Peri-implant Probing Depth Research Articles

Investigating the Impact of Various Abutment Materials on Peri-Implant Tissue Health at Tripoli-Libya

This research investigates the impact of different abutment materials, including titanium, zirconia, and hybrid materials, on peri-implant tissue health in dental implantology. A prospective cohort study design was employed, involving 150 participants who received single or multiple dental implants from Banzi & Bianco s.r.l. (B&B) a dental implant company based in Italy. Clinical parameters, such as peri-implant probing depth, bleeding on probing, and radiographic analysis, were measured at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-abutment placement. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and regression, were conducted to identify significant associations between abutment materials and peri-implant tissue health parameters. The results revealed nuanced relationships among the abutment materials and their impact on peri-implant tissue health. Interestingly, the hybrid material group exhibited more favorable outcomes in maintaining optimal tissue health compared to the titanium and zirconia groups. This finding suggests that the choice of abutment material can significantly influence the long-term health of peri-implant tissues. This study contributes valuable insights for clinicians in selecting abutment materials for dental implant restorations, highlighting the importance of considering hybrid materials as a potential option for better clinical outcomes (p< 0.001).

Reconstructive surgical therapy of peri-implant defects with ribose cross-linked collagen matrix and crosslinked hyaluronic acid – a prospective case series

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of ribose-crosslinked collagen (RCLC) matrices functionalized by crosslinked hyaluronic acid (xHya) for reconstructive treatment of class I and III (b-c) peri-implantitis lesions in a transmucosal healing mode.Materials and methodsThirteen patients presenting with 15 implants were included in this prospective case series. Upon flap reflection, the implants were thoroughly decontaminated employing glycine powder air polishing and adjunctive sodium hypochlorite. For defect augmentation, xHyA was administered to the bony defect walls, exposed implant surfaces, and the RCLC matrix before defect grafting. The full-thickness flap was readapted and sutured around the implant neck for transmucosal healing. Baseline and respective values at the 12 months post-op evaluation were recorded for the clinical parameters peri-implant probing depth (PPD), buccal soft tissue dehiscence (BSTD) and bleeding on probing (BoP). Furthermore, two independent investigators analyzed radiographic changes in the defect area. The mean changes for all variables were analyzed with a paired t-test.ResultsThe initial mean PPD was 7.2 ± 1.9 mm, and BoP was present in 63% of sites. After 12 months, PPD at the latest visit was 3.2 ± 0.66 mm, which amounted to a respective 3.9 ± 1.85 mm reduction, while the BoP frequency dropped to 10% at all sites. Radiographic bone fill was accomplished for 62.8% of the former defect area, accompanied by a mean MBL gain of 1.02 mm around the treated implants (all p < 0.001).ConclusionsWithin the limits of this case series, we conclude that the proposed treatment sequence substantially improved peri-implant defects and offered a simplified but predictive technique.Clinical relevanceReconstructive treatment approaches for peri-implantitis are effective but remain non-superior to open flap debridement. Further research on novel biomaterial combinations that may improve reconstructive treatment outcomes are warranted. Ribose-crosslinked collagen matrices biofunctionalized by hyaluronic acid used in this study yield improved clinical and radiographic peri-implant conditions after 12 months.Graphical

Comparative evaluation of submerged versus nonsubmerged dental implants - A prospective, clinico-radiographic, split-mouth study

Background: To minimize the risk of impaired osseointegration historically, it has been recommended to insert the implant into the bone (submerged implants) and to allow for submerged healing of 3-6 months in the lower and upper jaw, this conventional technique is advocated. The concept of nonsubmerged healing was introduced in 1988 in which gingival former was placed at the time of implant placement instead of cover screw. The treatment concept of nonsubmerged implant placement enables early implant loading, one surgical procedure only, and a reduced treatment period for the patients. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of submerged and nonsubmerged implants. Materials and Method: A prospective split-mouth study of a minimum of 20 bilateral edentulous patients (total of 40 sites) was selected and randomly distributed in two groups: submerged and nonsubmerged implants. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically by assessing the patients on clinical parameters which included peri-implant probing depth, mucosal thickness, and width of keratinizing gingiva. Radiographic parameters were crestal bone height-distance between implant shoulder and alveolar crest compared from the bone level, on intraoral periapical. Results: Our results revealed that the marginal bone loss is statistically significant and has higher values in nonsubmerged implant protocol. All the other clinical parameters were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: The nonsubmerged implants have reduced the chairside time of the patient, but have a comparatively higher crestal bone loss. Our study concludes that whether it is submerged or nonsubmerged implant placement protocol, under an appropriate oral environment, proper implant selection and methodology both the treatment modalities provide an overall similar success rate.

