Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement Research Articles

The ultrasound-guided versus standard technique for peripheral intravenous catheter placement by nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AimTo comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of Ultrasound-guided technique for peripheral intravenous catheter placement by nurses in their daily practice. BackgroundPeripheral intravenous catheter insertion is a common clinical procedure in healthcare settings. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement has emerged in recent decades and was recognized as particularly useful in some specific patient groups. MethodsStudies that had compared the ultrasound-guided and traditional approaches were eligible for inclusion and further analysis. The primary outcome was the success rate on the first intravenous insertion attempt. The secondary outcomes included the time needed for successful insertion, and the average number of attempts to establish the IV access. We systematically assess all studies using Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We calculated the odds ratio and standardized mean difference with 95 % confidence intervals for the outcomes. Data were analyzed and visualized on Review Manager 5.3.4 and Stata 16.0. Results23 studies were included (17 randomized controlled trials and six cohort studies) with a population of 2051 patients offered ultrasound-assisted technique and 2479 treated with the conventional approach for comparison. The former approach was associated with a higher success rate on the first attempt in comparison (OR = 2.95, 95 % CI: 1.86, 4.69). This technique also took less time and less acupuncture to patients’ skin (SMD = −0.62, 95 % CI: 1.01, −0.23; SMD = −0.55, 95 % CI: 0.92, −0.18). In the sub-group analyses, children were more likely to benefit from ultrasound guided technique. Ultrasound guided technique demonstrated consistent and significant benefits in emergency clinical settings. Hospitals from different geographical locations exhibited similar trends in the three outcomes. Year of publication and study design revealed inconsistent and insignificant outcomes. ConclusionsUltrasound-guided technique can be a safer, faster, and more effective alternative to the traditional approach for nurses to establish intravenous access across different clinical settings and age groups.

Pediatric hemolysis in emergency departments: Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications.

This study aimed to analyze the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications of hemolyzed laboratory samples in the pediatric emergency department (ED), a subject on which existing data remains scarce. We conducted a multi-site observational cohort analysis of pediatric ED encounters in Metro Detroit, Michigan, United States. The study included participants below 18 years of age who had undergone peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement and laboratory testing. The primary outcome was the presence of hemolysis, and secondary outcomes included identifying risk factors for hemolysis and assessing the impact of hemolysis on PIVC failure. Between January 2021 and May 2022, 10,462 ED encounters met inclusion criteria, of which 14.0% showed laboratory evidence of hemolysis. The highest proportion of hemolysis occurred in the infant (age 0-1) population (20.1%). Multivariable regression analysis indicated higher odds of hemolysis for PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist in the toddler (age 2-5) and child (age 6-11) subgroups. PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist also demonstrated higher odds of failure in infants. Hemolysis in the pediatric ED population is a frequent complication that occurs at similar rates as in adults. PIVCs placed in the hand/wrist were associated with higher odds of hemolysis compared to those placed in the antecubital fossa. Clinicians should consider alternative locations for PIVC placement if clinically appropriate. Further research is needed to better understand the clinical implications of pediatric hemolysis.

The economic burden of difficult intravenous access in the emergency department from a United States' provider perspective.

Peripheral intravenous catheter placement is one of the most common invasive procedures that nurses will perform, especially in emergency departments. This early analysis aimed to quantify the economic burden associated with intravenous therapy in patients presenting in emergency departments with difficult intravenous access, receiving traditional peripheral intravenous catheters. This may inform the opportunity for improvement for investment in nursing tools and services regarding difficult venous access burden reduction. Model parameter data were obtained from published literature where possible via a targeted literature review for the terms including relative variations of 'Difficult Venous Access', 'burden', and 'costs', or elicited from expert clinical opinion. A simple decision tree model was developed in Microsoft® Excel 2016. Results included number of insertion attempts, number of patients requiring escalation, catheter failures due to complications, healthcare professional (e.g. nurse) time, and total costs (including/excluding health care professional time). Sensitivity analyses were performed. The model considers 64,000 individuals presenting in the emergency department annually, of which 75% (48,000) require a peripheral intravenous catheter; of these 22% (10,560) are estimated to have difficult venous access. The total cost burden of difficult venous access is estimated to be $890,095 per year/$84.29 per patient with difficult venous access, including the cost of clinician time. Key total cost drivers include the population size treated in the emergency department annually, the proportion of midlines placed by a specialist IV (intravenous access) nurse and the percentage of patients with difficult venous access. This is the first formal analysis estimating the significant economic burden of difficult venous access in emergency departments via peripheral intravenous catheter placement, a task frequently performed by nurses. Further studies are needed to evaluate nursing-centric strategies for reducing this burden. Additionally, adoption of a concise definition is needed, as is routine use of reliable assessment tools so that future cost analyses can be better contextualised.

Operation STICK: A vascular access specialty program for the generalist emergency medicine clinician.

Comprehensive education and training programs are urgently needed to improve vascular access outcomes in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to demonstrate the success of a formalized vascular access program in developing competent ED clinicians in traditional and ultrasound-guided insertion methods. This was a retrospective observational study exploring the success of trainees in obtaining competency in peripheral vascular access at an academic suburban ED with 120,000 annual visits. Eligible participants included healthcare workers that enrolled in the Operation STICK vascular access program and perform vascular access procedures as an aspect of their clinical practice. Competency in vascular access included both traditional and ultrasound-guided (US) peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertions. Competency was defined as demonstration of successful insertion of one traditional and one US PIVC in compliance with checklist. The primary objective was competency. Secondary objectives included trainee time to competency, trainee number of line encounters, and changes in program competency achievements over time. From October 15, 2021, to April 15, 2023, 141 clinicians participated in peripheral vascular access training via the Operation STICK model, which included 72 (51.1%) nurses, 52 (36.9%) ED technicians, and 17 (12.0%) healthcare personnel with other medical training. Clinicians overall reported an average of 5.6 years of experience inserting peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) and 23 (16.3%) had experience with using ultrasound. About 122 (86.5%) clinicians successfully completed the program and demonstrated competency in traditional and ultrasound-guided techniques. Time to competency varied over time, with a median of 124 days in the early phase, 32.5 days middle phase, and 10.6 h over 9.5 days in the later phase of the program (p < 0.001). Achieving competency in PIVC insertion necessitates a focused effort on refining and systematizing education and training approaches. Recognizing the inherent challenges present in ED settings, it is feasible to effectively and efficiently train emergency clinicians to be expert in both basic and advanced PIVC placement techniques through participation in a well-organized vascular access training program.

Incorporating Near Infrared Light Vein Visualization Technology Into Peripheral Intravenous Access Protocols.

Placement of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) is a frequent occurrence. Yet, PIVCs consistently require multiple attempts for successful cannulation, leading to an increased use of resources and risk of complications. Even though hospitals have established vascular access teams to improve outcomes and increase longevity of PIVCs, not every facility has one, and some struggle to meet demand. In these cases, PIVC placement depends on the confidence and skills of bedside nurses. Difficult access risk identification tools, as well as vein visualization technologies, like near infrared (nIR), have been developed to assist nurses with cannulation. This study sought to explore how hospitals are using vein visualization technology in nurse-driven protocols and to evaluate whether the technology is being meaningfully integrated into venous assessment and PIVC access protocols. In a survey sent to facilities utilizing nIR technology, 48% of respondents incorporated nIR in nurse-driven protocols. Of these respondents, 88% reported improvement in patient satisfaction, 92% saw a reduction in escalations, and 79% reported a reduction in hospital-acquired infections associated with PIVC placement. Integrating vein visualization technology into nurse-driven PIVC placement protocols has the potential to make a positive impact but requires future research to reproduce these findings in clinical studies.

