Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy Research Articles

Full endoscopic percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression and discectomy: An outcome and efficacy analysis on 606 lumbar stenosis patients

ABSTRACT Introduction: Laminectomy has long been a “gold standard” to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Minimal invasive spine surgery (MISS) is widely developed to overcome the limitations of conventional laminectomy to achieve a better outcome with minimal complications. Full endoscopic percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression (FE-PSLD) is the newest MISS technique for spinal canal decompression. We aimed to evaluate and analyze the significance of FE-PSLD in reducing pain and its association with age, duration of symptoms, stenosis level, and operative time (OT). Materials and Methods: A longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted on 606 LSS patients who underwent FE-PSLD and enrolled from 2020 to 2022. Three-month evaluation of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the modified MacNab criteria were assessed. The significance of changes was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Spearman’s correlation test was performed to evaluate the significant correlation of several variables (pre-PSLD-VAS, age, symptoms duration, OT, and level of LSS) to post-PSLD-VAS, and multiple regression analysis was conducted. Results: The reduction of VAS was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.005) with an average pre-PSLD-VAS of 6.75 ± 0.63 and post-PSLD-VAS of 2.24 ± 1.04. Pre-PSLD-VAS, age, and stenosis level have a statistically significant correlation with post-PSLD-VAS, while the duration of the symptoms and OT have an insignificant correlation. Multiple regression showed the effect of pre-PSLD-VAS (β =0.4033, P = 0.000) and stenosis level (β =0.0951, P = 0.021) are statistically significant with a positive coefficient. Conclusions: FE-PSLD is an efficacious strategy with favorable outcomes for managing LSS, shown by a significant reduction of pain level with a relatively short follow-up time after the procedure. Preoperative pain level, age, and stenosis level are significantly correlated with postoperative pain level. Based on this experimental study, PSLD can be considered a good strategy for treating lumbar canal stenosis in all age groups and all LSS levels.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Return to Work after CT-Guided Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy: A Prospective Study

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous lumbar discectomy (PLD) under computed tomography (CT) guidance on pain and functional capacities and to estimate the speed of recovery by assessing the time to return to work. Materials and MethodsPatients treated with PLD were prospectively included between December 2019 and April 2021. Data regarding pain, duration of symptoms, analgesia intakes, time of absence from work, and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were collected. Patients were followed-up during 6 months. Duration of hospitalization and time to return to work were reported. The Fisher test was used to compare nominal variables, the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare ordinal variables, and the Student t test to compare quantitative continuous variables. ResultsA total of 87 patients were evaluated (median age, 56 years; interquartile range [IQR], 43–66 years). The median ODI decreased from 44 (IQR, 33–53) to 7 (IQR, 2–17) at 6 months (P < .001). The median visual analog scale score decreased from 8 (IQR, 8–9) to 2 (IQR, 0–3) within 6 months (P < .001). In total, 96.5% of patients were discharged on the day of the procedure, and 3.5% were discharged on the following day. No severe adverse events were reported according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification system. Of the 57 patients previously employed, 50 were able to return to work during the follow-up, with a median time of 8 days (IQR, 0–20 days). ConclusionsSymptomatic lumbar disc herniation can be successfully treated using PLD, resulting in significant improvement in symptoms and functional capacities and a fast return to work.

Angulation error assessment for the trajectory in the anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic views during percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy

BackgroundAnteroposterior (AP) and lateral fluoroscopies are often used to evaluate the intraoperative location and angulation of the trajectory in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD). Although the location of the trajectory shown in fluoroscopy is absolutely accurate, the angulation is not always reliable. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the angle shown in the AP and lateral fluoroscopic views.MethodsA technical study was performed to assess the angulation errors of PETLD trajectories shown in AP and lateral fluoroscopic views. After reconstructing a lumbar CT image, a virtual trajectory was placed into the intervertebral foramen with gradient-changing coronal angulations of the cephalad angle plane (CACAP). For each angulation, virtual AP and lateral fluoroscopies were taken, and the cephalad angles (CA) of the trajectory shown in the AP and lateral fluoroscopic views, which indicated the coronal CA and the sagittal CA, respectively, were measured. The angular relationships among the real CA, CACAP, coronal CA, and sagittal CA were further demonstrated with formulae.ResultsIn PETLD, the coronal CA is approximately equal to the real CA, with a small angle difference and percentage error, whereas the sagittal CA shows a rather large angle difference and percentage error.ConclusionThe AP view is more reliable than the lateral view in determining the CA of the PETLD trajectory.

Percutaneous lumbar discectomy: a systematic review

Introduction: low back pain is a clinical condition with a multifactorial etiopathogenesis, which has a high socioeconomic impact, especially in the economically active population, as it is associated with frequent absenteeism and reduced quality of life. Through intervertebral disc degeneration, a progressive instability of the compromised region is observed, triggering a harmful positive feedback mechanism that further promotes intervertebral disc disease. Built by the interaction between the predisposing biopsychosocial components, a multidisciplinary therapeutic proposition is suggested. In persistent low back pain, treatment involves surgical procedures such as Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy. Objective: to evaluate the scientific evidence regarding the clinical outcomes and safety of this surgery. Methods: systematic review duly registered in Prospero (CRD42022370811), based on the PICOD question, elaborated from a Boolean search in different databases for scientific articles, evaluated and selected in a paired way based on the eligibility criteria. In addition to extracting data related to the proposed objectives, the articles included were evaluated in relation to their level of evidence and strength of recommendation. Results: among the 12 articles included, it was observed that it is a clinically effective and safe procedure. In the set of evidences gathered, they are of high and moderate level of evidence with respective strength of recommendation strong/good and weak/moderate. Conclusion: Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy promotes significant reduction of pain and increase in body functionality, in addition to preserving local musculoskeletal structures and preventing post-surgical joint instability. It is, therefore, a safe and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure for patients with herniated discs.

Biomechanical evaluation of effects of percutaneous cement discoplasty and percutaneous cement interbody fusion on spinal stability

To investigate the effects of percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) and percutaneous cement interbody fusion (PCIF) on spinal stability by in vitro biomechanical tests. Biomechanical test was divided into intact (INT) group, percutaneous lumbar discectomy (PLD) group, PCD group, and PCIF group. Six specimens of L 4, 5 (including vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs) from fresh male cadavers were taken to prepare PLD, PCD, and PCIF specimens, respectively. Before treatment and after the above treatments, the MTS multi-degree-of-freedom simulation test system was used to conduct the biomechanical test. The intervertebral height of the specimen was measured before and after the axial loading of 300 N, and the difference was calculated. The range of motion (ROM) and stiffness of the spine in flexion, extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation under a torque of 7.5 Nm were calculated. After axial loading, the change of intervertebral height in PLD group was more significant than that in other three groups ( P<0.05). Compared with INT group, the ROM in all directions significantly increased and the stiffness significantly decreased in PLD group ( P<0.05). Compared with INT group, the ROM of flexion, extension, and left/right rotation in PCD group significantly increased and the stiffness significantly decreased ( P<0.05); compared with PLD group, the ROM of flexion, extension, and left/right bending in PCD group significantly decreased and the stiffness significantly increased ( P<0.05). Compared with INT group, ROM of left/right bending in PCIF group significantly decreased and stiffness significantly increased ( P<0.05); compared with PLD group, the ROM in all directions significantly decreased and the stiffness significantly increased ( P<0.05); compared with PCD group, the ROM of flexion, left/right bending, and left/right rotation significantly decreased and stiffness significantly increased ( P<0.05). Both PCD and PCIF can provide good biomechanical stability. The former mainly affects the stiffness in flexion, extension, and bending, while the latter is more restrictive on lumbar ROM in all directions, especially in bending and rotation.

A comparative study of single and double incision for L4/5 and L5/S1 double-level percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy.

ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the clinical outcome of single and double incision for double-level percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomyMethodsA retrospective analysis was performed involving patients with L4/5 and L5/S1 double-level lumbar disc herniation who received percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PEID) in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020. These enrolled patients were divided into single- and double-incision groups, with 25 patients in each group. We compared the incision length, operation time, fluoroscopy times, and length of hospital stay between the two groups. Meanwhile, the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA), and modified MacNab standard were used to evaluate the outcomes of the patients within the two groups.ResultsIt showed that the single-incision group performed better than double-incision group in incision length, operation time, and fluoroscopy times (P < 0.001). The VAS score, JOA score, and ODI index in the two groups were significantly decreased at the time points of postsurgery, 1 month after surgery, and the last follow-up (P < 0.01), but there was no statistical significance between the two groups involving above parameters (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the excellent and good rates of MacNab efficacy in the two groups were 92% and 88%, respectively, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionBoth the single- and double-incision approaches are effective and safe for managing L4/5 and L5/S1 double-level LDH. Single-incision PEID for treating L4/5 and L5/S1 double-segment lumbar disc herniation has advantages of less trauma, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and shorter operation time, as compared to double-incision PEID. However, the operation of double-segment LDH through a single laminar incision is difficult, the learning curve is steep, and professional skill is highly required. Importantly, the surgical indications should be strictly grasped.

Ultrasound Images under an Optimized Image Processing Algorithm in Guiding the Neurological Safety of Resection of Lumbar Disc Nucleus Pulposus in Spinal Surgery.

This study was aimed at investigating the effect of an optimized image processing algorithm in ultrasound images and the influence of resection of lumbar disc nucleus pulposus in spinal surgery under the guidance of ultrasound images on the neurological safety of patients. A total of 60 patients with lumbar disc herniation were selected and divided randomly into the control group and observation group. Patients from the control group were treated with resection of lumbar disc nucleus pulposus by an X-ray-guided foraminal microscope, and patients from the observation group underwent the ultrasound image-guided surgeries with an optimized image processing algorithm. Then, the treatment of patients from the two groups was compared. The results showed that the radiotherapy time in the control group was 120 ± 6.3 min and the radiotherapy dose was 129 ± 10.3 min/sec, while the radiotherapy time in the observation group was 4.5 ± 1.2 min and the radiotherapy dose was 22 ± 7.7 min/sec. The time and dose of radiotherapy in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In the control group, the numbers of significant effective cases, effective cases, and ineffective cases were 8, 16, and 6, respectively, while those in the observation group were 12, 18, and 0, respectively. The comparison between the groups showed that the number of effective cases and the number of effective cases in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the number of ineffective cases was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, ultrasound-guided percutaneous foraminal lumbar discectomy could improve patients' clinical symptoms, promote clinical efficacy, and reduce postoperative pain symptoms, thereby accelerating the postoperative rehabilitation of patients. Moreover, it was extremely safe for the nerves.

Evaluation of Lumbar Fusion in Recurrent Disc Prolapse

Abstract Background Recurrent disc herniation is the most common cause of reoperation after the primary disc surgery, The management of recurrent disc herniation remains somewhat controversial. Surgical treatment for recurrent disk herniation can be broadly categorized as revision discectomy alone or revision discectomy and fusion or percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. Aim of the work to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect between different modalities of treatment of the recurrent lumbar disc protrusion (RLDP) through 3 groups: (1) First group treated by conventional discectomy. (2) Second group treated by discectomy and lumbar fusion either by PLF, PLIF or TLIF. (3) Third group treated by percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. Patients and methods It is a prospective cohort study performed between January 2012 and April 2017 on 150 patients complained of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. They were surgically treated at the Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University Hospitals. All patients are evaluated clinically by VAS, JOA and Oswestry disability index (ODI) through follow up period of 2 years (one month, 6 months, 1 yr, 2 yrs). They were divided into 3 groups (I&amp;II and III) each group was a fifty patients Results the mean overall recovery rate is 89%, comparison between the three groups showed significant improvement of the endoscopic group and fixation group than simple discectomy group in term of VAS LBP, leg pain , JOA and ODI. Intraoperative blood loss, length of operation and hospital stay were significant less in endoscopic group than fixation and simple discectomy group CONCLUSION Recurrent lumbar disc prolapse management is a controversial issue, there are different surgical modalities (either by open discectomy, discectomy and fixation or Percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy PEILD) although those surgical modalities are successful the PEILD is the optional choice that offers less tissue trauma, rapid recovery, less cost effect and early return to work

A comparative study of conventional microlumbar discectomy and endoscopic lumbar discectomies

