Peri-implant Fracture Research Articles

Psychological impact of peri-implant fractures: A cross-sectional study.

Peri-implant fractures (PIFs) are uncommon yet critical complications following orthopedic surgery. These complications can significantly impact a patient's psychological well-being and overall quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the psychological effects of PIFs. This was a cross-sectional study that involved 136 patients who underwent surgery for PIFs between 2018 and 2022. We utilized various validated scales and questionnaires such as Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Brief COPE Inventory (BCI) to assess their psychological state. The results revealed that patients with PIFs experienced higher levels of anxiety, depression, stress, and post-traumatic stress compared to the general population. Additionally, they reported lower physical and mental health. Factors such as the number of surgeries, treatment delay, post-operative pain levels, and complications significantly influenced their psychological outcomes. Notably, acceptance, positive reframing, and seeking emotional support were the most common coping mechanisms employed by these patients. Conversely, denial, substance use, and self blame were the least employed strategies. This study suggests that psychological interventions could significantly benefit patients with PIFs, potentially reducing their distress and improving their quality of life.

Plate, Short Nail, or Long Nail? Revision Rates and Complications of Three Different Treatments for Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

BackgroundWe sought to investigate the relationship between peritrochanteric femur fracture (OTA 31A fractures) fixation and rates of peri-implant fracture, rates of transfusion, and the rates of increased dependence after secondary surgery for fracture for short cephalomedullary nails (SCMN), long cephalomedullary nails (LCMN), and plate and screw devices (PSD). MethodsMulti center retrospective study involving data collected from 151 Level I-IV trauma centers using ICD9/10 and CPT codes for identification. 13,197 patients with peritrochanteric femur fractures between 2016-2021 were included in analysis. ResultsWe report no significant difference in peri-implant fractures in extramedullary and intramedullary devices (LCMN 50, 0.84%; SCMN 57, 0.88%; PSD 6, 0.74%; p=0.91) as well as no significant difference in the rates of discharge to home after surgical fixation of a peri-implant fracture. ConclusionsThere is no difference in peri-implant fracture rates between SCMN, LCMN, and PSD methods of fixation for peritrochanteric femur fractures. Therefore, longer implants do not seem to protect the femur from future peri-implant fracture when compared to shorter implants. Further analysis is needed to more fully elucidate the morbidity associated with readmission and revision of peri-implant fractures following fixation of peritrochanteric femur fractures. Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level III

Elderly trochanteric fracture outcomes: Unveiling the risks of excessive postoperative sliding - A retrospective multicenter (TRON group) investigation

BackgroundIntramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral trochanteric fractures (FTF) is the primary surgical intervention. Excessive lag screw sliding (ES) of the femoral neck screw sometimes occurs. This multicenter investigation sought to 1) determine the prevalence of ES, 2) evaluate the relationship between ES and postoperative complications, and 3) identify the factors of ES in elderly patients with FTF undergoing IMN. MethodsFrom 2016 to 2020, 1448 patients with FTF were treated using a short IMN across 11 institutions (TRON group). Upon applying exclusion criteria, 519 patients (127 men, 392 women; mean age, 84.4 years) were included. The postoperative sliding distance was measured immediately after surgery and at final follow-up. A sliding distance of ≥8 mm categorized patients as having ES. We identify the factors contributing to ES using the logistic regression analysis, with a p < 0.05 as statistical significance. ResultsES was observed in 116 patients (22.4 %). Patients with ES had a higher incidence of postoperative cut-out and peri-implant fracture. Logistic regression analysis showed that achieving optimal reduction in both AP and lateral views (odds ratio (OR) 0.48, p = 0.0012) and the use of a double screw system or twin screws with integrated locking mechanism significantly reduced the risk of ES (OR 0.27, 0.17; p = 0.0027, <0.001). ConclusionsThe incidence rate of ES was 22.4 %. ES was associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications. The surgeons should aim for optimal reduction and use a double screw or twin screws with an integrated interlocking mechanism as the implant of choice.

