Abstract BACKGROUND Despite advancements in molecular classification of ependymomas, the tumor immune microenvironment of posterior fossa group A (PFA) ependymomas and the spatial interplay between tumor and immune cells have not been elucidated. Here, we aim to comprehensively characterize the tumor immune microenvironment of pediatric PFA ependymomas, which could ultimately uncover leads for immunotherapy for these children. METHODS We collected bulk RNA-sequencing data of 28 PFA ependymoma samples and defined two subgroups based on the expression of immune-related genes (n = 716). Furthermore, we analyzed single-cell RNA-sequencing data of PFA ependymomas to dissect myeloid and lymphocyte heterogeneity, which we subsequently used to deconvolute bulk data. Lastly, we performed both high-dimensional cyclical immunofluorescence of 20 protein markers on a tissue microarray containing 60 cores from 20 tumor samples and immunohistochemistry on whole tissue slides. RESULTS Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of bulk RNA expression of immune-related genes revealed the presence of an immune-enriched subgroup. Furthermore, analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing data identified multiple distinct myeloid cell subpopulations, with gene expression signatures reflective of inflammation, angiogenesis/hypoxia response and proliferation. Deconvolution of the bulk RNA-sequencing data using the newly annotated single-cell data as a reference showed enrichment of both myeloid cells and lymphocytes in the immune-enriched subgroup. Lastly, spatial immune profiling enabled detailed mapping of the organization of the tumor immune microenvironment and unveiled a heterogeneous presence of myeloid cells, with enrichment of infiltrating myeloid and T-cells in peri-necrotic areas compared to areas with high tumor cell density. CONCLUSIONS Our multi-faceted approach has shed unprecedented light on the cellular and spatial heterogeneity within the PFA ependymoma immune microenvironment. Further studies are warranted to unravel the functional differences between the two subgroups and the potential impact on response to future immunotherapeutic approaches/interventions.
Read full abstract