthetic Fractures in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Triple-Tapered Wedge Stem.

Utilization of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been steadily increasing in recent years. While the DAA may offer some benefits compared to other approaches, there are still risks involved including relatively higher rates of periprosthetic femur fractures, especially when combined with cementless femoral stem use. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the early postoperative femoral complications with a short triple-wedge tapered stem used in primary THA via a DAA. A retrospective review was conducted of the arthroplasty registry of our institution from April 2022 to August 2023 to identify patients who underwent a primary THA via a DAA with the Short Medacta Stem (SMS) (Medacta International, Castel San Pietro, Switzerland). Patients were excluded if the stem was used for a revision surgery, they were within 90 days of surgery, or they refused research consent. Inclusion criteria was met in 262 patients (302 hips). Data was collected after reviewing the chart, and reports and radiographic measurements, including Dorr type and canal fit ratios, were obtained from preoperative and postoperative radiographs, respectively. A total of 302 total hips were included, 161 patients were male (53.3%) and 141 were female (46.7%), with an average age of 66.5 years (27-88, +/- 10.7 years). Average follow up was 0.3 years (range, 0.05-1.71 years). The majority of patients had a Dorr B femur (81.7%). The Median stem size used was an 8 (range, 2-15), and 89.4% of those had a collar. Average canal fill ratio was 0.83 (range, 0.43-0.98, +/- 0.07). Overall, there were two Vancouver B2a periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures (0.66%) that required revision surgery to a modular stem. In addition, there were two Vancouver Ag greater trochanteric fractures (0.66%) with acceptable alignment that did not require revision surgery. Demographic information about the patients with femoral complications is summarized in Table I. Average age of patients with femoral complications was 69.5 years, with an average canal fit ratio of 0.88. We found that the triple-wedge implant had a low rate of early femoral complication in primary THA from an anterior approach and is safe for use in THA from a DAA. More follow up is needed to evaluate continuing implant survivorship and patient outcomes.

Shaft Fractures in Patients Requiring Primary or Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Can Be Successfully Treated with Long-Stemmed Implants without Additional Fixation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone union, complication rate, clinical and functional outcomes of long-stemmed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with periprosthetic femoral or tibial shaft fractures and in patients with femoral or tibial shaft fractures with coexisting advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA). This retrospective study comprised 25 patients who underwent surgery due to tibial or femoral shaft fractures: (1) with coexisting severe knee OA or (2) with a periprosthetic fracture requiring implant exchange. In all cases, fracture stabilization was performed intramedullary with the use of long-stemmed implants without the use of additional fixation material (plates, screws, or cerclage). Bone union was achieved in 22/25 patients (88%). One patient required revision with additional plate stabilization due to non-union, and asymptomatic partial bone union was observed in two cases. The group with periprosthetic fractures demonstrated good clinical (mean 73.1 ± 13.3) and moderate functional (mean 59.2 ± 18.8) outcomes in the Knee Society Scoring system (KSS). In the group with shaft fracture and coexisting OA significantly higher clinical (excellent results, mean 84.1 ± 11; p = 0.03) and functional (good results, mean 76.2 ± 20.6; p = 0.04) results were noted. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of range of motion (ROM) or complication rate between these two groups. One-stage TKA with a long-stemmed implant without the use of additional fixation material is an effective method for the treatment of femoral or tibial shaft fractures in patients who require joint replacement. Despite being technically demanding, the approach yields bone union and moderate to excellent clinical and functional outcomes with a relatively low complication rate.

Management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture by reversed contralateral distal femur locking plate

Management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture by reversed contralateral distal femur locking plate

Locking attachment plate fixation around a well-fixed stem in periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures.

