Abstract Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Current guidelines recommend that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of >70% proximal coronary lesions prior to TAVI. The aim of the current study was to evaluate two approaches to CAD diagnosis pre-TAVI. Methods We investigated 2,027 patients undergoing TAVI for severe aortic stenosis at two large centers with different pre-procedural CAD assessment: pre-TAVI computed tomography angiography (CTA) with selective invasive angiography according to CTA results (N=831) or mandatory invasive angiography (IA) (N=1,196). Peri-procedural complications were documented according to the VARC-2 criteria. Mortality rates were prospectively documented. Results Mean age of the study population was 86±4, of whom 55% were female. Patients in the IA group had significantly higher rates of pre-TAVI PCI compared to the CTA group (32% vs. 17%, p<0.001). Following TAVI, peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) rates were significantly lower among the IA group (0.1% vs. 1.5%, p=0.001). However, multivariate binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors failed to show association between centers strategy and peri-procedural MI. Periprocedural bleeding rates were similar between the groups (3.5% vs. 2.9%, p=0.477). Thirty day, and 1-year mortality crude rates were similar between the groups (2.5% vs. 3.4%, p=0.25, and 10.2% vs. 12.0%, p=0.19). Multivariate cox regression adjusted for age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors did not find association between CAD clearance strategy and outcome. Conclusions In elderly patients, CTA driven approach for CAD evaluation pre-TAVI is a valid strategy with similar outcome as compared to invasive approach. CTA strategy significantly reduces invasive procedures rates without compromising patient's outcome. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None