Background: Low back pain is fairly common in India and lumbar disc herniation is its most common specific cause. In the present study we compared three minimally invasive surgical modalities for treating lumbar disc herniation.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted on patients who presented to our department with low back pain with radicular symptoms. Twenty-five patients who underwent either microlumbar disectomy (MLD), percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PELD) or microendoscopic lumbar discectomies (MED) were compared.Results: Of the total sample of 75 cases, it was found that male population was affected more and the degenerative disc process was more prevalent among those over 40 years of age. The MED had the shortest operative time while MLD had the longest mean duration. A comparison of the intraoperative blood loss was negligible in PELD group and 42.80 ml in MED and 63.20 ml in MLD which was strongly significant with a p&lt;0.001. Pain scores were comparable between the patients in the three surgery groups. We observed significantly higher ODI score for patients in MLD group at in the immediate post-operative, 3 months and 6 months post-operative period.Conclusions: MLD is the gold standard for treatment for lumbar disc disease even today due to its familiarity among neurosurgeons; however, reduced tissue destruction and cosmetic demand with equally good results if not better, endoscopy could replace MLD as the first-line treatment for LDH until lesser invasive modality comes to light.

Comparison of the Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy at the L5-S1 Level

Although many studies have compared full endoscopic spine surgery and open spine surgery, few have compared the outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PEILD) and open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) at the L5-S1 level. We compared the clinical, surgical, and radiological outcomes of patients with disc herniation at the L5-S1 level who underwent either PEILD, or OLM, performed by a single surgeon with novice-level proficiency. Observational, retrospective matched cohort design. An analysis of clinical data was performed at a single center, collected from September 2012 to August 2016. The study enrolled 56 patients who underwent discectomy at the L5-S1 level, with a minimum one-year follow-up. Patients were allocated to 2 groups: a PEILD group (n = 27; September 2014 to August 2016), or an OLM group (n = 29; September 2012 to August 2014). Clinical, surgical, and radiological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Baseline characteristics including age, gender, past medical history, body mass index, preoperative symptom, and preoperative radiological findings did not differ significantly between the groups. Further, overall clinical outcomes including back and leg pain; surgical outcomes including blood loss, complication rate, and recurrence rate; and radiological outcomes including degree of decompression, disc height, and sagittal alignment were not different significantly between the 2 groups.However, the PEILD group showed significant advantages including lower immediate postoperative back pain (mean 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16-1.72] versus 2.41 [95% CI, 2.14-2.69], P < 0.001), favorable immediate postoperative Odom's criteria (excellent 57.14% versus 24.14%, P = 0.025), shorter operation time (mean 63.89 ±17.99 minutes versus 109.66 ±31.42 minutes, P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (3.15 [95% CI, 2.21-4.09] days versus 5.72 [95% CI, 3.29-8.16] days, P < 0.001), and rapid return to work (15.67 [95% CI, 12.64-18.69] days versus 24.31 [95% CI ,19.97-28.65] days, P = 0.001). Due to its retrospective nature, it was not possible to control for all variations. Moreover, the number of patients in the final cohort was relatively small. Our findings indicate that the PEILD group achieved better perioperative outcomes despite no significant intergroup difference in mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

Percutaneous discectomy under CT and fluoroscopy guidance: an international multicentric study.

To evaluate the technical efficacy, safety, and reproducibility of automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy (APLD) under CT and fluoroscopic guidance, for treating radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation in patients impervious to conservative treatment. A total of 77 patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation were treated with APLD in a prospective multicentric study performed in four centers across three countries. Magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography was used to evaluate the disc herniation before and after the procedure. Only local anesthesia was used during these procedures. Clinical outcomes were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at one and 6 months after the procedure. Technical success rate was 100% with a mean intervention duration of 30min (15-45min). No complications occurred during the procedure. Post-lumbar puncture syndrome occurred in three patients who were successfully treated with blood patches. VAS decreased from a mean of 8 before the intervention to 3 1 month after (p value = 0.001). The requirement for analgesia decreased from 100 to 27%. No statistically significant differences in outcomes were found between the centers. APLD with dual imaging guidance under local anesthesia is a safe, feasible, and reproducible technique to treat symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.

