Performance Of Liver Stiffness Measurement Research Articles

Liver stiffness: a novel imaging biomarker by ultrasound elastography for prediction of early allograft failure following liver transplantation.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) and serum transaminase levels for predicting early allograft failure (EAF) after liver transplantation (LT). A total of 189 patients who underwent LT were prospectively recruited in the study. Of these patients, 13 cases died or received re-transplantation within 90 days after surgery were classified as EAF group, while rest 176 patients were included in the non-EAF group. LSM values and serum transaminase levels within 1 week after operation were recorded and compared between two groups. The area under the curve (AUC) was utilized to assess the performance of LSM, serum transaminase and their combination in predicting EAF. The earliest significant difference in LSM between EAF and non-EAF group was observed on postoperative day 3 (POD-3) (p = 0.046). Comparing to non-EAF group, patients in the EAF group had higher aspartate-aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) on postoperative day 2 (POD-2)(p = 0.009, 0.033), and also demonstrated higher AST on POD-3 (p = 0.021). Furthermore, the reduction rate of AST/ALT from day 1 to day 3 (AST/ALT Red) were slower (p = 0.001, 0.014) in EAF group. Using a LSM value > 12.1kPa and an AST level > 339U/L on POD-3 predicted EAF with a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 86%, and an AUC of 0.926, surpassing the traditional early allograft dysfunction (EAD) model. The combination of LSM values and AST levels on the third day after LT can effectively predict EAF and facilitate timely interventions.

Development of Clinical Algorithm Utilizing Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography to Detect Advanced Hepatic Fibrosis in Liver Transplant Recipients

IntroductionVibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) based liver stiffness measurement (LSM) is an excellent ‘rule-out’ test for advanced hepatic fibrosis in liver transplant (LT) recipients, however, its ability to ‘rule-in’ the disease is suboptimal. The study aimed to improve diagnostic performance of LSM in LT recipients.MethodsAdult LT recipients with a liver biopsy and VCTE were included (N = 150). Sequential covering analysis was performed to create rules to identify patients at low or high risk for advanced fibrosis (stage 3–4).ResultsAdvanced hepatic fibrosis was excluded in patients with either LSM < 7.45 kPa (n = 72) or 7.45 ≤ LSM < 12.1 kPa and time from LT < 5.6 years (n = 25). Conversely, likelihood of advanced fibrosis was 95% if patients had LSM > 14.1 and controlled attenuation parameter > 279 dB/m (n = 21). Thus, 118 (79%) were correctly identified and 32 (21%) would have required a biopsy to establish the diagnosis. Compared to previously established LSM based cutoff values of 10.5 kPa (Youden index) and 13.3 kPa (maximized specificity), the false positive rates of sequential covering analysis was 1% compared to 16.5% with LSM ≥ 10.5 kPa and 8.3% with LSM ≥ 13.3 kPa. The true positive rates were comparable at 87% for sequential covering analysis, 93% for LSM ≥ 10.5 kPa and 83% for LSM ≥ 13.3 kPa.ConclusionThe proposed clinical sequential covering analysis allows for better risk stratification when evaluating for advanced fibrosis in LT recipients compared to LSM alone. Additional efforts are necessary to further reduce the number of patients with indeterminate results in whom a liver biopsy may be required.

Liver stiffness measurement as a noninvasive method for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis D virus infection.

Noninvasive tests (NITs) have been proposed as an alternative to liver biopsy for diagnosing liver cirrhosis. The evidence of NIT performance in patients with chronic hepatitis D (CHD) is limited. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and other NITs in CHD patients. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of LSM by transient elastography for the detection of liver cirrhosis in a retrospective, multicentre cohort of 144 CHD patients with paired (±6 months) LSM and liver biopsies. Cirrhosis was diagnosed histologically in 22 patients (15.3%). Mean LSM was significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis compared to those without fibrosis (23.4 vs 10.2 kPa, p < 0.0001) or with intermediate fibrosis (23.4 vs 13.5 kPa, p < 0.0001). In the detection of liver cirrhosis, LSM was superior to other NITs (AUROCs: 0.89 [LSM], 0.87 [D4FS], 0.74 [APRI], 0.73 [FIB-4], and 0.69 [AAR]). The optimal cut-off for identifying patients with liver cirrhosis was ≥15.2 kPa (Se 91%, Sp 84%, PPV 50%, NPV 98%). The ideal cut-off for diagnosing non-advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir ≤2) was <10.2 kPa (Se 55%, Sp 86%, PPV 90%, NPV 45%), correctly identifying 90% of patients. Data were validated in an independent cohort of 132 CHD patients. LSM is a useful tool for identifying patients at risk for liver cirrhosis and is superior to other NITs. The cut-offs of <10.2 and < 15.2 kPa reliably diagnose non-advanced liver fibrosis and exclude cirrhosis in the majority of patients. However, LSM cannot completely replace liver biopsy in CHD patients.