Dimensional changes in free gingival grafts at implant sites in the reconstructed mandible: a retrospective study.

To evaluate the dimensional changes in free gingival grafts (FGG) at implant sites in mandibular reconstruction patients. Patients who received FGG 4 months after implant placement in the reconstructed mandible with no keratinized mucosa (KM) present were invited for re-examination after 36.7 ± 16.8 months (3.06 ± 1.4 years). Immediately after graft extraction (T0), graft width (GW), graft length (GL), graft thickness (GT), graft dimension (GD), and vertical bone height were documented. Re-examination (T1) included clinical examinations (GW, GL, GD, peri-implant probing depths, and modified Sulcus Bleeding Index), radiographic examination (marginal bone level), and medical chart review. Twenty patients and 62 implants (47 in fibula flaps and 15 in iliac flaps) were included. A significant decrease in GW (51.8%), GL (19.2%), and GD (60.2%), were found between T0 and T1 (p < .001). The univariate analysis showed that GW change was not significantly associated with reconstruction technique, baseline GL, baseline GT, baseline GD, implant location, or type of prosthesis. Implant survival rate of 100% was observed at follow-up. Within the limitations of the study, free gingival grafts at implant sites in the reconstructed mandible undergo dimensional change that result in a reduction of approximately 60% of the original graft dimension. Graft width decreased over 50%. FGG is the standard of care intervention for increasing the amount of KM around implants. This study was the first to evaluate the dimensional change in FGG at implant sites in mandibular reconstruction patients after a medium-term follow-up. Clinical trial registration is not applicable as this study comprehends a retrospective analysis.

Assessment of Peri-Implant Tissue Health and Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate Versus Delayed Implant Placement

ABSTRACT Objectives: The ambition of this research is to gauge marginal bone loss (MBL) and peri-implant tissue health by comparing immediate and delayed implant implantation in a tertiary care setting. Methods: Subjects who had immediate and delayed implants were assessed. Clinical indicators such as bleeding on probing (BOP), peri-implant probing depth, and MBL were assessed at baseline and six months postimplantation. A result was considered statistically significant if it was P &lt; 0.05. Findings: At first, there was no discernible variance between the demographic traits of the two groups. Regarding MBL and peri-implant probing depth, there were statistically significant (P &lt; 0.05) deviations between groups at the six-month mark following implant installation. There were no appreciable variations in bleeding between the two groups, according to probing. Conclusion: In summary, compared to delayed implant placement, rapid implant placement was associated with MBL and increased peri-implant probing depth throughout a six-month follow-up period. These results emphasize the need for careful patient selection and treatment planning in implant dentistry.

Evaluation of ozonated olive oil in the success of immediate dental implants placed into infected sockets

Abstract Purpose This prospective study was conducted to assess the clinical and radiographic influences of topical application of ozonated olive oil on immediate implants inserted into infected fresh extraction sockets. Patients and methods This study was implemented on 14 cases with infected nonrestorable teeth or remaining roots. All cases underwent two-stage implant surgery, stage I: extraction of the tooth, application of ozonated olive oil gel into the infected postextraction socket, and immediate insertion of dental implant fixture, and stage II: 4 months after stage I surgery, the abutment was installed onto the implant fixture. After soft tissue healing around the abutment, the implant was loaded with the final functional prosthesis. All the patients had regular follow-up intervals throughout the study period to evaluate soft tissue and bone healing and implant stability. Results Fourteen patients enrolled in this study, of which there were six (42.9%) males and eight (57.1%) females. The age of the patients ranged between 21 and 45 years with a mean of 33.21 ± 9.16 years. The clinical outcomes including visual analog scale, soft tissue dehiscence, infection, implant stability quotient, gingival index, and peri-implant probing depth all indicated uneventful postoperative healing and 100% survival rate of the implants throughout the follow-up intervals. Radiographic outcome included interpreting cone beam computed tomography measurement of alveolar bone height which showed marked significant positive difference between stage I and stage II surgeries indicating a potential enhancing effect of ozonated olive oil on osseointegration and tissue healing. Conclusion Based on the outcomes of this study, we concluded that topical administration of ozonated olive oil might potentially enhance healing and osseointegration of implants immediately inserted into infected fresh extraction sockets and could exhibit a significant influence on increasing the success rate and minimizing complications. However, further investigation employing a control group, larger sample size, and longer follow-up duration is required to confirm this influence.

