Perioperative Neurologic Events Research Articles

Diabetes mellitus: a risk factor for carotid endarterectomy?

Symptomatic cerebrovascular disease is more common in patients who have diabetes mellitus than in the nondiabetic population, even when matched for associated risk factors. Although the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy has been established by NASCET and ACAS, several small studies have noted an increased rate of perioperative neurologic morbidity in patients with diabetes. Data for all patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy at a single institution from Jan. 1990 to Dec. 1995 were prospectively entered into a computerized vascular registry and form the basis of this report. Of 732 carotid endarterectomy procedures performed, 284 (39%) were performed in patients who had diabetes mellitus. Patients with diabetes and without diabetes were matched for clinical presentation (diabetic patients, 45% asymptomatic; nondiabetic patients, 43%) and internal carotid artery percent stenosis (86.6% +/- 10.6% vs 86.4% +/- 10.6%). Patients with diabetes were younger at presentation than patients without (68.8 +/- 8.5 years vs 70.9 +/- 8.5 years; p < 0.005) and were more likely to have a history of coronary artery disease (53% vs 45%; p = 0.04). The mean total length of stay was 6.1 days for patients with diabetes and 4.8 days among patients without (p = 0.01). An adverse postoperative cardiac event (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or arrhythmia) occurred in nine patients with diabetes (3.2%) and in five nondiabetic patients (1.1%; p < 0.05). By logistic regression analysis, however, diabetes was not an independent risk factor for a postoperative cardiac event (p = 0.28). There were 11 perioperative neurologic events (eight cerebrovascular accidents, three transient ischemic attacks) during the entire period (1.5%), of which six were among diabetic patients (2.1%) and five among nondiabetic patients (1.1%; p = NS). Of the eight cerebrovascular accidents, three occurred in diabetic patients (1.0%) and five in nondiabetic patients (1.1%; p = NS). The total operative mortality rate was 0.3% (diabetic patients, 1 of 284, 0.35%; nondiabetic, 1 of 447, 0.2%). Patients with diabetes who undergo carotid endarterectomy are more likely to have coexisting cardiac disease, which may contribute to a higher incidence of postoperative cardiac morbidity. Diabetes mellitus alone, however, is not a risk factor for postoperative cardiac morbidity in patients who undergo carotid surgery. In addition, carotid endarterectomy may be safely performed in patients with diabetes with neurologic morbidity and mortality rates that are comparable with those of the nondiabetic population

Hemodynamically Significant Carotid Disease and Prophylactic Carotid Endarterectomy in CABG Patients—Impact on Perioperative Neurologic Events

Perioperative neurologic deficits occur in 2-5% of patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The effect of preexisting high-grade carotid artery stenosis, as determined by (1) the presence of a cervical bruit, (2) ocular plethysmog raphy (OPG), and (3) duplex scan, and the value of prophylactic carotid endarterectomy in preventing stroke, are uncertain. The hospital courses of 427 patients who underwent pre-CABG carotid duplex scan and coronary artery bypass (CAB) as the only cardiac procedure between April 1992 and June 1994 were reviewed (1) to evaluate the rela tionship between carotid stenosis and perioperative neurologic events and (2) to determine whether endarterectomy for high-grade lesions (80-99%) decreases the risk of perioperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA). There were 11 strokes (2.58%) in 427 patients, 4 CVAs occurred in 389 patients without significant carotid disease; 12 patients had total occlusion of one carotid artery and 4 of them developed a CVA (33.3%); 26 patients had a high-grade stenosis (80-99%) of one carotid artery. Twelve of these patients underwent either a pre-CABG carotid endarterectomy (CE) (5 patients) or simul taneous CE + CABG (7 patients). There were no neurologic events in this group. The 14 other patients with 80-99% stenosis did not undergo a CE. There were 3 CVAs and 1 transient ischemic attack (TIA) in this group. Seven of 11 CVAs (64%) occurred in 34 patients with either total or high-grade carotid disease (P &lt; .0001 by Fisher Exact Test and Wilcoxin Rank Sum). Conclusions: (1) high-grade or total occlusion of a carotid artery is associated with significantly increased risk or perioperative neurologic events. (2) Carotid endarterec tomy appears to be protective. (3) A significant number (4 of 11) of neurologic events are due to causes other than carotid stenosis.

“Just in time” decision making for ICU care after carotid endarterectomy

Many patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CE) do not require active intensive care unit (ICU) care (AIC). Until recently, all patients spent 24 hours postoperatively in an ICU, but many of these patients were simply monitored and did not need unique ICU services. To aid in developing a selective policy for ICU admission following CE, we reviewed preoperative risk factors, recovery room course, and total hospital stay of 126 patients for 2 years when postoperative ICU admission was routine. Preoperative assessment included presence or absence of cardiac disease, hypertension, severe respiratory disease, diabetes, arrhythmia, renal failure, and a Goldman cardiac risk score. The operative, recovery room, and ward records were reviewed for conditions requiring AIC. Requirement for AIC was defined as need for infusion of vasoactive, bronchodilator, or antiarrhythmic medication beyond the recovery room period. In addition, treatment for coronary ischemia or MI, need for active diuresis, perioperative neurological event, or requirement for mechanical ventilation were indications for AIC. There were 132 CEs in 126 patients; 37% required AIC as defined above. When patients who required AIC were compared with patients not requiring AIC, the only significant difference was the number of risk factors per patient. Goldman cardiac risk class I patients were at less risk for cardiac morbidity than the combined Class II and III patients. In an individual patient, preoperative risk assessment does not aid in predicting the need for AIC following CE. Selection of patients for ICU admission following CE can be accurately determined by a short period of recovery room observation.