Relationship Between Spleen Pathologic Changes and Spleen Stiffness in Portal Hypertension Rat Model

The aim of the study described here was to explore the influence of splenic pathology and hemodynamic parameters on spleen stiffness in portal hypertension (PH). A Sprague‒Dawley rat model of PH (n=34) induced by CCl4 was established, and 9 normal rats were used as controls. All animals underwent a routine ultrasound examination, spleen stiffness measurement (SSM), liver stiffness measurement (LSM), portal vein pressure (PVP) measurement and histopathologic assessment. The diagnostic performance of SSM and LSM in PH was evaluated. SSMs were compared among the groups at different pathologic and hemodynamic levels. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the factors affecting SSM. SSM had excellent diagnostic efficacy for PH (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]=0.900) and was superior to LSM (AUC=0.794). In a rat model of PH, pathologic changes such as splenic sinus widening, thickening of the splenic capsule and an increase in collagen fibers were observed in the spleen. There were significant differences in SSM at different splenic capsule thicknesses and splenic sinus widths (all p values <0.05), but there were no significant differences in the SSM at different levels of the splenic collagen fiber area and red pulp area (all p values >0.05). In addition, there were significant differences in SSM at different levels of portal vein diameter, blood flow and congestion index (all p values <0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that PVP, portal vein congestion index and splenic capsule thickness were significantly associated with SSM. SSM is a good non-invasive way to assess PH. PVP, splenic capsule thickness and portal vein congestion index are responsible for spleen stiffness but not the proliferation of splenic fibrous tissue.

Utility of ElastPQ point-shear wave elastography in the work-up of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) have been shown to be useful tools for assessing the risk of fibrosis and portal hypertension, respectively. However, data on the accuracy of LSM and SSM measured by point-shear wave elastography (pSWE) in patients affected by primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are still lacking. Thus, we aimed to prospectively assess their performance in a cohort of patients with PSC. We determined the correlation between LSM assessed by a pSWE technique (ElastPQ) and by FibroScan-transient elastography (F-TE). Furthermore, we used receiver-operating characteristic curves and area under the curves (AUROC) to evaluate the performance of LSM by ElastPQ for the staging of fibrosis, using F-TE as a reference standard, and the performance of LSM and SSM by ElastPQ in predicting the presence of oesophageal varices (OVs). One hundred and fifty-two patients with PSC (93 males [61.2%], mean age 46 ± 16 years) were prospectively recruited. ElastPQ and F-TE LSMs were available for all patients, while ElastPQ SSM was available in 109 (72%) patients of whom 35 underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within 1 year of the ultrasound assessment. ElastPQ LSM showed an excellent correlation with F-TE (p <0.001, Spearman's 0.93; Lin's 0.86) and a good diagnostic accuracy for fibrosis staging along all stages of liver fibrosis (AUROCs 0.96, 0.97, 0.97 and 0.99 for fibrosis stages F≥1, F≥2, F≥3 and F=4, respectively), using F-TE as a surrogate of histological fibrosis. ElastPQ SSM showed a good diagnostic performance in predicting the presence of OVs at endoscopy. LSM and SSM by ElastPQ can be used as accurate tools for liver fibrosis risk assessment and fibrosis staging, as well as for predicting the presence of OVs in the work-up of patients with PSC. Liver and spleen stiffness measurement (LSM and SSM, respectively) by ElastPQ point-shear wave elastography in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis represent reliable and reproducible tools for non-invasively staging the severity of liver disease and stratifying patients according to their risk of developing liver-related outcomes. In particular, LSM shows good accuracy for staging liver fibrosis and therefore detecting those patients at high risk of having compensated advanced chronic liver disease who require close monitoring. SSM seems to be promising to detect the risk of portal hypertension and therefore of oesophageal varices, enabling the triaging of patients who really need to undergo a screening endoscopy.

Evaluation of liver stiffness measurement-based scores in liver transplantation recipients.

