Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty Research Articles

Clinical Course of Cervical Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty in Single-Level Cervical Disc Disease with 12-Month Follow-up

Background: Cervical disc disease is a common and occasionally disabling condition, occurring as a natural consequence of aging in the vast majority of the adult population. Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) has been used to deliver highly concentrated drugs for chronic neck pain and to prevent scarring in cases refractory to conventional epidural blocks. However, the clinical course after PEN in cervical disc disease is not well-documented. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cervical PEN for single-level cervical disc disease. Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Methods: A consecutive series of 100 patients who underwent cervical PEN for single-level disc disease (bulging or protrusion) were included in this study. Preoperatively, all patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores as well as Odom’s criteria were measured preoperatively and at post-operative follow-up visits (one, 3, 6, and 12 months). Limitations: The results of this study are limited by the lack of a control group that did not undergo treatment with PEN. Results: Additional block therapy was performed in 58 patients (58.0%). Subsequent surgery was performed in 10 patients (10.0%, excluded from data of clinical follow-up). Mean neck pain and VAS arm pain scores for all follow-up patients decreased from 6.82 and 4.74 preoperatively to 2.18 and 1.87 at 12 months after PEN (P < 0.001). More than 80% and 40% of all patients with and without additional block therapy after cervical PEN, respectively, showed good and excellent outcomes according to Odom’s Criteria during 12 months of follow-up. During this follow-up period, no severe complications related to the procedure were observed. Conclusion: Cervical PEN was shown to be a safe and effective treatment for neck and arm pain in single-level disc disease during 12 months of follow-up.

Spinal cord injury after percutaneous epidural neuroplasty with anticoagulation therapy in elderly patient

Spinal cord injury after percutaneous epidural neuroplasty with anticoagulation therapy in elderly patient

Surgical treatment of a broken neuroplasty catheter in the epidural space: a case report

BackgroundPercutaneous epidural neuroplasty with a Racz catheter is widely used to treat radicular pain caused by spinal stenosis or a herniated intervertebral disc. The breakage or shearing of an epidural catheter, particularly a percutaneous epidural neuroplasty catheter, is reported as a rare complication. There has been a controversy over whether surgical removal of a shorn epidural catheter is needed. Until now, only three cases related to sheared Racz neuroplasty catheters have been reported. We report a case of a neuroplasty catheter which completely broke when it was inserted into the epidural space, and compressed root symptoms were exacerbated by the broken catheter.Case presentationA 68-year-old Asian man with leg pain and lower back pain caused by lumbar vertebral body 4 to lumbar vertebral body 5 intervertebral disc herniation and stenosis underwent percutaneous epidural neuroplasty. During the procedure, the epidural neuroplasty catheter was trapped in the left foraminal portion and broke. Our patient complained of left-side leg pain and numbness. Surgery performed to remove the broken catheter led to complete resolution of his leg pain and numbness.ConclusionsWe report a rare case of catheter breakage occurring during epidural neuroplasty. We suggest surgical removal because the implanted catheter can aggravate a patient’s symptoms and lead to the development of neurologic deficits due to infection, fibrosis, or mechanical neural irritation.

Randomized Controlled Study of Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty Using Racz Catheter and Epidural Steroid Injection in Cervical Disc Disease

Background: The efficacy of lumbar percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) as a minimally invasive technique has been relatively well investigated, but the clinical effectiveness of cervical PEN (C-PEN) has yet to be established. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between C-PEN and cervical epidural steroid injection (C-ESI). Study Design: Randomized control study. Setting: University hospital center. Methods: Eighty patients with neck pain from single level cervical disease with and without radiculopathy were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: C-PEN or C-ESI. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to Neck Disability Index (NDI) score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for arm pain until 12 months after treatment. Results: All C-PEN and C-ESI groups showed better NDI recovery and greater reduction in VAS score at postoperative 6 months (P < 0.001). The C-PEN group demonstrated better NDI score at postoperative 6 months than the C-ESI group (P = 0.014), while there were no differences at 2, 4, and 12 months. Additionally, the C-PEN group showed lower VAS scores at all follow-up intervals compared to the C-ESI group (P < 0.050). Symptom relief was sustained for a significantly longer duration in the C-PEN group than in the C-ESI group (23.4 vs. 20.5 weeks, P < 0.001). Limitations: The follow-up period was relatively short with a small sample size, and the grade of cervical disc disease, root compression, and disc degeneration grade were could not considered in this study. Conclusions: C-PEN was superior to C-ESI in terms of better NDI recovery (at 6 months) and greater reduction in VAS score (until 12 months) in treating single level cervical disc herniation. Better outcomes with C-PEN may have been achieved via a more localized selective block in the epidural space closer to the dorsal root ganglion and ventral aspect of the nerve root. Key words: Cervical, cervical disc disease, pain management, percutaneous epidural neuroplasty, percutaneous adhesiolysis, epidural steroid injection

