Perinatal Care Providers Research Articles

Adapting Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Perinatal Depression to Improve Access and Appeal of Preventive Care.

Existing and emerging evidence indicates that perinatal depression is a key contributor to preventable morbidity and mortality during and after childbearing. Despite this, there are few effective options for prevention and treatment that are readily accessible for and appealing to pregnant people. Aspects of routine health care systems contribute to this situation. Furthermore, societal and health care systems factors create additional barriers for people of color, people living in rural regions, and people living in poverty. Our interprofessional team of perinatal care providers, mental health providers, community partners, health services scientists, health equity scientists, and business leaders developed and are piloting a perinatal mental health preventive intervention designed to increase access and appeal of a program incorporating mindfulness cognitive behavioral therapy with proven efficacy in preventing perinatal depression. In this article, we briefly summarize key systems barriers to delivering preventive care for perinatal depression in standard prenatal care clinics. We then describe Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Perinatal Depression and outline our adaptation of this intervention, Center M. Finally, we identify next steps, challenges, and opportunities for this recent innovation.

Midwifery Autonomy and Employment Changes During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented the midwifery workforce with challenges for maintaining access to high-quality care and safety for patients and perinatal care providers. This study analyzed associations between different types of professional autonomy and changes in midwives' employment and compensation during the early months of the pandemic. An online survey distributed to midwifery practices in fall 2020 compared midwives' employment and compensation in February 2020 and September 2020. Chi-square analysis determined associations between those data and measures of midwives' autonomy: state practice environment, midwifery practice ownership, intrapartum practice setting, and midwifery participation in practice decision-making. Participants included lead midwives from 727 practices, representing 50 states and the District of Columbia. Full-time equivalent (FTE) positions and number of full-time midwives were stable for 77% of practices, part-time employment for 83%, and salaries for 72%. Of the remaining practices, more practices lost FTE positions, full-time positions, part-time positions, and salary (18%, 15%, 9%, and 18%, respectively) than gained (11%, 8%, 8%, and 9%, respectively). Early retirements and furloughs were experienced by 9% of practices, and 18% lost benefits. However, midwifery practice ownership was significantly associated with increased salaries (20.3% vs 7.1%; P < .001) and decreased loss of benefits (7.8% vs 19.9%; P = .002) and furloughs (3.8 vs 10.1%; P = .04). Community-based practice was significantly associated with increased FTE positions (19.0% vs 8.8%; P = .005), part-time positions (17.4% vs 5.1%; P < .001), and salary (19.7% vs 7.0%; P < .001), as well as decreased loss of benefits (11.5% vs 21.1%; P = .02) and early retirement (1.4% vs 6.6%; P = .03). State practice environment and participation in practice decision-making were not directly associated with employment and compensation changes. Policies should facilitate midwifery practice ownership and the expansion and integration of community birth settings for greater perinatal care workforce stability, greater flexibility to respond to disasters, and improved patient access to care and health outcomes.

Experiences, Beliefs, and Values Influencing Midwives' Attitudes Toward the Use of Childbirth Interventions.

Intervention rates in perinatal care vary between and within countries, without populations' characteristics as a full explanation. Research suggests that one factor in this variation might be the attitudes of perinatal health care providers. Systematic knowledge on the background of midwives' attitudes and how this influences the use of interventions is limited. The study aim was to to explore experiences, beliefs, and values that influence midwives' attitudes toward interventions in perinatal care. A qualitative study using in-depth interviews with primary care midwives (n = 20) in the Netherlands. The interviews were performed in June 2019 and combined a narrative approach with a semistructured interview guide. Inductive content analysis was applied. We identified 2 main themes: attitudes toward interventions and influences on midwives' attitudes. The midwives in our study described their attitudes toward interventions as oriented to either wait and see or check and control. Care based on wait and see displayed a more supportive style of behavior, and care based on check and control appeared to display a more directive style of behavior. In the theme of influences on midwives' attitudes, 3 subthemes emerged: experiences in collaboration, trust and fear, and woman-centeredness. Midwives with a wait and see attitude seem to have a more restricted approach toward interventions compared with midwives with a check and control attitude. Midwives need to be aware how their experiences, beliefs, and values shape their attitudes toward use of interventions. This awareness could be a first step toward the reduction of unwarranted interventions.

