Perceptions Of Healthcare Professionals Research Articles

Assessment of perception of oral healthcare professionals in management of medical emergencies in children: A cross-sectional study

Background: Medical emergency is an acute condition which can occur when least expected. It is more common to occur in a dental setup as this environment can be stressful for a patient. Children are more prone to emergencies as their dental procedures usually takes place under sedation. Therefore, it is mandatory for a dentist to have adequate knowledge, proper attitude and good training in handling any medical emergency seen in children during their dental treatment. Objectives: To assess the perception of oral healthcare professionals in management of medical emergencies in children. Method: A cross-sectional survey comprising 270 participants was conducted on oral healthcare professionals including interns, postgraduate students, practising dentists and faculty dentists. An 18-item validated questionnaire containing four domains of professional demographic data, knowledge, attitude and practice were distributed among the participants. Descriptive analysis was used followed by Chi Square test to check for association between age, gender, educational qualification and years of experience.Results: The level of knowledge, attitude and practices was lower in graduate dentists than postgraduate dentists. The correlation between knowledge, attitude and practices was found to be highly statistically significant (p=0.001).Conclusions: The study concluded that while knowledge and attitude levels were high in the population, there is a gap in practices of the dentists to handle a medical emergency.

Perception, attitudes, knowledge of using complementary and alternative medicine for cancer patients among healthcare professionals: A mixed-methods systematic review.

With the rapid increase in the prevalence of cancer worldwide, the utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increased among cancer patients. This review aimed to understand the perception, attitudes, and knowledge of healthcare professionals toward using CAM for cancer patients. A mixed-methods systematic review was undertaken in four databases. Inclusion criteria were primary studies reporting perception, attitudes, and knowledge of healthcare professionals for using CAM for cancer patients were eligible. A mixed-methods convergent synthesis was carried out, and the findings were subjected to a GRADE-CERQual assessment of confidence. Forty-two studies were chosen. The majority of the studies were quantitative and had less than 100 participants. Most publications were from European countries, and oncology was the highest among the specialties. The review found the following themes: feasibility of having negative adverse effects, low expectations of using CAM among HCPs, potential positive effects of using CAM, specific CAM training may be helpful, no concrete regulations to promote CAM practice, and poor physician-patient communication. Nurses had more positive views than other professions; oncologists were concerned regarding herb-drug interactions; integration of CAM into the healthcare system was favorable; HCPs felt the need to participate in specific CAM training; and HCPs agreed that CAM education should be provided more regularly. Future studies should explore the studies views of cancer patients and details of in-depth evidence of CAM in oncology settings.

Perception of Health Care Professionals Toward Hospital Accreditation at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare.

The quality of health care relies on achieving the best quality and patient safety goals, and accreditation plays a fundamental role in achieving these goals through compliance with standards that guide excellence. Accreditation also helps streamline operations and supports evidence-based quality improvement plans. This study aims to evaluate the perception of health care professionals on the accreditation process and its impact on the quality of health care and patient safety. This is a cross-sectional questionnaire survey distributed via the SuccessFactors website and made accessible to all hospital staff. The online questionnaire was completed by 2047 participants, representing 51% of the entire hospital staff at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare (JHAH). Overall analysis indicated a positive perception of accreditation benefits among health care employees (as indicated by participation in accreditation activities and/or preparation for the survey visits) and reflected on patient health care quality and safety dimensions, with an overall Likert median score of 4.0 (interquartile range = 3.7-5.0; P < .05). The outcomes of our study confirm that JHAH employees perceived a positive impact of accreditation on health care quality improvement and patient safety. Also, the study supports considering accreditation as a fundamental requirement to improve health care system processes. However, it is critical to sustain quality of services over time during accreditation cycles.

Evaluating healthcare professionals’ perceptions of dispensing separation and sale of pharmacy medicine in Brunei Darussalam

BackgroundPharmacy medicine (P) is obtained exclusively from a pharmacy under the supervision of a pharmacist. This study aims to understand the perception of healthcare professionals towards the dispensing separation, as well as the dispensing of pharmacy medicine by community pharmacies to enhance patient health outcomes in Brunei Darussalam.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between 1st March 2023 and 20th April 2023 among healthcare professionals. A newly designed and validated questionnaire was used. Its face and content validity, along with internal consistency, was adequately established. Convenient sampling was employed to recruit participants for the study. Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA was performed, considering a p-value < 0.05 as statistically significant.ResultsThe study compiled data from 108 participants, comprising doctors (38.9%) and pharmacy technicians (45.4%). Approximately 28.7% of respondents had 11–20 years of healthcare experience, while 25.9% had less than 5 years. Nearly all respondents (98.1%) agreed on the vital role pharmacists and pharmacy technicians play in prescription checks. A significant number of participants (93.5%) agreed that Brunei’s current medicine dispensing system needs improvement. The mean total score for the perception of medicine dispensing in Brunei was 3.79 ± 1.103. A statistically significant difference was found between the perception score and the respondents’ profession (p = 0.018), but not with their age, experience, or place of work. Respondents’ awareness score showed no statistically significant correlation with their profession, age, experience, or place of work.ConclusionThe study underscores the necessity for more patient-centered care in community pharmacies in Brunei Darussalam. The country’s healthcare professionals should recognize the potential advantages of expanding pharmacy services. However, to implement these services successfully, regulatory restrictions and infrastructure limitations must be addressed.

The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Study: US and European Patient and Health Care Professional Perceptions of the Experience and Impact of Symptoms of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) study aimed to evaluate the experience and impact of ulcerative colitis (UC) symptoms on patients' lives and elucidate gaps in communication between patients and health care professionals (HCPs). Online, quantitative, cross-sectional surveys of patients with moderate-to-severe UC and HCPs responsible for making prescribing decisions were conducted in the United States (US) and Europe. UC disease severity was defined by treatment, steroid use, and/or hospitalization history. Surveys were completed by 200 US and 556 European patients and 200 US and 503 European HCPs. The most common UC symptoms experienced in the preceding month were diarrhea, bowel urgency, and increased stool frequency. Many patients (45.0% of US patients, 37.0% of European patients) reported wearing diapers/pads/protection at least once a week in the past 3 months due to fear/anticipation of fecal urge incontinence. The top reasons for declining participation in social events, work/school, and sports/exercise were due to bowel urgency and fear of fecal urge incontinence. HCPs ranked diarrhea, blood in stool, and increased stool frequency as the most common symptoms. While over half HCPs ranked bowel urgency as a top symptom affecting patients' lives, less than a quarter ranked it in the top 3 most impactful on treatment decisions. Similar disparities exist between patient and HCP perceptions in the United States and Europe on the experience and impact of UC symptoms. Bowel urgency has a substantial and similar impact on US and European patients, is underappreciated by HCPs, and should be addressed during routine appointments.

Translation and transcultural adaptation of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory Staff (PCPI-S) for health professionals in Spain

Person-centred practices - following national and international developments in health-care policies - have become a key approach in healthcare. The Person-Centred Practice Inventory - Staff is an instrument based on the theoretical framework Person-Centred Practice that focuses on the staff's perspective and how they experience person-centred practices. Here, the aim of this study is to obtain the first Spanish version of the PCPI-S translated and adapted into the Spanish context. The translation and adaptation of the instrument followed the Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures - Principles of Good Practice, which included a consulting session with experts. Content validation measures on clarity and relevance were assessed for every item (I-CVI) and the survey as a whole (S-CVI/Ave). No major difficulties were registered to reach an agreement on the 12 items that needed to be clarified. Regarding clarity and relevance. The validity index per item (I-CVI) obtained excellent scores for clarity in 53 items and for relevance in 59; the S-CVI/Ave showed excellent results (=90). This first version of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory - Staff instrument adapted to the Spanish context is conceptually and semantically equivalent to the original one. This valuable tool will be of great help to identify the perception of healthcare professionals on person-centred practices.

The perception of patients, mothers and healthcare professionals regarding introduction of home visits for adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Despite advancements in diabetes management, a subgroup of patients does not achieve an acceptable level of metabolic control. To achieve treatment goals for high-risk patients, a higher frequency of contact with healthcare professionals is essential. However, socioeconomic challenges often lead to nonattendance at the outpatient clinic. Therefore, home visits were introduced as a supplement/an alternative to consultations at the paediatric diabetes clinic. The aim of this study was to uncover the perception of patients, mothers and healthcare professionals regarding home visits versus consultations at the outpatient clinic in order to being able to improve the services offered. Semistructured interviews with patients, mothers and healthcare professionals were conducted to explore the experiences and perspectives of the concept at two paediatric diabetes clinics in Denmark. Paired t tests were used to compare the glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels at the start of the intervention with HbA1c 1 year before and HbA1c at the end of the intervention. Both patients, mothers and healthcare professionals found consultations in familiar surroundings to result in stronger relationships between healthcare professionals and families, creating greater opportunities to discuss personal issues aimed at improving the outcome of diabetes. Furthermore, home visits facilitated finding alternative methods of helping patients and the families integrating diabetes into everyday life. Overall, home visits were found to contribute toward creating a more constructive relationship. However, it was still a challenge to keep the scheduled appointments, and during this short study, no improvement in metabolic control could be observed.

The wake of the triple epidemic (Tripledemic): does it emphasizes the COVID-19 vaccine as a routine immunization for children? - A cross-sectional study.

Many countries, including the USA, are currently confronting a triple epidemic in children as COVID-19 cases increase and new strains emerge which urge COVID-19 vaccination for children. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for the CDC unanimously approved the inclusion of the COVID-19 vaccine (C19V) in the recommended immunizations. As healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents are significant players in changing the trend of the triple epidemic by giving the C19V, the present study was done to determine awareness and perception of HCPs and parents on the tripledemic and the need for inclusion of C19V in vaccination schedules for children. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 HCPs and 200 parents to assess their knowledge and perception of tripledemic and the need for the inclusion of C19V. Noticeably, half of the participants had either recent personal (36.2%) or family (21.8%) exposure to some of the tripledemic like RSV, Flu, or COVID-19. On perceived awareness, 42% were concerned about tripledemic, and 35% thought that regular C19V may prevent or reduce tripledemic. Ironically, 11% were not willing to give C19V to their children. The logistic regression model for positive perception of tripledemic and regular C19V identified significant relationships with education (OR 2.19, CI 1.48-3.81), gender (OR 0.9, CI 01.02-2.63), recent personal or family exposure to any of the tripledemic (OR 0.239, CI 0.87-1.63) and presence of children in the family (OR 0.71, CI 1.4-1.96). The reason for favorable perception was preventing self and family from tripledemic. The findings may give insight to the policymakers for a strategic plan to include C19V in the routine schedule to combat the pandemic and tripledemic by improving herd immunity.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in cardiac rehab: an exploration of lived experiences of patients and the knowledge, understanding, and perceptions of healthcare professionals

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a non-atherosclerotic type of cardiovascular disease (CVD) that affects young and middle-aged women more than men. Many aspects of SCAD, however, remain unclear, including the outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and the lived experiences of people with this condition in the programme. Furthermore, the awareness and knowledge of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding SCAD may be an important factor in determining patient engagement with rehabilitation services. A longitudinal study examining changes in physical and mental health outcomes of patients with SCAD is yet to be performed. Similarly, an in-depth exploration of HCPs' perspectives on SCAD is also needed. Objectives The objectives of this project are to understand the lived experiences of patients with SCAD, examine the knowledge of HCPs about the management of SCAD, and analyse the outcomes of CR on physical activity, diet, body mass index, waist circumference, stress, anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life upon completion of phase III and phase IV CR, and a year post-event. Methods A mixed-methods longitudinal observational study will be performed with four time points (pre-phase III CR, post-phase III CR, post-phase IV CR, and a year follow-up after SCAD event). Lived experiences of both male and female patients with SCAD, their pathways of care and barriers to engagement to CR will be explored through semi-structured interviews. Physical activity (short-form IPAQ questionnaire), dietary intake, anthropometric measures (waist circumference and body mass index), stress (PSS-10 questionnaire), anxiety (GAD-7 questionnaire), depression (PHQ-9 questionnaire) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) will be assessed at each timepoint. Patients with SCAD who are not engaged with CR will be used as a control group. Outcome measures will be compared between two groups using a mixed model ANOVA (time x intervention). A qualitative cross-sectional study using semi-structured interviews with HCPs will explore their understanding and management of SCAD. Discussion: The findings of this project will indicate weather current CR needs are met in this patient group and what changes need to be made to existing CR services to improve uptake in patients with SCAD. This could lead to a larger clinical trial that examines the effectiveness of tailored CR for this group of patients. Additionally, the information received from HCPs will indicate if there is an unmet educational need regarding SCAD, which may ultimately lead to better recognition, medical and lifestyle management for this patient group.

Exploring the natural and treatment history of vitiligo: patient and healthcare professional perceptions from the global VALIANT study.

Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting melanocytes, resulting in depigmentation of skin. Patients with vitiligo often have reduced quality of life and comorbid autoimmune conditions and have reported a lack of available treatments for their vitiligo. The Vitiligo and Life Impact Among International Communities (VALIANT) study is the first global survey to explore the natural history and management of vitiligo from the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). The survey recruited adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with vitiligo and HCPs treating patients with vitiligo via an online panel in 17 countries. Patients were queried regarding clinical characteristics and vitiligo treatment. HCPs were queried regarding diagnosis and management of patients with vitiligo. Included in the analysis were 3541 patients and 1203 HCPs. Nearly half (45.2%) of patients had >5% affected body surface area; 57.1% reported family history. Patients obtained formal diagnosis after a mean (SD) of 2.4 (4.1) years; 44.9% reported previous misdiagnosis. Many patients (56.7%) reported being told that vitiligo could not be treated; 53.9% of HCPs believed patients who never treated their vitiligo were told that vitiligo could not be treated. One-quarter of HCPs (26.3%) did not believe an effective therapy for vitiligo exists; 44.6% of patients reported giving up on finding an effective therapy. Top treatment goals for patients and HCPs, respectively, were reduction/cessation of spread (24.7%/18.5%) and repigmentation (22.5%/37.2%). Patient perception of effective care was similar for treatment by dermatologists (66.9%) and primary care HCPs (67.0%). Patients with vitiligo and HCPs reported similar treatment goals and expressed frustration with lack of effective therapies. Patients reported high rates of initial misdiagnosis; many ceased seeking healthcare because they perceived that vitiligo could not be treated. Findings highlight the need for earlier diagnosis and improved disease management for vitiligo.

Essential Skills for Health Communication, Barriers, Facilitators and the Need for Training: Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals from Seven European Countries.

Many healthcare professionals are unaware of the necessary skills and barriers hindering interpersonal health communication. This study aimed to evaluate the healthcare professional's perception regarding health communication training's necessity, barriers, facilitators and critical skills in health communication. Data from a cross-sectional online survey in the framework of the H-Com project were utilized. The study included 691 healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, students and allied health professionals) from seven European countries. Only 57% of participants had participated in health communication training, while 88.1% of them indicated a willingness to be trained in health communication. Nurses were more likely (OR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.16, 2.91) to have received such training, compared to physicians. Most examined communication skills, barriers and facilitators of effective communication, and perceived outcomes of successful communication were considered crucial for most participants, although physicians overall seemed to be less concerned. Most agreed perceived outcomes were improved professional-patient relations, patient and professional satisfaction, physical and psychological health amelioration and patients' trust. Nurses evaluated the importance of these communication skills and communication barriers, facilitators and outcomes higher than physicians. Physicians may underestimate the importance of communication skills more than nurses. Health communication should become an integral part of training for all health professionals.

“My gut feeling is…”: An Ethnographic Study Exploring Interprofessional Communication About Children and Adolescents With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Paediatric Rheumatology

Interprofessional communication about inflammatory and non-inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions is an important component of assessment and management in paediatric rheumatology. Chronic pain is a feature of some of these conditions which likely influences the extent and type of communication about pain. Research investigating interprofessional communication about paediatric pain is limited but has found that communication is inclusive of the biopsychosocial context of children/adolescents as well as their families. The aim of this ethnographic study was to explore interprofessional communication about children and adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain in paediatric rheumatology. We observed forty-five healthcare professionals recruited from 3 UK paediatric rheumatology teams during thirty multi-disciplinary team meetings. Contemporaneous field notes created during observations were analysed using grounded theory procedures. Core processes identified in interprofessional communication involved describing, making sense of, and managing children/adolescents with pain and their families. Topic areas discussed within these core processes included healthcare professional perceptions about children’s and parents’ personality characteristics, as well as healthcare professionals’ familiarity with families. Underlying diagnoses and possible attributions of pain aetiology were also discussed. Interprofessional narratives included consideration of the potential anxieties and uncertainties about pain within families. Healthcare professionals communicated about strategies for managing expectations about pain. These findings characterise the nuances in interprofessional communication about pain and can be used to inform future work aimed at understanding and optimising the impact of interprofessional communication on clinical decisions and pain outcomes. PerspectiveThis study characterises the processes (series of actions), the function (purpose) and the content (topic areas) of interprofessional communication about paediatric pain in rheumatology settings. These findings should be used to inform interventions targeting both the appropriateness and effectiveness of this communication.

"Keep It Short and Simple": Perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals on the use of a mobile health app in the care for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer generally have good long-term survival rates. However, late recurrences can occur and require lifelong follow-up. This research aims to investigate different stakeholders' perceptions on the use of mobile health (mHealth) applications for prostate cancer follow-up after radical prostatectomy. A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted to explore stakeholders' perceptions of an mHealth application for follow-up after radical prostatectomy. Urologists, nurses, and patients treated with radical prostatectomy were interviewed, and data were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis according to Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. Recommended features for an ideal mHealth application were grouped according to the Persuasive Systems Design model. A total of 30 stakeholders, consisting of nurse specialists (n= 7), urologists (n= 8), and patients (n= 15), were interviewed. Expected benefits and barriers were mentioned and grouped in five overarching themes: healthcare optimisation, disease management, app compliance, legal and organisational requirements, and patient-mHealth interaction. Stakeholders provided a multitude of suggestions for an ideal mHealth app. Yet, not all types of stakeholders were interviewed, and patient selection limited generalisability of findings. Stakeholders indicate that an mHealth app in the care for post-prostatectomy patients can improve patient care and promote disease management but consider app compliance as a major challenge. We interviewed patients, nurses, and urologists about using an mHealth application for follow-up after radical prostatectomy. The participants agreed that an mHealth app could improve care optimisation and disease management, but some concerns and barriers were expressed. This resulted in a list of recommended features for an ideal app.

A Descriptive Survey Investigating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Public's Perception of Healthcare Professionals.

The COVID-19 pandemic brought immense attention to the healthcare system and its workers. While much research has been completed about the effects of COVID-19 on the healthcare system, little exists about how the opinions of patients have been altered by this pandemic. We decided to further investigate how the public opinion of healthcare workers (HCWs) has changed to better understand how best we can serve society. The key takeaway from the data was that both the levels of perceived trustworthiness and respectability of healthcare workers decreased following the pandemic. Data showed that the level of perceived respectability decreased from an average of 7.84 to 7.30 and the level of perceived trustworthiness from 7.38 to 6.54, all of these values out of 10. While these changes were not enormous, they demonstrate a striking trend and were found to be significant through a paired t-test. Finally, respondents were also queried about their level of desire in pursuing healthcare as a career field and overwhelmingly there was little interest, with an average level of 1.24 out of 10. We believe our data and results show important trends that all HCWs should be aware of; notably decreasing interest in the field, reduced trust, and decrease in respect, all of which will require further study and analysis. We must consider the current environment in which small mistakes or mistrust can have grave consequences on public health and patient compliance. In addition, the lack of interest in joining the medical community is concerning considering the large efflux of workers leaving the profession. Future studies could focus on how to increase trust in HCWs or attract more people to the healthcare field.

Healthcare professionals and pregnant and post-natal women's perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in a maternity care facility: A qualitative study from Botswana

ObjectiveTo explore the perceptions of healthcare professionals and pregnant and post-natal women regarding interprofessional collaboration in a maternity care setting in Botswana, a low-to-middle-income country in Sub-Sahara Africa. DesignA descriptive qualitative design using in-depth interviews with forty participants, including healthcare professionals and women in maternity wards. Data were transcribed and thematically analysed. SettingAntenatal, delivery and post-natal maternity wards in a referral hospital that provides basic and specialist care in Botswana. ParticipantsWe interviewed 13 pregnant and post-natal women and 27 healthcare professionals in the maternity care wards. FindingsParticipants perceived several interrelated factors that influenced the delivery of interprofessional collaborative care. Interpersonal factors such as poor communication, disrespectful behaviours and inadequate teamwork practices prevented interprofessional collaboration. Other barriers to collaboration included lack of understanding of each other's roles and responsibilities, ineffective coordination of resources, hierarchical power struggles and poor collaborative leadership. Key conclusionsEffective interprofessional collaboration remains elusive in this maternity care setting. Healthcare systems in low-to-middle-income countries may benefit from interventions for healthcare professionals to learn and practice interprofessional collaborative care.

Identifying pain problems, healthcare professional perceptions, expectations and challenges in multidisciplinary pain center establishment.

Aim: Before establishing a multidisciplinary pain center (MPC), the pain problem, healthcare professionals (HCP) perceptions, expectations and the potential challenges of multidisciplinary pain center establishment need to be identified. Methods: A quantitative survey study on 1058 Indonesian HCP. The study uses a national inquiry sent by the national International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)chapter for pain. Results: 99.0% of respondents had met patients with pain as the primary complaint and acute pain as the most common complaint. Insufficient pain management in Indonesian healthcare, insufficient pain epidemiological data, and unaware HCP about MPC become problems of pain management in Indonesia. However, most HCP agreed that health facilities should have MPC. Financial issues (insufficient patient insurance) were considered the most important barrier for referring patients to MPC. Conclusion: The identified core problem, HCP perceptions, expectations and challenges of MPC establishment should become a consideration in the strategic planning of MPC establishment.

Knowledge and perception of health-care professionals on clinical trials in India: A pan-Indian cross-sectional survey.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the knowledge and perception of health-care professionals (HCPs), such as doctors/surgeons, pharmacists, nurses, optometrists, and lab technicians, on clinical trials (CTs) in India. The study was a pan-Indian cross-sectional survey initiated by the Indian Ophthalmology Clinical Trial Network (IOCTN) by using a previously validated questionnaire for three months of data collection. An online survey was used to record information regarding demographics, CT knowledge, and CT perception among HCPs. A total of 630 responses were recorded from HCPs: 207 doctors and surgeons, 159 pharmacists, and 264 laboratory technicians, nurses, and optometrists across India. Over 90% of HCPs had a clear knowledge on the purpose of CTs, the informed consent (IC) process, ethical approval by the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI). About 80% and 90% were aware of confidentiality of patients, voluntariness of participation, and good clinical practice. Surprisingly, less than 50% had lesser knowledge regarding monetary incentives of CT participants (CTPs). A slightly positive perception was observed regarding the potential benefits of CTPs, compensation related to injury, and importance of obtaining IC. Less than 50% had a negative perception that monetary compensation to CTPs led to bias and deprivation of standard treatments. However, no significant difference was observed between other aspects of demographics and perception regarding CTs. We observed doctors and surgeons to be having the highest regarding CTs, followed by pharmacists. The survey highlighted the necessity of scheduling awareness programs among the HCPs, which would improve their misconceptions and perception of CTs while interacting with patients for CT enrollment.

An E-survey study protocol for the perception of African healthcare professionals on the intrathecal injection of antitetanic serum for the treatment of tetanus

Abstract Background Tetanus remains a public health neuroinfectious burden in Africa, accounting for the long stay in hospitals. For the past two decades, intrathecal injection of antitetanic serum has been described by several meta-analyses as the therapy for the treatment of tetanus with the best outcome. Particularly with neonatal tetanus, but in Africa, the reality faced by healthcare professionals is in contradiction to the literature. This study aims to assess the perception of healthcare professionals regarding the intrathecal administration of antitetanic serum for the treatment of tetanus, to decide on which action to undertake to preserve patients’ health. Methodology Data will be collected through a self-administered Qualtrics questionnaire from a Qualtrics account. The minimum and maximum sample sizes calculated were, respectively, 384 and 426. Anonymous links to the three versions of the questionnaire will be disseminated from 15 May 2023 to 15 July 2023, through mobile phones, social media (WhatsApp, LinkedIn, Telegram) and e-mail. Ata shall be analyzed with SPSS version 26 (IBM, WA, USA). The analyzed data will be presented as frequency tables and charts. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals, Chi-Square test and analysis of variance will be used to test for associations between independent and dependent variables. A P-value &amp;lt;0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Dissemination Our study findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and the abstract will be presented at an international conference.

Assessing Factors Influencing Commitment to a Disparities Reduction Intervention: Social Justice Attitudes and Organizational Mission.

This mixed-methods study aims to understand what the perceptions of leaders and healthcare professionals are regarding causes of disparities, cultural competence, and motivation before launching a disparity reduction project in hypertension care, contrasting perceptions in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and in a non-FQHC system. We interviewed leaders of six participating primary care systems and surveyed providers and staff. FQHC respondents reported more positive cultural competence attitudes and behavior, higher motivation to implement the project, and less concern about barriers to caring for disadvantaged patients than those in the non-FQHC practices; however, egalitarian beliefs were similar among all. Qualitative analysis suggested that the organizational missions of the FQHCs reflect their critical role in serving vulnerable populations. All system leaders were aware of the challenges of provider care to underserved groups, but comprehensive initiatives to address social determinants of health and improve cultural competence were still needed in both system types. The study provides insights into the perceptions and motivations of primary care organizational leaders and providers who are interested in improving chronic care. It also offers an example for care disparity programs to understand commitment and values of the participants for tailoring interventions and setting baseline for progress.

Healthcare Professionals and Patient Perceptions on the Use of Herbal Medicines to Control Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension in Nigeria

The perception that herbal medicines are generally safe and non-toxic, has all necessitated patients' use of herbs in the management of diabetes and hypertension. The study evaluated healthcare professionals' and patients' perceptions of the use of herbs to control diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension. The study utilized a randomized sampling method for the survey; an online form was designed and used for data collection. The questionnaire was sent to professional and non-professional groups having the target population (patients and relatives. The results showed that the majority of the participants stated the use of Vernonia amagdalena in the management of HTN (33.0%) and DM (9.9%). Other plants mentioned include Moringa leaves HTN n (5.5%), DM n(6.6%); Carica papaya; HTN (9.9%), DM (8.2); Ginger, and DM (12.6%). Dogoyaro/Agbo (4.9%). Notable antidiabetic plants reported in this study include Rauwolfia vomitoria (1.1%), Ugu leaves (2.2%), Hibiscus (zobo) (4.4%), Ocimum gratiscimum (1.1%), cucumber (1.1%), neem plant (3.8%). Previous knowledge on Diabetes Mellitus between the patients and healthcare workers was P=0.038 while previous knowledge on hypertension was p=0.029. The knowledge of herbal product(s) used in diabetes was p=0.043 while knowledge of herbal product(s) used in hypertension was p=0.019, at p&lt;0.05. It was thus concluded that the participants believe that herbal medicines can relieve disease within a short period, are effective at the correct dosage, have fewer side effects or no side effects at the proper doses, and can effect a complete cure if standardized, affordable, better tolerated in the body.