The writings of Heinrich von Kleist provide an opportunity to examine a particularly intense engagement with eighteenth-century views on the theory and practice of pedagogy, an engagement that brings out some of the tensions and potential contradictions in these views. Kleist never worked as a professional teacher, but pedagogical situations and opinions appear repeatedly throughout his work. It is striking, for example, how easily and naturally he assumes the role of pedagogue in his correspondence. His letters to Wilhelmine von Zenge often sound insufferably didactic to modern ears. At one point, over a period of several months during the spring and summer of 1800, he even went so far as to send her a series of questions on various ethical issues, which she then at his request answered in writing and returned to him to be corrected (508-13, cf. also 967). 1 He also felt it necessary to write her an instructional essay, Uber Aufklarung des Weibes, in which he expounds his concept of Pflicht, and more specifically his ideas on motherhood as the primary duty of women. Such texts indicate that, for Kleist, being Wilhelmine's fiance also meant being her tutor, especially in matters of ethics. His attitude towards his half-sister Ulrike is similar. Even though she was several years older than Kleist and he was often in the position of asking her for financial assistance, many of his letters to her contain advice on how she should live her life. In one letter from May 1799, Kleist begins by stating: Wenn ich von jemandem Bildung erhalte, mein liebes Ulrikchen, so wunsche ich ihm dankbar auch wieder einige Bildung zuruckzugeben (486). Here he writes of Bildung almost as if it were some sort of commodity that could be exchanged, and he goes on to present Ulrike with a healthy quantity of it in return for the assistance she has given him in their common pursuit of die Wahrheit [...], der wir beide aufrichtig entgegenstreben und in welcher wir uns auch gewohnlich
Read full abstract