Surface Topography Has Less Influence on Peri-Implantitis than Patient Factors: A Comparative Clinical Study of Two Dental Implant Systems.

This study aims to assess the risk of peri-implantitis (PI) onset among different implant systems and evaluate the severity of the disease from a population of patients treated in a university clinic. Furthermore, this study intends to thoroughly examine the surface properties of the implant systems that have been identified and investigated. Data from a total of six hundred and 14 patients were extracted from the Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo. Subject- and implant-based variables were collected, including the type of implant, date of implant installation, medical records, recall appointments up to 2022, periodontal measurements, information on diabetes, smoking status, sex, and age. The outcome of interest was the diagnosis of PI, defined as the occurrence of bleeding on probing (BoP), peri-implant probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm, and bone loss (BL). Data were analyzed using multivariate linear and logistic regression. Scanning electron microscopy, light laser profilometer, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were utilized for surface and chemical analyses. Among the patients evaluated, 6.8% were diagnosed with PI. A comparison was made between two different implant systems: Dentsply Sirona, OsseospeedTM and Straumann SLActive, with mean follow-up times of 3.84 years (SE: 0.15) and 3.34 years (SE: 0.15), respectively. The surfaces have different topographies and surface chemistry. However, no significant association was found between PI and implant surface/system, including no difference in the onset or severity of the disease. Nonetheless, plaque control was associated with an increased risk of developing PI, along with the gender of the patient. Furthermore, patients suffering from PI exhibited increased BL in the anterior region. No differences were observed among the evaluated implant systems, although the surfaces have different topography and chemistry. Factors that affected the risk of developing PI were plaque index and male gender. The severity of BL in patients with PI was more pronounced in the anterior region. Consequently, our findings show that success in implantology is less contingent on selecting implant systems and more on a better understanding of patient-specific risk factors, as well as on implementing biomaterials that can more effectively debride dental implants.

Clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic outcomes at two narrow-diameter implants to replace congenital missing maxillary lateral incisors: A 3-year prospective, clinical study.

To present the 3-year clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic outcomes in patients with congenitally missing lateral incisors rehabilitated with two narrow-diameter implants (NDIs). The original population consisted of 100 patients rehabilitated with a cement-retained bi-layered zirconia single-unit crown supported by either a Ø2.9 mm (Test) or a Ø3.3 mm (Control) NDI (n = 50). At the 1- and 3-year follow-up (T2, T3), implant survival rate, crestal bone level (CBL) changes, biological, and technical complications were recorded, while the assessment of the aesthetic outcomes was performed using the Copenhagen Index Score. Seventy-four patients Ø2.9 mm (n = 39) or Ø3.3 mm (n = 35) reached T3, as 24 patients were lost to follow-up and 1 implant (Ø3.3 mm) was removed. Throughout the observation period, minimal CBL changes (i.e., <1 mm) were detected between groups. Despite the positive aesthetic scores recorded (i.e., 1-2), at T3 20% of patients rehabilitated with a Ø3.3 mm versus 2.6% of patients Ø2.9 mm displayed an alveolar process deficiency (Score 3). No additional technical and/or mechanical complications were recorded between T2 and T3. Tooth vitality was maintained in all neighboring teeth. Peri-implant probing depths and plaque scores remained low in both groups (p > 0.05). The use of 2.9 or 3.3 diameter implants showed comparable favorable mid-term results in terms of survival rate, CBL, and aesthetic outcomes. Hence, clinicians should rely on the use of such NDIs when replacing maxillary lateral incisors.