Combining bioclinical parameters with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has improved the diagnostic performance of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) for detection of advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. However, this approach has not yet been tested in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of combining LSM-based scores with LSM alone for the detection of advanced fibrosis in LT recipients. Adult LT recipients with a liver biopsy, VCTE, and clinical data necessary to construct LSM-based fibrosis models (FibroScan-AST [FAST], AGILE-3+, and AGILE-4) were included ( n = 132). The diagnostic statistics for advanced fibrosis (fibrosis stage 0-2 vs. 3-4) were determined by optimal cut-off using the Youden index. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for LSM was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.89-0.99), FAST was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.50-0.79), AGILE-3+ was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97), and AGILE-4 was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.97). No statistically significant differences were noted between the AUROC of LSM versus LSM-based scores. The false-positive rates for AGILE-3+ and AGILE-4 were 14.5% and 11.8% compared with 8.3% for LSM alone. The false-positive rates in LSM-based scores were higher among patients with diabetes mellitus, higher AST levels, and lower platelet counts. The LSM-based scores did not improve the diagnostic performance of LSM alone in LT recipients for the detection of advanced fibrosis. This lack of improvement in diagnostic performance results from the impact of immunosuppression on bioclinical profile and underscores the importance of developing LSM-based scores that are specific to LT patients.

The diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography for biliary atresia: A meta-analysis.

Biliary atresia (BA) is a severe inflammatory obliterative cholangiopathy of infancy that requires early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention. In this study, we aimed to obtain comprehensive evidence on the diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measurement by ultrasound elastography in the detection of BA through a meta-analysis. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies that investigated the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography in the detection of BA up to January 10, 2022. In this study, in order to summarize the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) modeling was constructed. Heterogeneity was estimated with the I 2 statistic. Multiple subgroup analyses were also performed. Fourteen studies from eleven articles, including 774 BA patients, 850 non-BA patients, and 173 controls were included in the present meta-analysis. The summary sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound elastography for liver stiffness were 85% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79-89%] and 82% (95% CI: 73-88%) with the I 2 value of 82.90 and 84.33%, respectively. The area under the SROC curve (AUROC) using ultrasound elastography for diagnosing BA was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92). In addition, a subgroup analysis of 9 two-dimensional shear wave elastography studies was also performed. Subgroup analysis revealed that the summary sensitivity and specificity were 85% (95% CI: 77-91%) and 79% (95% CI: 71-86%), respectively, and the summary AUROC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.92). Ultrasound elastography exhibits good diagnostic accuracy for BA and can be served as a non-invasive tool to facilitate the differential diagnosis of BA.

Relation of Liver Siderosis to Liver Fibrosis in Hemodialysis Patients With Severe Hyperferritinemia Secondary to High Doses of Intravenous Iron Supplementation

ObjectiveAggressive iron substitution in hemodialysis (HD) patients leads to iron overload. The association between liver siderosis and fibrosis is still debatable. We studied the association of liver siderosis with liver fibrosis in HD patients. Furthermore, we studied the performance of liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) in identifying advanced liver fibrosis. We investigated the performance of biochemical indicators of iron status in identifying advanced liver fibrosis. MethodsFifty-five HD patients (average HD duration 6 ± 2 years) with hyperferritinemia secondary to intravenous iron supplementation (weakly iron dose 252.7 ± 63 mg; median blood transfusions 3 [2-5]) were recruited. The liver fibrosis grade was determined with Fibroscan, aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and Fib-4 index. Liver iron concentration (LIC) was estimated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Iron parameters and liver function biochemical indicators were also assessed. ResultsThe median serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) were 3531 μg/L and 77%, respectively. 34.5%, 20%, and 45.5% of the patients showed mild, moderate, or severe liver siderosis, respectively. All patients with severe liver siderosis showed advanced liver fibrosis. Patients with severe liver siderosis and advanced liver stiffness showed higher serum iron, TSAT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), serum bilirubin, APRI, and Fib-4 index scores than those with mild liver siderosis. Serum iron and TSAT showed good utility in identifying advanced liver fibrosis determined with Fibroscan, APRI, and Fib-4 index. Liver stiffness exhibited good utility in identifying advanced liver fibrosis diagnosed with APRI and Fib-4 index. ConclusionsHigh weekly intravenous iron dose associated with severe hyperferritinemia, high serum iron, and TSAT might lead to severe liver siderosis and concomitant liver fibrosis in HD patients. Serum iron, TSAT, Fibroscan, Fib-4, and APRI scores might offer noninvasive tools for identifying advanced liver fibrosis in those patients.

Accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for assessing steatosis and fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

SummaryBackgroundNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common chronic liver disease, and among the non-invasive tests, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) have shown better diagnostic performance in NAFLD. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of CAP and LSM for assessing steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for relevant articles published up to February 13th, 2022, and selected studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and evaluated the quality of evidence. Then we pooled sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. A random effect model was applied regardless of heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis and subgroup analysis were performed to explore heterogeneity, and Fagan plot analysis was used to evaluate clinical utility. This meta-analysis was completed in Nanjing, Jiangsu and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022309965).FindingsA total of 10537 patients from 61 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The AUROC of CAP were 0·924, 0·794 and 0·778 for steatosis grades ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and = S3, respectively, and the AUROC of LSM for detecting fibrosis stages ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and = F4 were 0·851, 0·830, 0·897 and 0·925, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² had lower accuracy for diagnosing S ≥ S1, ≥ S2 than BMI<30 kg/m². For the mean cut-off values, significant differences were found in CAP values among different body mass index (BMI) populations and LSM values among different regions. For diagnosing S ≥ S1, ≥ S2 and = S3, the mean CAP cut-off values for BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² were 30·7, 28·2, and 27·9 dB/m higher than for BMI < 30 kg/m² (P = 0·001, 0·001 and 0·018, respectively). For diagnosing F ≥ F2 and = F4, the mean cut-off values of Europe and America were 0·96 and 2·03 kPa higher than Asia (P = 0·027, P = 0·034), respectively. In addition, the results did not change significantly after sensitivity analysis and the trim and fill method to correct for publication bias, proving that the conclusions are robust.InterpretationThe good performance of CAP and LSM for the diagnosis of mild steatosis (S ≥ S1), advanced liver fibrosis (F ≥ F3), and cirrhosis (F = F4) can be used to screen for NAFLD in high-risk populations. Of note, the accuracy of CAP for the detection of steatosis in patients with obesity is reduced and requires specific diagnostic values. For LSM, the same diagnostic values can be used when the appropriate probes are selected based on BMI and the automated probe selection tool. The performance of CAP and LSM in assessing steatosis in patients with obesity, moderate to severe steatosis, and low-grade fibrosis should be further validated and improved in the future.FundingThe study was funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Hepatic steatosis leads to overestimation of liver stiffness measurement in both chronic hepatitis B and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease patients

BackgroundThe impact of hepatic steatosis on liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in both chronic hepatitis B(CHB) and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) remains controversial. AimsTo determine whether LSM is affected by hepatic steatosis in CHB-MAFLD. MethodsHepatic steatosis and liver fibrosis were assessed by histological and noninvasively methods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LSM. ResultsThe prevalence of MAFLD in CHB patients (n = 436)was 47.5% (n = 207). For patients with low amounts of fibrosis (F0–1 and F0–2), the median LSM was 8.8 kPa and 9.2 kPa in patients with moderate- severe steatosis,which was significantly higher than that in patients with none-mild steatosis (P < 0.05) . The positive predictive value(PPV) was lower for LSM identifying significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) as well as severe fibrosis (F ≥ 3) in group which controlled attenuation parameter(CAP) ≥ 268 dB/m than its counterpart(68.2% vs 84.6% and 24.3% vs 45.0%). The AUROC of LSM detected F ≥ 2 was 0.833 at a cutoff of 8.8 kPa and 0.873 at a cutoff of 7.0 kPa in patients with CAP ≥ 268 and CAP < 268, respectively. ConclusionsThe presence of moderate-severe steatosis, detected by histology or CAP, should be taken into account to avoid overestimation of LSM.

The value of liver stiffness measured by two-dimensional shear wave elastography for predicting symptomatic posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

