Newborns with growth restriction have been found to be at risk of cognitive delay. We sought to determine if there is cognitive delay among newborns who are large-for-gestational age [LGA; birthweight ≥ 90% for weight for gestational age (WGA)] vs. those who are not. The nationally-representative Early Childhood Longitudinal Study -Birth Cohort (ECLS-B; US Center for Education Statistics) data set was utilized to identify non-anomalous, singletons with birthweight ≥ vs. < 90%. An additional analysis compared cognitive function among newborns ≥ vs. < 95%. Cognitive and academic functioning was measured at four time points: 9 months, 2 years, 3.5 years, and 5.5 years. The association between high WGA and cognitive functioning at each time point was examined using a series of confounder-adjusted General Linear Models (GLM) based methods, to best characterize the potential developmental impact of high WGA. Of 3,043 cases that met criteria, 267 (9.6%) were ≥ 90% WGA. In terms of cognitive performance, children who were ≥ 90% WGA were not statistically different from children between 5%-89% WGA at 9 months, 2 years, Preschool (3.5 years), or Kindergarten (5.5 years) time points (F (1, 2794) = 5.107, p = .068), nor did they change at different rates across early childhood (Wilk's λ (3, 2792) = 0.600, p = .615). The sample size of 3,043 permitted .80 power at α = .05 to detect differences as small as 7.1 percentile points around typical (50th percentile) performance, with greater sensitivity at extreme values. The 95th percentile cut point yielded similar results. There is no difference in cognitive function in children with birthweight ≥ vs. < 90% for gestational age. The long-term risk for LGA infants remains metabolic (i.e. obesity and diabetes).