Per-protocol Population Research Articles

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Quality of Life and Medication Adherence in Patients on Antidepressant Monotherapy.

Background and objectives The quality of life declines with the growing severity of major depressive disorder (MDD). In depressed people, medication adherence and the quality of life are mutually corrosive. These concerns spurred the investigation of relationships between treatment outcomes and adherence levels. Limited studies are looking at how vortioxetine, escitalopram, and vilazodone affect these parameters. We aimed to detect how the Short Form-36 (SF-36) had changed 16 weeks after the baseline. The connection between treatment results (as expressed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scaleor HDRS) and medication adherence (as reflected by the MoriskyMedication Adherence Scale-8or MMAS-8) was also explored. Methods An open-label, randomized, three-arm trial with 96 MDD patients was conducted. For 16 weeks, the participants were put into three groups per a 1:1:1 ratio and administered tablets of vilazodone (20-40 mg/day), escitalopram (10-20 mg/day), or vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day). There were two test drugs: vilazodone and vortioxetine; the control was escitalopram. Four weeks apart, follow-up appointments were set after the baseline visit. The HDRS, mental and physical components of SF-36, and MMAS-8 scores were evaluated in the per-protocol (PP) population. Reduced HDRS scores were indicative of improved depression symptoms. Higher MMAS-8 and SF-36 scores indicated high drug adherence and enhanced quality of life. Our analysis used the Kruskal-Wallis test, the Bonferroni correction, and the Sankey diagram. In the Clinical Trial Registry-India (CTRI), we recorded this study prospectively (2022/07/043808). Results One hundred nine (81.34%) of the 134 individuals we examined were eligible. The PP population consisted of 96 (88.07%) of them who wrapped up the 16-week study. The mean age of the group was 46.3 ± 6.2 years. For each of the three groups, the SF-36 physical component scores revealed a median difference of 24.5 (23.8-26.0), 24.0 (22.8-25.3), and 27.0 (25.0-29.0) (p = 0.001). Accordingly, the mental components of their SF-36 scores showed a median difference of 32.0 (31.0-33.3), 31.0 (29.8-34.3), and 36.0 (33.0-38.0) (p = 0.001). A median difference of -15.0 (-16.0 to -14.0), -16.0 (-17.0 to -15.0), and -16.0 (-17.0 to -15.8) was observed in the HDRS scores after 16 weeks, with respect to the baseline (p < 0.001). The median MMAS-8 scores at 16 weeks were 6.0 (6.0-7.0), 6.8 (6.0-7.0), and 7.5 (6.5-8.0)(p = 0.031). The Sankey diagram illustrated the connection between better treatment results, increased medication compliance, and decreased symptoms of depression. Conclusion In comparison to vilazodone and escitalopram, vortioxetine demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in HDRS scores and an improvement in the physical and mental component scores of the SF-36. Clinical improvements were evident in the individuals' drug adherence levels. Larger-scale studies are advised to investigate the effects of these medications on the quality of life, medication adherence, and treatment outcomes.

Final overall survival results from phase 3 SPOTLIGHT study evaluating zolbetuximab + mFOLFOX6 as first-line (1L) treatment for patients (pts) with claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2)+, HER2−, locally advanced (LA) unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

4036 Background: The phase 3 SPOTLIGHT study showed statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with 1L zolbetuximab + modified folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin regimen (mFOLFOX6) vs placebo (PBO) + mFOLFOX6 in pts with CLDN18.2+, HER2−, LA unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma at prespecified interim and later updated analyses. We present the prespecified final OS analysis. Methods: Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to zolbetuximab IV 800 mg/m2 (cycle 1, day [D] 1) followed by 600 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks) + mFOLFOX6 IV (D1, D15, D29) for four 42-day cycles or to PBO + mFOLFOX6; pts without PD continued with zolbetuximab or PBO, + folinic acid and 5-FU at investigator’s discretion, until PD or discontinuation criteria were met. The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST v1.1 by IRC. OS was a key secondary endpoint; additional secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Ad hoc analyses examined PFS and OS in per-protocol set population (PPS; pts adherent to protocol) and time to progression (TTP) by best overall response (BOR). Results: At data cutoff (September 8, 2023), 565 pts were assigned to zolbetuximab arm (n = 283) or PBO arm (n = 282). In zolbetuximab vs PBO arms, median follow-up was 18.04 vs 17.91 mo for PFS and 33.28 vs 31.38 mo for OS, respectively. Efficacy results are summarized in Table. Median PFS and OS were significantly longer in zolbetuximab vs PBO arms. Separation of PFS and OS curves occurred earlier in the PPS population analysis (excluded majority of early withdrawals) compared with the ITT population. ORR was similar between treatment arms in ITT and pts with measurable lesions – despite this, TTP for patients with BOR of CR/PR was numerically longer in zolbetuximab vs PBO arms. Safety and tolerability were maintained with no new findings. Conclusions: Zolbetuximab + mFOLFOX6 continued to demonstrate statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS vs PBO + mFOLFOX6, with no new safety signals—supporting zolbetuximab + mFOLFOX6 as a new standard of care option for 1L treatment of pts with CLDN18.2+, HER2–, LA unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03504397 . [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by salvage surgery and adjuvant tislelizumab for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after radiotherapy: A single-arm, phase II trial.

6070 Background: Locoregional recurrence remains a significant challenge in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after surgery and radiotherapy. Salvage surgery is the best option if negative margins can be achieved, and this can be strengthened in the era of immunotherapy. However, some relevant questions remain unanswered. The objectives of this prospective study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy followed by salvage surgery and adjuvant tislelizumab for recurrent HNSCC after radiotherapy. Methods: In this phase II, single-arm study, eligible pts 18 years of age or older with locoregional recurrent HNSCC after radiotherapy received neoadjuvant therapy with tislelizumab (200 mg), albumin-bound paclitaxel (260 mg/m2), and cisplatin (60-75 mg/m2) Q3W for 2 cycles, followed by salvage surgery and adjuvant tislelizumab (200 mg) Q3W for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR) rate. Secondary endpoints included pathological complete response (pCR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Between March 2022 and September 2023, 34 pts were enrolled. Median age was 56 (30-75) yrs, 20.6% smoking history, 20.6% alcohol history and 61.8% male. All pts completed neoadjuvant therapy with an ORR of 35.3% (12/34) and DCR of 94.1% (32/34). Twenty-six pts (23 OSCC, 3 OPSCC) successfully underwent surgery with MPR rate 19.2% (5/26), of which the pCR rate was 15.4% (4/26). At median follow-up of 15.1 months, 1-year EFS was 63.4% and 1-year OS was 82.5% for per-protocol population. Twenty-five pts complained symptoms included pain, trismus, dysphagic, and speech disorders at baseline visit, and 84% (21/25) achieved remission after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) with an incidence greater than 10% include 94.1% alopecia, 38.2% fatigue, 35.3% anorexia, 17.6% hypothyroidism and 14.7% anemia. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 1 pts (2.9%) with G3 hyperglycemia. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant tislelizumab with salvage surgery is well tolerated. The 1-year EFS and OS compared favorably with historical data. These encouraging results warrant further investigations. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100054296.

Phase II study of sitravatinib in combination with tislelizumab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who have failed to at least 1 prior systemic treatment.

4018 Background: In first line of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy is now standard of care supported by TOPAZ-1 and KN-966 studies. With this landscape, new drug development using ICI in second or later line setting is urgent unmet medical needs area. Anti-angiogenic agent induced improved anti-tumor immune responses by increasing tumor antigen presentation and promoting lymphocyte infiltration and migration. Methods: This study is an open-label, phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy of sitravatinib and tislelizumab (PD1 inhibitor) combination treatment for 2L advanced BTC. Patients who received prior ICI could be enrolled. All patients received sitravatinib 120mg orally once daily in combination with tislelizumab 200mg intravenously once every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), with key secondary endpoints including overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Tissue biopsies were conducted three times in total: screening, the first response evaluation, and disease progression. Blood samples were collected every cycles. (NCT04727996) Results: A total of 43 patients were enrolled. Data-cut off was on July 31, 2023. Median follow-up was 10.5months (95% Confidence interval (CI), 7.03-15.6). 9 patients had received prior ICI. This study met primary endpoint as a DCR of 65.1% in all population. ORR was 20.5% in unselected per-protocol population, and PFS was 4.93 months (95% CI, 3.10-8.87). OS was 10.3months (95% CI, 6.67-18.2). Similar efficacy was observed regardless of prior ICI exposure. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were sitravatinib-related; hand-foot syndrome (any grade 60.5%, grade 3/4 0%), hypertension (any grade 34.9%, grade 3/4 11.6%). Immune-related AEs (irAEs) were 46.5%, with most irAEs being grade 1-2. In exploratory analysis, patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) detected by baseline tissue NGS (frequency 18.5%) showed higher ORR (60% vs 13.6%), longer PFS (not reached vs 4.87 months) and OS (21.1 vs 8.57 months) than patients without HRD. HRD detected by circulating tumor DNA had a complementary role for patient selection. RNA sequencing showed upregulation in inflammatory signal and downregulation in angiogenesis signal between screening and on-treatment tumor tissue. Responders showed higher inflammatory signaling at baseline and on-treatment tumor tissue compared to non-responders. Conclusions: Sitravatinib/tiselizumab combination as 2L therapy in patients with advanced BTC demonstrated meaningful efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Especially, patient selection using HRD biomarker might be a promising strategy in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT04727996 .

Optimisation of dose level and vaccination schedule for the VLA15 Lyme borreliosis vaccine candidate among healthy adults: two randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 2 studies