PurposeTo assess and compare the value of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) with the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and pathological examination in predicting symptomatic posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodA total of 130 patients who underwent liver resection for HCC between August 2018 and July 2021 were enrolled. Preoperative assessments for LSM and other clinicopathological tests were performed in all patients. The performance of LSM, CSPH and fibrosis stage in predicting symptomatic PHLF was assessed and compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted on the risk factors for symptomatic PHLF. ResultsSymptomatic PHLF occurred in 40 patients (30.8%). The best LSM cutoff value for predicting symptomatic PHLF was 9.5 kPa. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of LSM ≥ 9.5 kPa, fibrosis stage and CSPH for predicting symptomatic PHLF were 0.732 (95% CI: 0.638–0.826, p < 0.001), 0.655 (95% CI: 0.553–0.758, p = 0.005) and 0.594 (95% CI: 0.484–0.705, p = 0.086), respectively. The AUC of LSM ≥ 9.5 kPa was significantly higher than that of CSPH (p = 0.010), and was comparable to that of fibrosis stage (p = 0.073). Multivariate analysis identified LSM ≥ 9.5 kPa (p = 0.001), major hepatectomy (p = 0.007) and CSPH diagnosis (p = 0.040) as independent predictors of symptomatic PHLF. ConclusionsLSM by 2D-SWE was promising for predicting symptomatic PHLF in HCC patients. The predictive performance was higher than that of CSPH and comparable to that of pathological fibrosis stage.

Liver stiffness measurement as a quantitative method for liver fibrosis in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis.

This study assessed the diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in detecting liver fibrosis in paediatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) through meta-analysis. Online database searches of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science were conducted for studies that evaluated the performance of LSM for diagnosing liver fibrosis in paediatric patients with NAFLD until 1 January 2021. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Three measures were used to assess the performance of LSM for detecting liver fibrosis in paediatric patients with NAFLD, including the summary sensitivities and specificities, the summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and the summary diagnostic odds ratios. Our final data included seven studies with a total of 436 paediatric patients with NAFLD for meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of mild fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 66.3, 31.5, 14.9 and 1.2%, respectively. The summary sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic values of LSM were 80, 92 and 0.94 for the prediction of mild fibrosis; 91, 97 and 0.98 for the prediction of significant fibrosis; and 89, 93 and 0.96 for the prediction of advanced fibrosis, respectively. Liver stiffness measurement exhibited good diagnostic performance in predicting liver fibrosis and can be used as a non-invasive tool in the management of paediatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Liver Stiffness Is a Predictor of Rebleeding in Patients With Hepatitis B-Related Cirrhosis: A Real-World Cohort Study.

Background: Esophageal vein rebleeding is a life-threatening complication of liver cirrhosis. However, the role of non-invasive methods that were developed to evaluate the severity of chronic liver disease, especially in rebleeding, remains unclear.Aims: To evaluate the performance of liver stiffness and non-invasive fibrosis scores in predicting esophageal vein rebleeding in hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhotic patients.Methods: A prospective analysis of 194 HBV patients between 2017 and 2021 was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and time-dependent ROC curves were used to assess the power for predicting rebleeding with non-invasive fibrosis score and liver stiffness.Results: During the median follow-up time of 68.28 weeks, 55 patients experienced rebleeding. In the entire cohort, the area under the ROC curve for liver stiffness measurement (LSM) predicting for rebleeding was 0.837, with a cut-off value of 17.79 kPa, and the time-dependent ROC curve also showed stable prediction performance of LSM. The predictive ability of the non-invasive fibrosis score was less than that of LSM, and there were statistical differences. Moreover, patients using non-selective beta-blockers and HBV DNA-negative patients experienced significantly reduced rebleeding.Conclusions: Compared with non-invasive fibrosis scores, LSM can more simply and accurately predict rebleeding events of hepatitis B liver cirrhosis.

The utility of shear wave elastography and serum biomarkers for diagnosing biliary atresia and predicting clinical outcomes.

To investigate the utility of liver stiffness measurement by shear wave elastography (SWE) and several commonly used biomarkers in differentiating biliary atresia (BA) from other causes of cholestasis (non-BA) patients within 45days and in predicting the postoperative prognosis. A consecutive series of medical records of patients presenting with cholestasis within 45days in our institution between February 2016 and December 2020 was collected. The BA diagnosis was confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). Other causes of cholestasis were confirmed by IOC, liver biopsy, genetic analysis, or recovery after conservative treatment. Preoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. A total of 156 patients were included, consisting of BA (n = 83) and non-BA (n = 73) cases. SWE and serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) showed better discriminative utility. The optimal cutoff values for SWE and GGT were > 7.10kPa and > 195.4 U/L, with AUC of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89; p < 0.0001) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.93; p < 0.0001), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed the increased discriminative performance of SWE with age. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed better diagnostic performance for SWE (adjusted OR, 35.03; 95% CI, 7.12-172.50) and GGT (adjusted OR, 24.70; 95% CI, 6.55-93.18) after adjusting for other confounders. The 30-day postoperative to preoperative serum direct bilirubin (DB) level, DB (post-30:pre), of > 0.3 showed the best predictive value for the need of liver transplantation, with HR of 6.15 (95% CI 1.95-19.38, P = 0.042).Conclusion: Serum GGT level and liver stiffness measurement by SWE showed the best discriminative utility. The diagnostic performance of SWE increased with age. A DB (post-30:pre) value > 0.3 was associated with the need for liver transplantation in later life. What is Known: • Liver stiffness measurement by shear wave elastography (SWE) could help discriminate biliary atresia (BA) from other causes of cholestasis, with sensitivity of 70-90%. • The postoperative total bilirubin less than 2 mg/dL within the first 3 months was a predictor of transplant-free survival. What is New: • The diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measurement by SWE increased with age. • The 30-day postoperative direct bilirubin (DB) level to preoperative DB level, DB (post-30:pre), is a predictor for short-term clinical outcomes.

Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD: an individual patient data meta-analysis

ObjectiveLiver biopsy is still needed for fibrosis staging in many patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The aims of this study were to evaluate the individual diagnostic performance of liver...

Diagnostic Performance of FibroTouch Ultrasound Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

INTRODUCTION:To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound attenuation parameter (UAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by FibroTouch for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).METHODS:We recruited 237 patients undergoing FibroTouch and liver biopsy within 2 weeks. The pathological findings of liver biopsy were scored by Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network, and the diagnostic accuracy of UAP for steatosis and LSM for fibrosis was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The impacts of histological parameters on UAP and LSM were analyzed, and diagnostic performance of FibroTouch UAP and LSM was compared with other noninvasive biomarkers.RESULTS:The success rate of FibroTouch examination was 96.51%. The AUROC of UAP for diagnosis of steatosis ≥S1, ≥S2, and S3 was 0.88, 0.93, and 0.88, and the cutoff values were 244, 269, and 296 dB/m, respectively. The AUROC of LSM for the diagnosis of fibrosis stages ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 was 0.71, 0.71, and 0.77, and the cutoff values were 9.4, 9.4, and 11 kPa, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that LSM was positively correlated with degree of fibrosis and NAFLD activity score. UAP was positively correlated with liver steatosis. The diagnostic performance of UAP for steatosis was significantly superior to that of the hepatic steatosis index.DISCUSSION:FibroTouch has a low failure rate with moderate to high diagnostic performance for discriminating the steatosis degree and fibrosis stage and is suitable for clinical evaluation and monitoring of patients with NAFLD.

Performance of liver stiffness measurements obtained with FibroScan is affected by glucose metabolism in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

BackgroundThe performance of liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) obtained using FibroScan can be affected by several factors, and cut-off values are different for fibrosis caused by various aetiologies. The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LSM in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients with abnormal glucose metabolism and investigate whether the LSM value would be affected by metabolic indicators.MethodsThe study involved 91 NAFLD patients with abnormal glucose metabolism who underwent liver biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of LSM value was evaluated by the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, with the biopsy results taken as the gold standard. Multivariate linear regression and subgroup analysis were performed to determine the correlated indicators.ResultsThe areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) of LSM values for detecting fibrosis stage ≥1, 2, 3 and 4 were 0.793 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.695–0.871), 0.764 (95% CI: 0.663–0.846), 0.837 (95% CI: 0.744–0.906) and 0.902 (95% CI: 0.822–0.955), with cut-off values of 6.3, 7.6, 8.3 and 13.8 kPa, respectively. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, β = 0.205, P = 0.026) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT, β = 0.192, P = 0.047) were independently associated with the LSM value after adjustment for fibrosis stage, ballooning and inflammation grade from liver biopsy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that LSM values were slightly higher in patients with HbA1c ≥7% than in those with HbA1c < 7% and in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 than in those with BMI < 30 kg/m2.ConclusionsFibroScan was valuable for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients with abnormal glucose metabolism. FibroScan is recommended to evaluate severe fibrosis, especially to exclude advanced fibrosis. Glucose metabolism state may affect LSM values.