A comparison between nail-plate constructs and the plate-on-plate technique in the treatment of proximal femoral peri-implant femoral fracture

Study designA single-centre, retrospective cohort study. ObjectivesTo compare the clinical outcomes between nail-plate constructs and the plate-on-plate technique in the treatment of proximal femoral peri-implant fracture (PFPIF). MethodsThirty-seven patients with PFPIF treated at our hospital were included. All patients underwent at least 1-year follow-up. Imaging studies and medical records, including walking ability, complications, and functional outcomes 1 year after surgery, were thoroughly reviewed. ResultsTwenty patients were treated with nail-plate constructs. Seventeen patients were treated with the plate-on-plate technique. The average surgical times in the plate-on-plate technique and nail-plate construct groups were 119.4±23.4 min and 246.3±48.0 min, respectively. The average blood losses in the plate-on-plate technique and nail-plate construct groups were 124.7±41.6 mL and 434.3±170.8 mL, respectively. The plate-on-plate technique group had a significantly shorter surgical time and less blood loss than the nail-plate construct group. No statistically significant differences were found in union time, ambulation status, 36-item Short Form Health Survey score, and complication rate between the two groups. ConclusionThe plate-on-plate technique can be considered an alternative option to reduce operation time and blood loss in the treatment of PFPIF, especially for older patients and those who are less capable of sustaining long-term operation and anaesthetic exposure.

Surgical treatment of peri-implant fracture with plate-on-plate technique: a case report

Due to the increased life expectancy and exposure to high-energy traumas, there has been a rise in the demand for surgical treatment using internal fixation, and consequently, an increase in refractures. Despite the growing discussion around peri-implant fractures, there is still little discussion addressing periplate fractures. This report presents a case using the plate-on-plate technique where the fracture is addressed while maintaining the previous fixation material by placing a locked plate above the previously existing material. This case involves a 54-year-old man with a peri-implant diaphyseal fracture of the distal third of the left femur after a motorcycle versus car collision. The patient underwent surgical treatment with a steel locking condylar plate, maintaining the previous fixation material through the plate-on-plate technique. Subsequently, fracture consolidation and functional range of motion were evidenced. Thus, in line with studies, the plate-on-plate technique proved to be an effective alternative for peri-implant fractures, allowing an approach with lower morbidity and mortality and reducing the risks of surgical complications; however, it requires studies with a higher level of epidemiological evidence.

Assessing functional and radiological outcomes: open reduction and internal fixation vs. minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humerus shaft fractures-a prospective comparative study.

To analyse and compare the functional and radiological outcome of different methods of surgical management of humerus shaft fractures in 30 patients treated by conventional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). This prospective interventional study was conducted among 30 patients by dividing into two equal groups over oneyear and sixmonths. All patients were followed up for a minimum of at least sixmonths. Radiological outcome was assessed using fracture union in serial radiographs and functional outcome was measured using DASH scoring. The majority of patients (26.7%) were between 18 to 30years, overall mean age was 44.4years, most of the patients (50%) had 12A3 AO type fractures, and 73.3% of patients had injuries following two-wheeler road traffic accidents. On comparing multiple factors, we found a statistically significant reduction of intra-operative blood loss in MIPO compared to ORIF. Though time taken for fracture union, functional outcome and complication rate were better in MIPO when compared to ORIF, these differences were not statistically significant. two patients in the MIPO group and one patient in the ORIF group had a peri-implant fracture following slip and fall again within the study period and underwent Revision plating. Excluding cases of peri-implant fractures, out of 13 patients in the MIPO group, only one patient developed fracture non-union. Of 14 patients in the ORIF group, three developed fracture non-union. MIPO is a safe, reproducible, efficient and good if not a better alternative to ORIF as it offers good radiological and functional outcomes with advantages of minimal soft tissue damage, minimal blood loss, better cosmesis, no incidence of radial nerve palsy and with few concerns such as the need for fluoroscopy, and a learning curve.

Geriatric femur fractures: Index fracture pattern is associated with the risk of subsequent peri-implant fracture

IntroductionFollowing an index femoral fragility fracture, patients are at risk of a subsequent peri-implant fracture. Management of these injuries are further complicated by patient factors and multi-institutional care. This study quantifies such events and compare rate of identification between in-system and out-of-system patients. MethodsA retrospective chart review of index operative femoral fragility fractures at a level I trauma center from January 1, 2005 to January 1, 2018 identified 840 patients with twenty-two subsequent peri-implant fractures. Kaplan Meier survival analyses assessed associations between patient and injury characteristics with the subsequent fracture while accounting for differential follow-up. Cumulative incidence curves were reported, and Cox regression analyses estimated hazard ratios for statistically significant associations. In-system and out-of-system patients were compared with absolute rate of identifying subsequent fracture and follow-up time. ResultsCumulative incidence of subsequent fracture was 2.1 % at 2 years, 3.4 % at 4 years, and 4.6 % at 6 years. The index fracture pattern (intertrochanteric vs other) was associated with a cumulative incidence of subsequent peri-implant fracture (0.8 % at 2 years, 1.4 % at 4 years, and 2.7 % at 6 years for intertrochanteric fractures vs 3.4 % at 2 years, 5.3 % at 4 years, and 6.4 % at 6 years for non-intertrochanteric fractures), p = 0.029. Follow-up was shorter for out-of-system patients (median 6 versus 28 months, p < 0.001), and only 1 of 348 out-of-system patients (0.3 %) vs. 21 of 492 in-system patients (4.3 %) were diagnosed with a subsequent peri-implant fracture (p < 0.001). There was no association of subsequent peri-implant fracture with patient demographics or comorbidity burden. ConclusionCumulative incidence of subsequent peri-implant fracture was higher for non-intertrochanteric (femoral neck, shaft and distal femur) fractures than intertrochanteric fractures. Out-of-system patients had shorter follow-up and were less likely to be diagnosed with a subsequent peri-implant fracture, indicating ascertainment bias and underscoring the importance of accounting for loss to follow-up. Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level III.

Complications of Hardware Removal in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery.

Hardware removal (HR) is one of the most common surgical procedures in pediatric orthopaedics. Surgeons advocate for HR for a variety of reasons, including to limit peri-implant fracture risk, restore native anatomy for adult reconstruction surgery, permit bone growth and development, and mitigate implant-related pain/irritation. To our knowledge, no recent study has investigated the characteristics and complications of HR in pediatric orthopaedics. The goal of this study is to report the prevalence and complications of hardware removals across all of pediatric orthopaedic surgery. A retrospective case series was conducted of all hardware removals from 2012 to 2023 performed at a single urban tertiary-care children's hospital. Cases were identified using CPT codes/billing records. Spinal hardware and cases for which hardware was either implanted or explanted at an outside hospital were excluded. Patient demographic and clinical data were recorded. For patients with multiple hardware removals, each case was recorded independently. A total of 2585 HR cases for 2176 children met study criteria (57.7% male; mean age 12.3±4.4y). The median postoperative follow-up time was 1.7 months (interquartile range: 0.6 to 6.9). The most common sites of hardware removal were the femur/knee (32.7%), tibia/fibula/ankle (19.3%), and pelvis/hip (18.5%). The most common complications included sustained, new-onset postoperative pain (2.6%), incomplete hardware removal (1.6%), and perioperative fracture (1.4%). The overall complication rate of hardware removal was 9.5%. Eighty-eight percent of patients who underwent hardware removal for pain experienced pain relief postoperatively. HR >18 months after insertion had a 1.2x higher odds of overall complication (P=0.002) and 3x higher odds of incomplete removal/breakage (P<0.001) than hardware removed 9 to 18 months after insertion. The overall complication rate of hardware removal across a large series in the pediatric population was 9.5%. Despite hardware removal being one of the most common and often routine procedures in pediatric orthopaedics, the complication rate is not benign. Surgeons should inform patients and families about the likelihood of success and the risks of incomplete removal during the informed consent process. IV.

OUTCOMES OF DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE IN THE ELDERLY TREATED WITH EITHER SINGLE PLATE OR DUAL PLATING OR NAIL-PLATE COMBINATION: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS FROM A SINGLE CENTRE

IntroductionDistal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP).MethodsA retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year.ResultsA cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year.ConclusionOur analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractures in elderly patients. We conclude that a lower re-operation rate and mortality rate can be achieved with early surgery and rigid fixation with either dual plating or nail-plate construct to allow early mobilisation. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the selection of optimal surgical strategies for these challenging fractures.

Peri-implant fractures after Intramedullary fixation for femoral trochanteric fracture: a multicenter (TRON Group) study.

With the rise in elderly populations, the incidence of femoral trochanteric fractures has also increased. Although intramedullary nail therapy is commonly used, the incidence of peri-implant fractures (PIFs) as a complication and its associated factors are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of PIFs and treatment strategies and outcomes. A retrospective study across 11 hospitals from 2016 to 2020 examined 1855 patients with femoral trochanter fracture. After excluding 69 patients treated without intramedullary nailing, 1786 patients were analyzed. Parameters studied included age, sex, body mass index, medical history, and treatment methods. PIFs were categorized using the Chan classification. Treatment outcomes and patient mobility were assessed using the Parker Mobility Score, and postoperative complications and one-year survival data were compiled. The incidence of PIFs was 8 in 1786 cases. Chan classification showed 1 case of N1A, 6 of N2A, and 1 of N2B. Only the type N1 case was a transverse fracture, whereas all cases of type N2 were oblique fractures. Among these cases, five patients had fractures extending to the upper part of the femoral condyle. The patient with N1A and one bedridden patient with N2A fracture underwent conservative treatment, one patient with N2A in which the fracture did not extend to the condyle was treated with nail replacement, and 5 patients (N2A: 4, N2B: 1) with fractures extending to the condyle were treated with additional plate fixation. All patients had survived at one year after treatment for PIF, and no reoperations were required. The incidence of PIF was very low (0.45%). Of the 6 PIF cases, excluding the bedridden patients, the treatment of choice for PIF was an additional plate if the fracture line extended to the femoral condyle; otherwise, the nail was replaced. All patients achieved bony fusion. Therapeutic Level IV.

CEPHALOMEDULLARY NAILING FOR SUBTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES: A COMPARISON OF SINGLE LAG SCREW DEVICE WITH AN INTERCALATED DUAL SCREW DEVICE

Subtrochanteric femoral fractures are a subset of hip fractures generally treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation\[1\]. Single lag screw devices are most commonly-used, but integrated dual screw constructs have become increasingly popular\[2,3\]. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) with a dual screw device (InterTAN nail, IN). The primary outcome was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out, back-out, nail breakage or peri-implant fracture.Consecutive adult patients (18yrs) with subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated in a single centre were retrospectively identified using electronic records. Patients that underwent surgical fixation using either a long GN (2010–2017) or IN (2017–2022) were included. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to identify complications of fixation. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the risk of mechanical failure and secondary outcomes by implant design. Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of mechanical failure.The study included 622 patients, 354 in the GN group (median age 82yrs, 72% female) and 268 in the IN group (median age 82yrs, 69% female). The risk of any mechanical failure was increased two-fold in the GN group (HR 2.44 \[95%CI 1.13 to 5.26\]; _p=0.024_). Mechanical failure comprising screw cut-out (_p=0.032_), back-out (_p=0.032_) and nail breakage (_p=0.26_) was only observed in the GN group. Technical predictors of failure included varus &gt;5° for cut-out (OR 19.98 \[2.06 to 193.88\]; _p=0.01_), TAD;25mm for back-out (8.96 \[1.36 to 58.86\]; p=0.022) and shortening 1cm for peri-implant fracture (7.81 \[2.92 to 20.91\]; _p=&lt;0.001_).Our results demonstrate that an intercalated screw construct is associated with a lower risk of mechanical failure compared with the a single lag screw device. Intercalated screw designs may reduce the risk of mechanical complications for patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Tibiotalocalcaneal ankle arthrodesis with posterior approach arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing.

End-stage ankle arthrosis causes severe pain and limited movement. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with arthroscopy-assisted hindfoot nailing can be used to achieve a high union rate and low complication rate. We aimed to examine the early- and mid-term results of patients treated with this technique from various perspectives and to evaluate them by comparing them with the current literature. Data were collected from 25 patients who met the established criteria and underwent TTCA with arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing. In addition to the demographic data of the patients, their clinical and pain scores were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, the union time and complication data during the follow-up period were examined. When the AOFAS and VAS scores of the 25 patients were examined, a significant improvement was observed in the preoperative period and early postoperative period comparisons (p < .001). No significant change was observed between the comparison of the postoperative 12th month and last postoperative control clinical scores. While the union rate of the patients was observed to be 92%, the average union time was 13.1 ± 3.5weeks. During follow-up, peri-implant fracture, deep infection, and non-union were observed in one patient each (12%). The early- and mid-term postoperative results of patients treated with TTCA surgery with posterior approach arthroscopic-assisted hindfoot nailing show that this technique may be an option with low complication and high union rates for the appropriate group of patients planned for ankle arthrodesis.