Quality of life after lumbar microsciopic discectomy

Introduction&#x0D; Lumbar disc herniation also known as prolapsed intervertebral disc is one of the well-known causes of low back pain. Among various modalities of treatment, surgery is often kept as the last resort when conservative treatment fails. Conventional surgical methods have been replaced by minimally invasive surgeries like microscopic, endoscopic and percutaneous lumbar discectomy in the hopes of decreasing post-operative pain. However, it is not uncommon for patient to have residual pain even after discectomy. Patients also complains of reduced quality of life (QOL). SF-36 is a standardized questionnaire for measuring QOL. Few studies have used this questionnaire to look into QOL of these patients but no such study is available in Nepalese perspective.&#x0D; Materials and Methods&#x0D; A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among all patients undergoing single level unilateral microscopic lumbar discectomy in Upendra Devkota Memorial National Institute of Neurological Sciences from February 1st 2017 to January 31 2018. After taking informed consent, subjects were asked to respond to the preformed questionnaire and SF-36 survey. Interviews were individually conducted by the same investigator at two different time points: i) before lumbar discectomy. ii) 3 months after lumbar discectomy. QOL scores before and after were compared.&#x0D; Results&#x0D; Total of 50 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were studied. The mean age of the study group was 38.7 ± 9.9 years with male preponderance of 76%. The median duration of exacerbation of symptoms was 4 weeks. Along with pain, 64% had sensory deficit whereas 52% had motor deficit. Surgery led to significant improvement in pain score as well as marked improvement of SF 36 quality of life score at 3 months of surgery. However, age, gender, duration of symptoms or presence of sensory or motor deficit before surgery did not predict improvement in overall QOL.&#x0D; Conclusion&#x0D; Patients undergoing microscopic lumbar discectomy for prolapsed intervertebral disc have significant improvement in pain score and QOL after 3 months of surgery.

Comparison of direct costs of percutaneous full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy: Results from Turkey.

Microdiscectomy (MD) is a stan-dard technique for the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Uniportal percutaneous full-endoscopic in-terlaminar lumbar discectomy (PELD) is another surgical op-tion that has become popular owing to reports of shorter hos-pitalization and earlier functional recovery. There are very few articles analyzing the total costs of these two techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare total hospital costs among microdiscectomy (MD) and uniportal percutaneous full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PELD). Forty patients aged between 22-70 years who underwent PELD or MD with different anesthesia techniques were divided into four groups: (i) PELD-local anesthesia (PELD-Local) (n=10), (ii) PELD-general anesthesia (PELD-General) (n=10), (iii) MD-spinal anesthesia (MD-Spinal) (n=10), (iv) MD-general anesthesia (MD-General) (n=10). Health care costs were defined as the sum of direct costs. Data were then analyzed based on anesthetic modality to produce a direct cost evaluation. Direct costs were compared statistically between MD and PELD groups. The sum of total costs was $1,249.50 in the PELD-Local group, $1,741.50 in the PELD-General group, $2,015.60 in the MD-Spinal group, and $2,348.70 in the MD-General group. The sum of total costs was higher in the MD-Spinal and MD-General groups than in the PELD-Local and PELD-General groups. The costs of surgical operation, surgical equipment, anesthesia (anesthetist's costs), hospital stay, anesthetic drugs and materials, laboratory wor-kup, nur-sing care, and two main groups (PELD-MD) me-dication diffe-red significantly among the two main groups (PELD-MD) (p<0.01). This study demonstrated that PELD is less costly than MD.

The Trans-Superior Articular Process Approach Utilizing Visual Trephine: A More Time-Saving and Effective Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy for Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation.