Analysis of the correlation between peri-implant probing depth and radiographic bone level

Objective: To evaluate the correlation between peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and radiographic bone level (rBL) in implants with peri-implantitis. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2022, 24 patients with 30 implants who suffered from peri-implantitis at the Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology were included in the present research. SPSS 26.0 software was used to simple random sampling select 30 healthy implants from which with electronic examination records in Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January 2007 to June 2023 as the control group. On the premise of retaining the implant prosthesis, PPD (distance between pocket bottom and peri-implant soft tissue margin) was examined using a Williams periodontal probe with a light force (about 0.2 N), and a total of 4 sites were recorded for each implant. Periapical radiography and cone beam CT were applied to measure the rBL (distance between the reference point at the neck of the implant and the apical point of the bone defect) and the width of the bone defect (DW), and the type of the bone defect was recorded. The correlation and consistency between the diagnosis of PPD and rBL were analyzed. Results: PPD was significantly correlated with rBL in a total of 60 implants in 180 sites (r=0.64, P<0.001). The chi-square test showed an 8.15-fold increase in the detection rate of PD≥6 mm at sites with rBL≥1 mm (P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that rBL was still statistically associated with PPD after adjustment for jaw position and examination position of implants. Take rBL <1 mm as reference, the odds ratios (OR) of 1 mm≤rBL<2 mm, 2 mm≤rBL<3 mm and rBL≥3 mm group with PPD were 6.23 (P=0.014), 2.77 (P=0.183) and 10.87 (P=0.001), respectively. Conclusions: There is a positive correlation between PPD and rBL in implants with peri-implantitis. PPD can be used as a clinical examination index to assist in estimating the level of peri-implant bone under the premise of retaining the prosthesis.

History of periodontitis as a risk factor for implant failure and incidence of peri-implantitis: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Dental implants are widely employed as dependable replacements for lost teeth. However, it is crucial to establish, solely through prospective cohort studies, whether a history of periodontitis indeed constitutes a significant risk factor for implant failure. A systematic literature search was conducted in October 2022 in several electronic databases with subsequent manual updates. Only original prospective cohort studies evaluating the implant (loss) rate ≥1 year after implant loading were included. Logarithmic risk ratio and weighted mean differences were calculated. Study results were summarized using random effects meta-analyses evaluated by trial sequential analyses. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale evaluated study bias and the GRADE approach assessed the certainty/quality of the evidence. A total of 14 publications reporting on 12 prospective cohort studies were included. Low evidence certainty/quality evidence due to the absence of randomized clinical trials revealed significantly greater odds of failure in patients with a history of periodontitis at follow-ups both after ≤5 years (RR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.71-2.37; p = 0.013) and >5 years (RR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.12-4.53; p = 0.023). The incidence of peri-implantitis (RR = 4.09; 95% CI: 1.93-8.58; p < 0.001) and the weighted mean (WM) of marginal bone loss (WM difference = 0.75 mm; 95% CI: 0.18-1.31; p < 0.05) were statistically significantly greater in the periodontally compromised group, whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups for peri-implant probing depth. A history of periodontitis can be considered a significant risk factor for incident implant failure, peri-implantitis, and greater marginal bone loss.

Erythritol powder airflow for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Peri-implant mucositis is a biofilm-related, reversible inflammatory disease that can evolve into peri-implantitis if not adequately treated. The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of air-abrasive powder as compared to chlorhexidine (CHX) for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis, in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and occurrence of peri-implantitis 12 months after treatment. In the control group, full-mouth calculus and plaque removal was performed with ultrasound and manual devices, and a 1.0% CHX gel was applied; in the test group, supra- and subgingival biofilm removal was performed using erythritol powder with a dedicated nozzle and calculus removal was performed with ultrasonic instruments if needed. Bleeding and plaque indexes, peri-implant probing depth and tissue level were measured at 1 week, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, while PROMs were evaluated up to 7 days after treatment. Among 80 included implants, 70 were analysed at 12 months follow-up (30 in the test group, 40 in the control group, and 20 subjects). Success rates (implant-level) in terms of bleeding index were significantly different between the test (96.7%) and control group (92.5%); as for PROMs, only taste sensation was significantly better in the test group. The test group was significantly correlated to the smallest changes in peri-implant probing depth between baseline and 3 months. The study showed that both treatment strategies are effective. This suggests that the use of air-abrasive powders could be used as an alternative biofilm removal method instead of adjunctive treatments with antiseptics.

Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of 174 implants with different variables associated over a minimum observational period of 20 years: A retrospective study.

To investigate the long-term implant survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants with different variables associated over an observational period of at least 20 years. Patients with at least one implant placed prior to 2001 were recalled and visited. Data on implant macro-design, prosthetic aspects, site distribution, and patient-related factors were collected. MBL was evaluated on intraoral X-rays and peri-implant soft tissue parameters were recorded. The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction with the treatment received. Descriptive statistics indicators were estimated. Analysis of variance and analysis of covariance models were used to investigate any differences in the MBL and peri-implant probing depth (PPD) among the variables. A chi-square analysis was performed to investigate any association between different types of prosthetic implant-supported rehabilitations and survival/success outcomes. Forty-one (41) patients and 174 implants were included with a mean observational period of 23.3±2.8 years. The implant survival and success rates were 96.5% and 83.3% respectively, while 3.5% of early failures were detected. The lowest success rates were observed for implants supporting fixed full-arch rehabilitations (71.05%) and overdenture rehabilitations (86.11%). A mean MBL of 1.81±0.71mm and a mean PPD of 3.38±1.62mm were recorded. The interaction between the collected data with MBL and PPD did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the variables (p>0.05). A statistically significant difference was recorded when analyzing the association between the different types of prosthetic implant-supported rehabilitations and success rates (p=0.014), with fixed and removable full-arch rehabilitations presenting with lower success rates. Answers to the questionnaire showed a generally high level of satisfaction. Within the limits of this retrospective study and based on the results, an implant survival rate higher than 96% was observed after a mean observational period of 23.3±2.8 years. Both the implant survival rate and MBL seemed stable after a mean observational period of 23.3±2.8 years. Implants supporting fixed and removable full-arch rehabilitations seemed to present lower success rates over time. Implant rehabilitation seemed to provide patients with optimal long-term outcomes in terms of functional and psychological aspects.

Para-implant residual cyst: A case report and review of the literature

Residual Cyst (RC) is an odontogenic inflammatory pathology that appears at the site of a previous odontogenic inflammatory lesion. In this report, we present a 65-year-old male, with a history of pulpal pathology in tooth 2.5, which was extracted and treated with dental implants. He currently refers pain in the upper left maxilla with great peri-implant probing depth and marginal bone loss. During the surgical procedure, a para-implant lesion was discovered and sent for analysis. This corresponded to an odontogenic cyst without inflammation and a non-keratinized polystratified epithelial lining, with positive expression for CK14 and CK19. Final diagnosis was para-implant residual cyst. To date, five para-implant residual cysts have been described. These cystic lesions appear as an irregular radiolucency with marginal bone loss. In most cases, the implant remains stable after cyst removal. It is key to perform a good clinical history and radiological examination in patients with dental implants, as well as an active monitoring, in order to reach an early diagnosis of the peri-implant disorders.

Full Arch Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A 7-Year Follow-Up Prospective Single Cohort Study.

Aim: The rising average age increases edentulous cases, demanding more implant-prosthetic rehabilitation, with cardiovascular diseases being significant factors. This study compared healthy patients (CG = Control Group) and those with cardiovascular disease (TG = Test Group) for implant survival, Marginal Bone Loss (MBL), peri-implant tissue level parameters as Periodontal Screening and Recording (PSR), Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP) Peri-implant Probing Depth (PPD), and surgical complications. Smoking impact on both groups and medication influence in the TG were secondary outcomes. Patients underwent full-arch implant prosthetic rehabilitation. Methods: Implant survival rate, MBL, and surgical complications were recorded during the monitoring period (7 years), while peri-implant parameters were assessed at the end of the observational time. A total of 26 and 28 CG and TG patients were recruited, respectively. Results: A total of 128 implants were placed in CG, while 142 in the TG. Implant survival and MBL showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, peri-implant parameters were more unfavorable in TG. The only significant surgical complication was higher bleeding rates in the TG (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Cardiovascular patients showed similar implant survival and MBL but had adverse peri-implant parameters and increased bleeding rates. Higher smoking levels may relate to unfavorable implant outcomes. Further investigation is needed on drug impact with larger samples.

Serum TNF-α level and probing depth as a combined indicator for peri-implant disease.

Peri-implant disease (PID) is a general term for inflammatory diseases of soft and hard tissues that occur around implants, including peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Cytokines are a class of small molecule proteins, which have various functions such as regulating innate immunity, adaptive immunity, and repairing damaged tissues. In order to explore the characteristics and clinical significance of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and tumor growth factor (TGF)-β1 expression levels in serum of patients with peri-implant disease, 31 patients with PID and 31 patients without PID were enrolled. The modified plaque index (mPLI), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), and peri-implant probing depth (PD) were recorded. The levels of serum TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and TGF-β1 were detected by ELISA. TNF-α, mPLI, mSBI, and PD levels were significantly higher in the PID group. TGF-β1 levels were significantly higher in the control group. There was a significant positive correlation between TNF-α and mPLI, mSBI, and PD. TGF-β1 was negatively associated with TNF-α, mPLI, mSBI, and PD. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that TNF-α and PD were risk factors for the severity of PID. The receiver operating curve analysis showed that high TNF-α levels (cut-off value of 140 pg/mL) and greater PD values (cut-off value of 4 mm) were good predictors of PID severity with an area under the curve of 0.922. These results indicated that TNF-α and PD can be used as a biological indicator for diagnosing the occurrence and progression of PID.

Comparison of Peri-Implant Health Parameters among Obese and Non-Obese South Indian Population.

Implant therapy is gaining immense importance in people presenting with missing teeth due to its increased life expectancy. There is a high concern regarding the link between obesity and peri-implant diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the peri-implant health parameters among the obese and non-obese South Indian population. The cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals Chennai, India among 859 patients who reported between January 2022-November 2022 and had a minimum of single implant in function for at least 1 year after crown cementation. Among 859 patients, 428 were non-obese (Group A) and 431 were obese (Group B). Patient's data including the menopausal status was recorded. Clinical parameters including peri-implant probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and radiographic parameter including alveolar bone level (ABL) was recorded and compared between both the groups using independent t-test. The mean PPD among non-obese and obese population were 2.58 ± 0.03 and 4.09 ± 0.04, respectively. The mean CAL among non-obese and obese population were 2.87 ± 0.02 and 4.19 ± 0.01, respectively. The mean ABL among non-obese and obese population were 2.06 ± 0.01 and 3.17 ± 0.03, respectively. Independent t-test revealed there was statistically significant difference in PPD (P = 0.04), CAL (P = 0.05) and ABL (P = 0.04). The present study suggests that the obese individuals demonstrated high peri-implant probing depth, clinical attachment loss and alveolar bone loss as compared to non-obese individuals.

Comparison between Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants in Immediate-Loading Full-Arch Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Multi-Center 1-Year Follow-Up Study

The objective of the present retrospective multi-center study was to analyze the outcomes of bone-level (BL) implants and tissue-level (TL) implants in immediate-loading full-arch rehabilitations. Patients who were previously rehabilitated with full-arch immediate-loading rehabilitations with either BL or TL implants were considered. Data regarding implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), peri-implant probing depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded, and the 1-year follow-up data were statistically analyzed between the two groups. In total, 38 patients were evaluated for a total implant number of 156 (n = 80 TL implants and n = 76 BL implants). An implant survival rate of 97.37% was recoded for the BL group while an implant survival rate of 100% was noted for the TL group. A total MBL of 1.324 ± 0.64 mm was recorded for BL implants, while a total MBL of 1.194 ± 0.30 mm was recorded for TL implants. A statistically significant difference was highlighted regarding MBL at the mesial aspect (p = 0.01552) of the implants, with BL implants presenting with higher MBL. Within the range of acceptable healthy values, a statistically significant difference was also highlighted regarding BOP (p &lt; 0.00001), with TL implants presenting higher values. No statistically significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) was recorded for any of the other variables analyzed. Within the limitations of the present retrospective study, both TL and BL implants seem to provide good clinical outcomes after a 12-month observational period when employed in immediate-loading full-arch rehabilitation.

Evaluation of different surface treated implants after provisionalization: A 6-month prospective study.