Is Positive Communication Sufficient to Modulate Procedural Pain and Anxiety in the Emergency Department? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Research suggests that therapeutic communication could enhance patient comfort during medical procedures. Few studies have been conducted in clinical settings, with adequate blinding. Our hypothesis was that a positive message could lead to analgesia and anxiolysis, and that this effect would be enhanced by an empathetic interaction with the nurse performing the procedure, compared with an audio-taped message. This study aimed to modulate the contents and delivery vector of a message regarding peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) placement in the emergency department (ED). This study was a 2 + 2 randomized controlled trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03502655). A positive versus standard message was delivered through audio tape (double-blind) in the first phase ( N = 131) and through the nurse placing the catheter (single-blind) in the second phase ( N = 120). By design, low practitioner empathic behavior was observed in the first phase (median, 1 of 5 points). In the second phase, higher empathic behavior was observed in the positive than in the standard message (median, 2 versus 3, p < .001). Contrary to our hypothesis, the intervention did not affect pain or anxiety reports due to PIC placement in either phase (all p values > .2). The positive communication intervention did not impact pain or anxiety reports after PIC. There might have been a floor effect, with low PIC pain ratings in a context of moderate pain due to the presenting condition. Hence, such a therapeutic communication intervention might not be sufficient to modulate a mild procedural pain in the ED.

Distraksi Virtual Reality (VR) terhadap Tingkat Nyeri dan Cemas Anak Usia Sekolah yang Dilakukan Tindakan Invasif

This study aims to discover that healthcare technology has innovated in the quality and delivery of care to patients to motivate the promotion of safe, comfortable, and cost-effective care. The method used is a literature review from several online database searches using a research design in the form of a literature review. The results showed that from the six articles reviewed, several themes were obtained, namely 1) Virtual Reality for Pediatric Needle Procedural Pain: Two Randomized Clinical Trials, 2) A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of virtual reality in Pediatrics: Effects on Pain and Anxiety, carried out meta-analysis, 3) Virtual reality distraction during pediatric intravenous line placement in the emergency department: A prospective randomized comparison study, 4). Virtual reality for pain and anxiety management in children, 5). Effect of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention on Pain and Anxiety Associated With Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement in the Pediatric Setting A Randomized Clinical Trial, 6). Effectiveness of virtual reality on pain and anxiety management in cancer patients, Literature review. So thus, the involvement of all parties is needed to improve distraction techniques using Virtual Reality during intervention so that it is hoped that it can reduce the pain scale in children according to standard care in every hospital that gets invasive procedures. In conclusion, the Virtual Reality distraction technique has or is very influential on the condition of the child to be carried out or to receive medical procedures.&#x0D; &#x0D; Keywords: School Children, Hospitalization, Pain and Cas Levels, Virtual Reality

Just the facts: ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement.

Just the facts: ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement.

Just-in-time procedural training for pediatric emergency medicine trainees: A randomized educational interventional trial.

Pediatric requirements include procedural skills training such as peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement and bag-mask ventilation (BMV). Clinical experiences may be limited and temporally remote from scheduled teaching. Just-in-time (JIT) training prior to utilization can promote skill development and mitigate learning decay. Our objective was to assess the impact of JIT training on pediatric residents' procedural performance, knowledge, and confidence with PIV placement and BMV. Residents received standardized baseline training in both PIV placement and BMV during scheduled educational programming. Between 3 and 6 months later, participants were randomized and received JIT training for either PIV placement or BMV. JIT training included a brief video and coached practice, totaling <5 min. Each participant was videotaped performing both procedures on skills trainers. Blinded investigators scored performance using skills checklists. Pre- and postintervention knowledge was assessed using multiple-choice and short-answer items, and confidence was reported using Likert scores. Seventy-two residents completed baseline training sessions: 36 were randomized to receive JIT training for PIV and 36 for BMV. Thirty-five residents in each cohort completed the curriculum. There were no significant differences between the cohorts with regard to demographics, baseline knowledge, or prior simulation experience. JIT training was associated with improved procedural performance for PIV (median 87% vs. 70%, p < 0.001) and for BMV (mean 83% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Results remained significant after using regression models to adjust for differences in prior clinical experience. Improvements in knowledge or confidence were not associated with JIT training in either cohort. JIT training resulted in a significant improvement in resident procedural performance with PIV placement and BMV in a simulated environment. There were no differences in outcome with regard to knowledge or confidence. Future work might explore how the demonstrated benefit translates into the clinical setting.

Effects of ultrasound with an automatic vessel detection system using artificial intelligence on the selection of puncture points among ultrasound beginner clinical nurses.

