Perioperative Anticoagulation Research Articles

Exploring the Perioperative Use of DOACs, off the Beaten Track

A notable increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has been observed in the last decade. This trend has surpassed the prescription of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to the absence of the need for regular laboratory monitoring and the more favorable characteristics in terms of efficacy and safety. However, it is very common that patients on DOACs need an interventional or surgical procedure, requiring a careful evaluation and a challenging approach. Therefore, perioperative anticoagulation management of patients on DOACs represents a growing concern for clinicians. Indeed, while several surgical interventions require temporary discontinuation of DOACs, other procedures that involve a lower risk of bleeding can be conducted, maintaining a minimal or uninterrupted DOAC strategy. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of patient characteristics, including age, susceptibility to stroke, previous bleeding complications, concurrent medications, renal and hepatic function, and other factors, in addition to surgical considerations, is mandatory to establish the optimal discontinuation and resumption timing of DOACs. A multidisciplinary approach is required for managing perioperative anticoagulation in order to establish how to face these circumstances. This narrative review aims to provide physicians with a practical guide for DOAC perioperative management, addressing the most controversial issues.

Case report: A case of perineal prolapse of giant uterine fibroids complicated by multiple pulmonary embolisms and deep venous thrombosis

A 43-year-old woman with a history of uterine fibroids, anemia, and deep vein thrombosis presented with a chief symptom of prolapse of tumor from the perineum, complicated by infection. The case was further complicated by bilateral pulmonary multiple embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute cardiac insufficiency, acute renal insufficiency, and shock. The patient was treated with preoperative placement of an inferior vena cava filter, open hysterectomy, and perioperative anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin. She smoothly navigated the perioperative period and recovered completely.

Postoperative bleeding after complex abdominal wall reconstruction: A post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundAbdominal wall reconstruction requires extensive dissection of the abdominal wall, exposure of the retroperitoneum, and aggressive chemoprophylaxis to reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications. The need for early anticoagulation puts patients at risk for bleeding. We aimed to quantify postoperative blood loss, incidence of transfusion and reoperation, and associated risk factors in patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction. MethodsAll patients underwent a posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release and placement of retromuscular mesh for ventral hernias <20 cm wide and were enrolled in a clinical trial assessing the utility of trans-fascial mesh fixation. A post hoc analysis was performed to quantify postoperative hemoglobin drop, blood transfusions, and procedural interventions for ongoing bleeding during the first 30 postoperative days. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of transfusion. ResultsIn 325 patients, hemoglobin decreased by 3.61 (±1.58) g/dL postoperatively. Transfusion incidence was 9.5% (n = 31), and 3.1% (n = 10) required a surgical intervention for bleeding. Initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation postoperatively resulted in a higher likelihood of requiring surgical intervention for bleeding (odds ratio 10.4 [95% confidence interval 2.75–43.8], P < .01). Use of perioperative therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with higher rates of transfusion (odds ratio 3.51 [95% confidence interval 1.34–8.53], P < .01). Neither intraoperative blood loss nor operative times were associated with an increased transfusion requirement or need for operative intervention. ConclusionPatients undergoing transversus abdominis release are at a high risk of postoperative bleeding that can require transfusion and reoperation. Patients requiring postoperative therapeutic anticoagulation are at particularly high risk.

Perioperative Management of Spinal Arteriovenous Malformation Embolization: Delayed Venous Thrombosis and Implications for Severe Back Pain.

The prognosis of untreated spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) is poor. Embolization plays an important role in the management of intramedullary SAVMs. Delayed aggravation due to spinal venous thrombosis following successful embolization has been reported; however, perioperative management strategies to prevent thrombosis have not been explored. We present our single-center experience of SAVM embolization and perioperative management, including anticoagulation. We retrospectively evaluated 18patients with SAVMs who underwent transarterial embolization. Perioperative anticoagulation therapy was administered to selected patients. We compared the characteristics of the patients, including perioperative management procedures, between those with and without postoperative worsening following embolization. Acute postoperative worsening within 1week occurred in 4 (22.2%) patients. Of these, immediate worsening was observed in one patient as aprocedure-related complication. Delayed worsening after 24 h was observed in 3 patients, caused by delayed venous thrombosis with severe back pain. Rescue anticoagulation for delayed worsening improved symptoms in two patients. Acomparison between patients with and without acute postoperative worsening revealed significant differences in age (median 46.5 vs. 26.5 years, p = 0.009) and the presence of postoperative back pain (75.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.005); however, there was no significant difference in use of selective anticoagulation (p = 0.274). The results of this study suggest that SAVM embolization can cause acute worsening due to postoperative venous thrombosis with severe back pain, which may be reversed by anticoagulation therapy. Back pain is an important finding that suggests venous thrombosis, and anticoagulation should be urgently administered.

