Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Research Articles

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: New perspectives for the method.

Ischemic stroke is a common complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, oral anticoagulant drugs are the most commonly used method of stroke prevention. Left atrial appendage occlusion is thought to be the main source of thrombi in patients with AF. Percutaneous left atrial appendage is a valuable therapeutic option for selected high-risk patients with AF and contraindications for oral anticoagulation therapy. While complete closure of the left atrial appendage is the goal of a device implantation the variable nature of the left atrial appendage anatomy makes this goal difficult to achieve. Currently, there are several types of devices available for left atrial appendage occlusion. Since the first percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in 2002 many studies have investigated both the safety and efficacy of this therapy using different closure devices. Still unresolved issues include a lack of data on optimal patient selection, risk of complications, and anticoagulant treatment after left atrial appendage occlusion.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in humans. It is a major cause of morbidity and mortality as it impairs cardiac function and is a major risk of embolic stroke. Traditionally, thromboembolic risk of AF has been treated with system anticoagulation with intravenous, intramuscular, or oral anticoagulants. Although the novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have revolutionized stroke risk reduction in AF patients, they are associated with a significant risk of bleeding and may be contraindicated in certain patients. Embolic events in AF typically originate from thrombi that form within the left atrial appendage (LAA), especially in nonvalvular AF. Both surgical and percutaneous LAA closure techniques have been devised as alternatives to systemic anticoagulation. As surgical LAA closure is typically performed as an adjunct to other cardiac surgeries, the amount of eligible patients for this type of therapy may be limited. Excluding the LAA from the systemic circulation may reduce the risk of thromboembolism in AF. Recent technologic advances have led to the development of several percutaneously delivered devices that can occlude or exclude the LAA from systemic circulation. These devices may be purely endocardially delivered such as the Watchman (Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, MN) and Amulet (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN), or both endocardially and pericardially delivered such as the Lariat (Sentre-HEART, Palo Alto, CA). During Amulet and Watchman procedures, a transseptally delivered device composed of nitinol is placed in the LAA orifice, subsequently excluding the LAA from the systemic circulation. In the Lariat procedure, a magnet link is created between a transseptally delivered endocardial wire and epicardially delivered pericardial wire, followed by epicardial suture ligation of the LAA. Their use is steadily increasing in worldwide either through routine clinical use of approved devices or within clinical trials. In this review, we describe the various devices available for percutaneous LAA closure, and the indispensable role of real-time transesophageal echocardiography in the periprocedural assessment and intraprocedural guidance of percutaneous LAA occlusion procedures.

Usefulness of N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide as a heart failure marker in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion.

The left atrial appendage is involved in secretion of N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for prevention of stroke may cause variations in NT-proBNP release. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of NT-proBNP after LAAO. The study group comprised 53 patients in whom LAAO was performed. The patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF) were allocated to group I (n = 16) whereas patients with no HF symptoms and EF > 40% were allocated to group II (n = 37). The symptomatic patients with EF > 40% were excluded. NT-proBNP values were measured prior to LAAO, at one-two days, and at three-month follow-up. EF, six-minute walk test (6MWT), and peak oxygen consumption (VO2max) were assessed 24 h prior to LAAO and after three months. Prior to LAAO the NT-proBNP level was higher in group I, when compared to group II (3084.74 ± 559.53 pg/mL vs. 808.02 ± 115.83 pg/ml, p < 0.01). In both groups there was a nonsignificant increase in NT-proBNP level at one-two days after LAOO (3100.14 ± 690.08 pg/mL in group I and 1012.09 ± 166.71 pg/mL in group II). At the three-month follow-up a further increase of NT-proBNP level in group I (3852.73 ± 1025.78 pg/mL) and a decrease in group II (855.03 ± 107.49 pg/mL) was observed. The pairwise comparison between the means of 6MWT and VO2max showed no significant changes during follow-up. At baseline, NT-proBNP level of 988 pg/mL presented 87.5% sensitivity and 75.7% specificity for prediction of HF. Three months after LAAO, it increased to 1358 pg/mL (sensitivity 81.2%, specificity 78.4%). When diagnosing HF in atrial fibrillation patients, the higher cut-off value of NT-proBNP should be used. NT-proBNP remains an appropriate diagnostic marker of HF in patients after LAAO.

Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Treatments for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events, which can be effectively prevented using oral anticoagulation (OAC) with either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. Until recently, VKAs were the only available means for OAC treatment. NOACs had similar efficacy and were safer than or as safe as warfarin with respect to reduced rates of hemorrhagic stroke or other intracranial bleeding in the respective pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of stroke prevention in non-valvular AF patients. Increasing “real-world” evidence on NOACs broadly confirms the results of the RCTs. However, individual patient characteristics including renal function, age, or prior bleeding should be taken into account when choosing the OAC with best risk–benefit profile. In patients ineligible for OACs, surgical or interventional stroke prevention strategies should be considered. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons, the left atrial appendage excision, ligation, or amputation may be the best option. Importantly, residual stumps or insufficient ligation may result in even higher stroke risk than without intervention. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, although requiring minimally invasive access, failed to demonstrate reduced ischemic stroke events compared to warfarin. In this review article, we summarize current treatment options and discuss the strengths and major limitations of the therapies for stroke risk reduction in patients with AF.

LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION UNDER INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC GUIDANCE: IMPACT OF THE LEARNING CURVE ON PROCEDURAL RESULTS

Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an alternative therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients. Currently, some centers use intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) to guide LAA closure to avoid general anaesthesia. However, data are lacking regarding the amount of experience required to achieve optimal procedural results with LAA occlusion under ICE Guidance. The aim of this study was to assess how operator experience affects the procedural results of LAA occlusion under ICE guidance. In our center, all percutaneous LAA occlusion are performed by two operators using ICE guidance, placing the ICE catheter in the left atrium through a separated transseptal access. We performed a retrospective analysis of the first 65 consecutive patients who such procedure with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACPTM) and second-generation AmuletTM (St.Jude Medical Inc. St.Paul’s MN) under left atrial ICE guidance in our institution from October 2012 to March 2017. Patients were divided into tertiles according to the procedure date. Baseline characteristics, procedural data and in-hospital outcomes for each tertiles were compared. The overall mean age was 74±9 years; mean CHADS2, CHA2DS-VASc and HASBLED scores were 3.36±1.4, 4.7±1.4 and 3.7±1.0, respectively with no difference between the 3 tertiles. Baseline characteristics and most of comorbidities were similar between the groups. Success rate of device implantation was similar between tertiles (95.2% vs 100% vs 95.5%; p=0.5). A significant reduction in procedural duration (109±27 vs 95±24 vs 82.4±34.6 minutes; p = 0.01), mean contrast volume (174±71 vs 126±54 vs 101±40 milliliter ; p = 0.001), and fluoroscopy times, 27±9 vs 22±10 vs 15.7±5 minutes; p < 0.0001) were seen across the 3 tertiles. In addition, a significant reduction in need for upgrading or downgrading ACP device (33.3% vs 13.6% vs 0%; p=0.01) was noted across the 3 tertiles. Rates of procedural complications was similar between tertiles. Experience accumulated over 65 LAA occlusion procedures under ICE guidance was associated with a significant decrease in procedural time, radiation dose and contrast use. In addition, the learning curve led to a better selection of occluder device size. The learning curve observed in our center could be related to the occlusion procedure, the ICE guidance, or both. Experience gathered in our center and others over the last few years could help abbreviate this learning curve for new operators.

Atrial fibrillation in kidney transplant recipients: is there a place for the novel drugs?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia of high clinical importance, occurring in 2% of the general population and in 19-24% in patients with chronic kidney disease. It is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Kidney transplant recipients with a history of AF were associated with significantly higher rate of ischaemic strokes, graft failure and post-transplant mortality. AF occurs in over 7% of kidney transplant recipients in the first 3 years after transplantation and is associated with reduced graft and patient survival. The incidence of stroke in patients after kidney transplantation (KTx) is higher than the general population, but markedly lower than those on dialysis. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy is recommended in AF patients at high risk of stroke. There are no randomized studies assessing OAC in patients after KTx and there are no specific recommendations and guidelines on therapeutic strategies in these patients. KTx recipients are a vulnerable population, exposed to variations in renal function, being at higher risk of bleeding and thrombotic complications, with possible interactions with immunosuppression. Surely, there is a place for novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in this group of patients as long as the summary of product characteristics is followed, as they are a valuable anticoagulation therapy. On one hand, they are at least as effective as warfarin; on the other hand NOACs are safer, especially when it comes to intracranial haemorrhages. However, NOACs seem to be underused in this population as they are excreted via kidney, may interact with immunosuppressive therapy and physicians need more experience and confidence in their administration. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion procedure may also be considered as an opportunity for this group of patients, in particular in the presence of contraindications to anticoagulation.

