Perioperative Care Of Patients Research Articles

Treatment of proximal femoral fractures : Principles, tips and tricks

Proximal femoral fractures occur at an annual incidence of approximately 200/100,000 inhabitants and mortality rates range up to 30% especially in geriatric patients where complications are not necessarily associated to surgery. In nearly all cases surgical treatment is required. Procedures to preserve the femoral head have to be performed as early as possible (as specified by the Federal Joint Committee, GBA, within 24 h). For joint-preserving approaches in medial femoral neck fractures a time to surgery within 6 h is considered to be advantageous. Perioperative patient care is of high importance regarding the prevention of pneumonia, renal failure, delirium and further complications. Postoperatively full weight bearing enables for early mobilization and prevention of surgery-related complications. Nonunions, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, cut-out and prosthetic dislocation must be avoided by the selection of the appropriate procedure. Minimally displaced femoral neck fractures are primarily treated by osteosynthesis and conservative management is only considered in isolated cases. For displaced femoral neck fractures, factors such as ayoung biological age with high activity levels, the absence of arthritis and good bone quality with asuccessful reduction favor for afemoral head-preserving osteosynthesis. Otherwise, (hybrid) total hip replacement (THR) is the preferred method for unstable and displaced fractures, whereby hemiarthroplasty should only be considered for very old and patients with pre-existing diseases. Fractures in the trochanteric region are treated with aproximal femoral nail and subtrochanteric fractures are managed using along proximal femoral nail. To avoid secondary complications, the choice of optimal treatment should be based on agood understanding of the injury pattern, biomechanical and technical aspects of each procedure.

REDISCOVER International Guidelines on the Perioperative Care of Surgical Patients With Borderline-resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

The REDISCOVER consensus conference aimed at developing and validating guidelines on the perioperative care of patients with borderline-resectable (BR-) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Coupled with improvements in chemotherapy and radiation, the contemporary approach to pancreatic surgery supports the resection of BR-PDAC and, to a lesser extent, LA-PDAC. Guidelines outlining the selection and perioperative care for these patients are lacking. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used to develop the REDISCOVER guidelines and create recommendations. The Delphi approach was used to reach a consensus (agreement ≥80%) among experts. Recommendations were approved after a debate and vote among international experts in pancreatic surgery and pancreatic cancer management. A Validation Committee used the AGREE II-GRS tool to assess the methodological quality of the guidelines. Moreover, an independent multidisciplinary advisory group revised the statements to ensure adherence to nonsurgical guidelines. Overall, 34 recommendations were created targeting centralization, training, staging, patient selection for surgery, possibility of surgery in uncommon scenarios, timing of surgery, avoidance of vascular reconstruction, details of vascular resection/reconstruction, arterial divestment, frozen section histology of perivascular tissue, extent of lymphadenectomy, anticoagulation prophylaxis, and role of minimally invasive surgery. The level of evidence was however low for 29 of 34 clinical questions. Participants agreed that the most conducive means to promptly advance our understanding in this field is to establish an international registry addressing this patient population ( https://rediscover.unipi.it/ ). The REDISCOVER guidelines provide clinical recommendations pertaining to pancreatectomy with vascular resection for patients with BR-PDAC and LA-PDAC, and serve as the basis of a new international registry for this patient population.

Analysis of the Effect of the Comprehensive Nursing Model on Patients with Moyamoya Disease Undergoing Intracranial and Extracranial Revascularization Surgery

Objective: To explore the effect of a comprehensive nursing model on patients with Moyamoya disease who underwent intracranial and extracranial revascularization surgery. Methods: 110 cases were divided into control and observation groups with 55 cases each. The control group received routine perioperative care, and the observation group received perioperative care along with comprehensive nursing care. The two groups’ disease cognition levels, anxiety, symptoms, daily living ability scores, and postoperative complication rates were compared. Results: The anxiety score and total postoperative complications of the observation group upon discharge were lower than that of the control group, and the disease cognition level and daily living ability upon discharge were higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Applying the comprehensive nursing model in conjunction with perioperative care for patients undergoing surgery can effectively improve their anxiety, strengthen activities of daily living, and reduce the risk of postoperative complications.

Length of Postoperative Hospital Stay and Related Factors After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Pre-enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Single Center Assessment.

