Periprocedural Adverse Events Research Articles

Meta-analysis of the Usefulness of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. We performed a literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR; where a RR <1.0 favors the HFpEF group) and mean difference (MD; where MD <0 favors the HFpEF group) 95% confidence intervals (CI) were measured for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Six studies with a total of 1,505 patients were included, of which 764 (51%) had HFpEF and 741 (49%) had HFrEF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF 1 year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared with those with HFrEF (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.76, 1.35). Fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the HFpEF group (MD -5.42; 95% CI -8.51, -2.34), but there was no significant difference in procedure time (MD 1.74; 95% CI -11.89, 15.37) or periprocedural adverse events between groups (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.54,1.32). There was no significant difference in hospitalizations between groups (MD 1.18; 95% CI 0.90, 1.55), but HFpEF patients experienced significantly less mortality (MD 0.41; 95% CI 0.18, 0.94). In conclusion, based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as safe and efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF.

Venous sinus stenting for the treatment of isolated pulsatile tinnitus: Results of a prospective trial.

This prospective study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of venous sinus stenting for patients with isolated pulsatile tinnitus and lateral sinus stenosis. Patients with isolated pulsatile tinnitus and lateral sinus stenosis with a minimum trans stenotic gradient of 4 mm Hg were treated with stenting. Pulsatile tinnitus before and after treatment was assessed with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI). Periprocedural adverse events, neurological complications, clinical and radiographic follow-up were also recorded. A total of 42 patients (41 females and 1 male) were included in the study (median age of 37.5 years). Thirty patients had post-stenotic fusiform and 12 had post-stenotic saccular venous sinus aneurysm. In addition to stenting, coils were used to treat the patients with saccular venous aneurysms. The median follow-up was 5 months (range 1 to 34 months). Most patients had complete (39/42) or near-complete (2/42) resolution of their pulsatile tinnitus post-procedure. There were no serious adverse events. Stenting of the lateral venous sinus is a safe and effective treatment for patients with isolated pulsatile tinnitus due to venous sinus stenosis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE): a retrospective multicenter study

Endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP; EDGE) is an alternative to enteroscopy- and laparoscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy. Although short-term results are promising, the long-term outcomes are not known. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the rates of long-term adverse events after EDGE, with a focus on rates of persistent gastrogastric or jejunogastric fistula; (2) to identify predictors of persistent fistula; (3) to assess the outcomes of endoscopic closure when persistent fistula is encountered. This was a multicenter retrospective study involving 13 centers between February 2015 and March 2019. Adverse events were defined according to the ASGE lexicon. Persistent fistula was defined as an upper gastrointestinal series or esophagogastroduodenoscopy showing evidence of fistula. 178 patients (mean age 58 years, 79 % women) underwent EDGE. Technical success was achieved in 98 % of cases (175/178), with a mean procedure time of 92 minutes. Periprocedural adverse events occurred in 28 patients (15.7 %; mild 10.1 %, moderate 3.4 %, severe 2.2 %). The four severe adverse events were managed laparoscopically. Persistent fistula was diagnosed in 10 % of those sent for objective testing (9/90). Following identification of a fistula, 5 /9 patients underwent endoscopic closure procedures, which were successful in all cases. The EDGE procedure is associated with high clinical success rates and an acceptable risk profile. Persistent fistulas after lumen-apposing stent removal are uncommon, but objective testing is recommended to identify their presence. When persistent fistulas are identified, endoscopic treatment is warranted, and should be successful in closing the fistula.