Left atrial appendage occlusion: 2016 in review.

A significant body of data has emerged in the area of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO). In this article, we present an overview of the most notable publications along with a review of the most important publications on LAAO in 2016. We also present important historical data such as landmark clinical studies, review of most utilized occlusion devices, and important clinical studies that are underway.

Interventional and surgical occlusion of the left atrial appendage

With a steadily increasing prevalence, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and an independent risk factor for stroke caused by thromboembolic events. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the primary source of thromboemboli in patients with nonvalvular AF who have a stroke. Novel strategies (such as mechanical and nonpharmacological intervention) targeting the LAA in patients with AF for stroke prevention have become a major focus during the past decade. Some devices for percutaneous LAA occlusion are supported by robust clinical data obtained from randomized trials or large registries, and are a valid alternative to pharmacological stroke prevention. However, the incidence of periprocedural complications and the presence of device-related thrombi or residual LAA leaks, whose long-term clinical implications are still unknown, are limiting factors in wider acceptability of these techniques. In this Review, we discuss the available techniques for LAA occlusion in patients with nonvalvular AF at high risk of stroke. We describe the pharmacological and mechanical approaches to LAA occlusion, and provide the current clinical evidence for various strategies. We particularly focus on the current management of the LAA, and discuss the challenges and future implications of the available approaches to LAA occlusion.

P3977Value of 3D printed left atrial appendix for predicting peri-prosthetics leaks and its usefulness in large cohort for guiding device optimal position in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion

P3977Value of 3D printed left atrial appendix for predicting peri-prosthetics leaks and its usefulness in large cohort for guiding device optimal position in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion

Anesthetic Management of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Endocardial and Epicardial Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in adults affecting almost 6 million adults in the United States. The 2 most common comorbidities associated with atrial fibrillation are heart failure and thromboembolic events. Heart failure symptoms may be treated with rate control, antiarrhythmic medications or by catheter ablation. Unfortunately, despite optimal medical management, thromboembolic events still occur. Recently, there has been a great deal of interest and innovation in finding an alternative to chronic anticoagulation. Several percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion devices have been developed over recent years, some of which have proven to be noninferior to anticoagulation in preventing strokes in atrial fibrillation patients. The 2 most widely used left atrial appendage occlusion devices are the WATCHMAN (Atritech Inc, Plymouth, MN, USA) and the LARIAT (SentreHEART, Palo Alto, CA, USA) devices. After a detailed description of the procedures, the anesthetic considerations of each procedure and management of specific adverse events are discussed within this review.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion procedures in patients with heart failure

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) may be considered for stroke prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF), especially in contraindications for oral anticoagulants (OAC) or high risk of bleeding. The data about implantation, safety, efficacy, and follow-up are limited. Moreover, there are no studies on patients with NVAF and heart failure with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤ 35%). To assess the safety, efficacy, and mid-term outcomes of LAAO procedures with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) and Amplatzer Amulet device in patients with NVAF and heart failure with LVEF ≤ 35% (group I) and to perform a comparative analysis of the patients who had LAAO with NVAF and LVEF > 35%. The analysis included 80 patients (group I: 19, group II: 61) with NVAF. The patients were enrolled for the study if they had: CHA2DS2VASc ≥ 2 and high risk of bleeding assessed in HAS-BLED (≥ 3) or less points in HAS-BLED but coexisting contraindications for OAC, or thromboembolic complications while using OAC. Time of follow-up was six months. In the studied population, the median CHA2DS2VASc score was 4 and the average HAS-BLED score was 3.2. Device implantation was successful in all patients from group I and in 59/61 patients from group II. The periprocedural clinical ef-ficacy (no thromboembolic complications) was 100% in group I and 98.4% in group II. Serious periprocedural complications (cardiac tamponade: 2.5%, device embolisation: 1.25%, unexplained death: 1.25%) occurred only in patients from group II (p = NS). The mid-term clinical efficacy was 100% in group I and 98.3% in group II (p = NS). During follow-up, one transient ischaemic attack and three deaths not related to the procedure occurred. Percutaneous LAAO is an effective and safe procedure in patients with NVAF and severe systolic heart failure. No significant periprocedural and mid-term differences, in terms of safety and efficacy, between the group with severe systolic heart failure (LVEF ≤ 35%) and the group without severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF > 35%) were found.

Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug could improve survival and prevent thrombo-embolic and major bleeding events in atrial fibrillation patients with increased bleeding risk.