Lobectomy for lung cancer often presents a lot of potentially severe complications after surgery for patients. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a program to improve unexpected events. When implementing ERAS, there needs to be evidence of relevant factors that prolong hospital stays to encourage the participation of medical staff and leaders. This study is to determine the length of hospital stay (LOS) and its related factors after surgery in patients undergoing lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. A descriptive retrospective study was conducted on 99 patients undergoing lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer at University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City. Data were extracted from a computerized database of patients who were hospitalized for lobectomy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer from January 2018 to December 2021. The primary outcome was the postoperative LOS. Median postoperative LOS was 5.2 days (interquartile range 4.8 to 6.8 days). The complication rate was 19.2%, of which Clavien-Dindo II accounted for the highest at 9.1%. The 30-day readmission rate was 13.1%. The median of LOS in the current cigarette smoker's group was 1.9 days higher than the never-cigarette smoker's group and 1.5 days higher than the former cigarette smokers (p<0.001). Tumor-nodes-metastasis (TNM) stage III showed the highest LOS compared to other stages (p=0.029). Open surgery and thoracoscopic conversion to open showed postoperative LOS about two days longer than thoracoscopic surgery (p<0.001). ​Performing muscle relaxation and early extubation, multimodal analgesia reduced postoperativeLOS by 1.6 days (p<0.001), and preoperative physical therapy and early physical therapy at recovery reduced postoperative LOS by 1.3 days (p<0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between the duration of endotracheal retention, duration of thoracic drainage, amount of blood loss, and postoperative LOS (R>0.5, p<0.001). The duration of the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit and fasting time after surgery showed an average positive correlation with postoperative LOS (0.3<R<0.5, p<0.001). Preoperative fasting time had a weak positive correlation with postoperative LOS (R=0.265, p=0.008). The median postoperative LOS was 5.2 days, and more than half of patients stayed in the hospital for over five days. Some factors affect the LOS, including current cigarette smokers, TNM stage, surgical approaches, some care processes such as early extubation, multimodal pain relief, physical therapy, vomiting,duration of thoracic drainage, amount of blood loss, duration of Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (hours), duration of thoracic drainage (days), preoperative and postoperative fasting time (hours).The study results help propose many changes in perioperative care for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

Anesthesia for gender-affirming surgery: a practical review.

Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is an effective, well studied, and often necessary component of gender-affirming care and mitigation of gender dysphoria for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals. GAS is categorized as chest surgeries, genitourinary surgeries, facial feminization/masculinization, and vocal phonosurgery. Despite increased incidence of GAS during recent years, there is a gap in knowledge and training on perioperative care for TGD patients. Our review discusses the relevant anesthetic considerations for the most common GAS, which often involve highly specialized surgical techniques that have unique implications for the anesthesia professional. Anesthesiology professionals must attend to the surgical and anesthetic nuances of various GAS procedures. However, as many considerations are based on common practice, research is warranted on anesthetic implications and outcomes of GAS.

Perioperative care to patients living with HIV by theatre nurses at a South African tertiary hospital

Background Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is one of the leading health challenges worldwide that influences the provision of quality patient care. Stigma and discrimination around this condition and the health care needs affect the health care provision. This study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of theatre nurses’ experiences in providing perioperative care to patients living with HIV at a tertiary hospital in South Africa. Methods This study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Tshwane district, South Africa. The study was underpinned by an interpretative phenomenological analysis design. Data were collected from 10 criterion purposively selected theatre nurses using in-depth individual interviews. Data were thematically analyzed and guided by an interpretive phenomenological analysis framework for data analysis. Results The study revealed that theatre nurses work in an under-resourced environment. The resources highlighted are human, materials, including personal protective equipment and life support. The situation negatively affects the perioperative care of HIV-positive patients, who are always prone to perioperative complications, such as profuse bleeding, and even death. The situation increases the occupational risk to the nurses. Conclusions The researchers proposed several recommendations targeted at improving the resources needed by theatre nurses when caring for people living with HIV perioperatively at South African tertiary hospitals. Findings will add to the body of knowledge of the Nursing profession about offering perioperative care to persons living with HIV.