To introduce, and to evaluate the efficacy of the trans-superior articular process (trans-SAP) approach utilizing visual trephine in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD) for migrated lumbar disc herniation. This study included 98 patients, 50 patients were in trans-SAP PETLD group and 48 patients were in conventional PETLD group. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), gender, age, blood loss, operation time, the frequency of X-ray fluoroscopy and the percentage of highly migrated herniation were evaluated and compared between the trans-SAP PETLD and conventional PETLD group. In both trans-SAP PETLD and conventional PETLD group, VAS and ODI were decreased at postoperative 1 day and 3 months compared with preoperative (p < 0.001). What's more, the VAS and ODI of postoperative 3 months were lower than postoperative 1 day (p < 0.001). There was no difference in gender, age, blood loss after the operation, and VAS during operation between trans-SAP group and conventional group (p > 0.05). The blood loss during the operation of trans-SAP group was higher (p < 0.05), but the operation time and frequency of X-ray fluoroscopy were lower than conventional group (p < 0.001). Last, trans-SAP group had a higher percentage of highly migrated herniation (p < 0.001). Both the conventional way and trans-SAP approach can achieve excellent surgical results. But, in trans-SAP group, the operation time is shorter, and X-ray fluoroscopy is less. PETLD with visual trephine has more advantages in highly migrated herniation and maybe easier to be mastered by young surgeons.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy via Eccentric Trepan foraminoplasty Technology for Unilateral Stenosed Serve Root Canals.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty for unilateral stenosed nerve root canals.MethodsThe article is a retrospective analysis. From May 2016 to April 2017, 32 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome (unilateral stenosed nerve root canals) were treated with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD). The study included 15 men and 17 women, with an average age of 53.8 ± 15.4 years, ranging from 24 to 78 years. The indexes used for preoperative and postoperative 1 day, 3 months, and final follow up were the visual analogue scale (VAS) for lumbar and leg, the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the modified Macnab criteria. All patients were followed up for an average 6 months after the operation.ResultsThe average operative time was 75.82 ± 10.58 min, the average blood loss was 15.83 ± 3.75 mL, and the average hospital stay after surgery was 6.2 ± 4.6 days. The VAS score (leg) decreased from 6.94 ± 0.50 preoperatively to 1.16 ± 0.45 at the final follow up (P < 0.05) and ODI were obviously improved, from preoperative evaluation of 80.19 ± 5.55 to 9.44 ± 1.16 at the final follow up (P < 0.05). However, the postoperative VAS score (lumbar) did not show an improvement, reducing from 1.78 ± 0.49 preoperatively to 1.62 ± 0.55 at the final follow‐up (P > 0.05). According to the modified Macnab criteria, the outcome showed that the excellent and good rate was 90.6%. There were three patients with hip soreness, and nerve root symptoms were relieved.ConclusionPercutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy has a satisfactory clinical effect in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome, especially for unilateral stenosed nerve root canals, and in decompressing the lateral recess and relieving the nerve root symptoms.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases with ruptured disc herniation

Objective To investigate the preliminary clinical and radiographic outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spine instability or lumbar spinal stenosis with ruptured disc herniation. Methods Data of 11 patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spine instability or lumbar spinal stenosis with ruptured disc herniation who had undergone PELD combined with OLIF between March 2017 to July 2018 in our spine surgery center were retrospectively analyzed. There were 5 males and 6 females with an average age of 61.2±6.8 years old. All the patients were diagnosed with degenerative lumbar diseases including lumbar spondylolisthesis (7 cases), lumbar spinal stenosis (3 cases) and segmental instability (1 case). The patients were treated with PELD combined with OLIF. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of low back pain and lower limb pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) of lumbar function, spinal canal anteroposterior diameter, intervertebral disc height, vertical diameter of intervertebral foramen, segmental angle and the whole lumbar lordotic angle were collected. Results All patients received PELD with local anesthesia before OLIF with general anesthesia. The mean operation time was 52.3±13.2 min and the mean blood loss was 10.9±4.7 ml for PELD. The mean operation time was 56.8±18.0 min and the mean blood loss was 65.5±24.6 ml for OLIF. All patients were followed up for an average of 11.2 months. At the latest follow-up, the mean VAS score for back pain was 1.3±0.8, the mean VAS score for leg pain 1.1±0.5, the mean ODI 14.6%±5.3%, thus all of those were improved significantly compared to those of pre-operation (t=10.37, 16.49, 8.73; P< 0.05). The radiographic results showed the mean pre-operative intervertebral disc height, vertical diameter of intervertebral foramen, spinal canal anteroposterior diameter, segmental angle, and lumbar lordosis angle was 7.1±1.2 mm, 15.3±2.2 mm, 6.2±1.3 mm, 10.2°±3.5°, 16.2°±6.2°, and thus all of those were increased significantly to the latest follow-up 11.5±1.8 mm, 19.2±2.6 mm, 10.4±2.5 mm, 19.3°±7.8°, 27.4°±8.3°, respectively (t=5.83, 4.21, 6.59, 10.32, 7.65; P< 0.05). One of the patients had weakness of flexor hip strength and one had a transient paresthesia immediately post-operation. All symptoms were relieved within 1 month. Another one case had cage subsidence and encountered serious back pain after 1 month, and alleviated after percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Conclusion PELD combined with OLIF can overcome the limitations of OLIF with indirect decompression effects, resulting in successful direct neural decompression without posterior decompressive procedures and providing a satisfactory outcome for the patients with degenerative lumbar diseases with ruptured disc herniation. Key words: Lumbar vertebrae; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Endoscopy; Spinal fusion; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive

Analysis of the clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of complex lumbar disc herniation

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in the treatment of complex lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 122 patients with LDH who underwent PELD from October 2015 to June 2019 in department of orthopedics, Beijing Chui Yang Liu Hospital was performed. There were 71 males and 51 females. According to whether lumbar disc herniation was a simple non migrated type, the patients were divided into control group (n=85) and complex group (n=37). The age, length of stay, operative approach, operation time, the bleeding volume, operative segments, perioperative complications, and excellent and good rate of 3 months after operation were recorded. Follow-up visit was performed by regular outpatient visit for 3 to 36 months. Before and after surgery, 3 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the effect of surgery. The measurement data were expressed as mean±standard deviation (Mean±SD), and the comparison between groups was performed by ANOVA analysis, the count data were expressed as percentage (%), and the comparison between groups was performed by χ2 test or Fisher test, the rank grouping data were performed by Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test. Results The age of patients in complex group [(63.0±15.9) years] was older than that in control group [(48.7±16.3 years] (t=2.289, P=0.030), and the length of stay in complex group [(13.0±6.9) d] was longer than that in control group [(8.2±4.3) d] (t=2.384, P=0.024). There were no significant differences of the operative approach between the two groups (χ2=0.420, P=0.517). Compared with the control group [(59.0±25.0) min, (16.3±10.9) mL], the operation time of the complex group [(87.0±29.2) min] was longer (t=2.737, P=0.011), and the bleeding volume [(63.5±52.5) mL] was more (t=3.925, P=0.001). There were no significant differences of the operative segments between the two groups (χ2=0.356, P=0.837). The incidence of operation related complications in the complex group (13.5%, 5/37) was significantly higher than that in the control group (2.4%, 2/85) (χ2=5.937, P=0.026). There were no significant differences in the excellent and good rate between the two groups at 3 months after operation (U = 1 398.000, P=0.106). The preoperative ODI score of the complex group [(86.6±8.8) scores] was significantly higher than that in the control group [(76.1±7.7) scores](t=3.359, P=0.002). The ODI score of the two groups decreased significantly. There were significant differences (t=18.683, P=0.001) between the preoperative [(76.1±7.7) scores] and 3 d postoperative [(36.6±7.5) scores] in the control group. There were significant differences (t=7.365, P=0.001) between the 3 d postoperative [(36.6±7.5) scores] and 1 month postoperative [(15.0±10.8) scores] in the control group. There were significant differences (t=4.524, P=0.001) between the 1 month postoperative [(15.0±10.8) scores] and 3 month postoperative [(10.4±12.7) scores] in the control group. There were significant differences (t=9.923, P=0.001) between the preoperative [(86.6±8.8) scores] and 3d postoperative [(40.1±11.0) scores] in the complex group. There were significant differences (t=3.619, P=0.006) between the 3d postoperative [(40.1±11.0) scores] and 1 month postoperative [(18.2±15.1) scores] in the complex group. There were significant differences (t=5.966, P=0.001) between the 1 month postoperative [(18.2±15.1) scores] and 3 month postoperative [(12.7±14.5) scores] in the complex group. Conclusions PELD technology can treat complex LDH. Compared with simple non migrated LDH, although the operation time is longer, the amount of intraoperative bleeding is more and the incidence of postoperative complications is higher, there is no difference in ODI scores, excellent and good rate. The clinical effect is similar to that of simple non migrated LDH. Key words: Disc degeneration; Surgical Procedures, minimally invasive; Video-assisted surgery

Preliminary clinical study: percutaneous lumbar discectomy combined with external drainage for treatment of intervertebral disc infections with epidural abscess.

