Abstract This paper describes an exergy comparison of the pressure gain combustion (PGC) gas turbine (GT) with conventional GT. PGC has recently emerged as a promising approach to achieve major performance improvements in the current gas turbines operating on the Joule cycle, where the potential for major performance upgrades has nearly plateaued. However, the inherently unsteady and periodic nature of this combustion technology presents challenges in modelling the PGC process and understanding its impact on the cycle. In this work, PGC is represented by a steady-state model of constant volume combustion based on the Humphrey cycle, along with a constant pressure combustion loss model for capturing practical losses. Exergy performance was analysed in terms of exergy destruction for three air-cooled GT cycles with different combustors: a conventional isobaric combustor, an optimistic PGC combustor with no losses and a realistic PGC combustor with losses. Gas turbine cycles were modelled in WTEMP (Web-based Thermo-Economic Modular Program) software, a modular and flexible cycle analysis tool developed by TPG at the University of Genova. Simulations were performed at compressor pressure ratios from 5 to 40 at turbine inlet temperatures of TIT=1300°C and TIT=1700°C, and results were analysed in terms of exergy destruction and exergy efficiency. It was found that a PGC combustor with optimistic losses recovers more exergy than a conventional combustor due to pressure gain. At a cycle pressure ratio of 20 and 1700°C TIT, the PGC combustor with a pressure ratio of 1.35 resulted in an exergy efficiency of 79.6% compared to 77.9% of the Joule combustor. However, with realistic loss from inlet pressure drop and constant pressure combustion in the PGC combustor, the PGC combustor showed higher irreversibility than conventional combustor but the overall benefit on the cycle was retained at low compressor pressure ratios. Moreover, the percentage increase in turbine irreversibility from blade cooling was found to be slightly lower for the PGC cycle as compared to Joule.
Read full abstract