Early experience with baroreflex activation therapy from a vascular surgery perspective

Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is an emerging device-based treatment for patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction refractory to maximally tolerated goal-directed medical therapy. Currently, there is sparse literature on the critical role that vascular surgeons serve in the delivery of this novel therapy. This single-institution series describes the creation of a BAT program and elaborates on the function of vascular surgeons in the multidisciplinary heart failure team. The preoperative evaluation, perioperative care, and postoperative course of patients receiving BAT from March 2022 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Eleven patients were evaluated by a dedicated heart failure cardiologist for medical eligibility and assessed by a vascular surgeon for technical feasibility. Of the 11 patients, 7 were men (63.6%). The median age was 60.5 years (range, 44-73 years). No patient (0.00%) had existing carotid artery disease, and one patient (9.1%) had undergone previous neck radiation therapy. All 11 patients (100%) had an existing cardiac implantable electronic device, and BAT implantation was performed on the same side as the cardiac implantable electronic device in two patients (18.1%). Four patients (36.4%) required preoperative hospital admission for medical optimization before surgery. The median length of surgery was 82 minutes (range, 58-113 minutes), and the median length of stay in the hospital after surgery was 1 day (range, 0-6 days). No major adverse neurologic or cardiovascular events, cranial nerve injuries, device complications requiring reintervention, or heart failure-related mortality at 6 months occurred. Three patients (27.3%) experienced extraneous stimulations, which affected BAT tolerability. Within 6 months after BAT implantation, no significant improvements were observed for several heart failure disease burden markers compared with 6 months before BAT implantation. Our early results demonstrate that BAT implantation is a safe procedure with rare complications. Vascular surgeons play an important role in the multidisciplinary delivery of this novel device-based therapy. More data are needed to understand whether BAT is beneficial in the treatment of heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction refractory to maximally tolerated goal-directed medical therapy.

Commentary: Optimizing perioperative care for elderly patients with a hip fracture: future directions?

Commentary: Optimizing perioperative care for elderly patients with a hip fracture: future directions?

Anesthetic Aspects of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy (HITHOC) in Treatment of Pleural Malignancies - Experiences from IORS

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) is a procedure that includes surgical removal of all visible tumor implants and intrathoracic application of gradually heated cytostatic solution. Numerous changes in hemodynamic, respiratory, core body temperature and metabolic parameters are possible during this complex procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze pathophysiological changes which occur during CRS + HITHOC procedure, and to suggest efficient strategies for perioperative patient care that might reduce complication rate. Methods: The study included 7 patients who underwent CRS + HITHOC in our cancer center. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guideline for Thoracic Surgery was applied to all patients. Data on intraoperative hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, heart rate, cardiac output) and temperature variations were collected from medical records and analyzed in three timelines: during the CRS phase, at the beginning, and the end of cytostatic perfusion. Occurrence of respiratory, renal, and cardiac complications was monitored. Results: All patients were respiratory stable during one-lung ventilation, with adequate gas exchange. Hemodynamic stability was compromised at the beginning of cytostatic perfusion, with significant decrease of mean arterial pressure and stroke volume. Two patients required vasopressor support. Average core body temperature was satisfactory in all patients. Coagulation disorders and acute renal failure were not recorded in postoperative period. One patient developed atrial fibrillation which was successfully pharmacologically restored. Conclusion: Our results indicate that goal directed fluid management following ERAS protocol, with maintaining hemodynamic stability and normothermia, could prevent perioperative complications during HITHOC procedure.

The impact of inhalation versus total intravenous anesthesia on the immune status in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a double-blind randomized clinical trial (TeMP).

Breast cancer (BC) mortality primarily stems from metastases rather than the primary tumor itself. Perioperative stress, encompassing both surgical and anesthetic factors, profoundly impacts the immune system, leading to alterations in neuroendocrine pathways and immune functions, potentially facilitating tumor progression and metastasis. Understanding the immunomodulatory effects of different anesthesia techniques is crucial for optimizing perioperative care in patients with BC. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) serves as one of the key indicators of perioperative immune response. To compare the effects of inhalation anesthesia (IA) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on perioperative immune response in BC surgery patients. In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, BC surgery patients were randomized to receive either TIVA with propofol or IA with sevoflurane. The primary endpoint was NLR assessment. Secondary immune parameters measured included natural killer cells, various T cell subsets, B cells, the immuno-regulatory index [T-helpers (CD3+CD4+)/cytotoxic T-cells (CD3+CD8+)], matrix metallopeptidases (MMP-9), complement components, and immunoglobulins, preoperatively and at 1 and 24 hours postoperatively. The study included 98 patients (IA: 48, TIVA: 50). The baseline characteristics exhibited remarkable similarity across the groups. No significant difference in absolute NLR values was found between IA and TIVA groups at any time point (1 hour: p = 0.519, 24 hours: p = 0.333). Decreased IgA and IgM levels post-surgery suggested potential negative impacts of IA on humoral immunity compared to TIVA. CRP levels increased more by 24 hours (p = 0.044) in IA compared to TIVA. No significant differences were observed in natural killer cells, T cell subsets, B cells, MMP-9 levels or complement components between groups. Significant differences in the immuno-regulatory index between the TIVA and IA groups at one hour postoperatively (p = 0.033) were not maintained at 24 hours. While there were no notable differences in NLR among the types of anesthesia, the observed disparities in immunoglobulin content and C-reactive protein levels between groups suggest that we cannot dismiss the potential immunosuppressive effects of inhalational anesthesia in breast cancer surgeries. Further investigation needed to clarify the impact of various anesthesia methods on immune function and their implications for long-term cancer outcomes.