The impact of perioperative pharmacologic anticoagulation on venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

The impact of perioperative pharmacologic anticoagulation on venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Comparative Outcomes of Peripheral Vascular Interventions in Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Inhibitors and Vitamin K Antagonists

In patients undergoing revascularization for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), low-dose Factor Xa inhibitors (FXaI) taken with aspirin improved limb and cardiovascular outcomes compared to aspirin alone. Furthermore, in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, FXaI are recommended over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for chronic anticoagulation. While studies have evaluated different perioperative anticoagulation regimens in patients treated for PAD, the optimal regimen for chronic anticoagulation in patients with PAD undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) has not been determined. This analysis compares outcomes of patients after PVI that require chronic anticoagulation with FXaI and VKA. The Vascular Quality Initiative-PVI database was used. Patients consistently treated with FXaI or VKA before the procedure, at discharge, and on long-term follow-up were defined as those receiving chronic anticoagulation. Patient demographics, procedural details, and perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between FXaI and VKA groups. A total of 109,268 patients were analyzed, and 6,885 were chronically anticoagulated with FXaI (N=2,427) or VKA (N=4,458). Patients anticoagulated with VKA were more frequently males (65.3% vs. 61.0%, P<0.001) with end-stage renal disease (9.7% vs. 4.6%, P<0.001) and more likely to be treated for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (58.1% vs. 52.7%, P<0.001). Rates of hematoma following PVI were significantly higher in patients taking VKA compared to FXaI (3.5% vs. 1.9%, P<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that VKA were associated with increased perioperative hematoma than FXaI (odds ratio=1.89 [1.30-2.82]). Compared to patients taking VKA, those receiving FXaI had lower rates of major amputation (6.7% vs. 8.4%, P=0.020) and mortality (7.6% vs. 15.2%, P ≤ 0.001). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients consistently anticoagulated with FXaI had improved amputation-free survival after PVI. Adjusting for significant patient and procedural characteristics, Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that there is an increased risk for major amputation or mortality in patients using VKA compared to FXaI (hazard ratio 1.61, [1.36-1.90]). Chronic anticoagulation with FXaI as compared to VKA was associated with superior perioperative and long-term outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing PVI. FXaI should be the preferred agents over VKA for chronic anticoagulation in patients with PAD undergoing PVI.

Clinical outcomes after inferior vena cava resection for malignant disease. A single center experience of 51 vena cava resections

Background and objectiveFor tumors involving inferior vena cava (IVC), surgery with complete resection remains the first line treatment. Management of IVC after resection, either ligation without reconstruction or primary reconstruction, is debated. Our study aimed to evaluate type of venous reconstruction, anticoagulation management and morbidity. MethodsA French single center database of patients who underwent partial or total circumferencial resection of the IVC for malignant disease was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were any oncologic procedure for a retroperitoneal neoplasm requiring concomitant resection of the IVC with or without venous reconstruction with prosthesis. Exclusion criteria were surgery before year 2000. Data were descriptive and reverse Kaplan Meier was used for follow-up calculation. The endpoints were the rate of prosthetic reconstruction, the use of anticoagulation and the post-operative outcomes. ResultsFifty – one patients were included with a median duration of follow-up of 54.8 months. The majority of patients were men (56.9%). Median age of the population was 44.1 years. Most of the patients underwent surgery for primary testicular cancer and for sarcoma. Complete IVC resections were performed in 46 (90,2%) patients, 32 having a concomitant prosthetic replacement. Eight patients underwent aortic resection in the same operative time. Postoperative morbidity was 33.3%. Post-operative anticoagulation was done in 24 patients. At 1 month, four patients developed thrombosis in the prosthesis. ConclusionsIVC resections are feasible and safe. Venous reconstruction and postoperative management were planned according to the preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings. We propose a decision-tree for peri-operative management and anticoagulation.