Periprosthetic fractures are difficult to manage. Plating technique has been considered a reliable form of management of periprosthetic fractures with a well-fixed stem, but a dependable and stable method of plate fixation to the bone is lacking. This study reports the clinical results using a locking attachment plate (LAP) instead of cable fixation to fix locking plates to a periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture. Nineteen patients with periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed stemmed implants were studied between August 2012 and December 2014. Patients were followed up for at least 1year postoperatively. Median age was 74years (range 56-96years). Fractures were classified according to the Unified Classification System, Vancouver classification, and Su classification. Open reduction was performed under minimal incision and the locking plate was fixed to the lateral cortex of the femoral shaft. The part of the shaft without a stem was fixed to the plate using 5.0-mm locking screws, and the part with an underlying stem was fixed using 3.5-mm locking screws through the LAP instead of cables. Postoperatively, patients were managed using general principles for femoral shaft fractures. Average follow-up was 16months (range 12-36months). All cases achieved fracture healing without loss of reduction. There were no cases of implant breakage or stem loosening at final follow-up. The average number of LAPs per fixation construct was 2.1 (range 1-4), and the average number of 3.5-mm locking screws through each LAP was 3.3 (range 2-4). The average value of plate screw density was 0.55 (range 0.37-0.8), and the average working length was four holes (range 2-8). Using the LAP to manage periprosthetic fractures with a well-fixed stem could obviate the need for cable around the stem area and yield acceptable outcomes.

Orthogonal plating of Vancouver B1 and C-type periprosthetic femur fracture nonunions.

Periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures are a significant complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Plate osteosynthesis has been the mainstay of treatment around well-fixed stems. Nonunions are a rare and challenging complication of this fixation method. We report the outcomes of a novel orthogonal plating surgical technique for Vancouver B1 and C-type periprosthetic fractures that previously failed open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). A retrospective review identified all patients with Vancouver B1/C THA periprosthetic femoral nonunions from 2010 to 2015. Exclusion criteria included open fractures and periprosthetic infections. The technique utilised a mechanobiologic strategy of atraumatic exposure, resection of necrotic tissue, bone grafting with adjuvant bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and revision open reduction internal fixation with orthogonal plate osteosynthesis. 6 Vancouver B1/C periprosthetic femoral nonunions were treated. 5 patients were female with an average age of 80.3 years (range 72-91 years). The fractures occurred at a mean of 5.8 years (range 1-10 years) from their initial arthroplasty procedure. No patients underwent further revision surgery; there were no perioperative complications. All patients had a minimum of 11 months follow-up (mean 18.6, range 11-36 months). All fractures achieved osseous union, defined as solid bridging callus over at least 2 cortices and pain free, independent ambulation, at an average of 24.4 weeks (range 6.1-39.7 weeks). This is the 1st series describing orthogonal locked compression plating using modern implants for periprosthetic femoral nonunions. This technique should be considered in periprosthetic femur fracture nonunions around a well-fixed stem.

Pathological Relationship of Osteomalacia at the Site of Atypical Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fracture after Typical Femoral Neck Fracture Occurred in the Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report

Pathological Relationship of Osteomalacia at the Site of Atypical Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fracture after Typical Femoral Neck Fracture Occurred in the Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report

Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Stem loosening in both cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty is the hallmark of the Vancouver type B2 classification of periprosthetic hip fractures. We discuss the technique we use at our institution for treating these fractures. Periprosthetic femoral-shaft fractures are associated with a relatively high mortality rate, approximating that of patients with hip fractures. Outcomes are directly associated with early mobilisation and construct stability. We recommend performing the procedure only when the surgeon is proficient in revision hip surgery and trauma care. A well-selected portfolio of different stem designs and an array of osteosynthesis devices should be available, as well.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of periprosthetic femoral fractures with percutaneous cerclage wiring for fracture reduction: tips and technique

Introduction: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFs) associated at or near a well-fixed femoral prostheses (Vancouver type-B1) present a clinical challenge due to the quality of the bone stock and instability of the fracture. Combining closed reduction techniques with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) or intramedullary nailing is a technically challenging procedure, especially when dealing with complex femoral fractures such as periprosthetic fractures. Cerclage wiring is a well known adjunct for fracture reduction and fixation. However, it is usually performed by open reduction, requiring wide surgical exposures, that results in soft tissue stripping. Materials and Methods: In our original study 18 patients with periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture (mean age, seventy-four years; range, forty-seven to eighty-four years) were treated with the described percutaneous cerclage wire and MIPO techniques. One patient died two months postsurgery, leaving seventeen patients who were followed for a mean of 13.2 months. Results and Discussion: Four patients sustained a spiral fracture pattern; three, an oblique fracture; and two, a wedge fracture. Closed reduction was successful in all but one case, and took a mean of 24.4 minutes (range, seven to forty-five minutes). The mean total operative time was 103 minutes (range, seventy-five to 140 minutes). Blood loss was <100 ml in all cases. All fractures united at a mean of eighteen weeks (range, sixteen to twenty weeks). No hardware failures were observed; one plate bent 100, but the bending did not progress and the fracture healed uneventfully at sixteen weeks. Seven of the nine patients were able to return to their previous level of mobility. During the application of the percutaneous cerclage wires, there were no vascular or nerve injuries and none of the patients returned with any wound complications.

