Of 73 patients with severe AS who did not undergo AVR, 15 (14%) died at 15-month follow-up [12]. Of these 73 patients, symptoms were thought to be unrelated to the AS in 31 patients. Exercise stress tests for symptoms were performed in only 4% of the 42 asymptomatic patients. Asymptomatic patients with low-gradient severe AS and normal LVEF with reduced stroke volume index had at 46-month follow-up aortic valve events similar to those with normal stroke volume index [13]. Of 248 patients with severe AS and a normal LVEF, 94 had a lowgradient ( 40 mm Hg mean gradient) (group 3) [14]. Symptoms were present in 49% of group 1 patients, in 55% of group 2 patients, and in 60% of group 3 patients (p not significant). At 45-60-month follow-up, the incidence of AVR or death was 71% for group 1, 77% for group 2, and 76% for group 3 (p value not significant). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for time to death in all 3 groups were significantly better for patients with AVR versus no AVR [14]. E/E 1 lateral was an independent predictor of time to death in patients who did not receive AVR [15]. Percutaneous heart valve implantation may be performed in nonsurgical patients with end-stage calcific AS. In the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial, 699 high-risk patients with severe AS, mean age 84 years, were randomized to AVR or (transcatheter aortic valve replacement) TAVR [16]. All-cause mortality was 3.4% for the TAVR group versus 6.5% for the AVR group at 30 days (p value not significant) and 24.2% for the TAVR group versus 26.8% for the AVR group at 1 year (p value not significant). Major stroke was 3.8% for the TAVR group versus 2.1% for the AVR group at 30 days (p value not significant) and 5.1% for the TAVR group versus 2.4% for the AVR group at 1 year (p value not significant). Major vascular complications at 30 days were 11.0% for the TAVR group versus 3.2% for the AVR group (p<0.001). At 1-year, there were similar improvements in cardiac symptoms for both groups. In the PARTNER trial, among inoperable patients with severe AS, compared with standard care, TAVR caused significant improvements in health-related quality of life maintained for at least 1 year [17]. On the basis of the available data, AVR should be performed in operable patients with severe AS. However, TAVR should be performed in non-operable patients with symptomatic severe AS to improve survival and quality of life compared with medical management.
Read full abstract