The University of Mary Wrestling Anaerobic Performance Test (UMWAPT) protocol simulates the requirements of a full wrestling match. The purpose of the study was to compare and correlate the mechanical outcomes of the WAnT and the UMWAPT. Fifteen wrestlers randomly underwent both protocols. Mechanical outputs (W) and fatigue index (%) were calculated and compared between the protocols and within the UMWAPT. Peak power correlations between protocols were weak to moderate and weak to strong within the UMWAPT test. Mean power correlations between protocols were weak and weak to strong within the UMWAPT test. Anaerobic capacity correlations between the protocols were weak and weak to strong within the UMWAPT test. Fatigue index correlations between protocols were weak and weak to moderate within the UMWAPT test. All participants indicated the UMWAPT as a very accurate simulation of their most challenging wrestling match. In conclusion, The UMWAPT seems to be a very good protocol to simulate a wrestler’s most challenging match. The UMWAPT allowed the wrestlers to utilize their own technique, leading to better mechanical outputs, and, thus, it seems that this study gives hope that a wrestling-specific all-out performance protocol such as the UMWAPT may be utilized rather than a nonspecific protocol such as the WAnT.