Neonatal stabilization in Canada: Updates to acute care of at-risk newborns (ACoRN) practices and programming.

Disparities in preterm birth and neonatal mortality rates persist in Canada, in part as the result of insufficient training in newborn resuscitation and stabilization care, and inconsistent adherence to best practices. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) has been the standard of care in all facilities providing perinatal care in Canada since the 1990s, but perinatal care providers and educators have continued to recognize gaps in knowledge and skill when stabilizing newborns post-resuscitation, especially in settings where this care is encountered infrequently. The Acute Care of at-Risk Newborns (ACoRN) program was developed to bridge such gaps. In ACoRN, an initial Primary Survey and systems-based care pathways (Sequences) prioritize and guide the assessment, essential care, and management of at-risk or unwell newborns in the first hours and days of life. This practice point highlights changes to practice and recommendations since 2012, when the ACoRN text and program were last revised. Like NRP, ACoRN is administered in Canada by the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS). A newly revised and updated textbook and teaching program, both launched in 2021, will standardize care, increase competence and confidence among perinatal care providers, and improve neonatal outcomes in Canada and elsewhere in years to come.

Pregnant and Postpartum Women's Perceptions of Barriers to and Enablers of Physical Activity During Pregnancy: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Physical activity throughout pregnancy has been shown to have health benefits for the pregnant person, including reductions in the risk of preeclampsia and gestational weight gain and improvements in blood pressure regulation. Despite the benefits, many pregnant women do not meet the guidelines for physical activity throughout pregnancy. Therefore, it is important to determine what influences women's activity levels during pregnancy. This systematic review of the qualitative literature aimed to determine pregnant and postpartum women's perceptions of barriers to and enablers of physical activity, specifically during pregnancy. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Embase were searched systematically to identify qualitative studies investigating pregnant or postpartum women's perceptions of barriers to and enablers of physical activity during pregnancy. Included studies were limited to populations of pregnant or postpartum women, the majority of whom were aged 18 to 40 years, and studies published from 1985 onward. Data quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Studies Checklist. Data were extracted using NVivo software and subsequently mapped on the COM-B framework. Twenty-five qualitative studies were included in this systematic review. Sixteen themes were identified that mapped onto 6 components of the COM-B framework. Commonly reported barriers to physical activity during pregnancy included pregnancy symptoms, lack of knowledge of what constitutes safe activity, and the opinions of women's social circles. Commonly reported enablers of physical activity during pregnancy were social support and the experienced benefits, including physiologic, psychological, and social benefits. The results of this systematic review have clinical implications for perinatal care providers, as the overall benefits of physical activity during pregnancy have been well documented in previous studies. The authors recommend clinicians aim to explore pregnant women's perspectives on physical activity during pregnancy in order to be able to address their perceived barriers to and enablers of physical activity during pregnancy.

Clinicians' Perspectives on Racism and Black Women's Maternal Health.

Objective:The objective of this study was to explore clinician perceptions of how racism affects Black women's pregnancy experiences, perinatal care, and birth outcomes.Materials and Methods:We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with perinatal care clinicians practicing in the San Francisco Bay Area (January to March 2019) who serve racially diverse women. Participants were primarily recruited through “Dear Perinatal Care Provider” email correspondences sent through department listservs. Culturally concordant, qualitatively trained research assistants conducted all interviews in person. The interviews ranged from 30 to 60 minutes and were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed verbatim. We used the constant comparative method consistent with grounded theory to analyze data.Results:Most participants were obstetrician/gynecologists (n = 11, 44%) or certified nurse midwives (n = 8, 32%), had worked in their current role for 1 to 5 years (n = 10, 40%), and identified as white (n = 16, 64%). Three themes emerged from the interviews: provision of inequitable care (e.g., I had a woman who had a massive complication during her labor course and felt like she wasn't being treated seriously); surveillance of Black women and families (e.g., A urine tox screen on the Black baby even though it was not indicated, and they didn't do it on the white baby when, in fact, it was indicated); and structural care issues (e.g., the history of medical racial experimentation).Conclusion:Clinicians' views about how racism is currently operating and negatively impacting Black women's care experiences, health outcomes, and well-being in medical institutions will be used to develop a racial equity training for perinatal care clinicians in collaboration with Black women and clinicians.