Ultrasound guidance increases the success rate of peripheral intravenous catheter placement. However, the longer time required to obtain ultrasound-guided access poses difficulties for ultrasound beginners. Notably, interpretation of ultrasonographic images is considered as one of the main reasons of difficulty in using ultrasound for catheter placement. Therefore, an automatic vessel detection system (AVDS) using artificial intelligence was developed. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of AVDS for ultrasound beginners in selecting puncture points and determine suitable users for this system. In this crossover experiment involving the use of ultrasound with and without AVDS, we enrolled 10 clinical nurses, including 5 with some experience in peripheral intravenous catheterization using ultrasound-aided methods (categorized as ultrasound beginners) and 5 with no experience in ultrasound and less experience in peripheral intravenous catheterization using conventional methods (categorized as inexperienced). These participants chose two puncture points (those with the largest and second largest diameter) as ideal in each forearm of a healthy volunteer. The results of this study were the time required for the selection of puncture points and the vein diameter of the selected points. Among ultrasound beginners, the time required for puncture point selection in the right forearm second candidate vein with a small diameter (<3 mm) was significantly shorter when using ultrasound with AVDS than when using it without AVDS (mean, 87 vs 247 s). Among inexperienced nurses, no significant difference in the time required for all puncture point selections was found between the use of ultrasound with and without AVDS. In the vein diameter, significant difference was shown only in the absolute difference at left second candidate among inexperienced participants. Ultrasonography beginners needed less time to select the puncture points in a small diameter vein using ultrasound with AVDS than without AVDS.

Assessing the utility of ultrasound-guided vascular access placement with longer catheters in critically ill pediatric patients.

Critically ill pediatric patients can have difficulty with establishing and maintaining stable vascular access. A long-dwelling peripheral intravenous catheter placement decreases the need for additional vascular interventions. The study sought to compare longevity, catheter-associated complications, and the need for additional vascular interventions when using ultrasound-guided longer peripheral intravenous catheters comparing to a traditional approach using standard-sized peripheral intravenous catheters in pediatric critically ill patients with difficult vascular access. This single-center retrospective cohort study included children 0-18 years of age with difficult vascular access admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit between 01/01/2018-06/01/2021. One hundred and eighty seven placements were included in the study, with 99 ultrasound-guided long intravenous catheters placed and 88 traditionally placed standard-sized intravenous catheters. In the univariate analysis, patients in the traditional approach were at a higher risk of intravenous failure compared to those in the ultrasound-guided approach (HR=2.20, 95% CI [1.45-3.34], p=.001), with median intravenous survival times of 108 and 219 h, respectively. Adjusting for age, patients in the traditional approach remained at higher risk of intravenous failure (HR=1.99, 95% CI: [1.28-3.08], p=.002). Adjusting for hospital length of stay, patients in the ultrasound-guided approach were less likely to have additional peripheral intravenous access placed during hospitalization (OR=0.39, 95% CI [0.18-0.85] p=.017). In critically ill pediatric patients with difficult vascular access, ultrasound-guided long peripheral intravenous catheters provide an alternative to traditional approach standard-sized intravenous catheters with improved longevity, lower failure rates, and reduced need for additional vascular interventions.

Cost effectiveness of ultrasound-guided long peripheral catheters in difficult vascular access patients.

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement is a routinely performed invasive procedure in hospital settings with an unacceptably high failure rate that can result in significant costs. This investigation aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of using long peripheral catheters (LPC) versus standard short peripheral catheters (SPC) in the difficult vascular access (DVA) population. A secondary analysis was performed of a randomized control trial that compared a 20-gauge 4.78 cm SPC to a 20-gauge 6.35 cm SPC for the endpoint of survival. This study assessed cost-effectiveness of the comparative interventions. Costs associated with increased hospitalization length of stay due to PIVC failure, including labor, materials, equipment, and treatment delays were estimated by utilizing healthcare resource utilization data. Cost-effectiveness of the LPC was analyzed through the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, and the incremental net benefit. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results during the time interval of PIVC insertion. Among the 257 patients, the average total cost for therapy was lower in the LPC group compared to the SPC group ($400 vs $521; mean difference -$121, 95% bootstrapped CI -$461 to $225). A marginally significant absolute difference of complication averted was found for LPC versus SPC (10.8%, p = 0.07). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for LPC as compared with SPC was -$1123 (95% bootstrapped CI -$8652 to $5964) per complication averted. In a willingness to pay (WTP) analysis, as WTP = $0, the incremental net benefit (INB) $121 was positive, indicating LPC was less costly. Analysis of PIVCs that survived ⩽48 h (n = 134) demonstrated a lower average total cost for therapy among the LPC group ($418 vs $531; mean difference -$113, 95% bootstrapped CI -$507 to $282). Forty-seven of 66 (71.2%) LPCs did not experience a complication, compared with 37 of 68 (54.4%) SPCs, resulting in a significant absolute difference of complication adverted of 16.8% (p = 0.04). In addition, with a positive slope, the INB $113 was positive as WTP = $0, indicating LPC was estimated to be cost-effective. When using ultrasound guidance for vascular access, LPCs are potentially a cost-effective strategy for reducing PIVC complications in DVA patients compared to SPCs. Given this finding, ultrasound-guided LPCs should be routinely considered as first-line among the DVA population in order to improve their overall care and wellbeing.