Multicenter cohort study of patients with buried bumper syndrome treated endoscopically with a novel, dedicated device

Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare adverse event of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in which the internal bumper migrates through the stomal tract to become embedded within the gastric wall. Excessive tension between the internal and external bumpers, causing ischemic necrosis of the gastric wall, is believed to be the main etiologic factor. Several techniques for endoscopic management of BBS have been described using off-label devices. The Flamingo set is a novel, sphincterotome-like device specifically designed for BBS management. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Flamingo device in a large, homogeneous cohort of patients with BBS. A guidewire was inserted through the external access of the PEG tube into the gastric lumen. The Flamingo device was then introduced into the stomach over the guidewire. This dedicated tool can be flexed by 180 degrees, exposing a sphincterotome-like cutting wire, which is used to incise the overgrown tissue until the PEG bumper is exposed. A retrospective, international, multicenter cohort study was conducted on 54 patients between December 2016 and February2019. The buried bumper was successfully removed in 53 of 55 procedures (96.4%). The median time for the endoscopic removal of the buried bumper was 22 minutes (range, 5-60). Periprocedural endoscopic adverse events occurred in 7 procedures (12.7%) and were successfully managed endoscopically. A median follow-up of 150 days (range, 33-593) was performed in 29 patients (52.7%), during which no significant adverse events occurred. Through our experience, we found this dedicated novel device to be safe, quick, and effective for minimally invasive, endoscopic management of BBS.

Abstract 13721: Is Single Dose Interruption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Necessary Before Atrial Fibrillation Ablation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) and undergoing catheter ablation, it is unclear if interruption of a single dose of DOAC before the procedure is necessary. We assessed the peri-procedural adverse events between uninterrupted vs single-dose interrupted DOACS. Methods: A systematic review of Medline and EMBASE was conducted and all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared uninterrupted versus interrupted DOACS were included. Random effects model was used and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported using Mantel Haenszel method. All studies defined dose interruption as holding a single dose of DOAC before ablation. Separate analyses were conducted for RCTs and observational studies. Results: Eight RCTs with 2656 patients and 4 observational studies with 834 patients were included. In RCT restricted analysis, no significant difference was seen in major bleeding [RR 0.65 (CI 0.30-1.42)], minor bleeding [RR 0.98 (0.68-1.40)], stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism [RR 0.90 (CI 0.27-2.98)] and silent cerebral infarction [RR 0.51 (CI 0.14-1.89)]. In observational study restricted analysis, no significant difference was seen in major bleeding [RR 3.04 (CI 0.13-74.07)], minor bleeding [RR 0.88 (0.46-1.69)], stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism [RR 0.98 (CI 0.12-7.91)] and a statistically significant lower silent cerebral infarction [RR 0.45 (CI 0.31-0.67)]. Conclusion: Uninterrupted DOACS are safe for patients undergoing AF ablation and logistically easier for patients. Figure 1: Forest plot showing outcomes with uninterrupted vs interrupted direct oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation in randomized controlled trials.

The predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score on adverse in-hospital outcomes among patients with the acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation who undergo PCI

Abstract Background Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and having concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) have a greater risk of adverse short- and long-term outcomes and death compared with patients in the same setting but without AF. On the other hand, the predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score in terms of in-hospital mortality and periprocedural adverse events following PCI among patients with ACS and AF is unknown. Purpose We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with the main admission diagnosis of ACS that underwent PCI and had AF during the 2004–2014 period from the large nationwide US National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Methods A CHA2DS2-VASc score was calculated for each patient and incorporated into a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to determine its independent impact on in-hospital outcomes consisting of death, acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding, vascular injury, and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Results A total of 283,890 patients with AF who underwent PCI following ACS were included in the analysis. The average reported prevalence of the AF in the whole cohort was 10.0% with a significant trend (p&amp;lt;0.001) of increase during the observed 10-year period. The average age of the cohort was 72.1±11 years, 63.4% were male while the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (IQR 2–4). Crude rates of adverse in-hospital outcomes were significantly higher among patient groups with higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (Table 1). Following adjustment for baseline covariates, incremental increase in CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with an increased odds of in-hospital death (OR 1.20, CI 95% 1.18–1.22), periprocedural vascular injury (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.17–1.20), bleeding (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.16–1.18), stroke/TIA (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15–1.19), and AKI (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.06) (Figure 1). Conclusions The CHA2DS2-VASc score provides important prognostic information in ACS patients with AF undergoing PCI and is independently associated with in-hospital death and periprocedural adverse events. Therefore, CHA2DS2-VASc score could be used as a practical and inexpensive tool for risk stratification in this population. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Orbital Atherectomy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: A Multicenter Analysis

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the safety and efficacy of orbital atherectomy (OA) for the treatment of severely calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions. BackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of severely calcified coronary artery lesions is associated with lower procedural success and higher rates of target lesion failure compared to non-calcified lesions. OA is an effective treatment for calcified coronary artery lesions prior to stent implantation. However, there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of OA in patients with coronary artery bifurcation lesions. MethodsData were obtained from analysis of patients with severe coronary artery calcification who underwent OA and coronary stent implantation at ten high-volume institutions. Data were pooled and analyzed to assess peri-procedural outcomes and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). ResultsA total of 1156 patients were treated with OA and PCI. 363 lesions were at a coronary artery bifurcation. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the bifurcation and non-bifurcation groups. In the bifurcation group, treatment involved the left anterior descending artery and its branches more frequently and right coronary artery less frequently. After propensity score matching, the 30-day freedom from MACE was not statistically significant between the two groups. ConclusionIn this multicenter cohort analysis, patients with severely calcified coronary bifurcation lesions had low rates of MACE and target vessel revascularization at 30 days at rates comparable to non-bifurcation lesions. This analysis demonstrates that OA is safe and effective for complex coronary lesions at both bifurcation and non-bifurcation locations.

The Use of Alternative Routes for the Delivery of Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma

The introduction of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for treatment of retinoblastoma considerably changed the paradigm by which this disease is managed, with event-free survival rates being above 70%. To analyze efficacy of IAC treatment using alternative approaches to ophthalmic artery catheterization (OAC), such as external carotid artery approach or balloon-assisted drug delivery. This is a retrospective chart review for subjects receiving IAC for retinoblastoma. The primary approach was OAC. In cases in which selective OAC was not feasible, alternative routes including catheterization of the external carotid artery or use of a balloon-assisted drug infusion were used. This study included 197 consecutive patients with 207 retinoblastomas who underwent 658 IAC procedures overall. The mean age at diagnosis was 24mo, and 54.5% of the study population was male. Success rate with IAC was 97% (639). Alternative approaches to OAC were, in total, 42 cases (6.4%)-external carotid artery catheterization and use of ICA balloon were performed in 22 (3.3%) and 20 (3%) cases, respectively. A mean of 3.1 IAC cycles were performed for each patient. In total, there were 23 technical failures of the primary OAC technique (3.4%). Periprocedural adverse events occurred in 4 procedures (0.6%). Use of an alternative technique for chemotherapy delivery other than selective OAC in at least one IAC cycle was not a predictor of enucleation. IAC is a safe and effective treatment option for retinoblastoma. Chemotherapy delivery using alternative techniques is as effective as selective OAC.

Incorporating Frailty in the Treatment Program of Elderly Patients with Gastrointestinal Disease