Perawatan Kolaborasi untuk Kesehatan Mental Perinatal: Tinjauan Literatur

Factors that enhance women's experience in health care during the perinatal period are providing opportunities to develop interrelated relationships with professional health care. The services provided are high-quality information for women, families, and health professionals. Collaborative practice can also reduce complications, hospital care, health team conflicts, and mortality rates. General patients report higher satisfaction, better service, and better health outcomes. In the health sector, collaborative practice can improve patient and health team satisfaction, reduce the duration of care, reduce maintenance costs, reduce the incidence of self-defense, and reduce outpatient visits. Objective: The literature of this review is to summarize collaborative care for perinatal mental health. Method: This study is a journal publication with a literature summary, and article search using comparative studies of computerized databases (PubMed and BMC). Results: In improving mental health care services Collaboration between health care institutions, general practitioners, and mental health professional services is needed. Access to mental health care is inadequate, this is because perinatal health care providers are not sufficient to make initial preparations, referrals, complaints about aspects of maternal emotional care, and psychological services only benefit a portion of the population. Conclusion: The main problem of this collaboration is the knowledge of doctors and general nurses on perinatal maternal mental health problems, poor supervision systems, inadequate information systems, and clinical technology. Collaboration between professionals in the health and health sector as well as adequate health program policy support, as well as increasing shared awareness will improve mental health for mothers in the perinatal period.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy during the Perinatal Period: Understanding Psychological and Cultural Factors to Improve Care and Address Racial/Ethnic Health Inequities.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy during the Perinatal Period: Understanding Psychological and Cultural Factors to Improve Care and Address Racial/Ethnic Health Inequities.

Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness studies of breech birth at term (Breech-COS)\u2014an international multi-stakeholder Delphi study: study protocol

BackgroundWomen pregnant with a breech-presenting foetus at term are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The most common intervention used to improve neonatal outcomes is planned delivery by caesarean section. But this is not always possible, and some women prefer to plan a vaginal birth. A number of providers have proposed alternative interventions, such as delivery protocols or specialist teams, but heterogeneity in reported outcomes and their measurements prevents meaningful comparisons. The aim of this paper is to present a protocol for a study to develop a Breech Core Outcome Set (Breech-COS) for studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve outcomes associated with term breech birth.MethodsThe development of a Breech-COS includes three phases. First, a systematic literature review will be conducted to identify outcomes previously used in effectiveness studies of breech birth at term. A focus group discussion will be conducted with the study’s pre-established Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) group, to enable service user perspectives on the results of the literature review to influence the design of the Delphi survey instrument. Second, an international Delphi survey will be conducted to prioritise outcomes for inclusion in the Breech-COS from the point of view of key stakeholders, including perinatal care providers and families who have experienced a term breech pregnancy. Finally, a consensus meeting will be held with stakeholders to ratify the Breech-COS and disseminate findings for application in future effectiveness studies.DiscussionThe expectation is that the Breech-COS will always be collected in all clinical trials, audits of practice and other forms of observation research that concern breech birth at term, along with other outcomes of interest. This will facilitate comparing, contrasting and combining studies with the ultimate goal of improved maternal and neonatal outcomes.Trial registrationCore Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) #1749

“Real decision-making is hard to find” - Swiss perinatal care providers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards decision-making in birth: A qualitative study