Prevalence and Treatment of Surgical Complications Following Proximal Femoral Osteotomies in Children with Cerebral Palsy: An Analysis of 1085 Hips.

Proximal femoral osteotomy (PFO) is a reconstructive surgical option used to improve hip containment or correct internal hip rotation gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP). A few reports describe the risk of surgical complications after PFO. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with adverse postoperative surgical outcomes in pediatric patients with CP following PFO and to report the treatment of complications. Following institutional review board approval, 1085 (1003 primary and 82 secondary) PFO procedures were retrospectively reviewed in 563 children with CP with at least 1year of follow-up after final surgery over an 18-year follow-up period. Demographic characteristics, motor type, gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) level, medical comorbidities, feeding tube status, seizure history, intervention type, and prevalence of PFO-related surgical complications and associated treatments were evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for all surgical complications. During a 5.8-year (± 3.8years) follow-up, at least 1 surgical complication was identified in 143 (13.1%) hips in 121 (21.5%) patients after PFO in children with CP. Of these complications, the most common was heterotopic ossification (65 [6%] of hips); most of which were asymptomatic and required no treatment. Other complications included 25 (2%) nonunions, 21 (2%) deep or superficial infections, 13 (1%) delayed unions, 12 (1%) peri-implant fractures, and 7 early implant failures (0.64). The rate of revision surgery due to these complications was 13.1% (6.8% of hips), of which 41% (30 revision surgeries) were for the treatment of nonunion. Regarding the development of delayed union or nonunion, dystonia, GMFCS level IV/V, and seizure history were identified as risk factors by multivariate analysis. The prevalence of surgical complications after PFO was 13.1% with 6.8% of hips requiring revision surgery. Dystonia, seizure history, and nonambulatory status were the strongest predictors for the need for revision surgery after PFO. These data can be used to help counsel patients and families regarding the risks associated with PFO for children with CP.Level of proof: IV; retrospective study.

Elbow Reconstruction with Megaprosthesis: An Effective Strategy for Salvage Surgery in Trauma Patients.

Delayed fracture healing can have devastating functional consequences, including pseudoarthrosis. Many factors can contribute to delayed healing, including decreased vascularity, micro-motion at the fracture site, large fracture gaps, multiple traumas at the same site, compromised metabolic status, surgical complications, and other conditions. A 61-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital with left distal humeral pseudarthrosis, accompanied by chronic pain and disability. Two years prior, the patient suffered a traumatic incident. At another medical facility, the patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation surgery with simultaneous ulnar nerve transposition. She showed favorable postoperative recovery. Unfortunately, approximately one year later, the patient sustained a second trauma to the same arm. This led to peri-implant fracture and post-traumatic aseptic degradation of the osteosynthesis system which was subsequently removed. Twelve months after the last surgery, the patient was referred to our hospital and, after thorough consideration of the therapeutic options, we decided to perform left elbow arthroplasty with left distal humeral reconstruction by using Zimmer's Comprehensive Segmental Revision System. This approach is generally reserved for tumors, and only a handful of cases of megaprostheses for non-tumoral indications have been previously reported. The surgery and perioperative care of our patient were optimal, there were no complications, and the patient recovered arm functionality following rehabilitation.

Research progress on distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures

To summarize the new research progress in distal interlocking screws of cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Relevant domestic and foreign literature was extensively reviewed to summarize the static/dynamic types of distal interlocking screw holes, biomechanical studies, clinical studies and application principles, effects on toggling in the cavity, and related complications of distal interlocking screws. The mode of the distal interlocking screw holes can be divided into static and dynamic. Distal interlocking screws play the role of anti-rotation, maintaining femur length, resisting compression stress, increasing torque stiffness, resisting varus stress, etc. The number of the screws directly affects the toggling of the main nail in the cavity. At present, regardless of whether long or short nails are used, distal interlocking screws are routinely inserted in clinical practice. However, using distal interlocking screws can significantly increase the duration of anesthesia and operation, increase fluoroscopy exposure time, surgical blood loss, and incision length. There is a trend of trying not to use distal interlocking screws in recent years. No significant difference is found in some studies between the effectiveness of dynamic and static interlocking for AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-A1/2 fractures. At present, the selection of the number and mode of distal interlocking screws is still controversial. When inserting distal interlocking screws, orthopedists should endeavor to minimize the occurrence of complications concerning miss shot, vascular injuries, local stress stimulation, and peri-implant fractures. Distal interlocking screws are mainly used to prevent rotation. For stable fractures with intact lateral walls, long cephalomedullary nails can be used without distal interlocking screws. For any type of intertrochanteric fractures, distal interlocking screws are required when using short cephalomedullary nails for fixation. Different interlocking modes, the number of interlocking screws, and the application prospects of absorbable interlocking screws may be future research directions.

CEPHALOMEDULLARY NAILING FOR SUBTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES: A COMPARISON OF SINGLE LAG SCREW WITH A DUAL LAG SCREW DEVICE

This study compares outcomes of fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) with a dual lag screw device (InterTAN nail, IN). The primary outcome was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out, back-out, nail breakage or peri-implant fracture. Technical factors associated with mechanical failure were also identified.All adult patients (&gt;18yrs) with a subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated in a single centre were retrospectively identified using electronic records. Included patients underwent surgical fixation using either a long GN (2010–2017) or IN (2017–2022). Cox regression analysis was used to determine the risk of mechanical failure and technical predictors of failure.The study included 587 patients, 336 in the GN group (median age 82yrs, 73% female) and 251 in the IN group (median age 82yrs, 71% female). The IN group exhibited a higher prevalence of osteoporosis (p=0.002) and CKD□3 (p=0.007). There were no other baseline differences between groups. The risk of any mechanical failure was increased two-fold in the GN group (HR 2.51, p=0.020). Mechanical failure comprising screw cut-out (p=0.040), back-out (p=0.040) and nail breakage (p=0.51) was only observed in the GN group. The risk of peri-implant fracture was similar between the groups (HR 1.10, p=0.84). Technical predictors of mechanical included varus &gt;5° for cut-out (HR 15.61, p=0.016), TAD&gt;25mm for back-out (HR 9.41, p=0.020) and shortening &gt;1cm for peri-implant fracture (HR 6.50, p=&lt;0.001).Dual lag screw designs may reduce the risk of mechanical complications for patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Angle-Adjustable Dynamic Hip Screw Plate for Unstable Trochanteric Fractures in Middle-Aged Patients: Mid-Term Outcomes and Return to Sport.

There are conflicting results in the literature regarding the superiority of proximal femoral nails over dynamic hip screw (DHS) plates. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate mid-term post-injury patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and return to sport (RTS) in middle-aged patients treated with the DHS plate for unstable trochanteric fractures. Fifty-seven middle-aged patients (35-64 years) treated for proximal femoral fractures of type 31-A2 and 31-A3 according to the AO/OTA classification with the DMS Dynamic Martin Screw (KLS Martin Group, Jacksonville, FL, USA) between January 2017 and December 2019 were enrolled. Forty-nine patients were included in this retrospective study, and the average age was 54.1 years (SD 8.4). The average follow-up duration at final follow-up was 60.5 months (SD 8.6). Post-operative complications included only one case of aseptic loosening of the implant, with a complication rate of 2%. There were no infections, peri-implant fractures, or other complications reported. Two out of the forty-nine patients (4.1%) required treatment with a total hip arthroplasty due to post-traumatic arthritis. The Harris Hip Score at final follow-up was 77.1 (SD 20.1), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index was 21.6 (SD 13.7). The overall rate of RTS was 57.7%. Treatment with DHS for unstable trochanteric fractures is a safe option in middle-aged patients, ensuring a good functional recovery.

Locking Attachment Plate for the Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic and Periimplant Fractures: Long-Term Follow-Up.

The surgical management of periprosthetic fractures (PPF) and periimplant fractures (PIF) can be challenging. The locking attachment plate (LAP) was proposed in recent years for the osteosynthesis of such fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the experience of a third-level hospital with LAP for the treatment of PPF and PIF, and analyse the clinical outcomes. Data were prospectively collected and analysed from all patients whose PPF/PIF was treated surgically with LAP in a third-level hospital from June 2018 to June 2022. All fractures were postoperative low-energy femur fractures. The minimum follow-up period was six months. Thirty-eight patients (31 women) met the eligibility criteria. The mean age was 86.3 years. The median time until surgery was 4 days. A mean of 3.61 screws were used for each LAP. The mean femur plate length was 14 holes, and the mean working length 7.1 holes. The median hospital stay was nine days. The mean follow-up was 19.56 months. At one month, 12 patients tolerated partial weight-bearing. Five patients walked independently indoors. One patient had died and seven patients were readmitted. At six months, six more patients had died. Fifteen patients tolerated full weight-bearing (FWB). Nine patients walked independently indoors, six outdoors. Twenty-five patients reached fracture consolidation without malalignment. Nine patients were readmitted. At 12 months, another patient had died. Seventeen patients tolerated FWB. Eleven patients walked independently indoors, six outdoors. Twenty-five patients achieved fracture consolidation without malalignment. Five patients were readmitted. Fourteen patients crossed the two-year postoperative threshold. All achieved fracture consolidation. Two patients passed the 4-year postoperative milestone. The clinical results of patients whose PPF or PIF was treated with the LAP are promising. This fixation method is a viable option to be considered when planning surgery for such fractures.

Reuse of orthopedic implants in a peri-implant fracture of both forearm bones in an adolescent: A case report

Fractures of both forearm bones in adolescents are common. Many of these fractures are surgically fixed with internal fixation. However, among the complications that can occur are peri-implant fractures, which are somewhat infrequent. They are due mainly to high-energy injuries. Therefore, not much information about them is found in the literature. Reusing implants is not a frequent or well-documented practice, and it is carried out only when the necessary resources are unavailable, particularly in developing countries. We are reporting a 16-year-old male patient who suffered a peri-implant fracture distal to plates that were placed 3 years earlier in both left forearm bones. The material was removed successfully and reused, achieving an adequate reduction and fixation with one dynamic compression plate (DCP) plate for the radius and one reconstruction plate for the ulna. The patient recovered successfully. This case report aimed to understand the lack of resources in a developing country and a possible solution for this problem in this type of scenario.

Perioperative peri-implant fracture after osteosynthesis for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fracture with the linear compression integrated screw intramedullary nail system (INTERTAN™): a retrospective study

BackgroundOsteosynthesis for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures using the linear compression integrated screw intramedullary nail system (INTERTAN™) has become popular. Nonetheless, cases of perioperative peri-implant fractures have been reported following this surgical technique. The factors responsible for this complication remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated perioperative peri-implant fracture risk factors and incidence, as well as overall outcomes, using the INTERTAN™ system for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive patients with geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures after INTERTAN™ fixation, with at least a 12-month follow-up period between May 2020 and April 2022 at a single medical institute. The patients’ demographic characteristics, fracture pattern, quality of reduction, quality of fixation, nail length, morphology of the femur, and perioperative complications were recorded and analyzed.ResultsAmong the 98 patients, 92 achieved union during follow-up. Twelve perioperative peri-implant fractures (12.2%) were recorded, all of which occurred during or within 1 month of osteosynthesis. Except for one patient who underwent re-osteosynthesis, the others underwent nonoperative treatment, and all achieved union. Multiple regression analysis revealed morphology of the femur with low-lesser trochanter width (odds ratio (OR) 0.532, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33–0.86, p = 0.01) to be the only factor contributing to perioperative peri-implant fractures. When the Youden index was used, the optimal cut-off value was 20.2 mm of low-lesser trochanter width. Low-lesser trochanter width < 20.2 mm was found to be a potential factor causing perioperative peri-implant fractures (OR 17.81, 95% CI 1.67–19.76, p = 0.017).ConclusionsMorphology of the femur with a low-lesser trochanter width smaller than 20.2 mm was found to be the only potential contributor to perioperative peri-implant fractures when using INTERTAN™ for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fractures. Care should be taken during osteosynthesis, focusing not only on the fracture site but also on the femoral cortex around the implant. Although perioperative peri-implant fractures were observed within one month following osteosynthesis, the majority of these cases were effectively treated without surgical intervention.