Rising Lyme borreliosis incidence rates, potential for severe outcomes, and limitations in accurate and timely diagnosis for treatment initiation suggest the need for a preventive vaccine; however, no vaccine is currently available for human use. We performed two studies in adults to optimise the dose level and vaccination schedule for VLA15, an investigational Lyme borreliosis vaccine targeting outer surface protein A (OspA) serotypes 1-6, which are associated with the most common pathogenic Borrelia species in Europe and North America. Both randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 2 studies included participants aged 18-65 years without recent history of Lyme borreliosis or tick bites. Study one was conducted at nine clinical research and study centre sites in the USA (n=6), Germany (n=2), and Belgium (n=1); study two was conducted at five of the study one US sites. Based on a randomisation list created by an unmasked statistician for each study, participants were randomly assigned via an electronic case report form randomisation module to receive 90 μg (study one only), 135 μg, or 180 μg VLA15 or placebo by intramuscular injection at months 0, 1, and 2 (study one) or 0, 2, and 6 (study two). Study one began with a run-in phase to confirm safety, after which the Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended the removal of the 90 μg group and continuation of the study. In the study one run-in phase, randomisation was stratified by study site, whereas in the study one main phase and in study two, randomisation was stratified by study site, age group, and baseline B burgdorferi (sensu lato) serostatus. All individuals were masked, other than staff involved in randomisation, vaccine preparation or administration, or safety data monitoring. The primary endpoint for both studies was OspA-specific IgG geometric mean titres (GMTs) at 1 month after the third vaccination and was evaluated in the per-protocol population. Safety endpoints were evaluated in the safety population: all participants who received at least one vaccination. Both studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (study one NCT03769194 and study two NCT03970733) and are completed. For study one, 573 participants were screened and randomly assigned to treatment groups between Dec 21, 2018, and Sept, 26, 2019. For study two, 248 participants were screened and randomly assigned between June 26 and Sept 3, 2019. In study one, 29 participants were assigned to receive 90 μg VLA15, 215 to 135 μg, 205 to 180 μg, and 124 to placebo. In study two, 97 participants were assigned to receive 135 μg VLA15, 100 to 180 μg, and 51 to placebo. At 1 month after the third vaccination (ie, month 3), OspA-specific IgG GMTs in study one ranged from 74·3 (serotype 1; 95% CI 46·4-119·0) to 267·4 units per mL (serotype 3; 194·8-367·1) for 90 μg VLA15, 101·9 (serotype 1; 87·1-119·4) to 283·2 units per mL (serotype 3; 248·2-323·1) for 135 μg, and 115·8 (serotype 1; 98·8-135·7) to 308·6 units per mL (serotype 3; 266·8-356·8) for 180 μg. In study two, ranges at 1 month after the third vaccination (ie, month 7) were 278·5 (serotype 1; 214·9-361·0) to 545·2 units per mL (serotype 2; 431·8-688·4) for 135 μg VLA15 and 274·7 (serotype 1; 209·4-360·4) to 596·8 units per mL (serotype 3; 471·9-754·8) for 180 μg. Relative to placebo, the VLA15 groups had more frequent reports of solicited local adverse events (study one: 94%, 95% CI 91-96 vs 26%, 19-34; study two: 96%, 93-98 vs 35%, 24-49 after any vaccination) and solicited systemic adverse events (study one: 69%, 65-73 vs 43%, 34-52; study two: 74%, 67-80 vs 51%, 38-64); most were mild or moderate. In study one, unsolicited adverse events were reported by 52% (48-57) of participants in the VLA15 groups and 52% (43-60) of those in the placebo groups; for study two these were 65% (58-71) and 69% (55-80), respectively. Percentages of participants reporting serious unsolicited adverse events (study one: 2%, 1-4; study two: 4%, 2-7) and adverse events of special interest (study one: 1%, 0-2; study two: 1%, 0-3) were low across all groups. A single severe, possibly related unsolicited adverse event was reported (worsening of pre-existing ventricular extrasystoles, which resolved after change of relevant concomitant medication); no related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. VLA15 was safe, well tolerated, and elicited robust antibody responses to all six OspA serotypes. These findings support further clinical development of VLA15 using the 180 μg dose and 0-2-6-month schedule, which was associated with the greatest immune responses. Valneva.

Evaluation of Dry Eye Treatment with Sodium Hyaluronate- and Dexpanthenol-Containing Eye Drops on Ocular Surface Improvement after Cataract Surgery.

To clinically evaluate how dry eye symptoms in preoperatively diagnosed dry eye patients change with the use of sodium hyaluronate- and dexpanthenol-containing eye drops (HYLO CARE (HC), URSAPHARM Arzneimittel GmbH, Saarbruecken, Germany) after cataract surgery. The aim of the study was not to compare different eye drops but to implement standard treatment in patients with dry eye undergoing cataract surgery. The impact of treatment was evaluated using Symptom Assessment Tools for Dry Eye. In this prospective, single-center, open-label clinical trial, 49 patients undergoing cataract surgery were included who showed signs and symptoms of dry eye disease assessed by the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) questionnaire, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and fluorescein tear break-up Time (TBUT). Patients were instructed to apply HC three to four times a day for 5 weeks in the operated eye in addition to the standard postoperative topical anti-inflammatory regimen. The primary endpoint was the change in TBUT. Secondary endpoints were the assessment of the subjective symptoms (VAS), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and slit-lamp examination including the corneal staining score, Schirmer test, and intraocular pressure. At 5 weeks after operation, the mean TBUT increased from 6.42 ± 1.57 s (s) to 7.81 ± 1.83 s in the per-protocol (PP) population (p > 0.001) and from 6.33 ± 1.64 s to 7.71 ± 2.05 s in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant decrease in all scores (p < 0.05) from the VAS questionnaire except for the tearing score (p = 0.062) at 5 weeks after operation. The mean total corneal staining score also decreased statistically significantly from 8.85 ± 2.49 before operation to 5.61 ± 3.37 at 5 weeks after operation on a 15-point scale. Controlled standardized dry eye treatment (with HC) improved tear film stability, ocular surface defects, and subjective symptoms of dry eye disease in patients 5 weeks after undergoing cataract surgery. Both the patient and physician assessments indicated high efficacy, tolerability, and a reliable safety profile, as indicated by the low number of at least possibly related adverse events (AE), suggesting its beneficial role in the postoperative management of the ocular surface (OS) in patients with dry eye symptoms prior to and after cataract surgery.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adalimumab Versus Cyclosporine for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study

Purpose To compare the 26-week cost-effectiveness of adalimumab-corticosteroids (ADA-CS) and cyclosporine-corticosteroids (CSA-CS) for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH). Methods A preplanned cost-effectiveness analysis based on the per-protocol population of a randomized-controlled trial. VKH subjects were randomized to receive either cyclosporine (100-200 mg daily) combined with corticosteroids or adalimumab (40 mg twice monthly) combined with corticosteroids. The primary outcome of this cost-effectiveness study was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) data were calculated by the medical records and health utility, respectively. Subgroup (early and late-phase VKH) analysis and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results The ICER at 26 weeks was $62,425/QALY for the total participants. Compared to the CSA-CS group, costs in the ADA-CS group were more expensive (mean difference [ΔA-C]: $2,497) with more gains in QALYs (mean difference [ΔA-C]: 0.04). The probability of ADA-CS being cost-effective was 0.17 and 0.41 at willingness to pay (WTP) thresholds of $12,000/QALY and $36,000/QALY, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analyses showed consistent findings with the primary analysis. Conclusions Regardless of early or late-phase VKH, the CSA-CS strategy may be recommended as the preferred initial choice for the majority of VKH.