Literature suggests a beneficial effect of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) to prevent thrombo-embolic events in patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared outcome of LAAO versus ‘suboptimal standard’ treatment in AF patients with high bleeding risk. Patients with sufficient follow-up data (n = 125) who underwent LAAO with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) were selected from the Belgian ACP database. AF patients who survived intracranial haemorrhage were recruited from the Leuven Neurosurgical Registry (LNR, n = 113). After propensity score adjustment, the outcome of both groups was compared for the combined end point (death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, systemic emboli, and major bleeding event). The LAAO group did not differ from the LNR group for mean age and gender (74 ± 7 versus 75 ± 10 years, P = 0.29; female 39% versus 48%, P = 0.18). However, the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were both higher in the LAAO group (4.8 ± 1.7 versus 3.9 ± 1.7, P = 0.0001; 3.5 ± 1.4 versus 3.2 ± 1.4, P = 0.036). After propensity score adjustment, the risk for the primary end point was significantly higher for the LNR group (HR 2.012, 95% CI 1.113-3.638). LAAO with ACP seems to improve the combination of survival and the prevention of thrombo-embolic and major bleeding events in patients with atrial fibrillation and increased bleeding risk.

Delayed left atrial appendage contrast filling in computed tomograms after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion

BackgroundThe gold standard for the follow-up of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is performing transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) at 45 days after LAAO; however, the duration for complete LAA seal-off after percutaneous LAAO is unknown in humans. We retrospectively evaluated the LAA contrast-filling (CF) rate in follow-up cardiac computed tomography (CT) scans after LAAO. MethodsWe included 35 patients (age 67.5±10.9 years, CHA2DS2VASc 4.2±1.6, HAS-BLED 3.7±1.5) who underwent LAAO [16 WATCHMAN, 19 Amplatzer cardiac plug (ACP)] and follow-up cardiac CT within 6 months after LAAO, and evaluated the LAA-CF rates. Eighteen patients (51.4%) underwent multiple episodes of CT follow-up. Results1. The proportions of patients with LAA-CF were 54.2% (19/35) at 6 months, 55.5% (5/9) at 6–18 months, and 33.3% (3/9) at >18 months after LAAO. 2. Among 23 patients with no peridevice leak at the 2 months TEE, LAA-CFs were found in 12 patients at 2.8±1.5 months (66.6% in WATCHMAN and 36.3% in ACP; p=0.158). 3. Among eight patients with consecutive follow-up CT (≥3 times), LAA-CFs were partially reduced in three; however, there was no complete LAA seal-off at 19.0±11.3 months. 4. A larger LAA landing zone diameter was independently associated with LAA-CF in follow-up CT [OR 1.45 (1.08–1.96), p=0.013, adjusted for age, sex, and device type]. ConclusionsDelayed LAA-CF is common after LAAO, with considerable discrepancies between cardiac CT and TEE findings. Although the clinical significance of LAA-CF is unclear, 45 days seem to be insufficient for complete LAA seal-off after LAAO.

Role of Imaging in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is now a valid alternative to long-term oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high thrombo-embolism risk, especially for patients who are considered ineligible for anticoagulation. The most frequently used occluders worldwide include the WATCHAMN (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug or Amulet (St. Jude Medical/Abbott, St Paul, MN, USA) devices. Multimodality imaging is key in the understanding of 3D aspects of the LAA and surrounding structures anatomy. Imaging is essential for procedural planning, during each step of the procedure and for device surveillance after implantation. Multimodality imaging, including 2D/3D echocardiography, fluoroscopy, and cardiac computed tomography can increase the safety and efficacy of the procedure.

Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the leading causes of stroke. Risks associated with oral anticoagulation (OAC) limit adherence to recommended therapy. Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is a treatment alternative in patients with AF. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of LAA occlusion compared with oral anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and placebo for stroke prevention. We also assessed the impact of LAA occlusion on mortality, major bleeding, and operative time. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library for randomized trials comparing percutaneous or surgical LAA occlusion with standard of care in AF patients. Conventional meta-analysis found no difference between groups for stroke (5 trials, 1285 patients;RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47-1.29), and a significant reduction in mortality (5 trials, 1285 patients; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) favouring LAA occlusion. NMA demonstrated a trend towards reduction in stroke (OR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.47-1.55) and mortality (OR 0.69, 95% CrI 0.44-1.10) for LAA occlusion versus warfarin, but no statistically significant effect. Statistical ranking curves placed LAA occlusion as the most efficacious treatment on the outcomes of stroke and mortality when compared to warfarin, aspirin, or placebo. No significant differences between groups were seen in major bleeding or operative time for surgical trials. The overall quality of the evidence was low as assessed by GRADE. LAA occlusion appears to preserve the benefits of OAC therapy for stroke prevention in patients with AF, but the current evidence is of low quality.