The goal of this paper is to review the utilization of frailty as a predictor of poor outcomes in gastrointestinal disease, hepatology, and gastrointestinal surgery. The frailty syndrome has been extensively described in the geriatric population as a predictor of poor clinical outcomes and its application has proven valuable in a variety of chronic and inflammatory disease states independent of age. In hepatology and gastroenterology, frailty has been associated with worsening pre- and post-liver transplant outcomes, post-operative complications, periprocedural adverse events during colonoscopy, and even possible early disruption of the gut microbiome. In patients undergoing immunosuppression, frailty has recently been independently associated with increased risk of infection, morbidity, and mortality. Frailty has been associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes in multiple patient populations and disease states including in chronic gastrointestinal and liver disease. The standardization and routine clinical application of frailty evaluation in groups at risk for frailty progression and deleterious outcomes have been recommended. Challenges regarding translating frailty evaluation to individualized frailty treatment remain. With emerging research examining frailty in gastrointestinal and liver disease, there is hope to bridge this gap to deter and ideally reverse frailty progression and its deleterious outcomes.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio as Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Surgery Procedures: A Literature Review.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been studied so far as prognostic factors of cardiovascular diseases. Their role interplayed with endothelial inflammation has emerged as optimal predictors for major cardiovascular disease events and prognostic factors for post-procedural outcomes. A review of the current literature was undertaken to investigate the relationship between NLR and PLR with percutaneous, cardiac surgery, and vascular surgery procedures. Our findings show that perioperative NLR and PLR levels are significantly correlated with patient morbidity and mortality rates. These biomarkers have several attractive characteristics, as they are inexpensive and quickly available, and they can contribute to the early identification of patients at high risk for periprocedural adverse events.

Comparison in Patients < 75 Years of Age - Versus – Those > 75 Years on One-year-Events With Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (From the Prospective Multicenter German LAARGE Registry)

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of embolic stroke and systemic embolism. Although elderly patients (>75 years) have both higher ischemic and bleeding risk as compared with younger patients, they benefit from optimal anticoagulation. The subanalysis aimed to assess the indications, the safety, efficacy, and 1-year outcomes of interventional LAAC in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) compared with younger (< 75 years) patients in clinical practice. We analyzed data from the prospective Left-Atrium-Appendage Occluder Registry Germany. A total of 638 patients were included in the registry, 402 (63%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Compared with younger subjects, patients aged ≥75 were more likely to have higher CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. Procedural success rate was high und similar in both groups (97.6%). Periprocedural adverse events were not statistically significant in groups (11.9% in <75 years vs 12.9% in ≥75 years; p = 0.80). At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was higher in patients aged ≥75 compared withwith younger group (13.0% vs 7.8 %,p = 0.04), mainly due to non-cardiovascular causes (10.6% vs 6.0%). No significant differences in major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism were observed. In conclusion, LAAC is feasible and safe in patients with AF at high stroke risk and with contraindications for OAC and should be considered as candidates for LAA closure. Elderly patients often present these characteristics and could benefit from this novel therapy.

Calcific Plaque Modification by Acoustic Shock Waves: Intravascular Lithotripsy in Coronary Interventions.

Constituting a significant proportion of lesions treated with transcatheter interventions in the coronary arteries, moderate-to-severe calcification portends lower procedural success rates, increased periprocedural major adverse events, and unfavorable long-term clinical outcomes compared with noncalcific plaques. Adapted from the lithotripsy technology for treatment of nephrolithiasis, intravascular lithotripsy is a new technique for treatment of severely calcific lesions that uses acoustic shock waves in a balloon-based system to induce fracture in the calcium deposits to facilitate luminal gain and stent expansion. Herein, we summarize the physics and characteristics of the currently available intravascular lithotripsy system (Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA), the clinical data on intravascular lithotripsy use in the coronary arteries, and future directions for adoption of the technique in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Two-Year Outcomes of Endovascular Interventions of the Common Femoral Artery: A Retrospective Analysis From Two Medical Centers