Different Performance of Liver Stiffness Measurement According to Etiology and Outcome for the Prediction of Liver-Related Events

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) has shown promising results for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic decompensation in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). However, whether prognostic performance of TE differs according to etiology or type of outcome remains further clarification. Performance of LSM for the prediction of HCC and hepatic decompensation was analyzed in a cohort of 4026 patients with asymptomatic CLD. During median 4.5years of follow-up (range 3.0-6.2years), liver-related events (LRE) were observed in 196 patients (166 with HCC, 45 with hepatic decompensation, and 15 with both). In the multivariate analysis, LSM was independent factor associated with LRE and showed high AUROC (0.78). When stratified by type of outcome and etiology of liver disease, LSM showed high AUROC for the prediction of HCC for patients with non-viral hepatitis (0.89), while it showed relatively low AUROC for the prediction of HCC for patients with viral hepatitis (0.75). For the prediction of hepatic decompensation, LSM showed high AUROC for patients with both viral- and non-viral hepatitis (0.90, 0.90, respectively). LSM showed powerful prognostic role for the prediction of LRE in patients with CLD. Notably, HCC risk was not negligible in patients with viral hepatitis who showed LSM value < 10kPa, indicating watchful attention for HCC is still needed for viral hepatitis patients with low LSM.

Similar performance of liver stiffness measurement and liver surface nodularity for the detection of portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background & AimsWe compare the performance of liver surface nodularity (LSN) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) for the detection of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsAll patients with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent computed tomography, LSM and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements within 30 days between 2015 and 2018 were included. The estimation of CSPH by LSN and LSM, and the LSM-spleen-size-to-platelet ratio score (LSPS) were evaluated and compared.ResultsIn total, 140 patients were included (109 men [78%], mean age 63 ± 9 years old), including 39 (28%) with CSPH. LSN measurements were valid in 130 patients (93%) and significantly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.68; p <0.001). Patients with CSPH had higher LSN measurements compared with those without [3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 2.5 ± 0.3, p <0.001; area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC): 0.87 ± 0.31]. LSM and LSPS were valid in 132 patients (94%) and significantly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.75, p <0.001; AUROC 0.87 ± 0.04 and r = 0.68, p <0.001; AUROC 0.851 ± 0.04, respectively). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance between LSN and LSM-LSPS (DeLong, p = 0.28, 0.37, and 0.65, respectively) in patients with both valid tests (n = 122). LSN <2.50 had a 100% negative predictive value for CSPH. A 2-step algorithm combining LSN and LSPS for the diagnosis of CSPH classified 108/140 patients (77%) with an 8% error.ConclusionsThe diagnostic performance and feasibility of LSN measurements were similar to those of LSM for the detection of CSPH in patients with compensated cirrhosis and HCC. Combining LSN and LSPS accurately detected CSPH in >75% of patients. Such a combination could be useful in centres where the HVPG measurement is unavailable.Lay summaryThe diagnostic performance and feasibility of liver surface nodularity was similar to that of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for the detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Thus, liver surface nodularity could be an option for the preoperative detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Combining liver surface nodularity with LSM-spleen-size-to-platelet ratio score resulted in the accurate detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in >75% of patients, thus limiting the need for HVPG measurements.

Higher liver stiffness scores are associated with early kidney dysfunction in patients with histologically proven non-cirrhotic NAFLD

AimThe association between Liver fibrosis (LF), as assessed by either histology or Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and the presence of Early kidney dysfunction (EKD) was investigated in this study, as was also the diagnostic performance of LSM for identifying the presence of EKD in patients with Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Materials and methodsA total of 214 adults with non-cirrhotic biopsy-proven NAFLD were recruited from two independent medical centres. Their histological stage of LF was quantified using Brunt's criteria. Vibration-controlled Transient elastography (TE), using M-probe (FibroScan®) ultrasound, was performed in 154 patients and defined as significant when LSM was≥8.0kPa. EKD was defined as the presence of microalbuminuria with an estimated glomerular filtration rate≥60mL/min/1.73 m2. Logistic regression modelling was used to estimate the likelihood of having EKD with NAFLD (LSM–EKD model). ResultsThe prevalence of EKD was higher in patients with vs without LF on histology (22.14% vs 4.82%, respectively; P<0.001) and, similarly, EKD prevalence was higher in patients with LSM≥8.0kPa vs LSM<8.0kPa (23.81% vs 6.59%, respectively; P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve of the LSM–EKD model for identifying EKD was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72–0.89). LF detected by either method was associated with EKD independently of established renal risk factors and potential confounders. ConclusionLF was independently associated with EKD in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Thus, TE-measured LSM, a widely used technique for quantifying LF, can accurately identify those patients with NAFLD who are at risk of having EKD.