Background. The choice of an antiarrhythmic drug, proof of its effectiveness and safety in a short period of time in patients with non-coronary ventricular arrhythmia are the most pressing problems of practical arrhythmology. Objective. To resolve the issue of choosing an antiarrhythmic drug in patients with a mixed nature of ventricular arrhythmia, several ectopic foci, and to optimize further tactics for their management. Design and methods. Of 167 patients with ventricular arrhythmia distribution during periods of wakefulness who performed a stress test, 32 individuals with non-coronary arrhythmias of a mixed nature (by the participation of the autonomic nervous system) were selected. All patients underwent an acute pharmacological stress test with a beta-blocker. Antiarrhythmic therapy was selected under the control of multi-day ECG telemonitoring. Results. In the pretest of exercise tests, single ventricular parasystole was recorded in all 32 patients. In 3 patients, the arrhythmia persisted throughout the entire load, in 4 patients it progressed, in 25 patients the parasystole of the initial morphology disappeared, and at the peak of the load/early recovery period, arrhythmia of a different morphology appeared. Indications for drug treatment were determined for all patients with the choice of the drug after acute pharmacological tests. Then, therapy with two antiarrhythmic drugs was initiated using multi-day ECG telemonitoring, the purpose of which was to control the efficacy, safety, choice of doses and time of drug administration. On days 5–6, combination therapy was effective in 25 patients (78 %). Conclusion. With the help of stress tests, it is possible to accelerate not only the search for the cause of ventricular arrhythmia, but also the choice of a personalized method of treatment. Supplementing the examination with pharmacological tests allows predicting the result of combined antiarrhythmic therapy with a beta-blocker and a class IС drug with an anticholinergic effect.
Read full abstract