Perioperativno zbrinjavanje pacijenata sa kardiovaskularnim rizikom u abdominalnoj hirurgiji

Introduction: The preparation of cardiovascular patients for different types of surgical interventions represents a challenge in an anesthesiologist's everyday practice. Its complexity depends on the severity of the underlying disease, the effects of the drug treatment, urgency, and the type of surgical intervention. Different types of scoring systems are available when it comes to the assessment of cardiovascular risk in patients during surgery. One of them, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI/Lee criteria), stands out due to its comprehensiveness and simplicity, and is thus applied most frequently. Using the example of two patients with cardiovascular disease, the aim of this paper is to show how the risk of perioperative complications can be reduced by applying a multidisciplinary approach, along with an individualized strategy and modern guidelines. Case reports: In the first case, we presented a patient with acute appendicitis. Because of angina pectoris, one month prior to the planned abdominal surgery, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention was performed placing one stent, after which dual antiplatelet drugs were prescribed. A patient with acute cholecystitis is presented in the second case. Coronary artery bypass grafting is planned within a month upon the abdominal surgery, due to a severe form of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Both patients are at high risk of myocardial damage during surgery, the first patient being at high risk of hemorrhage as well. Conclusion: The appropriate balance in the perioperative care of such patients can be achieved by a multidisciplinary approach, as well as by adapting modern guidelines to patients' individual needs.

The role of perioperative factors in the prognosis of cancer patients: A coin has two sides.

Cancer, the second leading cause of mortality globally, poses a significant health challenge. The conventional treatment for solid tumors involves surgical intervention, followed by chemo- and radio-therapies as well as target therapies, but the recurrence and metastasis of cancers remain a major issue. Anesthesia is essential for ensuring patient comfort and safety during surgical procedures. Despite its crucial role during the surgery, the precise effect of anesthesia on cancer patient outcomes is not clearly understood. This comprehensive review aims to elucidate the various anesthesia strategies used in the perioperative care of cancer patients and their potential effects on patients' prognosis, but understanding the complex relationship between anesthesia and cancer outcomes is crucial, given the complexity in cancer treaments. Examining potential implications of anesthesia strategies on cancer patient prognosis may help better understand treatment efficacy and risk factors of cancer recurrence and metastasis. Through a detailed analysis of anesthesia practices in cancer surgery, this review aims to provide insights that may lead to improving the existing anesthesia protocols and ultimately reduce risk factors for patient outcomes in the field of oncology.

Perioperative Intra-articular Infiltration of Tranexamic Acid and Ropivacaine Cocktail in Bilateral Total Knee Replacement

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative intra-articular infiltration with a tranexamic acid and ropivacaine cocktail in patients undergoing bilateral total knee replacement (TKR). Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 50 patients scheduled for elective bilateral TKR. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either intra-articular infiltration of a tranexamic acid and ropivacaine cocktail (intervention group) or standard care (control group). Outcome measures included postoperative blood loss, pain scores, range of motion, and adverse events. Results: Among the enrolled patients (n=50), the intervention group demonstrated reduced postoperative blood loss, evidenced by higher hemoglobin levels and lower drain output than the control group. Additionally, the intervention group exhibited consistently lower pain scores at various postoperative time points and greater improvements in range of motion. Conclusion: Intra-articular infiltration with a tranexamic acid and ropivacaine cocktail in bilateral TKR patients showed promising outcomes, including reduced blood loss, improved pain control, and enhanced range of motion. These findings suggest the potential of this adjunctive therapy in optimizing perioperative care for patients undergoing bilateral TKR. However, further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to validate these preliminary results and establish this intervention’s long-term efficacy and safety.

Racial and Ethnic Patient Care Disparities in Anesthesiology: History, Current State, and a Way Forward.

