Evaluation of Lumbar Fusion in Recurrent Disc Prolapse

Abstract

Abstract Background Recurrent disc herniation is the most common cause of reoperation after the primary disc surgery, The management of recurrent disc herniation remains somewhat controversial. Surgical treatment for recurrent disk herniation can be broadly categorized as revision discectomy alone or revision discectomy and fusion or percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. Aim of the work to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effect between different modalities of treatment of the recurrent lumbar disc protrusion (RLDP) through 3 groups: (1) First group treated by conventional discectomy. (2) Second group treated by discectomy and lumbar fusion either by PLF, PLIF or TLIF. (3) Third group treated by percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. Patients and methods It is a prospective cohort study performed between January 2012 and April 2017 on 150 patients complained of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. They were surgically treated at the Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University Hospitals. All patients are evaluated clinically by VAS, JOA and Oswestry disability index (ODI) through follow up period of 2 years (one month, 6 months, 1 yr, 2 yrs). They were divided into 3 groups (I&II and III) each group was a fifty patients Results the mean overall recovery rate is 89%, comparison between the three groups showed significant improvement of the endoscopic group and fixation group than simple discectomy group in term of VAS LBP, leg pain , JOA and ODI. Intraoperative blood loss, length of operation and hospital stay were significant less in endoscopic group than fixation and simple discectomy group CONCLUSION Recurrent lumbar disc prolapse management is a controversial issue, there are different surgical modalities (either by open discectomy, discectomy and fixation or Percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy PEILD) although those surgical modalities are successful the PEILD is the optional choice that offers less tissue trauma, rapid recovery, less cost effect and early return to work