Successful microvascular surgery in patients with thrombophilia in head and neck surgery: a case series

BackgroundIn this case series, a perioperative anticoagulation protocol for microvascular head and neck surgery in patients with thrombophilia is presented. Microvascular free-flap surgery is a standard procedure in head and neck surgery with high success rates. Nevertheless, flap loss—which is most often caused by thrombosis—can occur and has far-reaching consequences, such as functional impairment, prolonged hospitalization, and increased costs. The risk of flap loss owing to thrombosis is significantly increased in patients with thrombophilia. Therefore, perioperative anticoagulation is mandatory. To date, no perioperative anticoagulation protocol exists for these high-risk patients.Case presentationWe present three exemplary male Caucasian patients aged 53–57 years with free flap loss owing to an underlying, hidden thrombophilia.ConclusionWe present a modified anticoagulation protocol for microvascular surgery in these high-risk patients, enabling successful microsurgical reconstruction.

Hematoma Prevention Using Tachosil (Fibrin Sealant) Patch during Insertion of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices without Suspending Antithrombotics: Three Case Reports

Patients undergoing insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices often exhibit perioperative hemorrhagic complications. Perioperative antithrombotic management, which balances the risk of acute thrombosis and postoperative bleeding, is therefore important for these patients. In this case report, we present three cases of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) insertion. While the three patients each had different reasons for not discontinuing antithrombotic medications, they all needed CIEDs. During the CIED implantation procedures, a small incision was made on the pectoralis muscle region to obtain a small subcutaneous pocket, and Tachosil, a fibrin sealant patch, was inserted below and above the inserted device. The patients showed no pocket hematoma formation or any hemorrhagic complications. We thus concluded the application of a fibrin sealant patch could be an option for perioperative anticoagulation management without interruption of anticoagulants and antiplatelets.

Anticoagulation Stewardship to Bridge the Implementation Gap in Perioperative Anticoagulation Management.

Lack of alignment of care protocols among providers in health care is a driver of increased costs and suboptimal patient outcomes. Perioperative anticoagulation management is a good example of a complex area where protocol creation is a clinical challenge that demands input from multiple experts. Questions regarding the need for anticoagulation interruptions are frequent. Yet, due to layers of complexity involving analysis of anticoagulation indication, surgical risk, and anesthesia-associated bleeding risk as well as institutional practices, there is heterogeneity in how these interruptions are approached. The recent perioperative anticoagulation guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians summarize extensive evidence for the management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications in patients who undergo elective interventions. However, implementation of these guidelines by individual clinicians is highly varied and often does not follow the best available clinical evidence. Against this background, anticoagulation stewardship units, which exist to improve safety and quality monitoring for the anticoagulated patient, are of growing interest. These units provide a bridge for the implementation of value-based, high-quality guidelines for patients who need perioperative anticoagulation interruption. We use a case to pragmatically illustrate the problem and tactics for change management and implementation science that may facilitate the adoption of perioperative anticoagulation guidelines.

Anticoagulation management in elderly patients with proximal femur fractures- overview of current concepts.

Proximal femur fractures (PFF) are common injuries in elderly patients and can have considerable effects on their quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Due to pre-existing comorbidities, the prevalence of anticoagulated patients is increasing. The right timing for surgery and perioperative anticoagulation treatment remains controversial. This overview aims to summarize current practices in the pre- and postoperative anticoagulation management and the recommended time to surgery in elderly patients with PFF. Time to surgery for anticoagulated patients is often prolonged due to worries about serious perioperative bleeding and higher transfusion demands. But the delay of surgical PFF treatment increases the risk for perioperative complications like pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis and urinary tract infections. Early surgery can be achieved with a consistent and interdisciplinary perioperative anticoagulation management. Antiplatelets do not have to be discontinued and surgery should be performed early without delay. For patients taking vitamin K antagonists (VKA) an INR less than 1.5 is recommended prior to surgery, which can be achieved by pausing VKA intake or by administering vitamin K, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). For the treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) a plasma drug level of under 50 pg/mL is considered safe for surgery. If the plasma level can not be determined, a gap of 24 h between the last DOAC dose and surgery is recommended. The systemic administration of tranexamic acid can reduce overall blood loss and transfusion rates in anticoagulated patients with PFF. Surgical treatment of PFF should be performed within 24 h, as delayed surgery increases the risk for perioperative complications. This also applies to anticoagulated patients, when clinically appropriate. International and interdisciplinary guidelines are necessary to ensure early and appropriate treatment of anticoagulated elderly patients with PFF.