IntroductionPercutaneous lumbar discectomy (PLD) combined with external drainage (ED) is a new technique for the treatment of intervertebral disc infection with epidural abscess.AimTo discuss the feasibility, safety and efficacy of PLD and ED for the treatment of intervertebral disc infections with epidural abscess.Material and methodsWe enrolled 12 patients who underwent intervertebral disc infections with epidural abscess. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) and standard Macnab’s evaluation. Postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were also used to evaluate the clinical efficacy.ResultsThe technical success rate is 100%. Preoperation mean VAS score was 8.18 ±0.98; 5.36 ±1.50 postoperation 1 month; 3.36 ±2.24 postoperation 6 months; 2.77 ±0.31 postoperation 12 months. The comparison of preoperation and postoperation VAS showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). According to standard Macnab’s evaluation, of all 12 cases, postoperation 12 months – excellent 4 cases, good 7 cases, poor 1 case. The efficacy rate was 91.6%. No serious complications were recorded.ConclusionsPercutaneous lumbar discectomy combined with external drainage may be a safe and efficacy method for the treatment of intervertebral disc infections with epidural abscess.

Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty and Decompression by Using a Visualization Reamer for Lumbar Lateral Recess and Foraminal Stenosis in Elderly Patients

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy has been widely used to treat lumbar disc herniation; its advantages are less trauma, faster recovery, lower costs, and higher percentage of patient satisfaction compared with open surgery. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with percutaneous full-endoscopic surgery is still challenging, especially for elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and complex pathologic factors. The aim of this study was to introduce percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty and decompression using a visualization reamer in elderly patients with lateral recess and foraminal stenosis and evaluate efficacy and safety. This retrospective review comprised 65 consecutive elderly patients (30 men and 35 women) with lateral recess and foraminal stenosis who underwent percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty and discectomy from January 2017 to September 2017. Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index were used to evaluate pain relief and neurologic improvement. Mean patient age was 71.58 years (range, 65-89 years). Mean follow-up period was 16.12 months (range, 12-20 months). Mean operative time was 98.59 minutes per level (range, 55-120 minutes). Mean intraoperative perspective frequency was 3.21 times (range, 2-6 times). Mean hospital stay after the procedure was 2.18 days (range, 1-4 days). Back and leg visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at all time points in the postoperative period were significantly lower than preoperatively (P < 0.01). At final follow-up, modified MacNab criteria were rated as follows: excellent, 47 patients (72.31%); good, 12 patients (16.92%); fair, 3 patients (4.62%); and poor, 4 patients (6.15%). Therefore, excellent or good results were obtained in 89.23% of patients. Percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty and discectomy using a visualization reamer is an effective and safe treatment for elderly patients with lumbar lateral recess and foraminal stenosis. It improves safety and efficiency of decompression and reduces intraoperative fluoroscopy.

Efficacy of automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in young male soldiers.

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) often results in back pain and radicular pain and is frequently treated with minimally invasive non-surgical methods in Korean Armed Forces Hospitals. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy (APLD) has been reported to have good clinical outcomes with low complication rates; however, the clinical efficacy of APLD performed in young male soldiers is uncertain. In order to clarify the efficacy of APLD for the treatment of LDH in young male soldiers, we designed a retrospective case–control study to compare patients who received APLD with patients treated with epidural steroid injection (ESI) alone.A total of 181 patients were enrolled and divided into the APLD (n = 92) and ESI (n = 89) groups according to the treatment modality. A simple logistic regression analysis was conducted to clarify the difference between the two. To optimize patient selection, APLD group was additionally divided for subgroup analysis into favorable (n = 59) and unfavorable (n = 33) groups based on satisfaction scales. A simple logistic analysis was also performed.The differences between pre- and postoperative numerical rating scale of pain (P = .0027) and hospital-own satisfaction scale (P = .0045) of the APLD group were significantly better compared to those of the ESI group. In terms of subgroup analysis, single-level pathology (P = 0.244) and protruded disc (P = .0443) were associated with favorable outcomes, whereas dual pathology and extruded disc were related with unfavorable outcomes.APLD using Dekompressor, performed in young male soldiers with back and radicular pain owing to LDH, showed better clinical outcomes compared to the ESI only therapy. Additionally, a single-level pathology with protruded disc was associated with favorable outcomes and may be indicated for treatment.