Replacing missing teeth with dental implants has become the best treatment option; therefore, clinicians need to understand the predictability of the treatment. Surface treatment of implants is one of the methods to improve osseointegration, thus improving the quality of treatment. Increasing esthetic awareness among patients has led to the popularity of immediate provisionalization of dental implants. This study investigated the effect of surface treatment on implant stability when loaded with immediate non-functional temporary prostheses and compared the superiority of one surface treatment over the other in terms of osseointegration by evaluating implant stability quotient (ISQ). Twenty implants with different surface treatments were placed, i.e., resorbable blast media (RBM) surface and alumina blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE) surfaces. All the implants were non-functionally loaded, and ISQ was measured immediately after implant placement and 6 and 12 weeks after non-functional loading. Crestal bone levels, mPI, mSBI, and peri-implant probing depths were compared for both groups at 1, 3, and 6 months. At 12 weeks, all the implants showed desirable ISQ, indicating successful osseointegration. The increase in ISQ at 12 weeks was significantly higher for RBM implants compared to baseline, indicating a more predictable course of osseointegration. Crestal bone levels recorded at 1, 3, and 6 months did not significantly differ between the groups. All other parameters showed comparable values for both groups at all intervals. Replacing missing teeth with dental implants with immediate non-functional restorations is a predictable treatment option.

Effects of maintenance implant therapy with and without periodic removal and decontamination of prosthetic components on inflammatory peri-implant parameters.

A retrospective analysis based on patient records was used to assess inflammatory clinical and biochemical parameters around dental implants installed by the same clinician in a private clinic. The plaque index (PI), peri-implant probing depth (PPD), mucosa! recession (MR) bleeding on probing (BOP) and radiographic marginal bone level were determined at baseline and at each year during the follow-up period. Moreover, at last follow-up visit the peri-implant intrasulcular levels of active metalloproteinasis 8 (aMMP-8) were also assessed. All participants were under MT with a 6-month recall interval. Ninety-two patients with 132 implants were selected. At the end of the study period, 12 patients with 12 implants were classified as "dropouts". Remained 80 patients and 120 implants were classified into two groups: Group 1, (42 patients with 62 implants) received MT with periodic removal and decontamination of prosthetic components; Group 2, (38 patients with 58 implants) received MT without periodic removal and decontamination of prosthetic components. No statistical differences were found between the groups regarding presence of plaque, probing depth, and mean mucosal recession. Group 1 presented a statistically significant higher number of sites with BOP (12.4% vs. 6.2%). Marginal bone loss was statistically higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (0.23 ± 0.6 mm vs. and 0.78 ± 0.3 mm). Intrasulcular levels of aMMP-8 were statistically higher in Group 1 than in Group 2. The supplemental application of periodic removal and decontamination of prosthetic components during MT had a significant additional benefit in the peri-implant tissues inflammatory status.

Comparison of Radiographic and Clinical Status and Peri-implant Crevicular Fluid Prostaglandin E2 Levels Among Patients with Peri-implant Mucositis and Peri-implantitis.

The aim of this study was to compare radiographic and clinical status and peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels among patients with and without peri-implant disease. Patients with peri-implant mucositis (PiM) (Group 1) and peri-implantitis (Group 2) and individuals without peri-implant disease (Group 3) were included. Demographic information was collected, and peri-implant modified plaque and bleeding indices (mPI and mBI), probing depth (PD), and crestal bone loss (CBL) were recorded. PISF samples were collected and PGE2 levels measured. Statistical significance was set at P < .01. A total of 22 patients with PiM, 22 with peri-implantitis, and 23 without peri-implant disease (controls) were included. Scores of mPI (P < .01), mBI (P < .01), and PD (P < .01) were higher in patients with PiM and peri-implantitis than the controls. The volumes of collected PISF were significantly higher in patients with peri-implantitis (P < .01) compared to patients with PiM and the controls. The PISF volume was significantly higher in PiM patients (P < .01) than in the controls. There was a significant correlation between peri-implant PD and PISF PGE2 levels in patients with peri-implantitis (P < .001). Raised PISF PGE2 levels indicate poor peri-implant health; therefore, PGE2 is a potential biomarker for the assessment of peri-implant health status.