Egocentric Distance Perception Research Articles

Distance Perception in Virtual Reality: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Head-Mounted Display Characteristics.

Distances are commonly underperceived in virtual reality (VR), and this finding has been documented repeatedly over more than two decades of research. Yet, there is evidence that perceived distance is more accurate in modern compared to older head-mounted displays (HMDs). This meta-analysis, based on 137 samples from 61 publications, describes egocentric distance perception across 20 HMDs and examines the relationship between perceived distance and technical HMD characteristics. Judged distance was positively associated with HMD field of view (FOV), positively associated with HMD resolution, and negatively associated with HMD weight. The effects of FOV and resolution were more pronounced among heavier HMDs. These findings suggest that future improvements in these technical characteristics may be central to resolving the problem of distance underperception in VR.

Quantifying Egocentric Distance Perception in Virtual Reality Environment

In virtual reality (VR) studies, where object distance plays a role of an independent variable, unknown egocentric distance perception values can affect the interpretation of the collected data. It is known that the perceived egocentric distance in VR is often underestimated, which may affect other judgments that implicitly depend on it. In order to prepare later experiments on the effect of distance on audiovisual (a)synchrony perception, this study quantifies the egocentric distance perception in a virtual indoor environment using two methods: verbal judgment (VJ) and position adjustment (PA). For the VJ method, participants verbally estimated the distance between their own position and a cardboard box position at a distance between a nominal 5 m and 30 m, with increments of 5 m. For the PA method, participants were asked to position a cardboard box to an instructed distance of a nominal 5 m to 13 m, with increments of 1 m. Both methods (VJ and PA) showed significant and substantial levels of underestimation, where simulated distance was underestimated on average by 38.5%. Our study suggests taking these findings into account when treating distance as an independent parameter in experiments conducted in purely simulated virtual spaces which do not exist physically in the real world.

Reliability of distance estimation in virtual reality space: A quantitative approach for construction management

This paper reports a study aimed at assessing the reliability of decision-making for construction management based on visual observation of the built environment in virtual reality. The focus of this study is on egocentric distance perception, a critical factor in construction management decisions based on visual observation. The study evaluates the accuracy of distance estimation and walking a target distance in virtual reality, as compared to the real world, through experiments. The experimental results demonstrate that participants consistently underestimate distance and walk beyond the target distance. Notably, in virtual reality, they underestimated the distance by 22% more than they did in the real world, and they overwalked 53% more than they did in the real world. These findings offer valuable insights for construction managers reviewing digital twin models in virtual reality to make informed decisions. Furthermore, this study lays a foundation for future research on the reliability of understanding space occupancy in virtual reality.

Methods for measuring egocentric distance perception in visual modality.

Egocentric distance perception has been widely concerned by researchers in the field of spatial perception due to its significance in daily life. The frame of perception involves the perceived distance from an observer to an object. Over the years, researchers have been searching for an optimal way to measure the perceived distance and their contribution constitutes a critical aspect of the field. This paper summarizes the methodological findings and divides the measurement methods for egocentric distance perception into three categories according to the behavior types. The first is Perceptional Method, including successive equal-appearing intervals of distance judgment measurement, verbal report, and perceptual distance matching task. The second is Directed Action Method, including blind walking, blind-walking gesturing, blindfolded throwing, and blind rope pulling. The last one is Indirect Action Method, including triangulation-by-pointing and triangulation-by-walking. In the meantime, we summarize each method's procedure, core logic, scope of application, advantages, and disadvantages. In the end, we discuss the future concerns of egocentric distance perception.

From pictures to reality: modelling the phenomenology and psychophysics of 3D perception.

The dominant inferential approach to human 3D perception assumes a model of spatial encoding based on a physical description of objects and space. Prevailing models based on this physicalist approach assume that the visual system infers an objective, unitary and mostly veridical representation ofthe external world. However, careful consideration of the phenomenology of 3Dperception challenges these assumptions. I review important aspects of phenomenology, psychophysics and neurophysiology which suggest that human visual perception of 3D objects and space is underwritten by distinct and dissociated spatial encodings that are optimized for specific regions of space. Specifically, I argue that 3D perception is underwritten by at least three distinct encodings for (1) egocentric distance perception at the ambulatory scale, (2) exocentric distance (scaled depth) perception optimized for near space, and (3) perception of object shape and layout (unscaled depth). This tripartite division can more satisfactorily account for the phenomenology, psychophysics and adaptive logic of human 3D perception. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'New approaches to 3D vision'.