Disparities in patient care and outcomes are well-documented in medicine but have received comparatively less attention in anesthesiology. Those disparities linked to racial and ethnic identity are pervasive, with compelling evidence in operative anesthesiology, obstetric anesthesiology, pain medicine, and critical care. This narrative review presents an overview of disparities in perioperative patient care that is grounded in historical context followed by potential solutions for mitigating disparities and inequities.

Perioperative nursing care for hip arthroplasty patients with concomitant hypertension: A minireview.

Hip replacement (HA) is mainly indicated for the elderly, who generally suffer from various underlying diseases such as hypertension. This article provides a review of the key points of perioperative nursing care for patients with hypertension undergoing HA. It analyzes the key points of care during the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) and proposes directions for the development of perioperative nursing care for HA. The prognosis for patients can be improved through the modification of traditional medical approaches and the application of new technologies and concepts.

Transesophageal echocardiography during surgery of the thoracic aorta in adults

Thoracic aortic surgery poses significant challenges due to the complex anatomy and potential for life-threatening complications. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has emerged as a crucial imaging tool in the management of patients undergoing these operations. TEE offers real-time, high-resolution imaging of the heart and aorta, enabling accurate assessment of aortic pathology, evaluation of cardiac function, and monitoring of intraoperative hemodynamics. Its semi-invasive nature, immediate availability, and ability to provide dynamic information make TEE an indispensable adjunct during these intricate procedures. One of the primary indications for TEE during thoracic aortic surgery is the assessment of aortic pathology, including aneurysms, dissections, and aortic valve diseases. TEE allows precise visualization of the extent, location, and severity of aortic lesions, facilitating decision-making regarding repair strategies, graft sizing, and intraoperative guidance. Furthermore, TEE aids in identifying associated cardiac abnormalities such as valvular or ventricular dysfunction, which may impact surgical planning and outcomes. This review aims to summarize the current evidence supporting the use of TEE during thoracic aortic surgical interventions and highlight its invaluable contributions to perioperative patient care.

Comparison of intravenous ibuprofen and paracetamol for peri-operative analgesia in paediatric day care tonsillectomy.

To determine the effectiveness of intravenous ibuprofen and acetaminophen as perioperative analgesics in paediatric patients undergoing day- care tonsillectomy with general anaesthesia. The quasi-experimental stud y was conduc ted at the Ana esthe sia D epartment of Pa k Emirates M ilitary Hospital, Rawalpindi , Pak ist an, from July 20 21 to June 2022, and comp rised paediatric pa t ients aged 5-12 yea r s undergoing day- care tonsil lec tomy with gen era l anaesthesia. The sub jec ts were divid ed into two equa l groups. Patients in Group I received intravenous ibuprofen 7mg/kg and patients in Group P received intravenous paracetamol 10mg/kg im media t ely after induction of anaesthesi a. All patients recei ved standard general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The primary outcome measured was revised faces pain score immediately after recovery and at the time of discharge 6 hours later. Adverse events were also noted. Data was analysed using SPSS 26. Of the 100 patients, there were 50(50%) in Group I; 21(42%) boys and 29(58%) girls with mean age 7.82±1.903 years. The remaining 50(50%) subjects were in Group P; 25(50%) boys and 25(50%) girls with mean age 7.68±1.812 years. At baseline, 44(88%) patients in Group I and 42(84%) in Group P reported no pain, while 6(12%) and 8(16%) patients in the two groups, respectively, reported pain (p=0.56). At discharge, 35(70%) patients in Group I and 18(36%) in Group P reported no pain (p<0.001). Adverse events were not significantly different between the groups (p>0.05). I ntravenous ibuprofen was found to b e a superior pain-killer than intravenous paracetamol for perioperative care of paediatric patients in day- care tonsillectomy.

The Financial Implications of Pancreatic Surgery: The Hospital Is the Big Winner, Not the Surgeon!