Perioperative Optimization and Management of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Patient: A Narrative Review on Updates in Anticoagulation, Hypertension and Diabetes Medications

PurposeThe preoperative management guidelines of surgical patients are constantly evolving as newer evidence-based research is published. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons need to be current with the increasingly more complex new drug therapies and updated national association(s) guidelines. This narrative review provides a synopsis with important reference tables for updated preoperative optimization guidelines for anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, antihypertensive management, and glycemic control in the preoperative period for the oral and maxillofacial surgery patient. It also includes the most current anesthesia guidelines on glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) receptor agonists. MethodsThe search strategy utilized pubmed.gov to identify the most recent national society guidelines and review articles pertinent to perioperative anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, antihypertensive management, and glycemic control. ResultsThe search identified 75 articles from the American College of Surgeons, American Heart Association, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Cardiologists, in addition to recent reviews discussing the standard of care for optimization of patients in the perioperative period. ConclusionMedical optimization prior to surgery is important for safe and efficient surgical practice and has been shown to improve overall mortality. This narrative review provides a summary of the current data with recommendations focusing on four key points.

Perioperative Management of Anticoagulation and Antithrombotic Therapy

The latest updates to the NCCN Guidelines for perioperative management of anticoagulation and antithrombotic therapies reflect significant changes in the use of bridging anticoagulation. For patients with low- to intermediate-risk atrial fibrillation, the standard of care has shifted toward reduced reliance on bridging anticoagulation. The rationale for this shift is based on the BRIDGE trial, which revealed a 3-fold greater risk of major bleeding without significant reduction in thrombotic outcomes in patients receiving bridging therapy. In patients with mechanical heart valves, findings from the PERIOP2 study led to similar conclusions. Both of these studies have contributed to a paradigm shift in perioperative anticoagulation management, pivoting toward personalized therapy based on patient-specific bleeding and thrombotic risks. For emergent or elective surgeries, the NCCN Guidelines provide a framework for more individualized decision-making, emphasizing the need for ongoing cooperation among physicians, surgeons, and patients.

Association between left atrial strain and peri-operative stroke in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background It has been reported that left atrial (LA) phasic function, evaluated by LA strain, is associated with cardiogenic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There are no well-established echocardiographic findings to predict peri-operative stroke in AF ablation. Purpose The aim is to evaluate between LA strain and peri-operative stroke in AF ablation. Methods This study included 103 consecutive AF patients (90 paroxysmal and 13 non-paroxysmal AF cases) who underwent initial cryo-ablation without interruption of peri-operative anticoagulation from January 2019 to August 2022. Pre-operative echocardiography was used to measure the LA strain items: LA reservoir strain, contractile strain, and conduit strain in sinus rhythm. Twenty-three patients were excluded due to AF rhythm and atrial septal defect. Peri-operative stroke was detected by using magnetic resonance imaging on the day after ablation. Results Peri-operative stroke occurred in 9 patients (11.3%), and there was no symptomatic stroke. In univariate analysis, age (69.6 ± 4.8 years vs. 64.2 ± 10.9 years, p&amp;lt;0.05) and log brain natriuretic peptide (1.61 ± 0.26 vs. 1.32 ± 0.42 p&amp;lt;0.05) were significantly higher in the stroke group. On the other hand, LA reservoir strain (20.9 ± 5.6% vs. 29.8 ± 8.3%, p&amp;lt;0.01) and LA conduit strain (10.9 ± 2.3% vs. 15.9 ± 7.0%, p&amp;lt;0.01) in the stroke group was significantly lower compared with the non-stroke group. There were no significant differences in the rate of intra-operative electrical cardioversion and other clinical parameters between both groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that LA reservoir strain cut-off value of 22.7% provided a c-statistic of 0.82 for predicting peri-operative stroke in AF ablation. Conclusions LA reservoir strain is closely associated with peri-operative stroke in AF ablation.ROC curve analysis

Effectiveness of perioperative anticoagulation interruption without heparin bridging on thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing elective invasive procedures: a systematic review protocol.