Incorporating Evidence-Based Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access (USGVA) Standards Into the Nurse Anesthetist Armamentarium: A Quality Improvement Project

PurposeThis quality improvement (QI) project developed and implemented a hybrid training program, that included online modules and hands-on training for experienced certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) to increase confidence, knowledge, and competency with ultrasound-guided vascular access (USGVA). DesignThis QI project used a pre-post design. Seventeen volunteer CRNAs participated in USGVA training and education, and a 90-day follow-up assessment was performed. MethodsThe Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) guidelines were used as a framework to assess confidence, knowledge, and hands-on competency of 17 CRNAs who regularly place vascular access devices using USGVA in patients with difficult vascular access at a single facility. These assessments were measured at: (1) baseline, (2) immediately after attending a hybrid training educational program, and (3) 90 days after implementation into clinical practice. Additionally, the number of vascular access attempts required for successful placement of peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters, arterial catheters, and central venous catheters (CVC) with ultrasound assistance over a 90-day period was reviewed. FindingsCertified registered nurse anesthetists’ median confidence score increased significantly from pre- to posteducation (P = .009). The confidence reported from post- to 90 days posteducation improved, however it did not reach statistical significance (P = .812). The knowledge scores from pre- to posteducation indicated significant improvement (P <. 001), as well as from pre- to 90 days posteducation (P = .03). However, knowledge scores from post- to 90 days posteducation revealed a statistically significant decline (P = .004). The overall median score for hands-on USGVA competency declined from post- to 90 days posteducation (P = .109). The number of successful USGVA placements increased from 50% to 80% within a 90-day period. ConclusionsThe implementation of a USGVA hybrid training and education program improved overall provider confidence, knowledge, and competency. While confidence remained high in the 90-day follow-up, knowledge retention declined. Despite a decline in knowledge retention over time, results showed a significant improvement when compared to baseline scores. Although a decline in hands-on USGVA competency was seen at 90 days posteducation, it was not statistically significant. The percentage of overall successful USGVA placements in clinical practice increased following implementation.

THE EFFECT OF PEER MENTORING MODEL USED TO TEACH PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETER PLACEMENT ON KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, SELF-CONFIDENCE, SATISFACTION AND FEAR OF NURSING STUDENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of peer mentoring model used to teach peripheral intravenous catheter placement on knowledge, skills, self-confidence, satisfaction and symptoms of fear of nursing students.&#x0D; Method: This is a controlled, randomized, parallel group and single center study. The Shapiro-Wilk Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, Mann-Whitney U Test were used for the analysis of the data. The EtaSquared value was used for the effect value of the data.&#x0D; Results: When peripheral intravenous catheter knowledge and skills of students were evaluated, there was no statistical difference between the knowledge and skill mean scores of the students in the peer mentoring model group (n=50) and the students in the traditional teaching model (n=51) (p=0.389). When the scores for satisfaction about peripheral intravenous catheter insertion procedures were analysed, a significant difference was found between the groups with an effect value below the medium level (p=0.048, η2=0.038). When the students' self-confidence scores were evaluated, a significant difference was found the groups with an effect value the medium level (p=0.004, η2=0.078). The students in the control group experienced more often symptom of feeling tense compared to the students in the experimental group (p=0.004).&#x0D; Conclusion: This study found that the peer mentoring model was as effective as the traditional teaching model in gaining skills of peripheral intravenous catheter placement, and the students' self-confidence and satisfaction were higher.