PurposeIneffective communication and limited autonomy frequently lie at the core of negative birth experiences. Numerous studies indicate a need to improve decision-making with a deliberate shift towards person-centered care. Thus, it is imperative to study the determinants of autonomy-depriving decision-making and ineffective communication through both provider and birthing people perspectives. Our study explores providers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards decision-making in birth, particularly regarding person-centeredness, autonomy, informed consent, and decision-making capacity. We conducted a qualitative interview study and employed reflexive thematic analysis. In total, 15 Swiss providers from birth hospitals and birth centers participated. ResultsAnalysis resulted in the development of three themes and eight subthemes. First, the “otherness of birth” encompasses providers' perception of birth as a clinical situation that is fundamentally different from other clinical situations. Second, the otherness of birth goes along with an “ethical fading”, that is ethical dimensions – to some extent – fade into the background as they are obscured by various circumstances that are related to birth, birthing people, and providers. Third, the “physiology-pathology-dichotomy” describes the permeative power of this dichotomy with respect to providers’ decision-making approaches and their normative weighing of ethical principles. ConclusionsDecision-making in birth is a critical factor in the actualization of autonomy and characterized by bioethical complexity. Our study reveals important insights into how autonomy-depriving decision-making and ineffective communication unfolds in birth. Our findings provide a framework for future research and yield points of leverage for enhancing decision-making in birth.

Freestanding Birth Centers: An Evidence-Based Option for Birth.

Every childbearing person has the right to learn about all options for perinatal care provider and birth setting. To ensure an informed decision about their preferred birth plan, information should be provided either preconceptionally or in early pregnancy. Personal preferences and risk status should be considered in decision-making. Numbers of births in birth centers have doubled over past decade to almost 20,000 births per year. The evidence shows that childbearing people who participate in birth center care, even if they have only birth center prenatal care, experience better outcomes including lower rates of preterm birth, low birth weight births, and cesarean birth, and higher rates of breastfeeding when compared to people with similar risk profiles who receive typical perinatal care.

Measuring the readiness to screen and manage intimate partner violence: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the PREMIS tool for perinatal care providers.

Pregnancy and perinatal periods are significant risk factors of intimate partner violence (IPV), a major public health problem that could begin or intensify during these periods. Perinatal care providers have a major role in the identification and the management of IPV. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt into French the Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey (PREMIS) tool, a reliable instrument to assess the knowledge, attitudes and preparedness to address IPV, and to evaluate its psychometric properties. The PREMIS was cross-culturally adapted by conducting forward and backward translations, following international guidelines. An online cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the PREMIS-French in perinatal care providers: data completeness, factor analysis, score distribution, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, item-total correlations, inter-subscale correlations and test-retest reliability. The PREMIS was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted to the context of metropolitan France. The results obtained from 360 perinatal care providers showed good acceptability. Exploratory factor analysis of the "Opinions" items resulted in a six-factor solution with six of the eight subscales of the original structure identified. Good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.54 to 0.97) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.46 to 0.92) for the "Background" and "Opinions" subscales were found. This study provides evidence of the good psychometric properties of the PREMIS-French. This valid instrument will help to understand perinatal care providers' barriers to IPV screening and management and will help to focus on specific lacks of knowledge for developing IPV education programs.

A Socio-Ecological Approach to Understanding the Perinatal Care Experiences of People with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities in Ontario, Canada.

Accessible and quality care during the perinatal period is critical for optimal maternal and neonatal health. Using the socio-ecological model, the purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators that shape the perinatal care experiences of people with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 individuals with IDD in Ontario, Canada, who had given birth within the past 5years. Interviews focused on care experiences before, during, and after pregnancy. Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, and the socio-ecological model guided analysis. Barriers at the societal (e.g., cultural norms of motherhood), policy/institutional (e.g., child protection policies and practices), interpersonal (e.g., inadequate formal and informal support), and intrapersonal levels (e.g., internalized stigma) contributed to participants having negative perinatal care experiences. Conversely, we identified facilitators on the interpersonal level (e.g., positive interactions with perinatal care providers and familial and social service supports) as positively shaping participants' perinatal care experiences. Findings reveal that the perinatal care experiences of people with IDD are shaped by several interrelated factors that largely stem from societal-level barriers, such as dominant (stigmatizing) discourses of disability. To improve the perinatal care experiences of people with IDD, there is a need for interventions at multiple levels. These include the development of policies to support perinatal care for diverse populations and training care providers to enact policies at the institutional and interpersonal levels.