This review will determine whether withholding heparin bridging is superior to bridging in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring temporary interruption of anticoagulation therapy in the perioperative period of an elective invasive procedure. Atrial fibrillation is the most commonly diagnosed clinical arrhythmia. It is an important cause of cardioembolic events, requiring the use of oral anticoagulation in most patients. It is unclear whether heparin bridging during temporary interruption of anticoagulants has superior outcomes compared with no bridging in the perioperative setting. This review will consider studies that compare adults aged 18 years or above; diagnosed with atrial fibrillation; undergoing elective invasive procedures; and who have had oral anticoagulants temporarily withheld with or without heparin bridging. Participants will be excluded if they had an alternative reason for anticoagulation or were admitted for emergency surgery. Outcomes will include arterial or venous thromboembolism (including stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism), major bleeding events, non-major bleeding events, length of hospital stay, and all-cause mortality. The review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL will be searched for randomized and non-randomized trials from inception until the present. Two independent reviewers will screen citations by title and abstract, and again, at full text. Risk of bias will be assessed using the JBI critical appraisal instrument, and data will be extracted using a modified extraction tool. Results will be synthesized using a random effects meta-analysis and presented in a forest plot. Heterogeneity will be tested for using the standard χ2 and I2 tests. Overall certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE approach. PROSPERO CRD42022348538.

Perioperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Drain Placement Does Not Increase Venous Thromboembolism Risk After Thoracic and Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence after thoracic and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR/FEVAR) is high (up to 6-7%) relative to other vascular procedures; however, the etiology for this discrepancy remains unknown. Notably, patients undergoing TEVAR/FEVAR commonly receive cerebrospinal fluid drains (CSFDs) for neuroprotection, requiring interruption of perioperative anticoagulation and prolonged immobility. We hypothesized that CSFDs are a risk factor for VTE after TEVAR/FEVAR. Consecutive TEVAR/FEVAR patients at a single center were reviewed (2011-2020). CSFDs were placed based on surgeon preference preoperatively or for spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rescue therapy postoperatively. The primary end-point was VTE occurrence, defined as any new deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed on imaging within 30-days postoperatively. Routine postoperative VTE screening was not performed. Patients with and without VTE, and subjects with and without CSFDs were compared. Logistic regression was used to explore associations between VTE incidence and CSFD exposure. 897 patients underwent TEVAR/FEVAR and 43% (n=387) received a CSFD at some point during their care (preoperative: 94%[n=365/387]; post-operative SCI rescue therapy: 6%[n=22/387]). CSFD patients were more likely to have previous aortic surgery (44% vs. 37%; p=.028) and received more postoperative blood products (780 vs. 405mL; p=.005). The overall VTE incidence was 2.2% (n=20). 70% (14) patients with VTE had DVT, 50% (10) had PE, and 20% (4) had DVT and PE. Among TEVAR/FEVAR patients with VTE, 65% (n=13) were symptomatic. Most VTEs (90%, n=18) were identified in-hospital and the median time to diagnosis was 12.5 (IQR 7.5-18) days postoperatively. Patients with VTE were more likely to have non-elective surgery (95% vs. 41%; p<.001), had higher ASA classification (4.1 vs. 3.7; p<.001), required longer ICU admission (24 vs. 12-days; p<.001), and received more blood products (1386 vs. 559mL; p<.001). VTE incidence was 1.8% in CSFD patients compared to 3.5% in non-CSFD patients (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.28-1.78, p = .300). However, patients receiving CSFDs postoperatively for SCI rescue therapy had significantly greater VTE incidence (9.1% vs. 1.1%; p=.044). CSFD placement was not associated with an increased risk of VTE in patients undergoing TEVAR/FEVAR. VTE risk was greater in patients undergoing nonelective surgery and those with complicated perioperative courses. VTE risk was greater in patients receiving therapeutic CSFDs compared to prophylactic CSFDs, highlighting the importance of careful patient selection for prophylactic CSFD placement.

The Early Initiation of Perioperative Anticoagulation Therapy in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Hypertension After Laparoscopic Splenectomy Plus Esophagogastric Devascularization: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience.