Bariatric surgery for spontaneous ovulation in women living with polycystic ovary syndrome: the BAMBINI multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of anovulatory infertility. Obesity exacerbates the reproductive complications of PCOS; however, the management of obesity in women with PCOS remains a large unmet clinical need. Observational studies have indicated that bariatric surgery could improve the rates of ovulatory cycles and prospects of fertility; however, the efficacy of surgery on ovulation rates has not yet been compared with behavioural modifications and medical therapy in a randomised trial. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery versus medical care on ovulation rates in women with PCOS, obesity, and oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea. In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, 80 women older than 18 years, with a diagnosis of PCOS based on the 2018 international evidence-based guidelines for assessing and managing PCOS, and a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or higher, were recruited from two specialist obesity management centres and via social media. Participants were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either vertical sleeve gastrectomy or behavioural interventions and medical therapy using a computer-generated random sequence (PLAN procedure in SAS) by an independent researcher not involved with any other aspect of the clinical trial. The median age of the entire cohort was 31 years and 79% of participants were White. The primary outcome was the number of biochemically confirmed ovulatory events over 52 weeks, and was assessed using weekly serum progesterone measurements. The primary endpoint included the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were per-protocol population. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN16668711). Participants were recruited from Feb 20, 2020 to Feb 1, 2021. 40 participants were assigned to each group and there were seven dropouts in the medical group and ten dropouts in the surgical group. The median number of ovulations was 6 (IQR 3·5-10·0) in the surgical group and 2 (0·0-4·0) in the medical group. Women in the surgical group had 2.5 times more spontaneous ovulations compared with the medical group (incidence rate ratio 2·5 [95% CI 1·5-4·2], p<0·0007). There were more complications in the surgical group than the medical group, although without long-term sequelae. There were 24 (66·7%) adverse events in the surgical group and 12 (30·0%) in the medical group. There were no treatment-related deaths. Bariatric surgery was more effective than medical care for the induction of spontaneous ovulation in women with PCOS, obesity, and oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea. Bariatric surgery could, therefore, enhance the prospects of spontaneous fertility in this group of women. The Jon Moulton Charity Trust.

Bedaquiline-pretomanid-moxifloxacin-pyrazinamide for drug-sensitive and drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis treatment: a phase 2c, open-label, multicentre, partially randomised controlled trial

The current tuberculosis (TB) drug development pipeline is being re-populated with candidates, including nitroimidazoles such as pretomanid, that exhibit a potential to shorten TB therapy by exerting a bactericidal effect on non-replicating bacilli. Based on results from preclinical and early clinical studies, a four-drug combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and pyrazinamide (BPaMZ) regimen was identified with treatment-shortening potential for both drug-susceptible (DS) and drug-resistant (DR) TB. This trial aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of BPaMZ. We compared 4 months of BPaMZ to the standard 6 months of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE) in DS-TB. 6 months of BPaMZ was assessed in DR-TB. SimpliciTB was a partially randomised, phase 2c, open-label, clinical trial, recruiting participants at 26 sites in eight countries. Participants aged 18 years or older with pulmonary TB who were sputum smear positive for acid-fast bacilli were eligible for enrolment. Participants with DS-TB had Mycobacterium tuberculosis with sensitivity to rifampicin and isoniazid. Participants with DR-TB had M tuberculosis with resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, or both. Participants with DS-TB were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by HIV status and cavitation on chest radiograph, using balanced block randomisation with a fixed block size of four. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to sputum culture-negative status by 8 weeks; the key secondary endpoint was unfavourable outcome at week 52. A non-inferiority margin of 12% was chosen for the key secondary outcome. Safety and tolerability outcomes are presented as descriptive analyses. The efficacy analysis population contained patients who received at least one dose of medication and who had efficacy data available and had no major protocol violations. The safety population contained patients who received at least one dose of medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03338621) and is completed. Between July 30, 2018, and March 2, 2020, 455 participants were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. 324 (71%) participants were male and 131 (29%) participants were female. 303 participants with DS-TB were randomly assigned to 4 months of BPaMZ (n=150) or HRZE (n=153). In a modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis, by week 8, 122 (84%) of 145 and 70 (47%) of 148 participants were culture-negative on 4 months of BPaMZ and HRZE, respectively, with a hazard ratio for earlier negative status of 2·93 (95% CI 2·17-3·96; p<0·0001). Median time to negative culture (TTN) was 6 weeks (IQR 4-8) on 4 months of BPaMZ and 11 weeks (6-12) on HRZE. 86% of participants with DR-TB receiving 6 months of BPaMZ (n=152) reached culture-negative status by week 8, with a median TTN of 5 weeks (IQR 3-7). At week 52, 120 (83%) of 144, 134 (93%) of 144, and 111 (83%) of 133 on 4 months of BPaMZ, HRZE, and 6 months of BPaMZ had favourable outcomes, respectively. Despite bacteriological efficacy, 4 months of BPaMZ did not meet the non-inferiority margin for the key secondary endpoint in the pre-defined mITT population due to higher withdrawal rates for adverse hepatic events. Non-inferiority was demonstrated in the per-protocol population confirming the effect of withdrawals with 4 months of BPaMZ. At least one liver-related treatment-emergent adverse effect (TEAE) occurred among 45 (30%) participants on 4 months of BPaMZ, 38 (25%) on HRZE, and 33 (22%) on 6 months of BPaMZ. Serious liver-related TEAEs were reported by 20 participants overall; 11 (7%) among those on 4 months of BPaMZ, one (1%) on HRZE, and eight (5%) on 6 months of BPaMZ. The most common reasons for discontinuation of trial treatment were hepatotoxicity (ten participants [2%]), increased hepatic enzymes (nine participants [2%]), QTcF prolongation (three participants [1%]), and hypersensitivity (two participants [<1%]). For DS-TB, BPaMZ successfully met the primary efficacy endpoint of sputum culture conversion. The regimen did not meet the key secondary efficacy endpoint due to adverse events resulting in treatment withdrawal. Our study demonstrated the potential for treatment-shortening efficacy of the BPaMZ regimen for DS-TB and DR-TB, providing clinical validation of a murine model widely used to identify such regimens. It also highlights that novel, treatment-shortening TB treatment regimens require an acceptable toxicity and tolerability profile with minimal monitoring in low-resource and high-burden settings. The increased risk of unpredictable severe hepatic adverse events with 4 months of BPaMZ would be a considerable obstacle to implementation of this regimen in settings with high burdens of TB with limited infrastructure for close surveillance of liver biochemistry. Future research should focus on improving the preclinical and early clinical detection and mitigation of safety issues together and further efforts to optimise shorter treatments. TB Alliance.

Adapted EXTREME regimen in the first-line treatment of fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ELAN-FIT): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

A standard treatment for fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is yet to be established. In the previous EXTREME trial, few older patients were included. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of an adapted EXTREME regimen in fit, older patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. This single-arm, phase 2 study was done at 22 centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 70 years or older and assessed as not frail (fit) using the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation (EGE) and had recurrent or metastatic HNSCC in the first-line setting that was not eligible for local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. The adapted EXTREME regimen consisted of six cycles of fluorouracil 4000 mg/m2 on days 1-4, carboplatin with an area under the curve of 5 on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (400 mg/m2 on cycle 1-day 1, and 250 mg/m2 subsequently), all intravenously, with cycles starting every 21 days. In patients with disease control after two to six cycles, cetuximab 500 mg/m2 was continued once every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was systematically administered and erythropoietin was recommended during chemotherapy. The study was based on the two-stage Bryant and Day design, combining efficacy and toxicity endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate at week 12 after the start of treatment, assessed by central review (with an unacceptable rate of ≤15%). The primary toxicity endpoint was morbidity, defined as grade 4-5 adverse events, or cutaneous rash (grade ≥3) that required cetuximab to be discontinued, during the chemotherapy phase, or a decrease in functional autonomy (Activities of Daily Living score decrease ≥2 points from baseline) at 1 month after the end of chemotherapy (with an unacceptable morbidity rate of >40%). Analysis of the coprimary endpoints, and of safety in the chemotherapy phase, was based on the per-protocol population, defined as eligible patients who received at least one cycle of the adapted EXTREME regimen. Safety in the maintenance phase was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of cetuximab as maintenance therapy. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01864772, and is completed. Between Sept 27, 2013, and June 20, 2018, 85 patients were enrolled, of whom 78 were in the per-protocol population. 66 (85%) patients were male and 12 (15%) were female, and the median age was 75 years (IQR 72-79). The median number of chemotherapy cycles received was five (IQR 3-6). Objective response at week 12 was observed in 31 patients (40% [95% CI 30-51]) and morbidity events were observed in 24 patients (31% [22-42]). No fatal adverse events occurred. Four patients presented with a decrease in functional autonomy 1 month after the end of chemotherapy versus baseline. During chemotherapy, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological events (leukopenia [22 patients; 28%], neutropenia [20; 26%], thrombocytopenia [15; 19%], and anaemia [12; 15%]), oral mucositis (14; 18%), fatigue (11; 14%), rash acneiform (ten; 13%), and hypomagnesaemia (nine; 12%). Among 44 patients who received cetuximab during the maintenance phase, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypomagnesaemia (six patients; 14%) and acneiform rash (six; 14%). The study met its primary objectives on objective response and morbidity, and showed overall survival to be as good as in younger patients treated with standard regimens, indicating that the adapted EXTREME regimen could be used in older patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who are deemed fit with use of a geriatric evaluation tool adapted to patients with head and neck cancer, such as the EGE. French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC, and the Ligue Contre le Cancer), Sandoz, GEFLUC, and GEMLUC. For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Antithrombotic Treatment for Cervical Artery Dissection

Cervical artery dissection is the most common cause of stroke in younger adults. To date, there is no conclusive evidence on which antithrombotic therapy should be used to treat patients. To perform an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing anticoagulants and antiplatelets in prevention of stroke after cervical artery dissection. PubMed.gov, Cochrane database, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to August 1, 2023. Randomized clinical trials that investigated the effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic treatment (antiplatelets vs anticoagulation) in patients with cervical artery dissection were included in the meta-analysis. The primary end point was required to include a composite of (1) any stroke, (2) death, or (3) major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial) at 90 days of follow-up. Two independent investigators performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and inconsistencies were resolved by a principal investigator. The primary outcome was a composite of (1) ischemic stroke, (2) death, or (3) major bleeding (extracranial or intracranial) at 90 days of follow-up. The components of the composite outcome were also secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on baseline characteristics with a putative association with the outcome were performed. Logistic regression was performed using the maximum penalized likelihood method including interaction in the subgroup analyses. Two randomized clinical trials, Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study and Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke Study and the Biomarkers and Antithrombotic Treatment in Cervical Artery Dissection, were identified, of which all participants were eligible. A total of 444 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population and 370 patients were included in the per-protocol population. Baseline characteristics were balanced. There were fewer primary end points in those randomized to anticoagulation vs antiplatelet therapy (3 of 218 [1.4%] vs 10 of 226 [4.4%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.33 [95% CI, 0.08-1.05]; P = .06), but the finding was not statistically significant. In comparison with aspirin, anticoagulation was associated with fewer strokes (1 of 218 [0.5%] vs 10 of 226 [4.0%]; OR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.61]; P = .01) and more bleeding events (2 vs 0). This individual patient data meta-analysis of 2 currently available randomized clinical trial data found no significant difference between anticoagulants and antiplatelets in preventing early recurrent events.