Being Known: A Grounded Theory Study of the Meaning of Quality Maternity Care to People of Color in Boston.

IntroductionExperiences of people of color with maternity care are understudied but understanding them is important to improving quality and reducing racial disparities in birth outcomes in the United States. This qualitative study explored experiences with maternity care among people of color to describe the meaning of quality maternity care to the cohort and, ultimately, to inform the design of a freestanding birth center in Boston.MethodsUsing a grounded theory design and elements of community‐based participatory research, community activists developing Boston's first freestanding birth center and academics collaborated on this study. Semistructured interviews and focus groups with purposefully sampled people of color were conducted and analyzed using a constant comparative method. Interviewees described their maternity care experiences, ideas about perfect maternity care, and how a freestanding birth center might meet their needs. Open coding, axial coding, and selective coding were used to develop a local theory of what quality care means.ResultsA total of 23 people of color participated in semistructured interviews and focus groups. A core phenomenon arose from the narratives: being known (ie, being seen or heard, or being treated as individuals) during maternity care was an important element of quality care. Contextual factors, including interpersonal and structural racism, power differentials between perinatal care providers and patients, and the bureaucratic nature of hospital‐based maternity care, facilitated negative experiences. People of color did extra work to prevent and mitigate negative experiences, which left them feeling traumatized, regretful, or sad about maternity care. This extra work came in many forms, including cognitive work such as worrying about racism and behavioral changes such as dressing differently to get health care needs met.DiscussionBeing known characterizes quality maternity care among people of color in our sample. Maternity care settings can provide personalized care that helps clients feel known without requiring them to do extra work to achieve this experience.

Unravelling the epidemiology and clinical impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in neonates.

The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has transformed the means by which health care is delivered, including perinatal care. Given neonates have unique vulnerabilities to acquiring infections,1 determining optimal practices to prevent and respond to neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infections has been an area of much discussion and debate amongst perinatal healthcare providers. Published information on the clinical characteristics and mode of acquisition for neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection was scarce earlier in the pandemic, largely limited to case reports. An early cohort study from China revealed higher disease severity in young infants than older children, by criteria which defined severe and critical cases as including early respiratory and in some cases gastrointestinal symptoms, or progression to severe respiratory or systemic illness, respectively.2 Gale et al.'s paper presents data from a peak period of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United Kingdom (UK) and is an important contribution to our understanding of the incidence, disease severity and transmission modes for neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study found that COVID-19 disease severe enough to require hospitalisation was rare in neonates, at 5.6 per 10 000 livebirths. While many infections were mild, the study confirms a higher propensity to severe disease in neonates than older children.2, 3 42% of cases were defined as severe, albeit using criteria that may include neonates who, while unwell, would not necessarily require intensive care.2 Data on transmission modes for neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection have been limited and conflicting. World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines endorse keeping mother and baby together in cases of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection.4 However, confusion as to the likelihood of viral transmission may have influenced adherence to these guidelines, with a number of cases where separation of mothers and babies occurred, including in this cohort. This study confirms that vertical transmission is rare and that transmission by close contact is unlikely to occur with maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, even where a mother with active infection co-rooms with her baby. This finding supports the ongoing implementation of WHO guidelines to keep mothers and babies together, a practice important for bonding, the establishment of feeding, and newborn survival.5 Nosocomial transmission did occur, underscoring a need for stringent infection control procedures for all centres which provide care for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. This paper also highlights inequality in disease incidence for SARS-CoV-2 for babies of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups, with an incidence three to four-fold that of individuals classified as having white ethnicity. This finding is not isolated to neonates, with a disproportionately high disease incidence amongst individuals of BAME groups amongst pregnant women and wider adult populations.6, 7 This observation is a substantial public health concern that likely speaks to the influence of social determinants of health. Providers of perinatal health care still have much to learn about SARS-CoV-2. Ongoing collection and analysis of comprehensive perinatal epidemiologic data will remain paramount for our capacity to respond this pandemic in a manner that is well-informed, evidence-based and effective in optimising the health and well-being of all mothers and babies affected. None to declare. https://ebneo.org/sars-cov-2-epidemiology

