IntroductionRecent literature has suggested a trend toward a higher comorbidity burden in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a lack of data on the impact of increased comorbidities on the cost-effectiveness of TKA. The purpose of this study was to compare the financial implications and perioperative outcomes of patients who do and do not have a high comorbidity burden (HCB). MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 10,647 patients who underwent an elective, unilateral TKA between 2012 and 2021 and had available financial data. Patients were stratified into HCB (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] ≥ 5) and American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] scores of 3 or 4) and non-HCB groups and were 1:1 propensity-matched based on baseline characteristics. Perioperative data, revenue, costs, and contribution margins (CM) of the inpatient episode were compared between groups. The 90-day readmissions and revisions were also compared. Of the 10,647 patients reviewed (1,186 HCB, 9,461 non-HCB), 1,536 patients were included in the matched analyses (768 per group). ResultsThe HCB patients had significantly greater total (P < 0.001) and direct (P < 0.001) costs, yet hospital revenue did not differ between cohorts (P = 0.638). This resulted in a significantly decreased CM for the HCB group (P = 0.009). The HCB cohort also had a significantly greater length of stay (P < 0.001) and 90-day readmissions (P = 0.005). ConclusionsIncreased inpatient costs for HCB patients undergoing TKA were not met with increased revenue to cover these costs, leading to a decreased CM. Furthermore, greater 90-day readmissions in the HCB cohort add to the already disproportionate financial burden of these patients. The capacity of hospitals to cover indirect expenses might be impacted, jeopardizing the accessibility of care for HCB patients who need TKA. Current reimbursement models should be modified to adequately consider the increased financial burden associated with HCB patients undergoing TKA.
Read full abstract