Egocentric distance perception in older adults: Results from a functional magnetic resonance imaging and driving simulator study.

The ability to appropriately perceive distances in activities of daily living, such as driving, is necessary when performing complex maneuvers. With aging, certain driving behaviors and cognitive functions change; however, it remains unknown if egocentric distance perception (EDP) performance is altered and whether its neural activity also changes as we grow older. To that end, 19 young and 17 older healthy adults drove in a driving simulator and performed an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment where we presented adults with an EDP task. We discovered that (a) EDP task performance was similar between groups, with higher response times in older adults; (b) older adults showed higher prefrontal and parietal activation; and (c) higher functional connectivity within frontal and parietal-occipital-cerebellar networks; and (d) an association between EDP performance and hard braking behaviors in the driving simulator was found. In conclusion, EDP functioning remains largely intact with aging, possibly due to an extended and effective rearrangement in functional brain resources, and may play a role in braking behaviors while driving.

Auditory-visual interactions in egocentric distance perception: Ventriloquism effect and aftereffect.

This study describes data on auditory-visual integration and visually-guided adaptation of auditory distance perception using the ventriloquism effect (VE) and ventriloquism aftereffect (VAE). In an experiment, participants judged egocentric distance of interleaved auditory or auditory-visual stimuli with the auditory component located from 0.7 to 2.04 m in front of listeners in a real reverberant environment. The visual component of auditory-visual stimuli was displaced 30% closer (V-closer), 30% farther (V-farther), or aligned (V-aligned) with respect to the auditory component. The VE and VAE were measured in auditory and auditory-visual trials, respectively. Both effects were approximately independent of target distance when expressed in logarithmic units. The VE strength, defined as a difference of V-misaligned and V-aligned response bias, was approximately 72% of the auditory-visual disparity regardless of the visual-displacement direction, while the VAE was stronger in the V-farther (44%) than the V-closer (31%) condition. The VAE persisted to post-adaptation auditory-only blocks of trials, although it was diminished. The rates of build-up/break-down of the VAE were asymmetrical, with slower adaptation in the V-closer condition. These results suggest that auditory-visual distance integration is independent of the direction of induced shift, while the re-calibration is stronger and faster when evoked by more distant visual stimuli.

Perception of action-relevant egocentric distance is not underestimated in virtual reality

Perception of action-relevant egocentric distance is not underestimated in virtual reality

The foggy effect of egocentric distance in a nonverbal paradigm

Inaccurate egocentric distance and speed perception are two main explanations for the high accident rate associated with driving in foggy weather. The effect of foggy weather on speed has been well studied. However, its effect on egocentric distance perception is poorly understood. The paradigm for measuring perceived egocentric distance in previous studies was verbal estimation instead of a nonverbal paradigm. In the current research, a nonverbal paradigm, the visual matching task, was used. Our results from the nonverbal task revealed a robust foggy effect on egocentric distance. Observers overestimated the egocentric distance in foggy weather compared to in clear weather. The higher the concentration of fog, the more serious the overestimation. This effect of fog on egocentric distance was not limited to a certain distance range but was maintained in action space and vista space. Our findings confirm the foggy effect with a nonverbal paradigm and reveal that people may perceive egocentric distance more "accurately" in foggy weather than when it is measured with a verbal estimation task.

Egocentric Distance Perception Disorder in Amblyopia.

Egocentric distance perception is a psychological process in which observers use various depth cues to estimate the distance between a target and themselves. The impairment of basic visual function and treatment of amblyopia have been well documented. However, the disorder of egocentric distance perception of amblyopes is poorly understood. In this review, we describe the cognitive mechanism of egocentric distance perception, and then, we focus on empirical evidence for disorders in egocentric distance perception for amblyopes in the whole visual space. In the personal space (within 2 m), it is difficult for amblyopes to show normal hand-eye coordination; in the action space (within 2 m~30 m), amblyopes cannot accurately judge the distance of a target suspended in the air. Few studies have focused on the performance of amblyopes in the vista space (more than 30 m). Finally, five critical topics for future research are discussed: 1) it is necessary to systematically explore the mechanism of egocentric distance perception in all three spaces; 2) the laws of egocentric distance perception in moving objects for amblyopes should be explored; and 3) the comparison of three subtypes of amblyopia is still insufficient; 4) study the perception of distance under another theoretical framework; 5) explore the mechanisms of amblyopia by Virtual Reality.

Estimating Distances in Action Space in Augmented Reality

Augmented reality ( AR ) is important for training complex tasks, such as navigation, assembly, and medical procedures. The effectiveness of such training may depend on accurate spatial localization of AR objects in the environment. This article presents two experiments that test egocentric distance perception in augmented reality within and at the boundaries of action space (up to 35 m) in comparison with distance perception in a matched real-world ( RW ) environment. Using the Microsoft HoloLens, in Experiment 1, participants in two different RW settings judged egocentric distances (ranging from 10 to 35 m) to an AR avatar or a real person using a visual matching measure. Distances to augmented targets were underestimated compared to real targets in the two indoor, RW contexts. Experiment 2 aimed to generalize the results to an absolute distance measure using verbal reports in one of the indoor environments. Similar to Experiment 1, distances to augmented targets were underestimated compared to real targets. We discuss these findings with respect to the importance of methodologies that directly compare performance in real and mediated environments, as well as the inherent differences present in mediated environments that are “matched” to the real world.

Effect of Angle of View and Partial Sleep Deprivation on Distance Perception.

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of intensive effort on egocentric distance perception according to different angles of view after sleep deprivation at the beginning (SDB) or at the end (SDE) of the night and after a normal sleep night (NNS). Ten male students soccer players (age 22.8 ± 1.3 years; body mass 72.0 ± 10.4 kg; body height 180.0 ± 3.0 cm) performed a repeated cycling (RS) exercise (10 × 6 s maximal cycling with 24 s in between) after SDB, SDE, and NNS. They were asked to estimate three distances (i.e. 15, 25, and 35 m) before and after RS from different angles of view [i.e. in front (0°) and in side (45° left and 45° right)]. For 35 m, distance estimation was better during NNS compared to SDB and SDE for the front and the two side angles either before or after RS (p < 0.05). Concerning 25 m, distance estimation was better after compared to before RS for the front angle during the NNS session (p < 0.05). For 15 m, distance estimation was better during NNS than SDB and SDE for the front and both side angles after RS (p < 0.05). We concluded that partial sleep deprivation negatively affected the estimation of the egocentric distance for the three angles of view either at rest or after RS exercise.

Influences of Experience and Visual Cues of Virtual Arm on Distance Perception.

Egocentric distance perception refers to the perception of distance from a target to a perceiver, which is an important component of visual space perception. It is important to activities in virtual environments and influenced by several factors, such as action capacities and visual cues. However, few studies have investigated such aspects. Hence, Experiments 1 and 2 investigated the effect of using experience and visual cues, respectively, of virtual arms on egocentric distance perception in near and far spaces at equal, prolonged, and shortened lengths of a virtual arm. Results revealed that using experience and visual cues of the virtual arm had a significant effect on egocentric distance perception when the length of virtual arm was equal to the real arm and prolonged but not when shortened. The egocentric distance perception on the conditions of having using experience and virtual arm was most precise. The findings provide implications for the design and implementation of virtual body self-representation in virtual environments.

Measuring egocentric distance perception in virtual reality: Influence of methodologies, locomotion and translation gains.

Virtual reality has become a popular means to study human behavior in a wide range of settings, including the role of pedestrians in traffic research. To understand distance perception in virtual environments is thereby crucial to the interpretation of results, as reactions to complex and dynamic traffic scenarios depend on perceptual processes allowing for the correct anticipation of future events. A number of approaches have been suggested to quantify perceived distances. While previous studies imply that the selected method influences the estimates’ accuracy, it is unclear how the respective estimates depend on depth information provided by different perceptual modalities. In the present study, six methodological approaches were compared in a virtual city scenery. The respective influence of visual and non-visual cues was investigated by manipulating the ratio between visually perceived and physically walked distances. In a repeated measures design with 30 participants, significant differences between methods were observed, with the smallest error occurring for visually guided walking and verbal estimates. A linear relation emerged between the visual-to-physical ratio and the extent of underestimation, indicating that non-visual cues during walking affected distance estimates. This relationship was mainly evident for methods building on actual or imagined walking movements and verbal estimates.

Invalidly cued targets are well localized when detected.

Considerable attention has been devoted to understanding how objects are localized when there is ample time and attention to detect them. However, in the real world, we often must react to, or act upon, objects that we have glimpsed only briefly and are not directly at the focus of our attention. This paper describes two experiments examining the role of attentional constraints on 2-D (directional) localization, particularly in cases in which targets have been detected but are not within the spatial focus of attention. Targets were asterisks presented briefly (34-150 ms) above or below a central fixation point. Just prior to the target's appearance, a cue directed attention toward, or away from, the target. Participants indicated whether or not they saw the target, and then used a mouse to indicate the target's location. The impact of guessing was mitigated by removing trials that participants had flagged as not detected. Longer glimpses generally benefitted localization; by contrast, cue validity had very little effect on response sensitivity, bias or precision. At very brief durations, invalid cueing did result in a small increase in foveal bias. These results indicate that the directional location of objects can be extracted reasonably well from brief glimpses even with reduced attention. This directional information provides an important basis for 3-D localization of objects on the ground, via their angular declination. The current studies suggest that egocentric distance perception might be similarly robust to reduced attention when localization is based primarily on a target's angular declination.

Distinguish egocentric distance perception from traveled distance perception.

Distinguish egocentric distance perception from traveled distance perception.

Misperception of egocentric distances in virtual environments: More a question of training than a technological issue?

Findings from virtual reality applications in general and driving or flight simulators in particular, are frequently generalized to the study of human behavior. Thus, it is crucial to ensure that the virtuality of the experimental setup has little or no effect on perception of space and motion. Most studies show that observers immersed in virtual environments (VE) perceive virtual space as compressed relative to the real world, resulting in systematic underestimations of egocentric distance. Parallax and stereopsis, known to be important depth cues for distance perception, at least for short distances, are rarely used together in driving simulators, so their interactive role during driving tasks is still not clear. Inter-individual differences in misperception are also referred to, though few studies have explored this. The aim of this study was, first, to determine whether egocentric distance perception in driving simulation depends on two depth cues, binocular disparity and motion parallax, and, second, to examine the effect of inter-individual differences. Several conditions were tested, both with and without stereoscopic vision of the scene and/or motion parallax of the head. We focused first on a range of long distances, 40–80 m (Experiment 1) and subsequently widened the range to distances from 5 to 80 m, thereby including short distances where stereopsis should be more relevant (Experiment 2). The study reveals great inter-individual variability, clearly distinguishing two participant profiles. However, results suggest that such differences do not depend on the availability of motion parallax and stereoscopic vision.The findings also show that an initial familiarization phase, under conditions similar to those of the experiments, can be predictive of participants’ perceptual behavior.

Egocentric distance perception and performance of direct pointing in stereoscopic displays

In this study, the interaction performances and spatial perceptions in stereoscopic environments were investigated. The experiment compared direct user interactions during pointing at a target, which was continuously visible or presented briefly and disappeared, in both stereoscopic and real environments, at three parallax/depth levels. The position data, collected by a motion system, were used to compute accuracy, signed error, movement time, and throughput. The results showed inaccurate egocentric distance judgment in stereoscopic displays and accurate perceptions in the real world. The overall inaccuracy, which was overestimation of about 10 cm, was relatively better than that achieved in previous studies. The overestimation decreased as the egocentric distance increased. However, providing visual objects did not improve the accuracy. The study concluded that direct pointing could minimize the underestimation problems commonly reported in stereoscopic viewing studies and showed practical significance for developers to focus on incorporating more direct and natural human-virtual reality interactions for improved performance. The findings of this study provide insight towards the development of less expensive displays and their applications. Implications of this work and engineering solutions are also discussed.

Perception of Egocentric Distance during Gravitational Changes in Parabolic Flight.

We explored the effect of gravity on the perceived representation of the absolute distance of objects to the observers within the range from 1.5–6 m. Experiments were performed on board the CNES Airbus Zero-G during parabolic flights eliciting repeated exposures to short periods of microgravity (0 g), hypergravity (1.8 g), and normal gravity (1 g). Two methods for obtaining estimates of perceived egocentric distance were used: verbal reports and visually directed motion toward a memorized visual target. For the latter method, because normal walking is not possible in 0 g, blindfolded subjects translated toward the visual target by pulling on a rope with their arms. The results showed that distance estimates using both verbal reports and blind pulling were significantly different between normal gravity, microgravity, and hypergravity. Compared to the 1 g measurements, the estimates of perceived distance using blind pulling were shorter for all distances in 1.8 g, whereas in 0 g they were longer for distances up to 4 m and shorter for distances beyond. These findings suggest that gravity plays a role in both the sensorimotor system and the perceptual/cognitive system for estimating egocentric distance.

Editorial: Dynamics of Sensorimotor Interactions in Embodied Cognition.

Editorial: Dynamics of Sensorimotor Interactions in Embodied Cognition.