Peripheral Circadian Oscillators Research Articles

Entrainment of the circadian clock in the liver by feeding.

Circadian rhythms of behavior are driven by oscillators in the brain that are coupled to the environmental light cycle. Circadian rhythms of gene expression occur widely in peripheral organs. It is unclear how these multiple rhythms are coupled together to form a coherent system. To study such coupling, we investigated the effects of cycles of food availability (which exert powerful entraining effects on behavior) on the rhythms of gene expression in the liver, lung, and suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). We used a transgenic rat model whose tissues express luciferase in vitro. Although rhythmicity in the SCN remained phase-locked to the light-dark cycle, restricted feeding rapidly entrained the liver, shifting its rhythm by 10 hours within 2 days. Our results demonstrate that feeding cycles can entrain the liver independently of the SCN and the light cycle, and they suggest the need to reexamine the mammalian circadian hierarchy. They also raise the possibility that peripheral circadian oscillators like those in the liver may be coupled to the SCN primarily through rhythmic behavior, such as feeding.

Light‐induced phase‐shifts in the circadian expression rhythm of mammalian Period genes in the mouse heart

To investigate the molecular mechanism that regulates circadian rhythms in mammalian peripheral tissues, we examined the phase shifts evoked by light exposure in the circadian mRNA expression rhythms of mammalian Period genes (mPer1, mPer2 and mPer3) and a clock-controlled gene Dbp, in the mouse heart, by Northern blot analysis. The light pulse did not induce any acute mRNA expression of mPer in the heart, but the pulse gave rise to phase shifts in the circadian mRNA rhythms. On the first day after the exposure, only mPer1 mRNA showed a phase shift, whereas obvious phase shifts were not observed in the rhythms of mPer2, mPer3 and Dbp mRNAs. On the second day, phase shifts occurred to a similar extent in the mRNA rhythms of all four genes examined. The rhythm of mPer1 mRNA shifted fastest among those of the three mPers. Therefore mPer1 seems to play an important role in phase resetting of mammalian peripheral oscillators. Immediate responses to light pulses in mRNA expression of mPers may not be required for phase shifting of peripheral circadian oscillators. Our findings suggest that mammals require more than one day to have peripheral oscillators entrained to a new daily schedule.

Resetting central and peripheral circadian oscillators in transgenic rats.

In multicellular organisms, circadian oscillators are organized into multitissue systems which function as biological clocks that regulate the activities of the organism in relation to environmental cycles and provide an internal temporal framework. To investigate the organization of a mammalian circadian system, we constructed a transgenic rat line in which luciferase is rhythmically expressed under the control of the mouse Per1 promoter. Light emission from cultured suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of these rats was invariably and robustly rhythmic and persisted for up to 32 days in vitro. Liver, lung, and skeletal muscle also expressed circadian rhythms, which damped after two to seven cycles in vitro. In response to advances and delays of the environmental light cycle, the circadian rhythm of light emission from the SCN shifted more rapidly than did the rhythm of locomotor behavior or the rhythms in peripheral tissues. We hypothesize that a self-sustained circadian pacemaker in the SCN entrains circadian oscillators in the periphery to maintain adaptive phase control, which is temporarily lost following large, abrupt shifts in the environmental light cycle.

Circadian rhythms in olfactory responses of Drosophila melanogaster.

The core mechanism of circadian timekeeping in arthropods and vertebrates consists of feedback loops involving several clock genes, including period (per) and timeless (tim). In the fruitfly Drosophila, circadian oscillations in per expression occur in chemosensory cells of the antennae, even when the antennae are excised and maintained in isolated organ culture. Here we demonstrate a robust circadian rhythm in Drosophila in electrophysiological responses to two classes of olfactory stimuli. These rhythms are observed in wild-type flies during light-dark cycles and in constant darkness, but are abolished in per or tim null-mutant flies (per01 and tim01) which lack rhythms in adult emergence and locomotor behaviour. Olfactory rhythms are also abolished in the per 7.2:2 transgenic line in which per expression is restricted to the lateral neurons of the optic lobe. Because per 7.2:2 flies do not express per in peripheral oscillators, our results provide evidence that peripheral circadian oscillators are necessary for circadian rhythms in olfactory responses. As olfaction is essential for food acquisition, social interactions and predator avoidance in many animals, circadian regulation of olfactory systems could have profound effects on the behaviour of organisms that rely on this sensory modality.

Zebrafish Clock rhythmic expression reveals independent peripheral circadian oscillators.

The only vertebrate clock gene identified by mutagenesis is mouse Clock, which encodes a bHLH-PAS transcription factor. We have cloned Clock in zebrafish and show that, in contrast to its mouse homologue, it is expressed with a pronounced circadian rhythm in the brain and in two defined pacemaker structures, the eye and the pineal gland. Clock oscillation was also found in other tissues, including kidney and heart. In these tissues, expression of Clock continues to oscillate in vitro. This demonstrates that self-sustaining circadian oscillators exist in several vertebrate organs, as was previously reported for invertebrates.

Integrative coordination of circadian mammalian diversity:neuronal networks and peripheral clocks

Diverse circadian rhythms are generated, maintained and/or coordinated by brain structures constituting the circadian timing system. However, the mechanisms underlying the variety in activity types and circadian rhythm phases and amplitudes are currently unknown. We address this problem by comparing rhythms in diurnal and nocturnal mammals, while focusing on alterations not involving the central circadian oscillator. The circadian rhythms are divided into two groups: activity-independent and activity-related. The rhythms in the first group have similar acrophases in all mammals and are anticipated to function as an internal zeitgeber (time giver). Analysis of activity-related circadian rhythms in behavior, blood pressure (BP) and renal excretion suggests separate mechanisms in their regulation in addition to the central suprachiasmatic nuclei-located circadian oscillator. We propose that: (a) a passive hypothalamic oscillator coordinates the phases and underlies the high amplitude of behavioral circadian rhythms; (b) a separate rostral hypothalamic network participates in the regulation of the low-amplitude circadian BP rhythm; and (c) a circadian oscillator in the kidney generates electrolyte excretion rhythms. A model is offered where the overt activity is determined by the phase-relationship between the circadian and the passive hypothalamic oscillator. Specific brain structures or peripheral circadian oscillators integrate circadian and other signals for different activity-related circadian rhythms. The hypothalamic structures implicated in regulation of behavioral and blood pressure rhythms belong to the circadian timing system since they underlie circadian rhythms diversity. The same hypothalamic areas selectively modulate circadian rhythms in response to homeostatic stimuli or stress without engaging the circadian oscillator.