Efficacy of Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty Does Not Correlate with Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area in Single Level Disc Disease

PurposePercutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is a minimally invasive treatment. The efficacy of PEN has been relatively well investigated; however, the relationship between the clinical effectiveness of PEN and the severity of spinal canal stenosis by disc material has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of PEN according to the dural sac cross-sectional area in single level disc disease.Materials and MethodsThis study included 363 patients with back pain from single level disc disease with and without radiculopathy. Patients were categorized into groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material: Category 1, less or more than 50%; and Category 2, three subgroups with lesser than a third, between a third and two thirds, and more than two thirds. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain and Odom's criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment.ResultsThe demographic data showed no difference between groups according to spinal canal compromise by disc material except age (older age correlated with more spinal canal compromise). The dural sac cross-sectional area did not correlate with the VAS scores for back and leg pain after PEN in single level disc disease in Groups 1 and 2. Odom's criteria after PEN were also not different according to dural sac cross-sectional area by disc material.ConclusionPEN is an effective procedure in treating single level lumbar disc herniation without affecting dural sac cross-sectional area.

Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty

Interventional pain management by percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) has potential as a useful treatment method in chronic low back and/or radicular pain that is refractory to other conservative treatments. The effect of PEN is known to result from targeting of drug delivery to areas of pathology in the spinal epidural space. The procedure involves removing barriers, such as epidural fibrosis, that prevent drug from reaching target sites. Therefore, the goal during lysis of epidural adhesions is to penetrate mechanical barriers impeding injected material from spreading effectively into the areas of pathology in the epidural space by the catheter. An additional lavage effect, reducing the local concentration of proinflammatory substances seems possible. Although a true mechanical lysis of postsurgical adhesions or scar tissues by means of PEN appears to be impossible because it has been proven by experimental biomechanical study, mild to moderate adhesions may be broken up by a PEN catheter allowing the medications to reach the target site through the new channel made by the catheter. This review will focus on the adhesiolysis technique using the sacral hiatus approach in treatment of chronic low back pain with/ without lumbosacral radiculopathy.

A sheared Racz catheter in cervical epidural space for thirty months: a case report.

Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty may lead to complications such as hematoma, infection, epidural abscess, meningitis, hypotension, respiratory depression, urinary and fecal dysfunction, sexual dysfunction and paresthesia. Other technical complications may include shearing or tearing, misplacement, blockage and migration of the catheter. We report a case of a 41-year-old female patient, who underwent surgical removal of a sheared catheter, which was retained for 30 months after cervical Racz neuroplasty.

The Catheter Tip Position and Effects of Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty in Patients with Lumbar Disc Disease During 6-Months of Follow-up

Background: Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) is a minimally invasive intervention designed to treat neck, back, and low back pain. The efficacy of lumbar PEN has been relatively well investigated, but clinical effectiveness according to catheter position has not yet been established. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between the ventral and dorsal positions of the catheter tip during lumbar PEN procedures using a retrospective review series. Methods: A total of 303 patients with back pain from single-level lumbar disc disease with and without radiculopathy were included in this study. In all patients, an attempt was made to place the catheter tip in the ventral position to maximize theoretical clinical improvement; however, several catheters failed to reach the desired position. Patients were assigned to 2 groups after lumbar PEN procedures were completed: those with catheters in the ventral position (Ventral group) and those with catheters in the dorsal position (Dorsal group). Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for back pain and leg pain at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Results: The only demographic difference observed between the 2 groups (Ventral and Dorsal groups) was an elongated symptom duration in the Dorsal group compared to the Ventral group (16.1 vs. 9.4 months, P = 0.013). The VAS (back) scores during the follow-up period (1, 3, and 6 months) were similar between the 2 groups. In one area of the VAS scoring (leg), the Ventral group showed a similar effect at postoperative one month compared to the Dorsal group, but significantly improved at postoperative 3 and 6 months (1.3 and 0.9 in ventral group, and 1.9 and 1.4 in dorsal group, respectively; P = 0.002 and 0.010). Odom’s criteria were also significantly improved over 6 months in the Ventral group compared to the Dorsal group. Limitations: This study was a retrospective analysis with a relatively short follow-up duration was not a randomized, controlled study. Therefore, the clinical effects of the catheter position could be confounded by other variables. Conclusion: In this short-term follow-up study, the effects of lumbar PEN on VAS scores were different according to the position of the catheter tip in patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation. Better outcomes in the Ventral group may have been achieved by more localized treatment with a selective block in the epidural space closer to the dorsal root ganglion and ventral aspect of the nerve root. Key words: Lumbar disc disease, pain management, percutaneous epidural neuroplasty, catheter position, dorsal, ventral

168 Randomized Control Study of Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty and Translaminar Epidural Steroid Injection in Cervical Disc Disease With 6 Months of Follow-up

168 Randomized Control Study of Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty and Translaminar Epidural Steroid Injection in Cervical Disc Disease With 6 Months of Follow-up

Does improvement in epidurography following percutaneous epidural neuroplasty correspond to patient outcome?

The positive effects of percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) likely result from elimination of fibrous tissue. However, a direct link between epidural adhesions and pain symptoms is debatable. We tested the hypothesis that epidurographic improvements correspond to improved patient outcome. In this prospective study, patients with a filling defect on initial epidurography underwent PEN. Two weeks later, contrast agent distribution around the target area was assessed with repeat epidurography. A successful treatment was defined as over a 50% reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) score 2weeks postprocedure. The demographic data, history of lumbar spine operation, target nerve, diagnosis, VAS scores, degree of epidurographic improvement, and patient satisfaction were compared between the successful treatment group (Group I) and unsuccessful treatment group (Group II). Seventy-nine patients were included. Epidurographic findings improved in 67.1% of patients 2weeks after the procedure. Following PEN, the mean VAS scores of all patients were significantly decreased at 2weeks (4.12±2.34), 1month (3.56±2.30), 3months (3.84±2.45), and 6months (4.13±2.71) compared with the initial scores (7.82±1.78). In the comparison between Groups I and II, the rate of epidurographic improvement in Group I was higher than in Group II (P=0.022). Satisfaction in patients that had epidurographic improvement (median satisfaction: 4) was higher than in patients that did not have epidurographic improvement (median satisfaction: 3; P=0.003). The epidurographic changes following PEN correlate with patient-assessed pain relief and satisfaction.

101 Clinical Course After Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty According to the Type of Single Level Herniated Lumbar Disc With 12 Months Follow-up

101 Clinical Course After Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty According to the Type of Single Level Herniated Lumbar Disc With 12 Months Follow-up

Contrast mimicking a subarachnoid hemorrhage after lumbar percutaneous epidural neuroplasty: a case report

IntroductionSubarachnoid hemorrhage is one of the most feared acute neurologic events. Accurate diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage is essential, and computed tomography of the brain is the first diagnostic imaging study. However, in rare circumstances, a similar appearance may occur in the absence of blood in the subarachnoid space. The contrast enhancement of subarachnoid space is a rare complication after lumbar percutaneous epidural neuroplasty, with, to the best of our knowledge, no previous report in the literature.Case presentationA 42-year-old Korean male patient, who underwent a spinal operation five years previously at the level of L4 to S1, visited our clinic with persistent and aggravating low back pain. An imaging study revealed the focal and diffuse disc protrusion at the level of L4/5 and L5/S1. The clinician decided to perform a lumbar percutaneous epidural neuroplasty. During the procedure, dural adhesion was suspected at the previously operated level, and the neuroplasty catheter was malpositioned into the intradural space on the first attempt. After the catheter was repositioned, the scheduled epidural neuroplasty was completed. Our patient had no definite abnormal neurological signs. But, after a day, our patient complained of severe headache with sustained high blood pressure without neurological disorientation. Computed tomography of his brain showed a subarachnoid hemorrhage-like appearance with intracranial air. Sequential angiography, subtractional magnetic resonance imaging and examination of the cerebrospinal fluid revealed no abnormalities. Follow-up computed tomography after one day revealed no definite intracranial hemorrhage, and our patient was discharged with improved low back pain without neurological deficit.ConclusionWe report a rare case of contrast mimicking a subarachnoid hemorrhage after lumbar percutaneous epidural neuroplasty. The physician should keep in mind a rare case like this, and the supine position with head elevation is necessary to avoid a similar complication after lumbar percutaneous epidural neuroplasty.