High-volume pancreatic surgery centers require a significant investment in expertise, time, and resources to achieve optimal patient outcomes. A detailed understanding of the economics of major pancreatic surgery is limited among many clinicians and hospital administrators. A greater consideration of these financial aspects may in fact have implications for enhancing clinical care and for a broader sustainability of high-volume pancreatic surgery programs. In this retrospective observational study, patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), total pancreatectomy, or distal pancreatectomy at one academic medical center during the fiscal year 2021 were evaluated. Detailed hospital charges and professional fees were obtained for patients using the Qlik perioperative database. Clinical data for the study cohort were gathered from a prospectively maintained, IRB-approved pancreatic surgery database. Charges for the 91-day perioperative period were included. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. During the study period, 159 evaluable patients underwent 1 of 3 designated pancreatic resections included in the analysis. Ninety-seven patients (61%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and 70% (n = 110) underwent PD. The total charges (combined professional and hospital charges) for the cohort encompassing the entire perioperative period were $20,661,759. The median charge per patient was $130,306 (interquartile range [IQR], $34,534). The median direct cost of care was $23,219 (IQR, $6321) and the median contribution margin per case was $10,092 (IQR, $22,949). The median surgeon professional fee charges were $7700 per patient (IQR, $1296) as compared to $3453 (IQR, $1,144) for professional fee receipts (45% of the surgeon charge). The differences between the professional fee charges and receipts per patient were also considerable for other health care professionals such as anesthesiologists ($4945 charges vs $1406 receipts [28%]) and pathologists ($3035 charges vs $680 receipts [22%]). The surgeon professional fees were only 6% of the total charges, while the professional fees for anesthesiology and pathology were 4% and 2% of the total charges, respectively. Supply charges were 3% of the total charges. Longer operative time was correlated with increased hospital and anesthesia charges, without a significant increase in surgeon charges (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.2, respectively). Male sex, diabetes, and low serum albumin correlated with greater total hospital charges (P = 0.01, P = 0.01, and P = 0.03, respectively). The role of the surgeon in the perioperative clinical care of major pancreatic resection patients is crucial and important and is by no means limited to the operative day. Nevertheless, in the context of the current US health care system, the reimbursement to the surgeon in the form of professional fees is a relatively small fraction of the total health care receipts for these patients. This imbalance necessitates a substantial financial partnership between hospitals and their pancreatic surgery units to ensure the long-term viability of these programs.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for the perioperative management of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/pituitary adenomas.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway that has radically modified the management of patients in multiple surgical specialties. Until now, no ERAS Society guidelines have been formulated for the management of cranial pathologies. During the process of ERAS certification for their neurosurgical department, the authors formulated an ERAS protocol for the perioperative care of patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET), along with a compliance checklist to monitor the adherence to it and its feasibility. The authors describe the protocol and checklist and report the results, including a cost-minimization analysis, with the application of the ERAS philosophy. The steps that led to the development of this ERAS protocol, including items concerning the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative period, are detailed. The authors report their preliminary results through the comparison of the care practice of a historical cohort with a consecutive surgical cohort of patients with PitNET who underwent operation after the implementation of this ERAS protocol. A compliance checklist with key performance indicators was useful to monitor the adherence to the protocol and the changes in the perioperative management. Following the introduction of this ERAS protocol, the authors significantly shortened the duration of the antibiotic therapy (p < 0.00001) and increased the use of mechanical (p < 0.00001) and pharmacological measures to prevent deep venous thrombosis (p = 0.002). The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for the ERAS group (p = 0.00014), and there was no increase in readmission rate or postoperative complications. The documentation and data tracking strongly improved in the ERAS cohort and the authors were more attentive in pain evaluation (p = 0.001), postoperative hormonal supplementation (p = 0.001) and early feeding and mobilization (p = 0.0008 and p < 0.00001, respectively). More patients were discharged on day 3 after surgery in the ERAS group (p < 0.00001). The compliance to the whole process increased from 64.2% to 89.5% (p = 0.016), and the compliance per patient was also found to have significantly increased (p < 0.00001). The introduction of a standardized ERAS protocol for the perioperative management of patients with PitNET allowed the authors to improve the multidisciplinary management of these patients. With the application of simple cost-effective interventions and with the avoidance of unnecessary measures, gains were made in terms of early mobilization and feeding, thereby resulting in a shorter in-hospital stay.

Application Value of Evidence-Based Nursing in the Perioperative Care of Ankle Fracture Patients

Objective: To analyze the value of applying evidence-based nursing in the perioperative care of patients with ankle fractures and propose corresponding measures to improve the quality of patient care. Methods: The study started in May 2022 and was terminated in March 2023. During this period, 50 patients with ankle fractures treated by our hospital were selected as research subjects. They were divided into a control group and a research group. The control group had 25 patients who received routine care, and the research group had 25 who received evidence-based care. The nursing effects of the two groups were observed and compared. Results: The pain scores, quality of life, incidence of adverse reactions, and nursing satisfaction of patients in the research group were all significantly better than those in the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Evidence-based nursing can effectively improve the quality of care, reduce the risk of adverse reactions, and promote patient recovery, so it is suitable for clinical implementation.