Systematic Screening for Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders to Promote Onsite Mental Health Consultations: A Quality Improvement Report.

Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders are the most common complication during pregnancy and postpartum. Screening, diagnosis, and treatment for these disorders are inhibited by limited mental health resources for patients and health care providers, lack of provider training, and time constraints. Systematic screening combined with onsite mental health consultation is an evidence-based method to increase timely diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to promote and improve onsite mental health consultations through the implementation of a systematic screening guideline. The systematic screening guidelines included administration of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at the perinatal intake visit, the Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale between 28 and 32 weeks' gestation and again between 2 and 8 weeks postpartum. The guidelines included onsite mental health consultations for eligible women. Screening rates, attended onsite mental health consultations, and health care provider satisfaction and feedback surveys were collected over a 3-month period, before and after guideline implementation. Perinatal mood and anxiety disorder screening rates were significantly increased from 24.9% to 64.2% (P < .001) at the perinatal intake visit and in the third trimester from 0.3% to 32.8% (P < .001) with the implementation of a systematic screening guideline. Onsite mental health consultations significantly increased from 7.2% to 15.2% (P < .001). Perinatal care providers (n = 9, 100%) were satisfied with the screening guideline and reported that it added 5 minutes or less to their office visits. The implementation of a systematic perinatal mood and anxiety disorder screening guideline increased completed screenings in the perinatal period and increased the number of attended onsite mental health consultations. Systematic screening combined with onsite mental health consultation is a successful way to identify at-risk women and offer critical and convenient maternal mental health care without increasing the burden on perinatal care providers.

Why is the labor epidural rate low and cesarean delivery rate high? A survey of Chinese perinatal care providers.

China has a high cesarean delivery (CD) and low labor epidural analgesia (LEA) rate. This online survey was conducted to explore the reasons behind this phenomenon and potential solutions. A voluntary, anonymous survey was distributed via both WeChat and professional websites for 4 months amongst groups of Chinese perinatal professionals. Data was collected and analyzed using a Chi-square test and presented as percentages of respondents. 1412 respondents were recorded (43% anesthesiologists, 35% obstetricians, 15.5% midwives or labor and delivery nurses, and 6.5% others), and 1320 respondents were care providers. It was found that 82.7% (1092/1320) of the provider respondents used CD per patient request in fear of lawsuits or yinao/yibao and 63.4% (837/1320) used CD for respecting superstitious culture. The number one reason (noted by 60.2% (795/1320) of all the three specialties) for low LEA use was lack of anesthesia manpower without statistical difference among specialties. The most recommended solution was increasing the anesthesia workforce, proposed by 79.8% (1053/1320) of the three specialties. However, the top solution provided by the two non-anesthesia specialties is different from the one proposed by anesthesiologists. The later (83%, 504/606) suggested increasing the incentive to provide the service is more effective. The answers to questions related to medical knowledge about CD and LEA, and unwillingness of anesthesiologists, parturients and their family members to LEA were similar for the most part, while the opinions regarding low LEA use related to poor experiences and unwillingness of obstetricians and hospital administrators were significantly divided among the three specialties. In the providers' point of view, the unwillingness to LEA from parturient's family members was the most salient (26.1%, 345/1320), which is more than all care providers, hospital administrators, and parturients themselves (16.8%, 222/1320). The reasons for high CD rate and low LEA use are multifactorial. The sociological issues (fear of yinao/yibao and superstitious culture) were the top two contributing factors for the high CD rate in China, while lack of anesthesia manpower was the top response for the low LEA use, which contributes to its being the most recommended solution overall from the three specialties. An incentive approach to providers is a short-term solution while training more perinatal care providers (especially among anesthesiologists and midwives), improving billing systems, and reforming legal systems are 3 systemic approaches to tackling this problem in the long-term.

