Percutaneous Epicardial Access Research Articles

Phantom study of augmented reality framework to assist epicardial punctures.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of an augmented reality (AR) system in improving guidance, accuracy, and visualization during the subxiphoidal approach for epicardial ablation. An AR application was developed to project real-time needle trajectories and patient-specific 3D organs using the Hololens 2. Additionally, needle tracking was implemented to offer real-time feedback to the operator, facilitating needle navigation. The AR application was evaluated through three different experiments: examining overlay accuracy, assessing puncture accuracy, and performing pre-clinical evaluations on a phantom. The results of the overlay accuracy assessment for the AR system yielded . Additionally, the puncture accuracy utilizing the AR system yielded . During the pre-clinical evaluation on the phantom, needle puncture with AR guidance showed , whereas needle puncture without AR guidance showed . Overall, the AR platform has the potential to enhance the accuracy of percutaneous epicardial access for mapping and ablation of cardiac arrhythmias, thereby reducing complications and improving patient outcomes. The significance of this study lies in the potential of AR guidance to enhance the accuracy and safety of percutaneous epicardial access.

Dual operator percutaneous epicardial access to minimize needle pericardial dwell time: A modified SAFER epicardial approach

The sustained apnea for epicardial access with right ventriculography technique (SAFER epicardial approach) has been previously shown to be effective and safe (1). However, it requires a brief period of unprotected needle dwell time within the pericardium while the operator switches the contrast syringe for a guidewire. This transition period, though brief, raises concerns regarding the potential risk of inadvertent perforation of the right ventricular (RV) wall given the systolic-diastolic excursion of the heart and/or the possibility of losing epicardial access. In an effort to limit the unprotected needle dwell time in the pericardium, we describe the dual operator modified SAFER epicardial approach.

Current and novel percutaneous epicardial access techniques for electrophysiological interventions: A comparison of procedural success and safety.

Accessing the pericardial space safely and efficiently is an important skill for interventional cardiac electrophysiologist. With the increased recognition of the complexity of the 3-dimensional arrhythmogenic substrate due to advances in imaging and mapping technologies there has been an expansion of epicardial procedures in recent years. Equally, minimally invasive implantation of epicardial pacing, cardiac resynchronization, or defibrillation leads is expanding in specific patients where transvenous systems are contraindicated or their long term sequelae should be ideally avoided. Selective delivery of intrapericardial pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy is yet another potential indication, albeit still investigational. The expanding indications for percutaneous epicardial procedures is contrasted by the still substantial risk and challenges associated with accessing the pericardial space. Myocardial perforation, coronary artery laceration, and damage to the surrounding organs are all recognized and feared complications. A number of innovative epicardial access techniques have been proposed to overcome the difficulties and risks of traditional dry subxiphoid punctures and may allow for more widespread use of epicardial access in the future. We review 10 different established and novel subxiphoidal epicardial access techniques describing procedural success rates, safety profile and overall experience. The technical aspects as well as access times and costs for extra equipment will be reviewed. Finally, an outlook of reported preclinical techniques awaiting in-human feasibility studies is provided.

Cryothermal energy demonstrates shorter ablation time and lower complication rates compared with radiofrequency in surgical hybrid ablation for recurrent ventricular tachycardia

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) after prior endocardial catheter ablation(s) presents challenges in the setting of prior cardiac surgery where percutaneous epicardial access may not be feasible. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of cryothermal vs radiofrequency ablation in direct surgical epicardial access procedures. We performed a retrospective study of consecutive surgical epicardial VT ablation cases. Surgical cases using cryothermal vs radiofrequency ablation were analyzed and outcomes were compared. Between 2009 and 2022, 43 patients underwent either a cryothermal (n = 17) or a radiofrequency (n = 26) hybrid epicardial ablation procedure with direct surgical access. Both groups were similarly matched for age, sex, etiology of VT, and comorbidities with a high burden of refractory VT despite previous endocardial and/or percutaneous epicardial ablation procedures. The surgical access site was lateral thoracotomy (76.5%) in the cryothermal ablation group compared with lateral thoracotomy (42.3%) and subxiphoid approach (38.5%) in the radiofrequency group, with the remainder in both groups performed via median sternotomy. The ablation time was significantly shorter in those undergoing cryothermal ablation vs radiofrequency ablation (11.54 ± 15.5 minutes vs 48.48 ± 23.6 minutes; P < .001). There were no complications in the cryothermal ablation group compared with 6 patients with complications in the radiofrequency group. Recurrent VT episodes and all-cause mortality were similar in both groups. Hybrid surgical VT ablation with cryothermal or radiofrequency energy demonstrated similar efficacy outcomes. Cryothermal ablation was more efficient and safer than radiofrequency in a surgical setting and should be considered when surgical access is required.

Abstract 14704: Comparison of Anticoagulation Strategies for Epicardial Access in Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation

Introduction: Percutaneous epicardial access (EpiAcc) is frequently required for endo-epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT), especially in ischemic cardiomyopathy, where it has been demonstrated to increase success rate. For patients who have indications for chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC), this often poses a challenge due to potential risks of procedural complications. We sought to assess the safety and outcomes of epicardial VT ablation on uninterrupted OAC compared to off anticoagulation. Methods: In this multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT who underwent endo-epicardial ablation with EpiAcc. The study group included patients who underwent ablation either under uninterrupted OAC or off anticoagulation. Procedural data, outcomes, and complication rates were analyzed for comparison of both groups. Results: Overall, we analyzed 135 patients who underwent VT ablation via EpiAcc; 55 under full-dose uninterrupted AC and 80 off AC. There was no difference in procedure-related complications between both groups (1.8% vs 2.5%, p=0.09). There was no major bleeding requiring transfusion in any group. There was no difference in risk of cardiac tamponade between both groups (0% vs 0%, p=1). The rate of groin hematoma was 1.8% vs 1.3%, p=0.087). No thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusion: Epicardial VT ablation on uninterrupted OAC is a safe alternative to off AC, with no additional risk of life-threatening complications, thus preventing the possibility of thromboembolic events in patients who have an indication for chronic AC. 1

Current understanding of atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation: From pulmonary vein to epicardium.

Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation is common, with pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection considered the most likely cause. However, technologies such as contact force-sensing, irrigated catheters, and ablation index (AI)-guided ablation strategies have resulted in more durable PV isolation. As a result, it is difficult to predict which patients will develop AF recurrence despite durable PV isolation, with evolving non-PV atrial substrates thought to be a key contributor to late recurrences. Deciphering the complex mechanisms of AF recurrence beyond the cornerstone of PV isolation therefore remains challenging. Recently, there have been several important advances that may lead to better understanding and treatment of this challenging clinical entity: percutaneous epicardial access and mapping, late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI), improvements in high-resolution electroanatomic mapping, and new ablation energy sources, specifically pulsed-field ablation. This review aims to synthesize the current literature in an effort to better understand arrhythmia mechanisms and treatment targets in patients with AF/Atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence post-ablation.

Selective epicardial pulsed field ablation of atrial ganglionated plexi causes anti-arrhythmic prolongation of refractoriness: demonstration of feasibility in cardiac surgery patients

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): EU Horizon 2020 SME Instrument. Background Epicardial ganglionated plexi (GP) play a significant role in the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation. However, modulation of this effect, through GP ablation, has had limited success; outcomes being confounded by unnecessary atrial tissue ablation and inability to access and ablate all of the atrial GPs. Selective pulsed field ablation (PFA) of GPs, using epicardial access, provides the opportunity to better identify the role of GP ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Purpose This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of selective GP ablation in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It was hypothesized that GP ablation would provide an acute extension of atrial tissue refractoriness, which constitutes its antiarrhythmic effect. Methods Using a monopolar, monophasic PFA system, atrial GPs were ablated in nineteen patients with or without atrial fibrillation, undergoing CABG. The Oblique Sinus GP, Right Superior GP, Transverse Sinus GP, Left Superior GP and Ligament of Marshall GP were each ablated with up to sixty PFA pulses of 1000 V amplitude and 100 µs pulse width. Atrial Effective Refractory Period (AERP) was measured before and after all GP ablations, at the left atrial appendage (LAA) and on the right atrium (RA). Patients were monitored through to discharge for post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Results Complete ablation of the GPs was performed in nineteen patients (aged 63.4 ± 6.6 years, 63.1% male) immediately after sternotomy. Electric field pulses were ECG-gated, with energy delivery during the ventricular refractory period. All GP sites were successfully accessed and ablated; all patients progressed immediately to their planned elective surgery and were discharged on schedule. Procedure time, for all GP ablations and AERP measurements was in the range 35-45 minutes. Thirteen valid pre- and post-ablation datasets were obtained. AERP (LAA and RA combined) increased upon GP ablation on average by 23% (220 ± 46 ms pre-ablation versus 269 ± 59 ms post-ablation, p = 0.002). Four patients experienced POAF; there was no evident correlation between POAF and AERP data. Only three of the enrolled patients had a prior history of AF; none of these exhibited AF on 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions Selective epicardial PFA of GPs is feasible and safe. An acute increase in atrial tissue refractoriness is promising but further studies are required to see how this translates to longer term outcomes in symptomatic AF patients and in a percutaneous epicardial access setting.

Percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation of the ventricular tachycardia substrate in a patient after pericardiotomy: case report

We present a case of successful percutaneous epicardial access in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with limited mapping and ablation of the ventricular tachycardia substrate on the epicardial surface.

CT‐guided percutaneous epicardial access for ventricular tachycardia ablation: A proof‐of‐concept study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preprocedural computed tomography (CT) to guide percutaneous epicardial puncture for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. A preprocedural CT was used to plan the site, angle, and depth of needle insertion during epicardial access in 10 consecutive patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. Adjacent structures (right ventricle, diaphragm, liver, colon, internal mammary artery) were visualized and the course of the needle was planned avoiding these structures. During epicardial access, a protractor was used to guide the angle of needle entry into the subxiphoid space. Postprocedural CT was performed to calculate the deviation between the planned and executed access and to assess for any collateral damage. Percutaneous epicardial access was obtained successfully in all the patients using anterior (n = 4) and inferior (n = 6) approaches. The planned site and angle of puncture was more caudal (2.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7 cm, p = .021) and acute (61.7 ± 5.8 vs. 49.0 ± 5.4°, p = .011) for an anterior approach compared to an inferior approach, respectively. Postprocedure CT revealed minimal deviation of the puncture site (5.4 ± 1.0 mm), angle (5.4 ± 1.2°), and length of needle insertion (0.5 ± 0.2 cm). With regard to the site of entry in the pericardial space, there was a deviation of 5.9 ± 1.1, 6.1 ± 1.1, and 5.8 ± 1.4 mm in the x, y, and z dimensions, respectively. In eight patients with minimal deviation between planned and executed access, there was no collateral injury to adjacent viscera or vessels. In two patients with increased deviation of angle and length of needle insertion, there was entry through the diaphragm during inferior access. Utilizing pre-procedural CT planning may aid in the success and safety of percutaneous epicardial access during VT ablation.

Epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease: a single-centre experience over 12 years.

Epicardial ablation has risen to an essential part of the treatment of ventricular tachycardias (VTs). In this study, we report the efficacy, risks, and current trends of epicardial ablation in structural heart disease as reported in a tertiary single centre over a 12-year period. Two hundred and thirty-six patients referred for VT ablation underwent a successful epicardial access and were included in the analysis (89% non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 90% males, mean age 60 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 38.4%). After performing epicardial ablation the clinical VTs were eliminated in 87% of the patients and 71% of the cohort achieved freedom from VT during 22-month follow-up. Twelve patients (5%) suffered major procedure-related complications. Until the end of follow-up 47 (20%) patients died, 9 (4%) underwent a left ventricular assist device implantation and 10 (4%) patients received a heart transplantation. Antiarrhythmic drugs at baseline and during follow-up were independent predictors of VT recurrence. Atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, worse New York Heart Association class, and antiarrhythmic drugs at follow-up were associated with worse survival in our cohort. In this large tertiary single-centre experience, percutaneous epicardial access was feasible in the large majority of the cohort with acceptably low complications rates. A combined endo-/epicardial approach resulted in 87% acute and 71% long-term success. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of routine combined endo-/epicardial ablation in these complex cardiomyopathies.

Epicardial access complications during electrophysiology procedures.

Percutaneous epicardial access (EA) was first described more than two decades ago. Since its initial introduction, indications for its utilization in the field of electrophysiology have expanded dramatically. Epicardial mapping and ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia is routinely performed in tertiary electrophysiology centers around the world. Although limited by lack of randomized controlled trials, epicardial ablation for atrial fibrillation has been suggested as a conjunctive strategy in patients who have failed an initial endocardial catheter ablation attempt, and it is necessary for placement of some left atrial appendage occlusion devices as well. An accurate understanding of the cardiac anatomy is crucial to avoid complications such as inadvertent right ventricular puncture, injury to the coronary arteries, abdominal viscera, phrenic nerves, and esophagus during both EA and catheter ablation. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the cardiac anatomy, technical aspects to optimize the safety of epicardial puncture, recognize and avoid potential complications.

Open surgical ablation of ventricular tachycardia: Utility and feasibility of contemporary mapping and ablation tools.

BackgroundVentricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation success may be limited when transcutaneous epicardial access is contraindicated. Surgical ablation (SurgAbl) is an option, but ablation guidance is limited without simultaneously acquired electrophysiological data.ObjectiveWe describe our SurgAbl experience utilizing contemporary electroanatomic mapping (EAM) among patients with refractory VT storm.MethodsConsecutive patients with recurrent VT despite antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and prior ablation, for whom percutaneous epicardial access was contraindicated, underwent open SurgAbl using intraoperative EAM guidance.ResultsEight patients were included, among whom mean age was 63 ± 5 years, all were male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 39% ± 12%, and 2 (25%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Reasons for surgical epicardial access included dense adhesions owing to prior cardiac surgery, hemopericardium, or pericarditis (n = 6); or planned left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation at time of SurgAbl (n = 2). Cryoablation guided by real-time EAM was performed in all. Goals of clinical VT noninducibility or core isolation were achieved in 100%. VT burden was significantly reduced, from median 15 to 0 events in the month pre- and post-SurgAbl (P = .01). One patient underwent orthotopic heart transplantation for recurrent VT storm 2 weeks post-SurgAbl. Over mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.7 years, VT storm–free survival was achieved in 6 (75%); all continued AADs, although at lower dose.ConclusionSurgical mapping and ablation of refractory VT with use of contemporary EAM is feasible and effective, particularly among patients with contraindication to percutaneous epicardial access or with another indication for cardiac surgery.

Indirect and Direct Evidence for 3-D Activation During Left Atrial Flutter: Anatomy of Epicardial Bridging.

This study sought to describe arrhythmia characteristics using ultra-high density (UHD) mapping of macro-re-entrant left atrial flutter (LAFL) which propagate via epicardial bridging (EB), and highlight regional anatomy that poses challenges to ablation. Three-dimensional propagation via EB may contribute to the maintenance and complexity of LAFL. UHD activation maps of macro-re-entrant LAFL created with a mini-electrode basket catheter were analyzed between June 2015 and March 2020. EB was defined as a region of wave front discontinuity with focal activation distal to an activation gap. Regions of EB were correlated with anatomic structures known to have specialized epicardial bundles. Direct evidence of EB was obtained via percutaneous epicardial access (n=22) with simultaneous epicardial recordings during endocardial activation gaps. Among 159 patients who underwent LA endocardial procedures with UHD mapping, 43 patients with 47 macro-re-entrant LAFLs were included in this analysis. Evidence of EB was present in 38% of LAFLs. Four anatomic areas of EB were observed: coronary sinus (17%), vein of Marshall (28%), Bachmann's region (33%), and region of the septopulmonary bundle (22%). All 47 LAFLs were successfully ablated. Percutaneous epicardial mapping yielded direct evidence for EB in 9 patients with LAFL (41%). At 23 ± 13months, 70% remained free from recurrent LAFL. In a selected population, UHD mapping demonstrates evidence of EB in 38% of cases of LAFL involving 4 distinct epicardial anatomic regions. Identification of discontinuous 3-dimensional activation patterns with attention to correlative regional LA anatomy may reduce the incidence of ablation failures for complex re-entry.

Perioperative Imaging to Guide Epicardial Mapping and Ablation.

Accessing the epicardial space without a sternotomy or a surgical pericardial window to treat ventricular arrhythmias in Chagas disease became a medical necessity in South America. Since the introduction of the dry percutaneous epicardial access approach, epicardial access has been standard procedure for management of ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and atrioventricular accessory pathways after failed conventional endocardial ablation. Understanding the epicardial space and neighboring structures has become an important subject of teachings in electrophysiology. The evolution of complex ablation procedures to treat atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and device interventions to prevent cardioembolic stroke requires thorough understanding of pericardial anatomy.

Hybrid Surgical Ablation for Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Hybrid surgical ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation combines surgical epicardial access/exposure with contemporary mapping and ablation techniques adapted from percutaneous catheter ablation procedures. Patients considered for a hybrid surgical approach for VT are those who have had prior cardiac surgery or failed percutaneous epicardial access due to pericardial adhesions. They often represent the most challenging end of the spectrum of patients and usually have undergone multiple unsuccessful ablations. In this review, the indications, preprocedure work-up, ablation techniques, and outcomes from hybrid surgical access VT ablations are discussed as well as key technical details that present unique challenges to its success.

Techniques for Percutaneous Access.

Percutaneous epicardial access continues to have a growing role within cardiac electrophysiology. The classic approach has typically been with a Tuohy needle via a subxiphoid approach guided by fluoroscopic landmarks and tactile feedback. Recent developments have highlighted the role of the micropuncture needle, electroanatomic mapping, and real-time pressure sensors to reduce complications. Further, different access sites, such as the right atrial appendage, have been described and may offer a novel approach to percutaneous epicardial access. In addition, future directions of percutaneous access may involve direct visualization, near-field impedance monitoring, and real-time virtual imaging.

Epicardial Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardias.

Supraventricular arrhythmias are the most common cardiac arrhythmias encountered; however, it is uncommon that supraventricular tachycardias require percutaneous epicardial access for successful mapping and ablation. There are particular scenarios where epicardial access and ablation should be considered. Certain accessory pathways particularly in the posteroseptal region may require epicardial access for successful ablation. These pathways may also be approached from within the coronary sinus system. In addition, tachycardias near the phrenic nerve in the right atrium or left atrium may require epicardial access for successful ablation or to allow displacement of the phrenic nerve facilitating safe catheter ablation.

Left-lateral thoracotomy for catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia in patients with inaccessible pericardial access

ObjectivesWe aimed to describe the feasibility of a surgical left thoracotomy for catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with inaccessible pericardial access.BackgroundPericardial adhesion due to prior cardiac surgery or previous epicardial ablation procedures limits epicardial access in patients with drug-refractory VT originated from the epicardium.MethodsSix patients who underwent a surgical left lateral thoracotomy epicardial access for catheter ablation of VT after failed subxiphoid percutaneous epicardial access were reviewed. Patients’ baseline characteristics and procedural characteristics including epicardial access, mapping, and ablation were described. Epicardial access was successfully obtained in all patients by a surgical left lateral thoracotomy.ResultsThe reasons of pericardial adhesion were prior cardiac surgery (n = 3, 50%) and previous epicardial ablation procedures (n = 3, 50%). Epicardial mapping of the lateral and inferior left ventricle was acquired, and a total of 15 different VTs originated from those regions were abolished. Unless one patient with ST elevation myocardial infarction due to periprocedural occlusion of the posterior descending artery no further complications occurred. All patients were discharged 10.2 ± 4 days after the procedure. VT recurred in 1 patient (17%) and was controlled with oral amiodarone therapy during follow-up (median follow-up: 479 days).ConclusionsA surgical left lateral thoracotomy is feasible and safe for selected patients. This approach provides epicardial ablation in patients with VT located at the infero-lateral left ventricle and pericardial adhesions due to previous cardiac surgery or previous ablation procedures.Graphic abstract

Percutaneous pericardial access for electrophysiological studies in patients with prior cardiac surgery: approach and understanding the risks

ABSTRACTIntroduction: The number of procedures for which percutaneous pericardial access is used for has gradually increased since its initial description, and now includes mapping/ablation, atrial appendage ligation and pericardial biopsy.Areas covered: Successful percutaneous pericardial access is predicated on having a thorough understanding of regional anatomy, indications for attempting pericardial puncture and potential complications with appropriate management which are highlighted in this review. In addition, we will discuss the access technique itself, provide tips and pitfalls and highlight future directions with an emphasis on patients with prior cardiac surgery.Expert commentary: Percutaneous epicardial access, especially in patients with prior cardiac surgery, is associated with significant complications and therefore meticulous preparation is required. Even in experienced centers, unusual circumstances may be crossed.

Feasibility and safety of percutaneous epicardial access for mapping and ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in patients on oral anticoagulants

This study aimed to assess the risk of procedure-related complications of percutaneous epicardial access (EpiAcc) for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients chronically treated oral anticoagulants (OACs) with warfarin compared to those not on OACs. We analyzed 205 patients (53 ± 16years, 155 males) undergoing percutaneous EpiAcc as part of an RFA for VAs, and compared the outcome between patients chronically on OACs with warfarin (OAC group) and those without (non-OAC group). Forty-seven patients (23%) were chronically treated on OACs before their procedure. EpiAcc in patients on OAC (OAC group) was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac tamponade (11% vs. 6%, p = 0.238) compared to non-OAC group, but a higher risk of need for blood transfusion (17% vs. 6%; p = 0.013). With respect to the OAC group, the international normalized ratio (INR) on the day of the RFA was ≥ 2.0 in 9 patients (19%) and < 2.0 in the remaining 38 patients (81%). The rate of all complication and blood transfusion were similar between them (11% vs. 21%; p = 0.496, 11% vs. 18%; p = 0.600). Percutaneous EpiAcc in patients on chronic OAC with warfarin did not significantly increase the risk of cardiac tamponade, but was associated with a higher risk of need for blood transfusion. EpiACC in patients with an INR > 2.0 is reasonable in experienced hands when clinical indications are strong.