Interventions in Chronic Pain Management. 6. Interventional Approaches to Chronic Pain Management

Overton EA, Kornbluth ID, Saulino MF, Holding MY, Freedman MK. Interventions in chronic pain management. 6. Interventional approaches to chronic pain management. This self-directed learning module highlights strategies for interventional treatments for chronic pain disorders. It is part of the chapter on chronic pain in the Self-Directed Physiatric Education Program for practitioners in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Specifically, the first module reviews an interventional protocol for recalcitrant buttock and hip pain. The protocol includes hip and spinal injections, neuroablative lesioning, and percutaneous epidural neuroplasty. The second module reviews implantable treatments (spinal cord stimulation, implantable pumps) for intractable pain. Overall Article Objective To discuss interventional pain management approaches in the treatment of chronic pain disorders.

Complications of Epidural Neuroplasty: A Retrospective Evaluation

Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (lysis of epidural adhesions, epidural application of hypertonic saline) is an interventional technique for the management of pain due to spinal disorders. Epidural neuroplasty is found to be effective in removing fibrous tissue occurring in the epidural space for various reasons, however, the procedure may be prone to serious complications. We present here our retrospectively collected complications and precautions of complications of epidural neuroplasty in 250 patients. Neuroplasty, as per the technique of Racz etal., was only considered in patients suffering from low back and cervical pain after conservative treatments had been tried and had failed. Possible known complications include bending of the tip of the introducer needle, shearing/tearing of the catheter, misplacement of the catheter, inadvertent blockage of the catheter or catheter tip, migration of the catheter, hypotension, respiratory depression, urinary and/or fecal incontinence, urinary hesitancy, sexual dysfunction, paresthesia, epidural abscess, and meningitis. We found the following complications in our series: the tips of the introducer needle were bent in 12 patients; catheter sheaths were torn during withdrawal through the needle in three patients; 39 patients had bleeding or aspiration of blood from the epidural space; eight patients had their catheters migrate into an epidural vein; one patient's catheter migrated into the prevertebral space during the procedure; there were dural punctures in 11 patients; there were catheter blockages in six patients during consecutive applications of neuroplasty; hypotension was seen during and after drug injections in 12 patients, there was hypotension in one patient; three patients had migration and penetration of their catheters into the dura after placement and in consecutive days; 25 patients experienced numbness in dermatomal areas of the upper and lower extremities depending the level of the procedure; and there were eight infections at the entry site of the catheter, three epidural abscesses, and two patients with meningitis. In order to prevent complications such as those seen, epidural neuroplasty procedures must be performed in well-equipped centers by experienced hands.

Acute Aggravation of Post Procedural Spondylodiscitis and Paraspinal Abscess without Epidural Space Involvement after Lumbar Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty (PEN)

Acute Aggravation of Post Procedural Spondylodiscitis and Paraspinal Abscess without Epidural Space Involvement after Lumbar Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty (PEN)

Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty: Prospective evaluation of 0.9% NaCl versus 10% NaCl with or without hyaluronidase

Background and Objectives. Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (epidural neurolysis, lysis of epidural adhesions) is an interventional pain management technique that has emerged over approximately the last 10 years as part of a multidisciplinary approach to treating radiculopathy with low back pain. In addition to local anesthetic and corticosteroid, hypertonic saline (10% NaCl) and hyaluronidase are used for the technique. The objective of this study was to determine if hypertonic saline or hyaluronidase influenced treatment outcomes. Methods. Eighty-three subjects with radiculopathy plus low back pain were assigned to one of four epidural neuroplasty treatment groups: (a) hypertonic saline plus hyaluronidase, (b) hypertonic saline, (b) isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl), or (d) isotonic saline plus hyaluronidase. Subjects in all treatment groups received epidural corticosteroid and local anesthetic. Results. Twenty-four subjects did not complete the study. Most of the other 59 subjects receiving any of the four treatments as part of their pain management obtained significant relief immediately after treatment. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the area of maximal pain (VAS max, back or leg) were reduced in 25% or more of subjects in all treatment groups at all post-treatment follow-up times (1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months). A smaller fraction of subjects treated with hypertonic saline or hyaluronidase and hypertonic saline required more additional treatments than did subjects receiving the other treatments. Conclusions. Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty, as part of an overall pain management strategy, reduces pain (sometimes for over one year) in 25% or more of subjects with radiculopathy plus low back pain refractory to conventional therapies. The use of hypertonic saline may reduce the number of patients that require additional treatments.