Cultivating Resilience Among Perinatal Care Providers During the Covid-19 Pandemic.

The Covid-19 pandemic has further illuminated the already existing need for methods of building resilience in perinatal caregivers. Using a scoping review approach, literature was examined to identify evidence-based models of resilience building in a cohort of perinatal clinicians. Research published between January 2015 and 2020 was evaluated using PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases. Of the initial 3399 records reviewed, 2 qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Given the deleterious effects of Covid-19 on perinatal care providers, and in light of the paucity of available studies, personnel, time, and funding should be allocated for research to address these issues.

Clinically and Culturally Competent Care for Transgender and Nonbinary People: A Challenge to Providers of Perinatal Care.

Transgender and nonbinary people experience high rates of discrimination and stigma in healthcare settings, which have a deleterious effect on their health and well-being. While the preventative healthcare needs of transgender and gender nonbinary people are slowly starting to make their way into nursing curriculum, there is still a very little guidance on how to appropriately and respectfully care for this population during one of the most vulnerable interactions with the healthcare system, the perinatal period. Without exposure or education, nurses are challenged on how to provide compassionate and culturally competent care to transgender and nonbinary people. The focus of this review is to provide guidance to nurses caring for transgender and gender nonbinary people during the perinatal period. Terminology and respectful language, a discussion around the decision to parent, affirming approaches to physical examination, and care during pregnancy and the postpartum period are all discussed. By increasing the number of nurses who are trained to deliver high-quality and affirming care to transgender and nonbinary patients, challenging health inequities associated with provider discrimination can be mitigated.

Urgent Need of Continuing Medical Education: The Key for Patient Awareness of Labor Epidural Analgesia – A Survey of Chinese Perinatal Care Providers

Abstract Objective: This survey was designed to understand the misconceptions about labor epidurals. Methods: This voluntary and anonymous online survey on wenjuan.com was conducted from September 1st, 2015 to January 1st, 2016 via mainly WeChat groups dedicated to perinatal healthcare providers in China. The questionnaire included items inquiring the knowledge and opinions about labor epidural analgesia related to maternal complications, baby safety, and effect on laboring. Incomplete surveys were excluded from the data analysis. The data was presented as percentages and a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appreciate, was used to quantitatively compare the results. Results: A total of 1412 respondents completed surveys with 42.9% (606/1412) of them being anesthesiologists, 35.1% (495/1412) being obstetricians, 11.8% (167/1412) being midwives, 3.7% (52/1412) being labor and delivery nurses, and 6.5% (92/1412) being hospital administrators and unspecified. The study revealed a lack of knowledge in labor pain control. Although 82.4% (1164/1412) of respondents were familiar with labor epidural analgesia, 8.9% (126/1412) did not know how it works, and 1.1% (15/1412) never heard it in a multiple-choice question. The three main groups (anesthesiologists, obstetricians, and midwives/labor and delivery nurses) were chosen for comparisons. Opinions among these three groups concerning five questions in the three main concerns were evaluated using a statistical significance of P &lt; 0.05. Conclusion: The results in our survey indicated an urgent need of continuing medical education to multidisciplinary specialties to improve evidence-based medical practices as these misconceptions have existed for over 10 years in the medical professionals. Lack of public awareness fueled by misconceptions related to labor epidural analgesia may be associated with a lack of professional knowledge. Correct knowledge in professionals needs to be disseminated to the public in order to dispel possible misconceptions and rumors about labor epidural analgesia. This would not only enhance patient understanding of their care but also improve maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes.