Perceptions Of Professionals Research Articles

Interdisciplinary Operating Room Ergonomics Needs and Priorities: A Survey of Operating Room Staff.

To examine perceived OR ergonomics facilitators and barriers, with a focus on the interdisciplinary team. Poor ergonomics causes musculoskeletal injuries affecting all operating room (OR) staff with repercussions on patient care, outcomes, and sustainability. Lack of ergonomic awareness and education are risk factors. We conducted a self-administered web-based survey of OR nurses, surgeons, and anesthesiologists at a single centre (n=238). We developed a questionnaire through items generation and reduction, followed by reliability and validity testing. Response rate was 53.8%. Respondents perceived that on average 80% of nurses, 70% of surgeons, and 40% anesthesiologists experienced MSK injuries, with no difference in professional groups' perceptions. Guideline ergonomics interventions were rarely used (<25%) except for specialized clothing (33%), equipment repositioning (59%), and seating (37%), though perceived beneficial by 80-90%. Reported barriers to optimal ergonomics were organizational/structural (lack of time, space, equipment, funding), whereas solutions were individual. Fear of unfavourable perception from others was a concern for 62%. Teams discussing, prioritizing, monitoring, or helping with ergonomics was indicated by <50%. Individual ergonomic adaptations were perceived as convenience by other staff. While structural/organizational issues are reported as barriers to ergonomics, solutions appeared as individual responsibilities. Team dynamics did not prioritize nor support ergonomics. Education tools leveraging the interdisciplinary team are warranted. This work will be supplemented by interviews and live observations to build tailored educational tools for OR teams.

Access to oral health care for patients attending a medical-psychological center

People with mental health problems have a worse oral health condition than the general population. As part of a qualitative study using semi-directive interviews aimed at analyzing the perceptions of professionals working in medical-psychological centers regarding the difficulties encountered by their patients in accessing dental care, three obstacles were identified: factors intrinsic to the patient, background in prevention and the organization of the healthcare system.

Orthodontist dressing: Its impact on patient perception and cooperation

Background and Aim: Communication skills, including non-verbal cues such as attire, play a significant role in patient perceptions of healthcare professionals. An orthodontist’s attire may influence patient cooperation during treatment. This study aims to investigate Nigerian orthodontic patients' perception regarding their orthodontists' dressing and its impact on patient cooperation. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among orthodontic patients at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. A structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire with 34 items was used to gather data from 131 participants. The questionnaire covered socio-demographic characteristics, understanding of the orthodontist's role, and preferences for the orthodontist's attire. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 26, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: The study included 131 patients (82 females and 49 males), with a mean age of 19.2 ± 9.43 years. Most participants (88.6%) liked how their orthodontists dressed, with 50.4% stating that their orthodontists wore traditional white coats and 42.7% indicating that their orthodontists wore scrubs. When asked about the significance of the orthodontist's dressing, 46.6% indicated that it mattered to them, while the majority stated that it did not affect their cooperation or review appointments. Conclusion: The study reveals that while orthodontic patients have preferences for their orthodontists’ appearance, it does not significantly affect their cooperation or review attendance. These findings suggest that while maintaining a professional appearance is important, it may not be a determining factor in patient compliance.

Public and professional stakeholders' perceptions of alcohol advertising and availability policies: A qualitative study.

Reducing alcohol availability and restricting alcohol advertising are effective ways to reduce harm from alcohol. Implementation of public health policies involves collaboration between different stakeholders, and is influenced by public opinion. This paper explores public and professional stakeholders' perceptions of alcohol advertising and availability policies. It is the first to capture consensus and divergence in narratives of these stakeholders. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 stakeholders from third sector organisations, government, public health and alcohol licensing in Scotland. We conducted 11 online focus groups with 45 participants, living in neighbourhoods in Scotland characterised by varying levels of urbanity, deprivation and retail density change. We gave participants a list of policies and discussed their views on acceptability, feasibility and likely success. Despite general consensus that regulation of alcohol advertising is an important priority, public stakeholders were concerned about the feasibility of advertising interventions and potential unintended consequences. While professional stakeholders were in favour of regulating alcohol availability, public stakeholders had misgivings about feasibility and effectiveness. When prompted to discuss specific interventions, similar views about protecting children and achieving cultural change emerged. This study highlights the importance of policy makers and other stakeholders to consider public stakeholders' opinions on alcohol policy and understanding that their views may be influenced by competing framings of alcohol problems. Attempts to increase support for alcohol control policies need to consider people's concerns about the effectiveness and potential unintended consequences of these policies, and the wider social context of alcohol consumption.

A Framework for Bariatric Surgery Patient Care: Patient and Professional Perceptions

Abstract Introduction A multidisciplinary health team for perioperative care of the bariatric patient, sustained in a viable framework to support a long-term follow-up service, may decrease rates of complications, help the recognition of the complexity of this chronic disease, and provide a comprehensive bariatric surgery process analysis. This study aimed to analyze patients’ and professionals’ experiences with the perioperative care process and identify their perceptions of the bariatric surgery process to support the long-term management of obesity surgical treatment. Methods This qualitative study was conducted in a bariatric surgery center in south Portugal. Seven health professionals participated in one focus group, and sixteen patients participated in one of the three focus groups. Patients’ focus group script had eleven open main questions with follow-up questions to probe for more information, addressing motivations, experiences with the pre-surgery and post-surgery process, and perceptions of lifestyle changes. Results Participants reported the need for a reference professional in the hospital to contact, the importance of psychological support to help patients deal with the ‘ups and downs’ of post-surgery life, and the financial support for physical activity programs. Conclusions This research helped identify a need for a framework for long-term follow-up and showed priorities to tailor health services for managing bariatric surgery patients. New bariatric surgery programs should incorporate a diverse health team, focusing on patient support in the long-term follow-up. This team should be led by a dedicated case manager and include physical activity specialists. Key messages • The positive effects of bariatric surgery go beyond weight loss, reinforcing the importance of developing a new conceptual framework based on a patient-centered care model. • A case manager specialist on the bariatric surgery process may be the key to improving the long-term benefits of bariatric surgery.

Antimicrobial resistance and infection prevention in care for people with intellectual disabilities

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become one of the major public health threats worldwide. However, little is known about antimicrobial resistance and infection prevention and control (IPC) in long-term care facilities for people with intellectual disabilities. This study aims to assess knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards AMR and IPC among healthcare professionals working in long-term care facilities for people with intellectual disabilities (ID-LTCFs) in the Netherlands. Methods We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey study among medical and nonmedical trained healthcare professionals working in ID-LTCFs in the Netherlands. The survey study was carried out between July and November 2023 and consisted of validated survey items expanded with expert opinion and setting-specific items. Results In total, 109 medical and nonmedical trained healthcare professionals working in 37 long-term care organizations for people with intellectual disabilities throughout the Netherlands completed the questionnaire. Overall, knowledge levels about AMR and IPC differed between medical and nonmedical trained healthcare professionals working in ID-LCTFs, with medically trained professionals having a significant overall higher score on both topics. Knowledge regarding the perceived protective value of glove use was found to be insufficient. Moreover, healthcare professionals expressed a need for easy-to-read resources and tailored setting-specific information on AMR and IPC targeting both healthcare professionals as well as people with disabilities. Conclusions There is room for improvement regarding setting-specific IPC and hygiene policies, such as appropriate glove use in ID-LTCFs. As nonmedically trained professionals comprise most of the workforce within this setting, it is important to further tailor follow-up studies to the underlying factors that influence knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of these specific professionals within ID-LTCFs. Key messages • Developing setting and context-specific policies for infection prevention and control is crucial, particularly in long-term care facilities for people with intellectual disabilities. • Inclusive policy-making is key to combating antimicrobial resistance, and improving infection prevention and control in long-term care facilities for people with intellectual disabilities.

Editorial: Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of healthcare professionals and health professions students towards vaccinations and non-pharmaceutical interventions

Editorial: Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of healthcare professionals and health professions students towards vaccinations and non-pharmaceutical interventions

Understanding the benefits of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and influence of hyperkalaemia on their prescription: a UK survey of healthcare professionals' views and practice

Abstract Background Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and they should be increased to the maximally tolerated dose. However, their use is often hindered by hyperkalaemia leading to discontinuation or down titration. Purpose Assess perceptions of primary and secondary healthcare professionals regarding benefits of RAASi according to indication and, in the context of developing hyperkalaemia, to identify barriers to optimal utilisation, and to explore options for improving management protocols, specifically in HFrEF. Methods An electronic survey was distributed in primary and secondary care setting in Hampshire, UK, to evaluate knowledge about benefits of RAASi, clinical response to varying level of potassium (K+), and decision-making using several clinical scenarios. Hyperkalaemia was graded into mild (serum K+ 5.5 – 5.9 mmol/L), moderate (serum K+ 6.0 – 6.4 mmol/L) or severe (serum K+ ≥ 6.5 mmol/L). Results Between November 2021 and January 2023, 300 questionnaires were completed by 274 (91%) physicians (varying grades of seniority), 22 (7%) non-medical prescribers, and 4 (1%) pharmacists. 80% were working in secondary care across different specialities (31 working in cardiology and 15 in nephrology). The majority were aware of prognostic benefit of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in patients with HFrEF although this was lower for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) (Fig 1). Fewer than 2/3 of respondents were aware of impact of ACEi on symptoms. In the presence of mild hyperkalaemia, 75% and 88% of healthcare professionals would stop or reduce ACEi and MRA, respectively. In moderate or severe hyperkalaemia, this increased to 96% and 97%, respectively (Fig 2A-B). When considering the scenario of a patient with HFrEF who had ACEi stopped due to K+ 5.9 mmol/L, the potassium at which the responder would consider re-starting the ACEi ranged from 77% when potassium level &amp;lt; 5.5 mmol/L to 1% in moderate or severe hyperkalaemia (Fig 2C). 74% of healthcare professionals were familiar with local hyperkalaemia management protocol and 93% supported dedicated training on RAASi dose adjustment and hyperkalaemia management. Conclusion This survey, across a broad range of healthcare professionals, shows uncertainties around knowledge of benefits of RAASi in patients with HFrEF and there is sizeable variation in the prescribing response to degrees of hyperkalaemia. Given the voluntary nature of the survey, it is plausible that these data are biased towards individuals with greater understanding. Regardless, there is a need for continued education with a goal of improving patient-centred care.

Revisiting the conceptualisation and implications of medicine's 'hidden curriculum'.

In medical training and practice, our professional attributes, attitudes, perceptions, character traits and identities are fundamentally shaped by our lived experiences and observations in clinical and para-clinical settings instead of being inculcated through formal curriculum or classroom teaching. For instance, clinical acumen, communication skills and bedside manners are learnt through role modelling and experiential learning in the course of clinical rotations. Likewise, one's attitudes, professional behaviours and inclinations are often also influenced by direct/indirect observations of the actions of others in the medical fraternity in various clinical and non-clinical settings. This is also what is often termed as the 'hidden curriculum' of medicine. In this article, we sought to provide a practical conceptualisation of the hidden curriculum in medical training, which we describe as lived experiences and personal observations of medical trainees and residents in clinical and para-clinical spaces, which shape their perceptions of the medical profession (vocational identity and purpose), patients (patient-physician relationship) and colleagues (intra- and inter-professional relationships), with downstream implications on physician well-being and clinical decision-making. Although this idea of a 'hidden curriculum' has conventionally carried predominantly negative connotations in medical literature, we suggest that it is an inevitable part of medical education and practice, which, through deliberate regulation, can potentially be shaped to create more positive and meaningful effects in the professional development of medical trainees.

Healthcare professionals' knowledge and perceptions of post-stroke rehabilitation in the peripandemic period: an online cross-sectional survey.

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected healthcare systems, particularly post-stroke rehabilitation centers. The elevated severity of strokes and delayed hospital admissions caused numerous hurdles to rehabilitation administration during the peri-pandemic period. This study surveyed healthcare professionals' knowledge and perceptions of post-stroke rehabilitation during this period. An online cross-sectional survey was administered from September 17, 2023 to February 23, 2024, utilizing the SurveyMonkey platform. The questionnaire included 30 questions addressing participant baseline characteristics, knowledge of definitions and experiences, post-stroke rehabilitation procedures, obstacles encountered during the peri-pandemic period, and the utilization of telerehabilitation. Only complete responses from health professionals were considered. This report utilized convenience sampling. Data were analyzed via descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. A total of 79 health professionals, predominantly physiatrists, neurologists, and physiotherapists, from eight countries participated in the study. Over half of the participants (64.6%) indicated the existence of a dedicated department for post-stroke rehabilitation. Significant obstacles comprised an absence of advanced rehabilitative treatments (60.8%), inadequately skilled workers (50.6%), and restricted space for rehabilitation (46.8%). Telerehabilitation was regarded as a feasible option by 45.6% of participants; nonetheless, obstacles, including patients' telecommunication proficiency and the possibility of diagnostic inaccuracies, were acknowledged. Complementary therapies, such as music and dance therapy, received favorable evaluations from 67.1% to 63.3% of respondents, respectively. The pandemic reduced rehabilitation admissions due to infection concerns (75.9%) and increased multimorbidity cases among patients (48.1%). The study underscores the pandemic's negative effect on post-stroke rehabilitation, emphasizing the necessity for multidisciplinary, customized therapy and enhanced integration of telerehabilitation to overcome access barriers. Addressing obstacles regarding infrastructure, training, and access to advanced approaches, particularly in a post-pandemic context, is essential to improving rehabilitation outcomes.

Transforming stereotypes: how meeting male and female professors changes children's gender bias and ‘mad professor’ perceptions

ABSTRACT The persistent ‘mad professor’ stereotype – the perception of professors as typically old, dishevelled men with grey hair – contributes to the lack of diversity in the academic workforce, with important implications for social justice and the advancement of science. This study examined the research question of how an informal classroom visit by a male versus a female professor influences gender bias and mad professor stereotyping among upper primary school students. To investigate this question, a survey was conducted with 171 upper elementary school children, examining their gender bias and mad professor stereotyping both before and after a classroom visit from either a male or female professor. The results revealed that visits by female professors significantly reduced gender bias, while visits from male professors, conversely, heightened it. However, this bias-reinforcing effect of male visits was mitigated through supplementary activities that introduced the children to professors from diverse genders and backgrounds. Importantly, visits from both male and female professors were effective in diminishing mad professor stereotyping. This study not only highlights the critical role of a professor’s gender in shaping children’s perceptions but also introduces a novel pictorial choice task for measuring bias, offering an objective alternative to the traditional Draw-a-Scientist test.

Perceptions of primary health care professionals from Brazil about the food and nutrition monitoring system.

The main factors related to the lack of coverage in Health Information Systems are concentrated in the scarce and incipient training of health professionals regarding the collection and typing of data, as well as the importance of using information. The aim of this study was to analyze the perceptions of primary health care professionals from Brazil about the functioning of the Food and Nutritional Monitoring System (SISVAN). Multicentric qualitative study, carried out with 38 health professionals in Basic Health Units (BHU) in five regions around the country. Data collection took place through interviews, which were submitted to content analysis, using the thematic modality. The treatment of the results and interpretation of the themes were carried out using the theoretical framework of the philosopher Michel Foucault. Four themes emerged: (Lack of) knowledge of SISVAN; SISVAN and the conditional income transfer program; Difficulties in the execution and use of SISVAN information; and Strengths. Some of the interviewees recognized the purpose of SISVAN's functioning. The collection of anthropometric data was related to the conditions of the Bolsa Família Program. Ignorance of the system and/or limited perception emerged as obstacles in the operability, use and quality of the data. The participants recognize that professional training is necessary to optimize the strengths of the system.

Survey on current clinical practice in geriatric oncology: the individual experience in five European Cancer Centers.

To gather information from clinicians on how geriatric oncology models of care have emerged in different European countries and describe current practice in this clinical area. A semi-structured online interview was performed, exploring aspects related to implementation, perceived quality of care, and professional satisfaction. The centers participating in this interview showed significant differences in terms of resource allocation, team members, components of the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), and CGA-driven interventions. High levels of professional satisfaction were expressed by all participants. This was deemed a consequence of a perception of increased quality in the provision of care and enhanced educational and academic opportunities. Interdisciplinary models of care in geriatric oncology, regardless of implementation details, seem to provide grounds for increased professional satisfaction and perception of better provision of quality of care. These characteristics could support promoting and further developing similar collaborations on a wider scale.

Ethical aspects of staff responses when older people with dementia express false beliefs.

Challenging false beliefs are common situations among people living with dementia. They frequently imply time-shifts, that is, situations in which the person re-lives past experiences. Since they have emotional implications and important ethical implications, they are difficult to manage by caregivers, who are faced with the decision of telling or not telling the truth. The study aimed to explore professional staff's perceptions of common and best practices to manage a situation in which a person living with dementia is having a false belief, specifically a time-shift. The study compares technical staff's and assistant carers' responses. Forty-two staff members working in four Spanish long-term care facilities were interviewed. 21 were assistant carers and 21 were technical staff. This study involved a qualitative design, content-analyzing participant's responses to semi-structured interviews. Participants read a vignette about a person living with dementia having a time-shift and were asked (1) how a situation like that is commonly managed and (2) how it should be managed. The principles of informed consent, confidentiality, and assessment of consequences for participants were observed throughout the entire study, which was approved by the University of Barcelona Ethics Committee (IRB 00003099). Written participant's consent was obtained prior to interviews. All the participants mentioned having experienced a situation similar to that described in the vignette. In the case of common practices, lying was the most frequently mentioned strategy. As for best practices, lying and telling the truth were mentioned as well as responses that lie in-between, such as distracting or relaxing. However, most assistant carers reported that they do not know how a challenging false belief should be managed. Our findings stress the importance of organizational guidelines and staff development in the management of challenging false beliefs (and specifically time-shifts) in PLWD.

Transitioning identities in professional education: an appreciative enquiry

ABSTRACT Higher education lecturers who have moved into teaching on professional education programmes from careers in professional practice are an under-researched group. Questions related to self-concept combined with wider social and sectoral issues relating to perceptions about the nature and purpose of higher education can affect the development of their new professional identity. Building on previous research into the experiences of new and developing academics, the research reported here sought to gain an understanding of the experiences and dispositions that contribute to shaping professional identity for those who have moved from professional practice into teaching roles in higher education within an education and social work faculty. Utilising an Appreciative Inquiry model, the objective of this research was to better understand participants’ professional perspectives and needs. Findings are organised around three areas: i) the importance of values and goals as catalysts for identity change, ii) the role of social and professional perceptions that impinge on (in)security of identity, and iii) the sense that academic identity development is an iterative and elastic process. These findings suggest the need for future research that engages with exploring how best to promote and nurture productive and satisfying academic careers for those moving between professional and professional education contexts.

The Decontamination of N95 Masks as an Occupational Safety Strategy

Objective: This study aimed to monitor the use of a short-wave ultraviolet (UV-C) decontamination device for N95 masks at the João de Barros Barreto University Hospital, Belém, Pará, Brazil. The research investigated the reuse of masks, storage methods, and the perception of healthcare professionals regarding the decontamination protocol using UV-C after each work shift. Theoretical Framework: The research is based on theories related to biosafety and occupational health, focusing on the importance of decontamination processes in hospital settings to enhance the protection of healthcare workers and reduce infection risks. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 295 nursing professionals, including nurses, technicians, and assistants. Data were collected through a questionnaire addressing the reuse of N95 masks, storage between uses, and opinions on the use of the UV-C device for decontamination. Results and Discussion: All participants (n=295) agreed that UV-C decontamination improves biosafety by reducing the handling of potentially contaminated masks. The acceptance of the device was unanimous, confirming its feasibility both in high-demand scenarios, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, and in routine hospital practices. Research Implications: This study demonstrates that implementing UV-C decontamination systems is a practical and effective solution for hospitals, with the potential to increase occupational safety and reduce infectious waste generation. Originality/Value: The study contributes to the literature by highlighting the feasibility and benefits of reusing N95 masks with UV-C decontamination, promoting greater safety in hospital environments.

Are Judgments of Partner Abuse “Rose Tinted”? An Exploration of Judgments of Gender in Bidirectional Intimate Partner Violence

ABSTRACT Gendered models of intimate partner violence/abuse (IPV/A), and public and professional perceptions, describe IPV/A as a one-sided crime perpetrated by men unilaterally. This becomes problematic when considering bidirectional IPV/A: the dominant form of relational violence according to reviews. Here we explored judgments of bidirectional IPV/A, first using an experimental design and a general public sample, and then using qualitative inquiry with prospective trainee forensic psychologists. Although participants acknowledged bidirectionality, males were infrequently labeled as “victims” and females as “perpetrators”. Participant interviews suggested gender constructions influenced their judgments. Implications for training to challenge gendered narratives and de-bias professional practice are discussed.

The patient’s perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe process of identifying and discontinuing medicines in instances in which harms outweigh benefits (deprescribing) can mitigate the negative consequences of problematic polypharmacy. This process should be conducted with a focus on the patient and involve collaborative decision-making. Evidence is needed regarding patients’ views on how deprescribing should be safely and routinely implemented in English primary care to improve its application. This study aimed to identify optimal methods of introducing and actioning deprescribing from the patient’s perspective.MethodsParticipants in England aged 65 and above who were taking five or more medicines and residing in their own homes were recruited through social media and service user groups. An interview guide was created from deprescribing literature and input from patients and the public, guided by the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT). The interviews were held online using Microsoft Teams® or via phone, recorded, and then transcribed. The data was analysed using the Framework analysis.ResultsTwenty patients (mean age of 74.5, SD = 6.93), with 75% being female, were enrolled in the study. Three main themes emerged: (1) ‘Why deprescribe now?’ emphasised the significance of explaining the reasons behind deprescribing; (2) ‘Monitoring and follow-up’ underscored the necessity of safety measures during deprescribing and patients’ willingness to self-monitor post-intervention; (3) ‘Roles and relationships’ explored patient perceptions of various healthcare professionals involved in deprescribing and the essential interpersonal skills for fostering therapeutic relationships.ConclusionOptimal methods of introducing deprescribing included communicating a convincing rationale for stopping medicines and preparing patients for deprescribing conversations. Patients required support from a range of healthcare professionals with whom they had an existing therapeutic relationship. Whilst patients were motivated to self-monitor unwanted/unexpected effects post-deprescribing, timely support was required. The nature of such bolstered collective action and cognitive participation within NPT enhances the normalisation potential of deprescribing. These findings highlight the significance of considering the content and process of deprescribing consultations to enhance normalisation and tackle problematic polypharmacy. This provides a deeper understanding of patients’ needs for implementing safe and routine deprescribing in primary care, which should be considered when designing medication review and deprescribing services.

Healthcare professionals' perceptions on providing support to informal carers within stroke care.

The sudden nature of stroke onset does not provide carers with sufficient time to prepare for the demands associated with caring. Healthcare professionals can have a vital role in providing carers with support and training, which may reduce carer stress and strain, and allow for better health and rehabilitation outcomes for the stroke survivor. The experiences of healthcare professionals on supporting carers in stroke care, however, remain unclear. To understand the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals working in stroke care on implementing resources and support to informal stroke carers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 healthcare professionals (5 occupational therapists, 5 physiotherapists, 1 psychologist) with at least 12 months' experience in working with stroke survivors. Interviews ranged from 25-70 minutes in duration, and were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. Three overarching categories that were explored were: (1) Experiences of working in stroke care and supporting carers; (2) Recommendations for a program designed for carers; and (3) Future priorities in stroke care. Participants discussed a variety of strategies they utilised to support carers including collaborating with other healthcare professionals and utilising skills and experience. Healthcare professionals highlighted the need for additional resources that are designed specifically for carers and explored key topics including carer stress and fatigue, support services, stroke education, and how to look after oneself. Participants identified priorities for stroke care including additional professional training and resource availability. This study provided a unique insight from the perspectives of healthcare professionals on supporting carers. Participants identified the need for additional training and resources to equip healthcare professionals to better support carers. Future programs designed for carers should be informed by the needs and experiences of both informal carers and healthcare professionals.

Environmentally sustainable person-centred care: Occupational therapy students' attitudes, perceptions and self-perceived preparedness for practice.

Climate change threatens the environments in which person-centred occupational therapy occurs. Environmental sustainability is directly linked with the health and wellbeing of current and future generations, presenting occupational therapists with a unique advocacy and activist role. As practitioners of the future, there is an urgent need to understand students' attitudes, perceptions of, and self-perceived preparedness for, dealing with environmental determinants of health and intergenerational occupational and climate justice. A cross-sectional exploratory descriptive survey collected United Kingdom (UK) based allied health professional students' attitudes, perceptions, and self-perceived preparedness for advocating for environmental sustainability in the context of person-centred care. The survey was distributed to 48 gatekeepers in UK institutions with approved allied health professional training programmes (44 offered occupational therapy); 62 occupational therapy students responded. Descriptive and non-parametric inferential statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Text and short answers were analysed qualitatively via inductive content analysis. The study was co-designed and implemented with MSc (pre-registration) occupational therapy students. Participants (94%) expressed concerns for climate change, with 84% feeling responsible for addressing environmental sustainability in health care. While 64.5% identified climate justice as a top priority, a perceived challenge emerged between person-centred care and sustainability, with only 18% of participants feeling prepared for environmental sustainability in occupational therapy practice. Participants requested education on personal and professional sustainability practices, as well as collective action. Sharing personal climate change experiences, advocating with family and friends, and facilitating connections for collective action were highlighted as potentially transformative educational tools in this area. Occupational therapy curricula should address environmental sustainability through pragmatic, critical, and ethical lenses to enhance students' preparedness for this advocacy and activist role. Reflection and continuous professional development for environmentally sustainable practices is recommended. Occupational therapists believe that it is important to support people to participate in occupations that matter to them. However, the activities that some people choose to participate in may have negative effects on the environment and the planet. It is important to ensure that when occupational therapists support people in their choices of activities, this does not lead to unequal access to healthy and meaningful occupations of others, now or in the future. That is because occupational therapists also have a responsibility to prevent occupational injustice. Occupational therapy students are the professionals of the future, so it is important to include them in research about this topic. They need to develop skills that allow them to simultaneously make sure that they are delivering person-centred care, which is not environmentally detrimental and that does not lead to occupational injustice. Making sure that occupational therapists provide person-centred care while also managing risks of occupational injustice may be seen as a profession-specific dilemma. In this study, occupational therapy students in the UK completed a survey about their feelings, views, and readiness for managing this dilemma. Results showed that most respondents are concerned about climate change, but do not feel that their occupational therapy education sufficiently prepared them to practise in an environmentally sustainable way. They were asked to propose ideas for addressing this issue, and the article discusses how occupational therapy curricula might be changed in accordance.