Periprosthetic femur fractures.

Successful treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures, like all fractures, requires careful attention to understand the fracture pattern nuances, identifying and executing a rational treatment approach, and providing an appropriate postoperative recovery protocol. Unlike most other fractures, modification of standard techniques is often required to obtain a stable fixation construct, and there is a greater role for revision arthroplasty in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. Optimal indications for surgical repair versus revision arthroplasty and optimal postoperative weight-bearing protocols remain uncertain. Reported outcomes for patients with periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures are generally good and are relatively consistent. Results for periprosthetic distal femur fractures, however, are less good and more inconsistent. Both periprosthetic femoral shaft and distal femur fractures are associated with relatively high mortality rates, approaching that of patients with hip fractures. This review should provide insight into the current solutions and challenges for the treatment of patients with periprosthetic femur fractures.

Percutaneous cerclage wiring and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO): a percutaneous reduction technique in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFs) associated at or near a well-fixed femoral prostheses (Vancouver type-B1) present a clinical challenge due to the quality of the bone stock and instability of the fracture. The purpose of this study was to present a novel reduction technique and analyze clinical and radiographic outcome in patients with Vancouver type-B1 fractures treated with percutaneous cerclage wiring for fracture reduction and maintenance of reduction with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) utilizing a locking compression plate (LCP). Between March 2007 and December 2008, ten consecutive patients with spiral, oblique or wedge Vancouver type-B1 were treated with closed percutaneous cerclage wiring using a new cerclage passer instrument (Synthes) through small 2-3 cm incisions for reduction and maintenance of reduction. Internal fixation with MIPO was obtained utilizing a long LCP Synthes bridging the fracture. The reduction time, fixation time and operative time were recorded. The rehabilitation protocol consisted of partial weight bearing as tolerated. Clinical and radiographic outcomes included evidence of union, return to pre-injury mobility, and surgical complications were recorded. There were three men and seven women with an average age of 74 years (range 47-84 years) at the time the fracture occured. The average follow-up was 13.2 months. One patient died 2 months after surgery due to cardiovascular problems and was excluded. The average reduction time with percutaneous cerclage wiring was 24.4 min (range 7-45 min). The average fixation time was 79 min (range 53-100 min). The average operative time was 103 min (range 75-140 min). Blood loss was minimal and only two patients needed a blood transfusion. All fractures healed with a mean time to union of 18 weeks (range 16-20 weeks). There was one implant which bent 10° in the post-operative period but went on to heal uneventfully within 16 weeks. There was no evidence of loosening of any implants. Seven patients returned to their previous level of mobility. Two patients required a walker. There were no implant failures, wound complications or infections. Percutaneous reduction of spiral, oblique or wedge-type B1 PPFs with percutaneous cerclage wiring combined with minimally invasive locking plate osteosynthesis provided satisfactory reduction, adequate stability and healing in nine patients. Our early results suggest that this reduction technique and fixation may be a useful solution for this growing challenge in orthopaedics. The authors caution that this technique must be done carefully to avoid serious complications, e.g., vascular injury.

Long-term results of surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty

Long-term results of surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty

The biomechanics of plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: cables, screws, or both?

Femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain a serious problem, since there is no optimal surgical repair method. Virtually all studies that examined surgical repair methods have done so clinically or experimentally. The present study assessed injury patterns computationally by developing three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models that were validated experimentally. The investigation evaluated three different constructs for the fixation of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures following THA. Experimentally, three bone plate repair methods were applied to a synthetic femur with a 5 mm fracture gap near the tip of a total hip implant. Repair methods were identical distal to the fracture gap, but used cables only (construct A), screws only (construct B), or cables plus screws (construct C) proximal to the fracture gap. Specimens were oriented in 15 degrees adduction to simulate the single-legged stance phase of walking, subjected to 1000 N of axial force, and instrumented with strain gauges. Computationally, a linearly elastic and isotropic 3D FE model was developed to mimic experiments. Results showed excellent agreement between experimental and FE strains, yielding a Pearson linearity coefficient, R2, of 0.92 and a slope for the line of best data fit of 1.06. FE-computed axial stiffnesses were 768 N/mm (construct A), 1023 N/mm (construct B), and 1102 N/mm (construct C). FE surfaces stress maps for cortical bone showed Von Mises stresses, excluding peaks, of 0-8 MPa (construct A), 0-15 MPa (construct B), and 0-20 MPa (construct C). Cables absorbed the majority of load, followed by the plates and then the screws. Construct A yielded peak stress at one of the empty holes in the plate. Constructs B and C had similar bone stress patterns, and can achieve optimal fixation.

The biomechanics of plate repair of periprosthetic femur fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: the effect of cable-screw position

Optimal surgical positioning of cable-screw pairs in repairing periprosthetic femur fractures near the tip of a total hip implant still remains unclear. No studies in the literature to date have developed a fully three-dimensional finite element (FE) model that has been validated experimentally to assess these injury patterns. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of three different implant-bone constructs for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures following total hip arthroplasty. Experimentally, three bone-plate repair configurations were applied to the periprosthetic synthetic femur fractured with a 5 mm gap near the tip of a total hip implant. Constructs A, B, and C, respectively, had successively larger distances between the most proximal and the most distal cable-screw pairs used to affix the plate. Specimens were oriented in 15 degrees adduction, subjected to 1000 N of axial force to simulate the single-legged stance phase of walking, and instrumented with strain gauges. Computationally, a linearly elastic and isotropic three-dimensional FE model was developed to mimic the experimental setup. Results showed excellent agreement between experimental versus FE analysis strains, yielding a Pearson linearity coefficient, R2, of 0.90 and a slope for the line of best data fit of 0.96. FE axial stiffnesses were 601 N/mm (Construct A), 849 N/mm (Construct B), and 1359 N/mm (Construct C). FE surface stress maps for cortical bone showed maximum von Mises values of 74 MPa (Construct A), 102 MPa (Construct B), and 57 MPa (Construct C). FE stress maps for the metallic components showed minimum von Mises values for Construct C, namely screw (716MPa), cable (445MPa), plate (548MPa), and hip implant (154MPa). In the case of good bone stock, as modelled by the present synthetic femur model, optimal fixation can be achieved with Construct C.

The Outcome of Extensively Porous Coated Stems for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

During the past 30 years, we have routinely used distal diaphyseal fixation achieved with cylindrical, extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision. We report survivorship data for 1000 cementless femoral revision arthroplasties performed at our institution between 1980 and 2010 using this technique. To implant the stems, we attempted to achieve 5-7 cm of scratch fit in the distal diaphyseal segment. Kaplan–Meier survivorship was 94.5 ± 2.3% at 15 years when femoral rerevision for any reason was used as an end point. We have had 27 stems undergo rerevision: 14 for aseptic loosening, 7 for implant fracture, 4 for infection, and 2 in conjunction with periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures. Bypassing proximal defects with the use of distal ingrowth fixation is a durable and reliable option in the revision setting.

The Effect of Fixation Technique on the Stiffness of Comminuted Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stiffness of 3 different constructs for the fixation of comminuted Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: a single lateral locking plate, a single lateral locking plate plus an anterior strut allograft, and a lateral locking plate plus an anterior locking plate. The axial stiffness, lateral bending stiffness, and torsional stiffness of 10 synthetic periprosthetic femur fracture models were tested. Differences in stiffness between constructs were determined with a 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Fixation technique was found to have a significant effect for all loading modalities ( P < .0001). A lateral locked plate plus an anterior locked plate was significantly stiffer than the allograft that in turn was significantly stiffer than the single plate ( P < .0001).

Infection Associated With Cortical Allograft Strut Fixation of a Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fracture: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Submitted for publication April 7, 2005. Accepted for publication October 14, 2005. Address for reprints: Emil H. Schemitsch, 55 Queen Street East, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1R6, Canada; email: [email protected].

Biomechanical Evaluation of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Fixation

A variety of methods are available for the fixation of femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty. However, few studies in the literature have quantified the performance of such repair constructs. The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically four different constructs for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures following total hip arthroplasty. Twenty synthetic femora were tested in axial compression, lateral bending, and torsion to determine initial stiffness, as well as stiffness following fixation of a simulated femoral midshaft fracture with and without a bone gap. Four fracture fixation constructs (five specimens per group) were assessed: construct A was a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with locked screws; construct B, a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with cables and locked screws; construct C, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with cables and nonlocked screws; and construct D, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with allograft strut, cables, and nonlocked screws. Axial stiffness, lateral bending stiffness, and torsional stiffness were assessed with respect to baseline intact specimen values. Axial load to failure was also measured for the specimens. Construct D demonstrated either equivalent or superior stiffness in all testing modes compared with the other constructs in femora with both a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. A comparison of constructs A, B, and C demonstrated equivalent stiffness in all test modes (with one exception) in femora with a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. A combination of a nonlocking plate with an allograft strut (construct D) resulted in the highest stiffness of the constructs examined for treating a periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral component of a total hip replacement.

Intramedullary Stabilization of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur Taking Special Account of Bone Defects.

Healing of the periprosthetic fracture and area of defective bone by the bone healing mechanisms of intramedullary stabilization. Reconstruction of the correct length, axial alignment, and rotation of the fractured femoral shaft by anchoring a revision stem in the intact femoral diaphysis. Periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture in the region of the prosthetic stem combined with preexistent loosening and/or defect in the periprosthetic bone bed (Vancouver classification type B2 and B3). General contraindications, local infection. Lateral transmuscular approach to the femoral shaft. Longitudinal osteotomy of the proximal femur taking the geometry of the fracture into account. Opening of an anterior "bone shell". Removal of the loose prosthetic stem and cement. Debridement. Preparation of the femoral diaphysis and insertion of a distally anchored revision stem. Distal locking. Repositioning of the "bone shell", reduction of the fracture, and retention with cerclage wires. Bed rest for approximately 1 week, mobilization with 20 kg partial weight bearing for 12 weeks, gradual increase in weight bearing with radiologic checks on progress, removal of the distal locking bolts after 12-24 months at the earliest. 21 patients (13 women, eight men) aged between 43 and 86 years (mean age: 71.2 years) with periprosthetic fracture of the femur, additional loosening of the stem in eight cases (Vancouver B2) and additional bone loss in 13 cases (Vancouver B3). Postoperative complications: two fractures following another fall (repeat operations: one replacement, one plate), four revisions due to subsidence of the stem (three replacements involving change to a standard stem with healed proximal femur, one replacement with another interlocked revision stem). Bone healing occurred for all fractures after a mean 5.6 months (3-11 months). Follow- up examination after a mean 4.5 years: all patients were able to walk, average Harris Score 70.5 points (29- 95 points).

Mid-term Results of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Mid-term Results of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Fixation of Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures Associated With Cemented Femoral Stems

To determine which of 2 techniques for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures is of greater stiffness. A laboratory study using 8 pairs of matched, embalmed femurs. Femurs implanted with a cemented total hip prosthesis had a simulated periprosthetic femur fracture created distal to the implant. Fractures were fixed with a plate with locked screws or a plate with cables (Ogden construct). Fixation stability was compared in various loading modalities before and after cycling. Failure in torsional loading was then determined. The cement mantle was tested for crack propagation that may have occurred secondary to locked screw insertion and loading. Fixation stiffness (the ratio of applied load to displacement at the fracture site), torsional strength, mode of failure for each system, and cement mantle evaluation for cracks after screw insertion. Locked plating was stiffer than the Ogden construct in pre- and post-cyclic axial loading and torsion. There was no difference in lateral bending stability or torsional failure loads. Locked plating constructs were stiffer than the Ogden construct in axial loading and torsion. Although no differences in loads to failure during torsion were noted, locked plating constructs exhibited catastrophic failure not observed with the Ogden construct.