Assessing the treatment response of lateral elbow tendinopathy using time-dependent ultrasonography, Doppler imaging, and elastography

ObjectiveTo investigate the structural alterations, neovascularity, and elasticity of tendons and the relationship between elasticity and the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation score after undergoing US-guided fenestration or surgery in patients with chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy.MethodsParticipants from the per-protocol population of a randomized trial conducted between October 2016 and June 2020 were included. The surgery and fenestration groups included 24 (mean age, 50 ± 7 years [standard deviation], 10 men) and 29 (47 ± 8 years, 18 men) participants, respectively. Ultrasound exams were performed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Statistical analyses included linear mixed effects and generalized equation estimation models.ResultsFenestration had no significant impact on tendon thickness (p = 0.46). Conversely, surgery significantly increased tendon thickness at 6 months (p < 0.0001) and remained elevated at 12 months (p = 0.04). Tendon echostructure exhibited a group effect (p = 0.03), indicating a higher proportion of pathological scores in the surgery group post-intervention compared to the fenestration group. Both groups showed a similar reduction in neovascularity from 6 to 12 months postintervention (p = 0.006). Shear-wave velocity increased in the fenestration group at 6 months (p = 0.04), while the surgery group experienced a nonsignificant decrease at 6 months, with some improvement at 12 months (p = 0.08). Changes in shear-wave velocity did not correlate with clinical outcome.ConclusionsFenestration and surgery reduced tendon neovascularity over time. Unlike surgery, fenestration did not impact tendon size while improving tendon echostructure and elasticity.Critical relevance statementFenestration and surgery equally alleviated symptoms and decreased tendon neovascularity in lateral elbow tendinopathy; however, fenestration did not alter tendon thickness and improved echostructure and shear-wave velocity, suggesting shear-wave velocity’s potential for quantitatively monitoring tendon elasticity during healing.Key PointsReliable markers for monitoring healing response and informing treatment protocols in elbow tendinopathy are lacking.Fenestration and surgery reduced tendon neovascularity, while fenestration improved tendon echostructure and shear-wave velocity.Shear-wave velocity may provide quantitative measures to monitor tendon elasticity in response to treatment.Graphical

Abstract PS01-04: To dissect or not to dissect? The surgeon’s perspective on the prediction of ≥ 4 axillary lymph node metastasis in cN0 T1-2 breast cancer: A comparative analysis of the per-protocol population of the SINODAR-ONE clinical trial

Abstract Objectives The role of axillary surgery in the management of breast cancer (BC) has evolved considerably over the past decades, with only a few routine indications for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remaining in clinical practice. However, de-escalation of axillary surgery, especially in BC patients with 1-3 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) challenges the recently established criteria for adjuvant treatment (i.e., combination therapy with abemaciclib, endocrine therapy, and chemotherapy in patients with ≥ 4 positive nodes). The question remains as to whether these patients should undergo further ALND to determine whether ≥ 4 nodes are positive. To further investigate the latest controversies in axillary management of BC patients and predict the presence of ≥ 4 axillary lymph node metastasis, we evaluated and compared patients ≥ 4 positive nodes in the per-protocol population of the SINODAR-ONE clinical trial. Patients in the standard arm (ALND) of the per-protocol population were evaluated, and a comparison of characteristics between patients with ≥ 4 metastatic lymph nodes versus patients with 1-3 metastatic lymph nodes was performed. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Multivariable analysis was performed using a logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of ≥4 axillary lymph node metastasis. Results: Overall, 403 cN0 T1-2 BC patients in the per-protocol population were randomized to receive ALND. Of these, 65 and 338 patients presented with ≥ 4 or 1-3 axillary lymph node metastasis, respectively. Invasive lobular BC (26.2% versus 14.5% if other histology, odds ratio (OR)=4.185, 95% confidence interval (95%CI)= 1.284-1.443, p= 0.041), G3 (38.5% versus 21.3% if G1-2, OR=5.930, 95%CI= 2.134-2.289, p= 0.015), pT2 (46.2% versus 30.5% if pT1, OR=5.260, 95%CI= 15.330-16.346, p= 0.022), and 2 positive SLNs (32.3% versus 13.6% if 1 positive SLN, OR=13.188, 95%CI= 1.179-1.280, p&amp;lt; 0.0001) were found to significantly increase the probability to present ≥4 axillary lymph node metastasis at definitive histopathological evaluation. Conclusions: The introduction of abemaciclib and other combination therapies has the potential to impact the surgical management of the axilla. Our results suggest that a minority of cN0 T1-2 BC patients may be understaged if ALND is not performed. However, the improvements and increasing effectiveness of combination therapies may sufficiently control and treat the axillary tumor-burden left behind, potentially reducing the need for extensive axillary surgery, as demonstrated by the promising 3-year oncological outcomes of the SINODAR-ONE trial. Although ALND may still be considered, after multidisciplinary team discussion, in individual patients presenting with specific risk factors for additional axillary disease (lobular, G3, pT2 BC with 2 positive SLNs), our suggestion is that routine ALND is not indicated for systemic therapy decision-making in the upfront surgical setting. Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Andrea Sagona, Erika Barbieri, Alberto Bottini, Alberto Testori, Valentina Errico, Simone Di Maria Grimaldi, Giulia Caraceni, Shadya Darwish, Giuseppe Canavese, Corrado Tinterri. To dissect or not to dissect? The surgeon’s perspective on the prediction of ≥ 4 axillary lymph node metastasis in cN0 T1-2 breast cancer: A comparative analysis of the per-protocol population of the SINODAR-ONE clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS01-04.