BackgroundTreatment of common femoral artery (CFA) disease has been traditionally surgical. Recent data indicate that an endovascular option is feasible in treating CFA disease but there remains significant controversy about the endovascular versus surgical approach to treatment. Newer modalities of therapy have emerged to treat the CFA including atherectomy and drug coated balloons. We retrospectively reviewed data on the long-term outcome of endovascular treatment of CFA from 2 medical centers. MethodsConsecutive patients with CFA disease treated by 6 operators using endovascular techniques from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 were reviewed and analyzed. Two-year follow up was completed using medical records. Demographic, clinical, procedural and angiographic variables were collected. The primary endpoint of the study was target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints included target vessel revascularization (TVR), mortality, unplanned major and minor amputations and 30-day periprocedural adverse events. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables. Kaplan-Meier for freedom from TLR was plotted. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at our center. ResultsA total of 89 patients (116 limbs) were included at Index. There were males 57.3%, diabetics 42.7%. Mean age was 65.1 ± 16.3 years. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) was present in 27.7%. Disease distribution was classified by the Medina classification: 1–0-0 (CFA only) 48.3%, 1–0-1 (CFA + profunda) 6.9%, 1–1-1 (CFA+ profunda + origin of superficial femoral artery) 16.4%, 1–1-0 (CFA and origin of SFA) 28.4%. Denovo disease was present in 70.7%. Atherectomy was used in 104/116 limbs (89.7%). Drug coated balloons (DCB) in 15.5%, and stenting in 22.4%. Baseline stenosis 81.2 ± 13.1%, lesion length was 42.0 ± 14.5 mm. Final stenosis was 13.3 ± 11.0. Major bleeding occurred in 2.6%. At 2-year mortality was 9.0% (none related to procedure), CLI was 5.9% and no unplanned major or minor amputations. At 2-year KM analysis showed a probability of freedom from TLR of 72.2%. At 2-year the following TLRs were noted for various devices used: PTA 50%, orbital atherectomy 0%, jetstream 29.2%, laser 36.4%, and SilverHawk/TurboHawk 23.1% (p = 0.0476). ConclusionEndovascular treatment of CFA predominantly with atherectomy in this cohort, is feasible and with acceptable outcomes considering a low percentage of DCB use. A randomized trial is needed to validate these findings and explore the added role of DCB and atherectomy on clinical outcomes when compared to endarterectomy.

Impact of Massive or Torrential Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Intervention

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of baseline massive or torrential tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI). BackgroundThe use of TTVI to treat symptomatic severe TR has been increasing rapidly, but little is known regarding the impact of massive or torrential TR beyond severe TR. MethodsThe study population comprised 333 patients with significant symptomatic TR from the TriValve Registry who underwent TTVI. Mid-term outcomes after TTVI were assessed according to the presence of massive or torrential TR, defined as vena contracta width ≥14 mm. Procedural success was defined as patient survival after successful device implantation and delivery system retrieval, with residual TR ≤2+. The primary endpoint comprised survival rate and freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure, survival rate, and rehospitalization at 1 year. ResultsBaseline massive or torrential TR and severe TR were observed in 154 patients (46.2%) and 179 patients (53.8%), respectively. Patients with massive or torrential TR had a higher prevalence of ascites than those with severe TR (27.3% vs. 20.4%, respectively; p = 0.15) and demonstrated a similar procedural success rate (83.2% vs. 77.3%, respectively; p = 0.21). The incidence of peri-procedural adverse events was low, with no significant between-group differences. Freedom from the composite endpoint was significantly lower in patients with massive or torrential TR than in those with severe TR, which was significantly associated with an increased risk for 1-year death of any cause or rehospitalization for heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 3.34; p = 0.022). Freedom from the composite endpoint was significantly higher in patients with massive or torrential TR when procedural success was achieved (69.9% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.048). ConclusionsBaseline massive or torrential TR is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure 1 year after TTVI. Procedural success is related to better outcomes, even in the presence of baseline massive or torrential TR. (International Multisite Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies Registry [TriValve]; NCT03416166)

Procedural sedation for direct current cardioversion: a feasibility study between two management strategies in the emergency department

