You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized VII1 Apr 20101756 PERIDURAL ANESTHESIA IN RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY–A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL EVALUATING THE INFLUENCE ON INTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS Daniel Baumunk, Kurt Miller, Mark Schrader, Steffen Weikert, Florian Jentzmik, Jan Ebbing, Frank Friedersdorff, Hannes Cash, Jan Breckwoldt, and Martin Schostak Daniel BaumunkDaniel Baumunk More articles by this author , Kurt MillerKurt Miller More articles by this author , Mark SchraderMark Schrader More articles by this author , Steffen WeikertSteffen Weikert More articles by this author , Florian JentzmikFlorian Jentzmik More articles by this author , Jan EbbingJan Ebbing More articles by this author , Frank FriedersdorffFrank Friedersdorff More articles by this author , Hannes CashHannes Cash More articles by this author , Jan BreckwoldtJan Breckwoldt More articles by this author , and Martin SchostakMartin Schostak More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1605AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES As previously described, restriction of intraoperative infusions, general anesthesia in combination with peridural anesthesia and maintainance of a 25-30° Trendelenburg position reduces bleeding in radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). This study was initialized to prospectively evaluate the influence of peridural anesthesia alone on blood loss in RRP. METHODS Of 350 consecutive patients for RRP at the Charité-Urology (CBF) between May 2006 and Dec 2007, 265 were prospectively randomized into 2 groups: group 1 (gr.1) with peridural anesthesia in combination with general anesthesia, group 2 (gr.2) with deep general anesthesia alone. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning preoperative parameters such as patients age, BMI, hemoglobin levels, Charlson comorbidity score, PSA levels, Gleason score of biopsy, prostate size or clinical stage. All patients were operated by 3 highly experienced surgeons in relative volume restriction and 25-30° Trendelenburg position. Nerve sparing was achieved in 94% of all patients. RESULTS Assessment was possible in 235 out of 265 patients (gr.1: n=116; gr.2: n=119). Overall transfusion rate was 0.84%. There was no significant difference (p=0.63) in blood loss between the two groups neither regarding the hemoglobin difference between preoperative day and first postoperative day (3.7g/dl in gr.1 vs. 3.65g/dl in gr.2) nor counting volume of the surgical aspirator and weight of used lap sponges (gr.1: 665 gr; gr.2: 705 gr; p=0.948). The reduction of the mean arterial pressure as a sign of sympaticolysis was more intensive in gr.1 (p=0.001) which led to slightly more infusions (p=0.004), in particular more kolloids (p=0.007) for these patients. Postoperative pain relief and patients satisfaction were higher in gr.1. No differences were found between the two groups concerning oncological outcome, complications, operation time, hospitalization or duration of the transurethral catheterization. There were no additional complications with the peridural catheter but 2 patients in gr.2 were re-intubated for prolonged narcosis but extubated on the same day. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative use of peridural anesthesia leads to a very effective intraoperative sympathicolysis and painfree postoperative care but does not significantly reduce blood loss compared to deep general anesthesia alone. Berlin, Germany© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e678-e679 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Daniel Baumunk More articles by this author Kurt Miller More articles by this author Mark Schrader More articles by this author Steffen Weikert More articles by this author Florian Jentzmik More articles by this author Jan Ebbing More articles by this author Frank Friedersdorff More articles by this author Hannes Cash More articles by this author Jan Breckwoldt More articles by this author Martin Schostak More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract