Periprocedural Use Research Articles

Abstract 12383: Large Field-of-View Intravascular Ultrasound for Peri-Procedural Assessment of Stent Frame Expansion After Transcatheter Heart Valve-in-Valve

Introduction. It is unknown whether large field-of-view intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can be a valid peri-procedural imaging tool to assess actual expansion of transcatheter heart valve (THV) during valve-in-valve procedures. Hypothesis. To compare % expansion of SAPIEN 3 THV measured with peri-procedural IVUS versus post-procedural cardiac gated contrast multi-slice computer tomography (MSCT). Expansion was defined as actual outer frame area/nominal area x 100%. Methods. Studied were patients with successful valve-in-valve for failed surgical mitral and tricuspid bioprosthetic valves. All underwent peri-procedural IVUS using 10MHz Vision PV035 (Philips North America Corporation, Andover, USA) and post-procedural MSCT (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Dual Source, SIEMENS). IVUS and MSCT (Syngo Via, Siemens, Germany) measurements were off -line and done at 1-mm step along the entire height of SAPIEN 3 THV (height 18, 20 and 22 mm for the Sapien THV 23, 26 and 29 mm, respectively). Results. Five patients (68.8±11.2 years, 3 female) were treated for failed surgical mitral (n=3) and tricuspid (2) bioprosthetic valves using SAPIEN 3 THV size 23mm (n=1), 26mm (n=1), and 29mm (n=3). Mean peri-procedural and pre-discharge residual transvalvular gradient differed substantially (1.9±0.9 vs 7.9±1.1mmHg, p=0.001). In total, 104 corresponding cross-sections of the THVs were measured with both IVUS and MSCT. Actual outer-frame SAPIEN 3 expansion was smaller within the lengths of inflow and mid segment (overlapping the ring) than in the outflow, being substantially smaller than nominal (Fig 1). Overall, there was very good agreement between % expansion of THV stent frame assessed in IVUS and MSCT (93.5%±13.3% vs 96.3%±11.3%; r =0.976 and p<0.001). Conclusions. Peri-procedural use of large field-of-view IVUS offers an accurate insight into actual THV expansion deployed valve-in-valve. Figure 1. % expansion of SAPIEN 3 measured in IVUS and MSCT.

Intravenous antiplatelet therapy with cangrelor vs. tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Intravenous antiplatelet drugs provide rapid and sustained inhibition of platelet aggregation and can mitigate the ischemic risk of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). However, there are few real-world studies comparing cangrelor to tirofiban in this patient population. Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of cangrelor compared to tirofiban in a real-world population of STEMI patients undergoing pPCI. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study including consecutive STEMI patients who received either cangrelor or tirofiban during pPCI at six Italian high-volume pPCI centers from January 2020 to January 2022. The study population was divided into two groups according the antiplatelet treatment received (cangrelor or tirofiban). The primary study outcome was impaired myocardial revascularization assessed by post-procedural Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade <3. The secondary outcome measures were major bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5, and all-cause mortality during the hospitalization. Results A total of 478 STEMI patients received intravenous antiplatelet therapy during pPCI. Of them, 16 patients were excluded since they received both cangrelor and tirofiban as bailout strategy. Thus, the final study population included 462 patients (mean age 63.9±11.8 years; 79.7% males): 223 patients received cangrelor (48.3%), and 239 tirofiban (51.7%). Patients treated with tirofiban had higher prevalence of prior myocardial infarction (p=0.016) and prior PCI (p=0.048) than patients receiving cangrelor (Table 1); also, they showed higher SYNTAX score (p=0.038) than patients receiving cangrelor, and a higher proportion of stent thrombosis as culprit lesion (p=0.047; Table 2). Conversely, patients treated with cangrelor had worse Killip class (p<0.001), and underwent more frequently pPCI via femoral access. Post-procedural TIMI flow<3 was reported in 114 (24.7%) patients. At propensity score adjusted regression analysis, the use of cangrelor was associated with a lower probability of post-procedural TIMI flow<3 (aOR: 0.530; 95% CI: 0.313–0.900; p=0.019) than tirofiban. Major bleeding and all-cause death occurred in 28 (6.1%) and 19 (4.1%) patients. There was no difference in the risk of major bleeding (aOR: 1.626; 95% CI: 0.618–4.279; p=0.324) and death (aOR: 2.724; 95% CI: 0.719–10.318; p=0.140) between groups. Conclusions In this real-world population of STEMI patients undergoing pPCI, periprocedural use of cangrelor was associated with improved myocardial reperfusion compared to tirofiban, but with no differences in terms of major bleeding or death during the hospitalization. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

S607 Clopidogrel Bisulfate and the Risk of Bleeding After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy

Introduction: Guidelines from several professional societies suggest “holding” antiplatelet agents in advance of high-risk procedures. Previous studies suggested that antiplatelet agents did not significantly increase the risk of clinically-important bleeding events following endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Given the scant evidence in support of these contentions, our primary aim was to determine if the risk of post-sphincterotomy bleeding was increased in patients taking clopidogrel bisulfate. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected (2016-2020) on adult patients who underwent Endoscopic sphincterotomy (n=13,796). From the total patient population, 89 were excluded due to protected admission/discharge. Of the remaining 13,707 patients in the study, 2,837 patients were taking clopidogrel bisulfate and 10,870 were not taking Clopidogrel. We employed logistic regression, bleeding event was defined as a hemoglobin drop ( >3 g/dL), and/or a required transfusion, as our primary dependent variable. clopidogrel was the main predictor variable and acuity variables and selected co-morbidities were co-variates (Table). Results: Copidogrel was not a significant predictor of bleeding events (Odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI 0.44-1.16, NS). Bleeding events were also not significantly related to age (P = 0.31) or emergency department admission (p = 0.70). However, year admitted, length of stay, emergency ES vs scheduled ES, chronic pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, and obesity were significantly (P < 0.05) related to bleeding events. (Figure) Conclusion: Bleeding occurred after ES in 0.87% of patients in the control group and 0.99% of those taking Clopidogrel. clopidogrel was not significantly related to bleeding risk in our population. The bleeding rates in Clopidogrel group and control group were less than 1%. several covariates were significantly related to an increased risk of bleeding such as emergent ERCP, and patients with chronic pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, hypertension, or obesity.Our study has limitations, all patients in our data set were in our hospitals network, increasing the risk of selection bias. we also did not analyze the indications for endoscopic sphincterotomy . Despite that, we had a large sample size and an extended data gathering period (2016-2020) which likely counteracted some of the above concerns.In conclusion, peri-procedural or post-procedural use of clopidogrel bisulfate was not associated with a significant risk of bleeding events following endoscopic sphincterotomy.Figure 1.: Patient counts, exclusions, and groupings for the 13,796 patients in the initial data extraction Table 1. - Primary outcome measures for bleeding events (hemoglobin drop >3 g/dL, required transfusion) for patients in the clopidogrel bisulfate (CB), control group (CON, not taking CB), or All patients (ALL). CB (N=2,837) CON (N=10,870) ALL (N=13,707) Hemoglobin Drop >3 and/or Transfusion 28 (0.99%) 95 (0.87%) 123 (0.90%) Hemoglobin Drop >3 24 (0.85%) 75 (0.69%) 99 (0.72%) Required Transfusion 7 (0.25%) 21 (0.19%) 28 (0.20%) Required Readmission Transfusion 3 (0.11%) 18 (0.17%) 21 (0.15%)

Antibiotics Tubes and Lines

Antibiotic prophylaxis in interventional radiology (IR) is widely used; however, such practice is based on data from the surgical literature. Although published guidelines can help determine the need for prophylactic antibiotic use in the patient undergoing percutaneous procedures, local practice patterns often dictate when such medications are given. In this article, the current state of periprocedural antibiotic use in commonly performed IR procedures (i.e., tube and catheter placements) is presented.

Direct oral anticoagulant agents might be safe for patients undergoing endovenous radiofrequency and laser ablation

ObjectiveStudies assessing the effect of the use of anticoagulant agents on endovenous thermal ablation (ETA) have been limited to patients taking warfarin. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ETA for patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We hypothesized that the outcome of ETA for patients taking DOACs would not be superior to the outcomes for patients taking DOACs. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review to identify patients who had undergone radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser ablation with 1470-nm diode laser fibers for symptomatic great or small saphenous venous reflux from 2018 to 2020. The patients were dichotomized into those who had received a therapeutic dose of DOACs periprocedurally and those who had not (control group). The outcomes of interest included the rates of treated vein closure at 7 days and 9 months and the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT), and bleeding periprocedurally. ResultsOf the 301 patients (382 procedures), 69 patients (87 procedures) had received DOACs and 232 control patients (295 procedures) had not received DOACs. The patients receiving DOACs were more often older (mean age, 65 years vs 55 years; P < .001) and male (70% vs 37%; P < .001), with a higher prevalence of venous thromboembolism and more severe CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification (5 or 6), than were the control patients. Those receiving DOACs were more likely to have had a history of DVT (44% vs 6%; P < .001), pulmonary embolism (13% vs 0%; P < .001), and phlebitis (32% vs 15%; P < .001). Procedurally, radiofrequency ablation had been used more frequently in the control group (92% vs 84%; P = .029), with longer segments of treated veins (mean, 38 mm vs 35 mm, respectively; P = .028). No major or minor bleeding events nor any EHIT had occurred in either group. Two patients in the control group (0.7%) developed DVT; however, no DVT was observed in those in the DOAC group (P = .441). At 9 months, the treated vein had remained ablated after 94.4% of procedures for patients receiving DOACs and 98.4% of the control group (P = .163). On multivariable analysis, DOAC usage was not associated with an increased risk of vein recanalization (hazard ratio, 5.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-58.64; P = .139). An increased preprocedural vein diameter and the use of endovenous laser ablation were associated with an increased risk of recanalization. ConclusionsIn our study of patients who had undergone ETA for symptomatic saphenous venous reflux, the periprocedural use of DOACs did not adversely affect the efficacy of endovenous ablation to ≥9 months. Furthermore, DOAC use did not confer an additional risk of bleeding, DVT, or EHIT periprocedurally. DOACs may be safely continued without affecting the efficacy and durability of ETA.

Assessing Antibiotic Adherence and Improving Antibiotic Stewardship in Common Interventional Radiology Procedures

PurposeIn 2018, The Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (JVIR) updated its guidelines regarding periprocedural antibiotics. However, some institutions are slower to adopt these new guidelines. Additionally, antibiotic-resistant bacteria and sepsis are serious concerns due in part to incorrect usage of antibiotics. The purpose of this study is to assess institutional adherence to 2018 JVIR guidelines for the purpose of improving antibiotic stewardship. Materials and methodsA total of 800 cases over a 10-month time period were retrospectively identified and charted following the release of guidelines. Inclusion criteria for the study were adults aged 21 years or older undergoing mediport placement, tunneled central line (TCL) placement, nephrostomy tube exchange, percutaneous biliary drain, or cholecystostomy tube exchange. Exclusion criteria included immunocompromised and pregnant individuals as 2018 guidelines may not fit these patient populations. Guideline adherence for each procedure was recorded as a percentage; the timing of the antibiotic usage was also recorded and compared to the guidelines (within 60 minutes before incision). ResultsIn total, 49 mediport placements, 118 tunneled central line placements – 44 hemodialysis (HD) catheters and 74 nonhemodialysis (non-HD) catheters, 100 nephrostomy exchanges, and 82 biliary tube exchanges were included. Antibiotics were used in 83.6% (41/49) of mediport patients, 11.3% (5/44) of non-HD TCL patients, 20.5% (15/74) of HD TCL patients, 55% (55/100) nephrostomy tube changes, and 65.4% (55/84) of biliary or cholecystostomy tube exchanges. Out of those given prophylaxis, guideline-recommended antibiotics were used in 100% (41/41) of mediport, 100% (20/20) of TCL (both HD and non-HD catheters), 9% (5/55) of nephrostomy tube exchanges, and 1.8% (1/55) of biliary tube exchanges. Guideline-recommended timing was followed in 75.3% across all cases (ranging from 72.2% in mediports to 79.3% in biliary exchanges). ConclusionThis study of antibiotic practices at a single university-based academic institution revealed that antibiotic usage is not fully up to date with 2018 guidelines. For mediports, non-HD TCL placements, and nephrostomy tube exchanges, institutional changes should be made to reduce periprocedural antibiotic use, as antibiotics are no longer recommended for these procedures. For HD TCL and biliary exchanges, proper adherence to recommended prophylactic antibiotics should be followed. In addition, education about the correct antibiotic timing should be emphasized to increase compliance with guidelines.

Effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin in elderly patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A real-world study.

To assess the effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin compared with heparin monotherapy in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Bivalirudin is recommended for periprocedural use in patients undergoing PCI who are of high bleeding risk. However, its safe and efficacious use in elderly patients, a typical high bleeding risk cohort, in real world practice is yet to be reported. In this single center, real-world observational study, 4736 consecutive elderly patients who underwent PCI were enrolled. Of these, 1240 were treated with bivalirudin and 3496 with heparin according to the periprocedural anticoagulation strategies of PCI. The primary outcome was 12-month net adverse clinical events (NACE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, or any bleeding. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. After PSM, bivalirudin was found to be associated with lower rates of NACE (19.1% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.002), cardiac death (2.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.038), and any bleeding (10.0% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.023) compared to heparin monotherapy. No differences were found in the incidences of myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, stent thrombosis (0.1% vs. 0.1%, p = 1.000), and major bleedings (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 1.000) between the two patient groups. In this real-world observational study, periprocedural use of bivalirudin in elderly patients who underwent PCI was associated with less cardiac death and any bleeding compared to heparin monotherapy, without increased risk of stent thrombosis.

Catheter Ablation Energy Sources and Myocardial Injury and Coagulation Biomarkers During Uninterrupted Periprocedural Edoxaban Use - A Subanalysis of KYU-RABLE.

The effects of catheter ablation (CA) energy sources on myocardial injury and coagulation biomarkers among Japanese non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients receiving uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban are unclear. This KYU-RABLE exploratory subanalysis compared the effects of CA using radiofrequency energy vs. cryoballoon on: (1) myocardial injury; and (2) plasma edoxaban and coagulation biomarker concentrations measured before and after CA. Plasma creatine kinase (CK), edoxaban, D-dimer, and prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) concentrations within 1 h before CA were compared with concentrations the day after. All biomarkers increased after CA, regardless of the energy source, but especially with cryoballoon. Significantly higher increases in CK concentrations from before to the day after CA were seen with cryoballoon compared with radiofrequency energy (P<0.0001). Edoxaban concentrations were similar in both groups. Concentrations of D-dimer and F1+2 increased in both groups, but were significantly higher in the cryoballoon group (P<0.0001 and P=0.006, respectively). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of thrombotic or bleeding events. Uninterrupted edoxaban concentrations were similar in both groups. Both myocardial injury and coagulation biomarkers increased after CA, especially with cryoballoon, but there was no difference in the incidence of thrombotic or bleeding events. These findings suggest the efficacy of uninterrupted edoxaban, regardless of the CA energy source. Periprocedural anticoagulation, particularly with cryoballoon, should be undertaken with care.

Safety of upper endoscopy in patients with active cocaine use.

BACKGROUNDCocaine is a synthetic alkaloid initially viewed as a useful local anesthetic, but which eventually fell out of favor given its high addiction potential. Its predominantly sympathetic effects raise concern for cardiovascular, respiratory, and central nervous system complications in patients undergoing procedures. Peri-procedural cocaine use, often detected via a positive urine toxicology test, has been mostly addressed in the surgical and obstetrical literature. However, there are no clear guidelines on how to effectively risk stratify patients found to be positive for cocaine in the pre-operative setting, often leading to costly procedure cancellations. Within the field of gastroenterology, there is no current data available regarding safety of performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with recent cocaine use. AIMTo compare the prevalence of EGD related complications between active (≤ 5 d) and remote (> 5 d) users of cocaine.METHODSIn total, 48 patients who underwent an EGD at John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County from October 2016 to October 2018 were found to have a positive urine drug screen for cocaine (23 recent and 25 remote). Descriptive statistics were compiled for patient demographics. Statistical tests used to analyze patient characteristics, procedure details, and preprocedural adverse events included t-test, chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher exact test.RESULTSOverall, 20 periprocedural events were recorded with no statistically significant difference in distribution between the two groups (12 active vs 8 remote, P = 0.09). Pre- and post-procedure hemodynamics demonstrated only a statistically, but not clinically significant drop in systolic blood pressure and increase in heart rate in the active user group, as well as drop in diastolic blood pressure and oxygen saturation in the remote group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in overall hemodynamics between both groups.CONCLUSIONOur study found no significant difference in the rate of periprocedural adverse events during EGD in patients with recent vs remote use of cocaine. Interestingly, there were significantly more patients (30%) with active use of cocaine that required general anesthesia as compared to remote users (0%).

Impact of morphine use on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI – results from a new registry

Abstract Background Opioids decrease the effect of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in vitro and observational reports suggest that morphine use may be associated with larger infarct size. Our research group showed previously, using a prospective single-centre registry, that periprocedural morphine use may have no impact on long-term mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and clopidogrel. Purpose We aimed to study this in vitro interaction on clinical outcomes in patients who were predominantly treated with the novel P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel or ticagrelor, according to the current guidelines. Methods From May 2020 through February 2021, we collected demographic, anamnestic, procedural and laboratory data of 297 consecutive STEMI cases who were treated with primary PCI at our tertiary centre. Of them 126 patients (42.4%) received IV morphine during the periprocedural period. Outcome measure was time to all-cause mortality. The median follow-up time was 147 days (IQR 71–242 days), with 39 events. To adjust for confounding, a 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis (PSM) was performed using 186 cases. Absolute difference in survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the logrank test, whereas the relative change was assessed by univariable Cox regression. Results An adequate balance on baseline covariates was achieved by the propensity score-matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality of the treatment groups neither in the original nor in the propensity score-matched population (p=0.220 and 0.762 respectively). In the matched population we found no difference in survival as the HR (Morphine/No Morphine) was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39–2.00), p=0.76. Conclusion Our preliminary data suggest that morphine may have no impact on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and medical therapy according to the current guidelines including novel P2Y12 antagonists. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): The research was supported by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology NRDI Office within the framework of the Artificial Intelligence National Laboratory Program. Kaplan-Meier curves: Original populationKaplan-Meier curves: PSM population

Quality of periprocedural care in patients with von Willebrand disease.

While it has been shown that haemophilia patients receiving care at Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) experience decreased morbidity and mortality, little research has been done on the outcomes of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). To compare the quality of periprocedural care received by patients with VWD at HTCs and non-HTCs. We performed a retrospective chart review on all adult VWD patients undergoing an invasive procedure from 2015 to 2017. Quality of periprocedural care was measured using the following surrogate outcomes: periprocedural VWD-specific therapy use per 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines, procedural estimated blood loss (EBL), and post-procedure bleeding. Comparisons were performed according to the setting of care at the time of the invasive procedure, HTC versus non-HTC. There were 668 invasive procedures performed on 305 patients, of which 8.2% were HTC cases. Non-type 1 VWD was more likely in HTC cases. VWD-specific therapy was used per NHLBI guidelines in 100% of HTC cases compared with 10.6% of non-HTC cases. Procedural EBL>=100ml was more likely to occur in HTC differences cases (OR=2.34; 95% CI, 1.05 to 5.25). There was no difference in post-procedure bleeding between the two groups (OR=1.26, 95% CI, .20- 7.86). Despite widespread periprocedural use of VWD-specific therapy outside established guidelines at non-HTCs, there was no difference in periprocedural bleeding. Possible explanations include diagnostic error, in disease severity and procedure types, and dataset limitations. Additional studies are needed to investigate this further and compare other patient care outcomes between HTCs and non-HTCs.

Impact of anemia on short-term outcomes after TAVR: A subgroup analysis from the BRAVO-3 randomized trial.

To determine the prognostic impact of anemia in patients randomized to bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Whether the periprocedural use of bivalirudin as compared with UFH in anemic patients undergoing TAVR has an impact on outcomes remains unknown. The BRAVO-3 trial compared the use of bivalirudin versus UFH in 802 high risk patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Patients were stratified according to the presence (defined as hemoglobin levels <13 g/dl in men and <12 g/dl in women) or absence of anemia. The primary outcomes were net adverse cardiac events (NACE; a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or bleeding) and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥3b) at 30 days. Among 798 patients with available baseline hemoglobin levels, 427 (54%) were anemic of whom 221 (52%) received bivalirudin. There were no significant differences in NACE and major bleeding at 30 days between patients with and without anemia, irrespective of the type of anticoagulant used (pinteraction =0.71 for NACE, pinteraction =1.0 for major bleeding). However, anemic patients had a higher risk of major vascular complications (adjusted OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.42-4.16, p=0.001), and acute kidney injury (adjusted OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.16-2.59, p=0.007) compared to non-anemic patients at 30 days. Anemia was not associated with a higher risk of NACE or major bleeding at 30 days after TAVR without modification of the treatment effects of periprocedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus UFH.

Impact of morphine use on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI - preliminary data from a new registry

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Opioids decrease the effect of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in vitro and observational reports suggest that morphine use is associated with larger infarct size. Our research group presented previously, using a prospective single-center registry, that periprocedural morphine use may have no impact on long-term mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and clopidogrel. Purpose Our purpose is to check this interaction using a new registry of patients treated according to the current guidelines, including novel antiplatelet agents. Methods From May until November 2020, we collected 196 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. 88 (44.9%) of them got morphine during the prehospital and periprocedural care. Baseline demographic, anamnestic, procedural, and laboratory data were collected. Survival data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. To adjust for confounding, a 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis was performed using 114 cases. Results An adequate balance on baseline covariates was achieved during propensity score-matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in 30-days mortality of the patients treated with or without morphine neither in the original nor in the propensity score-matched population (p = 0.094 and p = 0.309, respectively). Conclusion Our preliminary data suggest that morphine may have no impact on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and medical therapy according to the current guidelines including novel P2Y12 antagonists. Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meier curves

Impact of central venous catheter repair in pediatric intestinal failure.

Patients with intestinal failure (IF) require long-term parenteral nutrition through central venous catheters (CVCs). When damaged, catheter replacement or repair is considered. Limited literature exists on repair outcomes in this population. We aimed to assess the impact of repair on durability of exiting CVCs and infection rates. This was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric IF patients with tunneled silicone CVCs over 10 years. Outcomes were evaluated by assessing CVC longevity, repair success, replacement, and postrepair infection rates. One hundred thirty-eight repairs and 45 replacements were conducted in 37 patients with repair and replacement rates of 4.7 and 1.5 per 1000 catheter days, respectively. Twenty patients (54%) required ≥1 repair. For CVCs requiring repair, median CVC durability without and with repairs were at 123 and 391 days, respectively (P < .0001). Overall repair success rate was 96% with significantly lower success in the emergency department at 81% (P = .007). The 7-day postrepair infection rate was 2.2% without specific risk factors identified. Most repairs (76%) were performed by the Pediatric Gastroenterology division. Variability in practice was noted among services, including frequency of periprocedural antibiotic use and performance of temporary repairs before permanent repairs. A gradual increase in CVC repair rate was noted over time. Our study showed that CVC repair is effective in prolonging CVC durability in pediatric IF patients without increasing infection rates. Incorporating a temporary repair as a step before permanent repair may offer a route to address potential intraluminal thrombosis before permanent repair.

Evaluation of a Real-World In-Hospital Antiplatelet-Switching Strategy Following Coronary Interventions: The SWITCH Study.

Antiplatelet therapy is paramount to reduce the risk of coronary stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Newer agents are reliable and have a fast onset of action, but have significantly higher cost, leading to compliance concerns. We adopted and evaluated an acute agent-switching strategy, using prasugrel or ticagrelor for rapid and reliable periprocedural antiplatelet action, followed by a switch to generic clopidogrel. This large, single-center study included all patients who underwent PCI between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016. Study endpoints were 30- day mortality and bleeding events. A total of 5007 patients met inclusion criteria. Average age was 63.5 ± 12.5 years. Prior to PCI, 54.8% of patients were preloaded with ticagrelor, 8.5% with prasugrel, and 36.7% with clopidogreI. The majority of patients (93%) loaded with ticagrelor and more than half (58%) of those loaded with prasugrel were subsequently switched prior to hospital discharge to clopidogrel for long-term therapy. Patients pretreated with ticagrelor or prasugrel and switched to clopidogrel had overall lowest bleeding rates (0.9% and 0.8%, respectively). The highest rates of bleeding were noted in patients maintained on ticagrelor or clopidogrel throughout (2.5% and 1.7%, respectively). After accounting for additional periprocedural use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, the lowest bleeding rates were observed in patients loaded with ticagrelor and switched to clopidogrel (0.75%), with the highest bleeding observed in patients maintained on ticagrelor throughout. There were no events of acute stent thrombosis. A strategy of using newer, fast-acting, and reliable antiplatelet agents prior to PCI and acutely switching to long-term clopidogrel therapy appears safe and efficacious. Although the superiority of the newer antiplatelet agents for long-term post-PCI dual-antiplatelet therapy in a trial setting is well established, the impact of increased adherence to lower-cost clopidogrel therapy in the real-world setting merits further consideration.

Provider Attitudes and Practices Regarding Intrauterine System (IUS) Insertion in Adolescents With and Without Bleeding Disorders for Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) may be the sentinel event for identifying a patient with a bleeding disorder (BD). The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) has been proposed as a treatment for HMB in adolescents with and without BDs; however, no standard protocols for LNG IUS insertion in these populations exist. Providers were surveyed regarding the use of the LNG IUS in adolescents with HMB, with and without BD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An institutional review board-approved survey assessing provider attitudes, LNG IUS insertion practices, and patient outcomes in adolescents with HMB, with and without BD, was electronically distributed to 3523 providers in the fields of hematology, adolescent medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology. Descriptive analysis was performed. A total of 312 respondents across all 3 specialties completed the survey. Nearly 100% of respondents considered the LNG IUS safe and effective treatment for adolescents with HMB, both with and without BD. Additionally, 66% of providers chose LNG IUS as the ideal treatment for HMB in patients with BD. Differences were noted in clinical setting for LNG IUS insertion, peri-procedural medication use, and post-procedure follow-up among specialties. Providers across all specialties reported low complication rates related to IUS insertion and use in both patient groups. Providers considered the LNG IUS safe and effective treatment for HMB in adolescents with and without a diagnosed BD. Practice patterns regarding LNG IUS insertion in this population vary. Further research is necessary to explore IUS outcomes in adolescent patients with HMB, with and without BD, and to inform evidence-based protocols for LNG IUS insertion.

Impact of periprocedural morphine use on mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.

Intravenous morphine (MO) decreases the effect of all oral platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in vitro and observational reports suggest that its use may be associated with larger infarct size. Yet, there are limited data available about the impact of this interaction on clinical outcomes. We studied the effect of MO on mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary PCI using a prospective registry. Of the 1255 patients who underwent primary PCI, 397 received MO based on physician's judgment. Clopidogrel was used as P2Y12 receptor antagonist in all cases. Median follow-up time was 7.5 years with 457 deaths. To adjust for confounding, two propensity score-based procedures were performed: 1 to 1 matching (PSM, 728 cases), and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) retaining data from all patients. Primary outcome measure was time to all-cause death, whereas predischarge left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was used as secondary end point. An adequate balance on baseline covariates was achieved by both methods. We found no difference in survival as the HR (MO/no MO) was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.26), p = 0.86 using PSM and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.84-1.23), p = 0.88 with IPTW. Likewise, distributions of LVEFs were similar using either methods: with PSM, median LVEFs were 50.0% (interquartile range [IQR]: 43.0%-55.3%) vs 50.0% (IQR: 42.0%-55.0%) in the no MO and MO groups, respectively (p = 0.76), whereas using IPTW, they were 50.0% (IQR: 42.5%-55.0%) vs 50.0% (IQR: 41.0%-55.0%), respectively (p = 0.86). Our data suggest that morphine use may have no impact on long-term mortality and on predischarge ejection fraction in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Angiography and Intervention.

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury has multiple definitions, but is generally described as worsening renal function after administration of iodinated contrast media. It is associated with high in-hospital mortality and poor long-term survival. Furthermore, patients undergoing coronary angiography commonly have comorbidities such as hypertension or congestive heart failure, which are often treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Trials assessing the effects of these renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents on the subsequent development of contrast-associated acute kidney injury have shown conflicting data, suggesting both beneficial and harmful effects. Therefore, there are no clear guidelines on whether clinicians should discontinue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents peri-procedurally. In this article, we review the data from trials assessing the effects of peri-procedural renin-angiotensin system-blocking agent use in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral angiography and intervention. Future studies will likely focus on the extent of damage or potential benefit of these agents on renal function, cardiac function, as well as morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend discontinuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors prior to coronary angiography.

Kidney Biopsy

The introduction of renal biopsies has transformed practice in nephrology, particularly with regard to glomerular disease and the care of kidney transplant recipients. A biopsy can provide information about the diagnosis and prognosis of kidney disease while most importantly often leading to changes in therapy that can be life saving. Four groups of patients benefit most from renal biopsy: those with nephrotic syndrome, those with acute nephritic syndromes with rapid deterioration of renal function, those with unexplained acute kidney injury and renal transplant recipients. Non-nephrotic range proteinuria and/or hematuria or unexplained chronic kidney disease represent indications in selected cases. The evaluation of patients prior to undergoing a kidney biopsy requires a careful assessment that includes a detailed history to confirm the relative benefit of a biopsy in making an accurate diagnosis compared with individual’s risk of bleeding. The use of real-time ultrasound or CT-guidance with gun-mounted biopsy needles is paramount for the successful performance of the biopsy and reduction of risks. renal biopsies are mostly done as an inpatient but can be performed on an outpatient basis in selected cases. A renal biopsy has a bleeding risk of up to 5% and is considered a “high bleeding risk procedure”. For patients receiving -antithrombotic therapy, the approach to periprocedural use of antithrombotic agents needs to be individualized. Because it is a high-risk procedure, all efforts must be undertaken to minimize the risk including a careful assessment of the patient's specific situation, and only experienced operators at institutions that can care for post-biopsy complications should perform the procedure. This review contains 7 tables, 7 figures and 83 references Key words: kidney biopsy, native kidney, transplant kidney, indications, preparation, performing biopsy, ultrasound guidance, transjugular, CT-guided, complications

Kidney Biopsy

The introduction of renal biopsies has transformed practice in nephrology, particularly with regard to glomerular disease and the care of kidney transplant recipients. A biopsy can provide information about the diagnosis and prognosis of kidney disease while most importantly often leading to changes in therapy that can be life saving. Four groups of patients benefit most from renal biopsy: those with nephrotic syndrome, those with acute nephritic syndromes with rapid deterioration of renal function, those with unexplained acute kidney injury and renal transplant recipients. Non-nephrotic range proteinuria and/or hematuria or unexplained chronic kidney disease represent indications in selected cases. The evaluation of patients prior to undergoing a kidney biopsy requires a careful assessment that includes a detailed history to confirm the relative benefit of a biopsy in making an accurate diagnosis compared with individual’s risk of bleeding. The use of real-time ultrasound or CT-guidance with gun-mounted biopsy needles is paramount for the successful performance of the biopsy and reduction of risks. renal biopsies are mostly done as an inpatient but can be performed on an outpatient basis in selected cases. A renal biopsy has a bleeding risk of up to 5% and is considered a “high bleeding risk procedure”. For patients receiving -antithrombotic therapy, the approach to periprocedural use of antithrombotic agents needs to be individualized. Because it is a high-risk procedure, all efforts must be undertaken to minimize the risk including a careful assessment of the patient's specific situation, and only experienced operators at institutions that can care for post-biopsy complications should perform the procedure. This review contains 7 tables, 7 figures and 83 references Key words: kidney biopsy, native kidney, transplant kidney, indications, preparation, performing biopsy, ultrasound guidance, transjugular, CT-guided, complications