BackgroundA cardiologist-only approach to procedural sedation with midazolam in the setting of elective cardioversion (DCC) for AF has already been proven as safe as sedation with propofol and anaesthesiologist assistance. No data exist regarding the safety of such a strategy during emergency procedures. The aim of this study is to compare the feasibility of sedation with midazolam, administered by a cardiologist, to an anaesthesiologist-assisted protocol with propofol in emergency DCC.MethodsSingle centre, prospective, open blinded, randomized study including all consecutive patients admitted to the Emergency Department requiring urgent or emergency DCC. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either propofol or midazolam treatment arm. Patients in the midazolam group were managed by the cardiologist only, while patients treated with propofol group underwent DCC with anaesthesiologist assistance.ResultsSixty-nine patients were enrolled and split into two groups. Eighteen patients (26.1%) experienced peri-procedural adverse events (bradycardia, severe hypotension and severe hypoxia), which were similar between the two groups and all successfully managed by the cardiologist. No deaths, stroke or need for invasive ventilation were registered. Patients treated with propofol experienced a greater decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure when compared with those treated with midazolam.As the procedure was shorter when midazolam was used, the median cost of urgent/emergency DCC with midazolam was estimated to be 129.0 € (1st-3rd quartiles 114.6–151.6) and 195.6 € (1st-3rd quartiles 147.3–726.7) with propofol (p < .001).ConclusionsProcedural sedation with midazolam given by the cardiologist alone was feasible, well-tolerated and cost-effective in emergency DCC.

Endovascular treatment of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas with SQUID 12.

Endovascular therapy with liquid embolic agents (LEAs) is the gold standard for the treatment of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas (cDAVFs). The aim of the study is to retrospectively evaluate effectiveness, safety, and midterm follow-up results of endovascular treatment of cDAVFs using SQUID 12. Between June 2017 and January 2020 the authors retrospectively reviewed clinical, demographic and embolization data of 19 consecutive patients with cDAVF who underwent embolization using SQUID 12. The number of arteries catheterized for each procedure, the total amount of embolic agent, the occlusion rate, the injection time, any technical and/or clinical complications were recorded. Mid-term follow-up with DSA was reviewed. 20 procedures were performed in 19 patients. A transarterial approach was accomplished in 19 procedure; a combined transvenous-transarterial approach was realized in 1 treatment. The average time of injection was 33 minutes (2-82 minutes), and the average amount of SQUID 12 was 2.8 mL (0.5-6 mL). Complete angiographic cure at the end of the procedure was achieved in 17 patients. No major periprocedural adverse events were recorded. Mid-term follow-up was achieved in 15 out of 19 patients and confirmed complete occlusion of the cDAVFs in 13/15 patients (87%); in 2 of the initially cured patients a small relapse was detected. The treatment of the cDAVFs using SQUID 12 was effective and safe. The lower viscosity seems to allow an easier penetration of the agent with a high rate of complete occlusion of the cDAVFs.

The Predictive Value of CHA2DS2-VASc Score on In-Hospital Death and Adverse Periprocedural Events Among Patients With the Acute Coronary Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 10-Year National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Analysis

BackgroundThe predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc score regarding the in-hospital death and periprocedural adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) is not established. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data of patients with the in-hospital and primary diagnosis of ACS, with concomitant AF, who underwent PCI during the 2004–2014 period from the US National Inpatient Sample database. A CHA2DS2-VASc score was incorporated into multiple covariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses to determine its independent impact on designated outcomes. ResultsA total of 283,890 patients hospitalized with the primary diagnosis of ACS who underwent PCI and had an AF on record were included in the analysis. The average reported prevalence of AF in the whole cohort of ACS patients was 10.0% with a significant increasing trend during the observed 10-year period (p < .001). The average age of the cohort was 72.1 ± 11 years, 63.4% were male while the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (IQR 2–4). Following adjustment for baseline covariates, incremental increase in CHA2DS2-VASc score was independently associated with an increased odds of in-hospital death (OR 1.20, CI 95% 1.18–1.22), periprocedural vascular injury (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.17–1.20), bleeding (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.16–1.18), stroke/transient ischemic attack (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15–1.19), and acute kidney injury (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.06). ConclusionsThe CHA2DS2-VASc score provides important prognostic information in ACS patients undergoing PCI. It is independently associated with in-hospital death and adverse periprocedural events following PCI in patients presenting with ACS and concomitant AF.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients: Difficult cannulation and adverse events.

BACKGROUNDEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a valuable therapeutic technique for pancreatobiliary diseases, and its application in the elderly is no longer limited. However, a higher incidence of procedure difficulty and periprocedural adverse events might be expected in elderly patients due to the presence of other medical disorders and the poor general condition of this population.AIMTo evaluate the incidence, causes, and management of difficult biliary cannulation during ERCP in elderly patients and the role of difficult cannulation as a risk factor for adverse events.METHODSA total of 614 patients who underwent ERCP during the study period were prospectively studied and divided into two groups based on their age. One hundred and forty-six patients were aged 80 years or older and 468 patients were aged less than 80 years. The primary outcome measurements were cannulation difficulty, cannulation success rate, ERCP procedure time, and related adverse events.RESULTSThere was no difference in the incidence of difficult cannulation among the two groups (32.9% vs 34.4%, P = 0.765), as well as in the cannulation success rate (96.6% vs 96.8%, P = 0.54). The cannulation techniques were shown to be safe and efficient in achieving successful cannulation. Logistic regression analysis showed that patients aged 80 years or older were not associated with increased adverse events; however, difficult cannulation cases [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.478; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.877-6.442; P < 0.001] and patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 (AOR = 1.824; 95%CI: 0.993-3.349; P = 0.045) were more likely to develop adverse events. In contrast, other factors including age ≤ 65 (AOR = 3.460; 95%CI: 1.511-7.922; P = 0.003), female gender (AOR = 2.362; 95%CI=1.089-5.124; P = 0.030), difficult cannulation (AOR = 4.527; 95%CI: 2.078-9.860; P < 0.001), and patients with cholangitis (AOR = 3.261; 95%CI: 1.204-8.832; P = 0.020) were strongly associated with a higher rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.CONCLUSIONAdvanced age has not been proved to be a risk factor for difficult cannulation, and secondary cannulation techniques can be safely and efficaciously utilized in this group. Patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 and difficult cannulation are associated with an increased overall adverse events rate, while age ≥ 80 years is not.

Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms

BackgroundWide-necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) present unique challenges for endovascular treatment. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an intrasaccular braided device, recently approved by the FDA for treatment of WNBAs. While...

Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with dissection and reentry versus wire escalation techniques: a meta-analysis.

The procedural safety of dissection and reentry (DR) techniques in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial, when compared with conventional wire escalation (WE) techniques. The meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of DR techniques vs. WE techniques on periprocedural outcomes in patients with CTO undergoing PCI. Studies were searched in electronic database from inception to December 2018. Results were pooled using random effects model and fixed effects model. The pooled analyses revealed that DR techniques increased risks of periprocedural complications in patients with CTO PCI, including higher coronary perforation rate [risk ratio (RR) = 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-3.55], periprocedural myocardial infarction (RR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.23-2.78), branch occlusion (RR = 2.69; 95% CI 1.92-3.77) and coronary hematoma (RR = 3.06; 95% CI 2.45-3.82) detected by intravascular ultrasound, when compared to those with WE techniques. However, DR techniques were more applied in patients with higher complexity CTO lesions, which was evidenced by higher J-CTO score [standard mean differences (SMD) = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.91] and longer fluoroscopy time (SMD = 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.16), that may explain the higher complications rates in the DR techniques group as compared with WE techniques. The present meta-analysis suggests that the DR technique is relatively frequently used during contemporary CTO PCI, especially for challenging more complex CTO lesions. However, it is associated with higher, yet acceptable, rates of periprocedural adverse events as compared with a conventional WE strategy. Further refinement of DR techniques and evidence from large RCTs is needed to define the optimal role of DR in hybrid CTO PCI.