Background: Portal veinous system thrombosis (PVST) is a common complication after laparoscopic splenectomy plus esophagogastric devascularization (LSED). Anticoagulation therapy was still in debate in LSED perioperation. This study aimed to determine the postoperative risk factors of PVST, the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulation therapy after LSED procedure, and the potential impact of anticoagulation on patients' liver function and overall survival (OS). Methods: Three hundred patients who underwent LSED were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed in the study. The characteristics of patients, perioperative parameters, risk of PVST, and long-term follow-up data were recorded and analyzed. Results: One hundred eighty six of 300 patients received perioperative anticoagulation therapy (p-AT) postoperation, while 114 patients did not receive p-AT (non-p-AT). The non-p-AT group had more intraoperative blood loss, PVST, longer abdominal drain days, and postoperative hospital stays separately compared with the p-AT group. No significant difference of postoperative complications was found between the two groups. In the 1-year follow-up postoperation, both groups had great improvement in hypersplenism and the portal vein hemodynamics. During the 10-year follow-up period, the incidence of PVST was significantly higher in the non-p-AT group than in the p-AT group. Anticoagulation therapy, sex, variceal hemorrhage history, portal vein diameter, and portal vein velocity were the independent prognostic factors determined by the Cox regression analysis for PVST. The thrombosis-free survival rate (P = .002), recurrent hemorrhage-free survival rate (P < .01), and the OS rate (P < .01) were significantly lower in the non-p-AT group than in the p-AT group. Conclusions: The initiate use of anticoagulation therapy in postoperation of LSED is effective and safe in cirrhotic patients. The anticoagulation therapy after LSED will help decrease portal vein thrombosis, the rebleeding rate, and extend the OS of the patients, especially among women, with variceal hemorrhage history, high portal vein diameter, and low portal vein velocity.

Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation associated silent cerebral emboli: A narrative review.

The incidence of silent cerebral emboli (SCE) associated with atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) is much higher than that of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Interventional electrophysiologists have been increasingly alerted to asymptomatic cerebral infarction over the years. Plentiful studies revealed that diagnostic definitions, detection modalities, energy sources, ablation strategies, perioperative anticoagulation regimens, and patient-related factors were associated with the risk of AFCA-associated SCE. Studies related to non-interventional procedures found that SCE may prompt stroke, cognitive decline, and dementia later in life, suggesting a possible role of AFCA-associated SCE in the cognitive function of patients with AF. However, there is no consistent evidence for this view to date. Given that the majority of patients with AF being elderly and the increased risk of cognitive impairment in AF itself, efforts should be made to minimize the occurrence of AFCA-associated SCE.

Potential for a Virtual Care Model in the Perioperative Management of Anticoagulant Therapy: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinic Review

Abstract Background With a trend toward greater virtual care in selected clinical settings, perioperative anticoagulant management appears well suited for this care delivery model. We explored the potential for virtual care among patients who are receiving anticoagulant therapy and require perioperative management around the time of an elective surgery/procedure. Methods We undertook a retrospective review of patients who were receiving anticoagulant therapy, either a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or warfarin, assessed in a perioperative anticoagulation-bridging clinic over a 5-year period from 2016 to 2020. Using prespecified criteria, we determined the proportion of patients who likely would be suitable for virtual care (receiving a DOAC or warfarin and having a minimal- or low-/moderate-bleed-risk surgery/procedure), those who likely would be suitable for in-person care (receiving warfarin and requiring heparin bridging for a mechanical heart valve), and patients who would be suitable for either care delivery model (receiving a DOAC or warfarin, but not with a mechanical heart valve, and requiring a high-bleed-risk surgery/procedure). Results During the 5-year study period, there were 4,609 patients assessed for perioperative anticoagulant management in whom the most widely used anticoagulants were warfarin (37%), apixaban (30%), and rivaroxaban (24%). Within each year assessed, 4 to 20% of all patients were undergoing a minimal-bleed-risk procedure, 76 to 82% were undergoing a low-/moderate-bleed-risk surgery/procedure, and 10 to 39% were undergoing a high-bleed-risk surgery/procedure. The proportion of patients considered suitable for virtual, in-person, or either virtual or in-person management was 79.6, 7.1, and 13.3%, respectively. Conclusion In patients who were assessed in a perioperative anticoagulation clinic, there was a high proportion of patients in whom a virtual care model might be suitable.

Perioperative bridging anticoagulation in patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs) undergoing elective surgery/procedures at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH), Thailand

Perioperative bridging anticoagulation in patients receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs) undergoing elective surgery/procedures at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH), Thailand