Mixed reality simulation for peripheral intravenous catheter placement training

BackgroundDespite the advantages of simulation-based training, trainees are typically unable to view internal anatomical structures. This limitation can be overcome by using mixed reality (MR) wherein 3-D virtual anatomical images can be projected. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an MR trainer for peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement.MethodsSixty-two participants used projected images of arm veins to place a PIVC in a mannequin arm. Participants were evaluated using a checklist on their ability to successfully place the PIVC. Participants completed a survey to elicit demographic information and perceptions of the trainer. A follow-up survey at two-weeks assessed clinical experiences with PIVC placement since using the MR trainer.ResultsFirst attempt catheter placement was successful in 48 (77.4%) cases. Only 11 (17.7%) and 3 (4.8%) of participants caused ‘extravasation’ and ‘hematoma’ formation on their first attempt, respectively. Fifty-nine participants (95.2%) agreed that ability to see internal structures was useful, and 58 (93.5%, respectively) agreed that the interactivity promoted learning and that MR should be included in training.ConclusionsResults of this study showed that use of a novel MR trainer for PIVC placement appears to provide an environment conducive to successful learning. Most participants were successful at PIVC placement on their first attempt and an overwhelming number found it helpful in identifying landmarks and confirming correct needle angles for insertion. Given the increasing emphasis on simulation training, highly immersive MR tools appear to offer promise to close the gap between classroom instruction and clinical experience.

Asynchronous training for ultrasound-guided peripheral IV placement among critical care nurses.

Teaching ultrasound (US) guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters requires significant time for synchronous didactic and hands-on training. The investigators assessed the feasibility of an asynchronous model for critical care nurses to learn the novel skill of US-guided PIV placement. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of successful attempts and number of sticks per attempt for anatomy versus US-guided approaches. The investigators built a self-contained training cart for learners to practice and record their performance. Training occurred asynchronously. The learners recorded data from PIV attempts. Participants completed pre- and post-training surveys. Data from this prospective observational cohort was analyzed for descriptive and comparative statistics, using Kirkpatrick's Model for evaluation of this educational intervention. During a 6 month period, 21 nurses completed the asynchronous training, with eight recording their PIV placements. 81.0% of the training occurred outside of a Monday to Friday 9AM-5PM period. There were 64 attempts by anatomy approach and 84 with US-guidance. The anatomic approach was successful in 35.9% of attempts with a mean of 1.5 sticks (SD 1.0, Range 1-5). The US-guided approach had a statistically significant greater rate of success (77.4%; p < 0.001) with a mean of 1.2 sticks (SD 1.2, range 1-2, p < 0.01). Participants reported increased confidence in US-guided PIV placement and enjoyment with this method of learning. Asynchronous learning model with cart-based instruction and practice is a feasible means for nurses to learn US-guided PIV placement. Significant outcomes were seen across Kirkpatrick levels I-IV for educational outcome assessment.

Incidence and type of peripheral intravenous catheter complications documented in hospitalised dogs.

To report the incidence and type of peripheral intravenous catheter complications in hospitalised dogs. A prospective, observational trial was performed. Peripheral intravenous catheters were monitored for complications. Complications were documented and classified as extravasation, phlebitis, dislodgement, occlusion and line breakage. If phlebitis was present, the Visual Infusion Phlebitis Scale was used to assign a grade (0 to 5). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the type of complications between the critical care unit and the intermediate care unit. A univariate logistic model was used to compare the incidence of complications between the critical care unit and the intermediate care unit and adjusted odds ratios were used to compare the groups. The incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter complications was 24.2% in the Critical Care Unit and 13.1% in the Intermediate Care Unit, with an overall incidence of 19.9%. Phlebitis was the most common peripheral intravenous catheter complication in the Critical Care Unit, and line breakage was the most common complication in the Intermediate Care Unit. Length of hospitalisation and weight had a significant effect on the likelihood of complication. In a multivariable logistic regression model, the odds of a peripheral intravenous catheter complication was not significantly higher in CCU than IMCU, accounting for length of hospitalisation and weight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 3.48). Peripheral intravenous catheter complications are common in hospitalised dogs and may result in an increased expense for owners, failure to deliver prescribed treatments, venous depletion (lack of peripheral vessels for intravenous catheter placement) and pain experienced by the patient. Techniques to reduce peripheral intravenous catheter complications should be further evaluated and may include the use of peripheral intravenous catheter placement and maintenance checklists, use of force-activated separation devices, or patient sedation.

