Just-in-time procedural training for pediatric emergency medicine trainees: A randomized educational interventional trial.

Abstract

Pediatric requirements include procedural skills training such as peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheter placement and bag-mask ventilation (BMV). Clinical experiences may be limited and temporally remote from scheduled teaching. Just-in-time (JIT) training prior to utilization can promote skill development and mitigate learning decay. Our objective was to assess the impact of JIT training on pediatric residents' procedural performance, knowledge, and confidence with PIV placement and BMV. Residents received standardized baseline training in both PIV placement and BMV during scheduled educational programming. Between 3 and 6 months later, participants were randomized and received JIT training for either PIV placement or BMV. JIT training included a brief video and coached practice, totaling <5 min. Each participant was videotaped performing both procedures on skills trainers. Blinded investigators scored performance using skills checklists. Pre- and postintervention knowledge was assessed using multiple-choice and short-answer items, and confidence was reported using Likert scores. Seventy-two residents completed baseline training sessions: 36 were randomized to receive JIT training for PIV and 36 for BMV. Thirty-five residents in each cohort completed the curriculum. There were no significant differences between the cohorts with regard to demographics, baseline knowledge, or prior simulation experience. JIT training was associated with improved procedural performance for PIV (median 87% vs. 70%, p < 0.001) and for BMV (mean 83% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Results remained significant after using regression models to adjust for differences in prior clinical experience. Improvements in knowledge or confidence were not associated with JIT training in either cohort. JIT training resulted in a significant improvement in resident procedural performance with PIV placement and BMV in a simulated environment. There were no differences in outcome with regard to knowledge or confidence. Future work might explore how the demonstrated benefit translates into the clinical setting.