Device‐associated thrombus formation after left atrial appendage occlusion: A systematic review of events reported with the Watchman, the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and the Amulet

This study aimed to provide a systematic review of device-associated thrombosis (DAT) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the Watchman, Amplatzer Cardiac Plug, and Amulet devices. DAT is known as a complication of LAAO but data about its clinical impact is scarce. A systematic review of studies evaluating the incidence, treatment and clinical implications of DAT from January 2008 to September 2015 was conducted. A total of 30 studies describing DAT events were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of DAT was 3.9% (82 DAT for 2118 implanted devices). The median time from procedure to diagnosis of DAT was 1.5 months (IQR: 0-2.9). Most cases were diagnosed with transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). The treatment consisted of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in 45.5% of cases, and oral anticoagulation (OAC) or other treatment modalities in 54.5%. Complete thrombus resolution was achieved in 95.0% of cases (100% with LMWH and 89.5% with OAC). Treatment duration varied greatly with a median treatment duration of 45 days (IQR: 14-135). Clinical events related to DAT consisted of neurologic events namely two transient ischemic attacks (2.4%) and four ischemic strokes (4.9%). DAT is an infrequent complication of percutaneous LAAO. It occurs mainly early after the procedure and is associated with a low rate of neurological complications. In the majority of cases, diagnosis is made during follow-up imaging with TEE. Anticoagulation treatment seems to be safe and highly effective. Further studies are needed to evaluate the optimal management of DAT. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Safety of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation after Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Single Center Experience

Aims: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and indication to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), triple therapy is recommended. However, this issue is still largely debated. Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) occlusion may represent an alternative therapeutic approach in this subset of patients, as it could lead to a reduction in the incidence of bleeding. Nevertheless, due to lack of clinical evidence, this approach does not represent the gold standard treatment for these patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of percutaneous LAA occlusion in patients with Atrial Fibrillation and indication of concomitant DAPT for ACS. Methods and Results: Fifteen AF-patients with indications to anticoagulant and DAPT after ACS underwent LAA occlusion with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) or Amulet ACP (St. Jude) from October 2014 to May 2016. Procedural success was achieved in 14/15 patients, while in 1 patient a clinically non-relevant pericardial effusion was registered before the trans-septal puncture, without implantation of the device. No peri-procedural death, major bleeding and dislocation or thrombi of the device were recorded. During a median follow-up of 182 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 169 to 183 days), one peri-procedural minor bleeding and two non cardiovascular death were described. Conclusions: LAA occlusion represents a relatively safe procedure for patients with atrial fibrillation and the need of DAPT due to ACS. Randomized trials should be designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure in this clinical setting.

Successful Retrieval of a Dislodged Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device

A 70-year-old man with persistent atrial fibrillation was referred for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion. Because of a high cardioembolic stroke risk (with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 points) and given his previous history of gastric bleeding during anticoagulation treatment, we decided to

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: is there a Role in Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation, a chronic and highly morbid cardiovascular condition which affects over 33 million people worldwide, can be broadly categorized as valvular vs non-valvular in etiology. However, definitions of valvular atrial fibrillation have varied widely in the literature, and there is no clear consensus definition to date. Historically, patients with atrial fibrillation in the setting of rheumatic mitral valve disease have constituted a particularly high risk group for cardioembolic stroke, and for this reason many contemporary trials of pharmaceutical and device therapies for atrial fibrillation have systematically excluded patients with valvular heart disease. Therefore, vitamin K antagonism remains the favored approach to mitigate stroke risk in valvular atrial fibrillation, and the optimal strategy to treat atrial fibrillation patients with valvular heart disease who cannot tolerate oral anticoagulation therapy is unknown. Recent trials have demonstrated an important role for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion devices in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, but the role of these devices in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation is uncertain. Given the worldwide burden of valvular atrial fibrillation, future trials intended to clarify the role of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure devices in valvular atrial fibrillation should provide important insight for the care of millions of patients.

The evolving role of left atrial ­appendage occlusion: a high-volume single-centre experience

Objectives: To report our 5-year single centre experience with percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).