Abstract PO5-19-10: First oncological outcomes of HypoG-01: a UNICANCER phase III trial comparing loco-regional hypo vs normo fractionated radiation therapy in early breast cancer patients

Abstract Objective Normofractionated (NF) radiation therapy (RT) is still standard for loco-regional early breast cancer (EBC) in many countries. HypoG-01, a UNICANCER, non-inferiority, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III trial (NCT03127995), conducted in parallel with the DBCG Skagen trial 1 (NCT02384733), evaluated hypofractionated (HF) RT with 40 Gy/15 fr (2.67 Gy/fr) versus NF RT 50 Gy/25 fr (2.0 Gy/fr). This is the first report of oncological outcomes, secondary endpoints of the trial. Methods Patients (pts) ≥18 years old were operated for T1-3, N0-3, M0 breast cancer. All pts received nodal and thoracic wall or breast RT. Tumor-bed boost (sequential or simultaneous) and nodal levels treated were decided according to local guidelines. Target volumes were delineated according to the ESTRO consensus. RT technique was left at the investigator’s discretion. Stratification factors included treating center, type of surgery, number of positive nodes and body mass index. The primary endpoint, reported previously, was time to occurrence of arm lymphedema. Oncological outcomes included locoregional relapse free survival (LRFS), invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) as defined per DATECAN guidelines. All time to cancer related endpoints were defined as starting from the date of randomization until the event. The primary statistic test was stratified one-sided logrank test: 5% significance level in per-protocol population (PPP) with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 1.545. Stratified Cox model was used for calculating hazard ratios of oncological outcomes. Results In total, 1265 pts were randomized to HF versus NF RT from Sep 2016 to Mar 2020 with 1221 in the PPP (HF group 614 pts (50.3%); NF group 607 (49.7%)), 5 consent withdrawn and 39 major deviations. Median age was 58 years (range 23-91), surgery included mastectomy (501 pts; 45%) and axillary clearance (921 pts; 82.8%). Sequential (67.8%) or simultaneous integrated (32.2%) tumor-bed boost was used in 596 pts (48.8%). With a median follow-up for OS in PP analysis of 3.8 years (95% CI 3.3 to 3.9), HF was non-inferior to NF RT in terms of lymphedema (HR=1.07; 90% CI 0.86-1.34, non-inferiority p=0.003). Table 1 reports the hazard ratio and 3-year survival rates for the oncological endpoints LRFS, IDFS, DDFS, BCCS and OS. There was no sign of disadvantage for any of these endpoints comparing HF to NF. Additional analyses will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion Moderately HF loco-regional RT is non-inferior to NF RT in terms of lymphedema risk in EBC and does not show a disadvantage in terms of LRFS, IDFS, DDFS, BCCS and OS with a median follow-up of 3.8 years. Together with the Skagen 1 trial, this study provides level 1A evidence supporting the use of 40 Gy/15 fr for loco-regional radiation therapy in EBC with respect to arm lymphedema risk; Table 1: Oncological outcomes according to treatment arm in the per protocol analysis HF: Moderately hypofractionated radiation therapy; NF: Normofractionated radiation therapy; n:number of patients; N: number of events Citation Format: Sofia Rivera, Eleni Karamouza, Youlia Kirova, Séverine Racadot, Mohamed Benchalal, Jean-Baptiste Clavier, Claire Charra-Brunaud, Marie-Eve Chand-Fouche, Delphine Argo-Leignel, Karine Peignaux, Ahmed Benyoucef, David Pasquier, Philippe Guilbert, Julien Blanchecotte, Agnès Tallet, Adeline Petit, Guillemette Bernadou, Xavier Zasadny, Claire Lemanski, Jacques Fourquet, Emmanuelle Malaurie, Honorine Kouto, Carole Massabeau, Alexandre Henni, Pauline Regnault, Aurélie Belliere, Yazid Belkacemi, Magali Le Blanc-Onfroy, Julien Geffrelot, Jean-Briac Prevost, Marie Bergeaud, Assia Lamrani-Ghaouti, Amandine Ruffier, Naima Bonnet, Stephanie Wong, Christine Rossier, Thomas Brion, Pierre Maroun, Claire Petit, Guillaume Auzac, Stefan Michiels. First oncological outcomes of HypoG-01: a UNICANCER phase III trial comparing loco-regional hypo vs normo fractionated radiation therapy in early breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-19-10.

Efficacy of Dequalinium Chloride vs Metronidazole for the Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common cause of vaginal infection. First-line treatments of BV are metronidazole and clindamycin. Due to the increase in antibiotic resistance, effective nonantibiotic treatments for BV are needed. To examine whether dequalinium chloride, a broad-spectrum antiseptic, is noninferior to oral metronidazole for the treatment of BV. This phase 4, multicenter, triple-blind, double-dummy, parallel, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 29, 2021, to August 25, 2022, with a 1-month follow-up. Participants were premenopausal women 18 years or older with BV from 11 gynecologic practices and 1 hospital in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech. Patients were randomized to treatment with dequalinium chloride vaginal tablets (10 mg once daily for 6 days) or oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for 7 days). Double-dummy medication kits contained vaginal and oral tablets with placebo and active medication. The main outcome was the noninferiority margin (of 15 percentage points) in the absolute difference in clinical cure rates between dequalinium chloride and metronidazole 7 to 11 days after start of treatment (visit 1). Noninferiority was met if the lower 95% CI for the difference in clinical cure rate was less than 15 percentage points at visit 1. A total of 147 women (mean [SD] age, 36.7 [9.0] years) were treated with dequalinium chloride (n = 72) or metronidazole (n = 75). The clinical cure rates at visit 1 were 64 of 69 (92.8%) for dequalinium chloride vs 69 of 74 (93.2%) for metronidazole in the intention-to-treat population, whereas in the per-protocol population, cure rates were 54 of 58 (93.1%) for dequalinium chloride vs 48 of 53 (90.6%) for metronidazole. The treatment differences of -0.5 percentage points (95% CI, -10.8 to 9.8 percentage points; P = .002) in the intention-to-treat population and 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, -9.4 to 14.4 percentage points; P = .001) in the per-protocol population confirmed the noninferiority of dequalinium chloride. The tolerability of dequalinium chloride was rated as very good by 30 of 50 patients (60.0%) but only by 21 of 54 (38.9%) for metronidazole. Three patients in the metronidazole group suspended treatment due to an adverse event. This randomized clinical trial showed that dequalinium chloride was not inferior to metronidazole for the treatment of BV. Dequalinium chloride had a similarly high cure rate but with better tolerability and fewer adverse events. With a similar efficacy to metronidazole and clindamycin, dequalinium chloride warrants consideration as first-line treatment for BV to help reduce antibiotic consumption. EudraCT: 2020-002489-15.