Factors Affecting Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement During Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation

IntroductionIntravenous access is required for resuscitation of injured patients but may be delayed in children because of challenges associated with peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement. Early identification of factors predisposing patients to difficult PIV placement can assist in deciding strategies for timely intravenous access. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, video-based review of injured children and adolescents treated between April 2018 and May 2019. Patient demographic, physiological, injury, and resuscitation characteristics were obtained from the patient record, including age, race, weight, injury type, Injury Severity Score, initial systolic blood pressure, initial Glasgow Coma Score, intubation status, activation level, and presence of prearrival notification. Video review was used to determine the time to PIV placement, the number of attempts required, the purpose for additional access, and the reason for abandonment of PIV placement. Multivariable regressions were used to determine factors associated with successful placement. ResultsDuring the study period, 154 consented patients underwent attempts at PIV placement in the trauma bay. Placement was successful in 139 (90.3%) patients. Older patients (OR [odds ratio]: 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9, 0.9) and patients who required the highest level activation response (OR: 0.0, 95% CI: 0.0, 0.3) were less likely to have an attempt at PIV placement abandoned. Children with nonblunt injuries (OR: 11.6, 95% CI: 1.3, 119.2) and pre-existing access (OR: 39.6, 95% CI: 7.0, 350.6) were more likely to have an attempt at PIV placement abandoned. Among patients with successful PIV placement, the time required for establishing PIV access was faster as age increased (−0.5 s, 95% CI: −1.1, −0.0). ConclusionsYounger age was associated with abandonment of PIV attempts and, when successful, increased time to placement. Strategies to improve successful PIV placement and alternate routes of access should be considered early to prevent treatment delays in younger children.

PEDIATRIC AND MEDICINE RESIDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ULTRASOUND VASCULAR ACCESS AND RESULTS OF AN INTERSPECIALTY, SIMULATION-BASED ULTRASOUND VASCULAR ACCESS WORKSHOP

PEDIATRIC AND MEDICINE RESIDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ULTRASOUND VASCULAR ACCESS AND RESULTS OF AN INTERSPECIALTY, SIMULATION-BASED ULTRASOUND VASCULAR ACCESS WORKSHOP

The effect of clinical guideline education on the knowledge and practice of nurses for peripheral intravenous catheter placement based on short message service: A quasi-experimental study.

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement is the most common invasive clinical procedure, often performed by nurses in hospitals worldwide. This study aimed to assess the effect of clinical guideline education on the knowledge and practice of nurses for PIVC placement based on short message service (SMS). In a quasi-experimental study with parallel groups, 66 nurses working in two general university hospitals in Iran were enrolled. Data was collected from 2017 to 2018. PIVC placement was assessed before, immediately, and 4 weeks after educational intervention based on SMS (twice a day for 10 days). Nurses' knowledge score immediately after intervention versus before intervention was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (4.48 vs -0.70; p < 0.001). Nurses' knowledge score in 4 weeks after intervention versus immediately after intervention was lower in the intervention group than in the control group (0.03 vs 0.42; p = 0.014). Nurses' knowledge scores 4 weeks after intervention versus before intervention was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (4.52 vs -0.27; p < 0.001). Nurses' practice score immediately after intervention versus before intervention was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (0.57 vs -0.18; p = 0.174). Nurses' practice score 4 weeks after intervention vs immediately after intervention was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (-0.10 vs -0.38; p = 0.046). Nurses' practice scores 4 weeks after intervention versus before intervention was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (0.47 vs -0.56; p = 0.001). Educational intervention by SMS had a significant effect on increasing the knowledge and practice of nurses toward clinical guidelines for PIVC placement. Therefore, it is suggested that educational intervention by SMS be conducted to improve nurses' knowledge as an effective educational method.