Objectives To correlate the accuracy of MRI with pathology in assessing the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with breast cancer and assessment of factors affecting the accuracy of MRI. Materials and Methods Twenty-five patients (with 33 tumors) having biopsy-proven breast cancer were included to undergo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, mammography, and ultrasound prior to NACT and after completion of NACT before undergoing surgery. Tumor morphological features and receptor subtypes were compared between complete and non-complete responders, and the accuracy of MRI in estimating residual disease was assessed with respect to histopathology. The performance of MRI was also compared with ultrasound and mammography, wherever feasible. Results The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of MRI for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) were 100%, 70%, 83.3%, 100%, and 88%, respectively, which were significantly better (p = 0.02) in the triple-negative subtype. Size measured in preoperative MRI had a significant positive correlation with pathological size (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) with the lowest mean size difference in triple negative subtype and in tumors showing a concentric pattern of shrinkage. Among the baseline morphological features on MRI, significant difference was seen in the shape (p = 0.02) and enhancement (p = 0.036) of the tumors between complete and non-complete responders. Also, MRI had the highest overall accuracy in predicting pCR and residual tumor size as compared to mammography and ultrasound. Conclusion MRI is a sensitive modality for predicting pCR and residual tumor size with better accuracy for triple-negative tumors as compared to other subtypes.
Read full abstract