Abstract PO4-22-12: Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy using da Vinci SP single-port system: primary results from the pilot trial RASPIM-01

Abstract Background Robot-assisted breast surgery was developed in 2014 for nipple-sparing mastectomy through a concealable lateral chest wall incision smaller. Although successful experiences have been reported using a multi-arm surgical robotic system, collisions between robotic arms and instruments often result in the discontinuation of console workflow and limit the performance of the surgical robot. Compared to multi-armed robot systems, the SP system is single-armed, equipped with flexible instruments containing multiple joints that may avoid instrument collision, a controllable camera reducing visual dead spots, and a designated non-third-party port that allows single-port entry and full deployment of the instrument. The RASPIM-01 trial (NCT05448963) is a single-armed pilot study assessing the feasibility of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) using a new SP system. Method This study is a pilot trial conducted in a single-arm, non-randomized design with a recruitment of 30 participants. The SP surgical robot is used in NSM through the lateral chest wall incisions. The major inclusion criteria are 1) Breast cancer with preoperative clinical tumor sizes less than 5 cm, with an adequate tumor-skin distance of at least 3mm, and without nipple-areolar involvement in at least 1cm around the nipple by image, 2) Breast cancer up to clinical stage IIIA (T3, N1-2) showing adequate response to neoadjuvant therapy and meeting criteria 1), 3) Germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic BRCA1 or 2 variant carriers with or without a breast cancer diagnosis, requiring unilateral or bilateral therapeutic mastectomy or prophylactic mastectomy. Exclusion criteria include extensive breast skin or nipple involvement such as inflammatory breast cancer, Paget’s disease, nipple discharge associated with malignancy, image suggestive of cancer involvement of the nipple and subareolar tissue, and stage III breast cancer without response to neoadjuvant therapy, and previous radiotherapy of the surgical side breast. The endpoint measurements include Primary endpoint: The ability to complete nipple-sparing mastectomy with an SP system in the per-protocol population without additional assistant port or conversion to open surgery. Statistical analysis includes point estimation with a 95% confidence interval to analyze the mean or proportion of key performance parameters. No interim analysis will be performed due to the limited number intended to recruit. Results The study recruited 30 breast cancer patients and conducted 30 NSMs, while no prophylactic mastectomy case was recruited. The median age was 44 years old, BMI was 22.4 (18.9-30.0) kg/m2. Median tumor size was 3.0 (1.0-14.6) cm, and axillary lymph node metastases were present in 7 cases (23.3%). T2 (13 cases, 43.3%) tumors were the majority, followed by Tis (10 cases, 33.3%), T1 (5 cases, 16.7%), and T3 (2 cases, 6.7%). The anatomical stages of invasive cancer were Ia (16.7%), IIa (26.7%), IIb (16.7%), and IIIa (6.7%), among them 9 (30.3%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. All NSMs met the primary endpoint of successful completion using the SP robot system without conversion to open mastectomy or the addition of an assistant port. Median console time was 108.5 (73-285) min and docking time was 2.5 (1-9) min. Specimen weight was 311.6 (107-838) gm, while 2 (6.7%) cases had their nipple excised due to cancer-involved margin reported from the frozen section. Twenty-six (86.6%) cases received autologous free flap reconstruction, among which 25 (83.3%) cases received DIEP, and 1 (3.3%) received PAP reconstruction. Four cases received implant (2 cases, 6.7%) or tissue expander (3 cases, 6.7%). Conclusion This is the first NSM clinical trial operated with SP surgical robot system and met its primary endpoint showing the feasibility to conduct NSM. Secondary and exploratory endpoints data will be reported after the completion of clinical follow-ups. Citation Format: Wen-Ling Kuo, Chia-Huei Chu, Jung-ju Huang. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy using da Vinci SP single-port system: primary results from the pilot trial RASPIM-01 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-22-12.

Abstract PO2-04-05: FINAL OUTCOME ANALYSIS FROM THE PHASE II TUXEDO-1 TRIAL OF TRASTUZUMAB-DERUXTECAN IN HER2-POSITIVE BREAST CANCER PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE BRAIN METASTASES

Abstract Background Brain metastases (BM) are a severe complication of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In the absence of any immediate indication for local therapy, the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor tucatinib combined with trastuzumab and capecitabine (TTC) is regarded as the preferred systemic treatment option for active BM, while data on the activity of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) is limited. In the primary outcome analysis of TUXEDO-1, an intracranial response rate (RR) of 73.3% was reported with the ADC trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd). Here, we report final progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) results of this study. Patients and Methods: TUXEDO-1 is a prospective, single-centre, single-arm phase 2 trial. Adult patients with HER2-positive BC and active BM (newly diagnosed untreated or progressing after prior local therapy), prior treatment with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, ECOG performance status 0 or 1 without indication for immediate local therapy were accrued and received T-DXd until progression, inacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal for any other reason. The primary endpoint was intracranial RR centrally assessed by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)-BM criteria in the intention-to-treat population; secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, safety, quality-of-life (QoL), and neurocognitive function. PFS and OS were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and analysed in the per-protocol population (PPP). Results A total number of 15 patients were accrued; one patient was found to have dural metastases only upon restaging, resulting in a PPP of 14 patients. Patients had received a median number of two prior treatment lines (range, 1-5), 60% had progressive brain metastases and 60% had received prior T-DM1. At 26.5 months median follow-up, median PFS was 21 months (95% CI 13.3-n.r.) and median OS was not reached (95% CI 22.2-n.r.). A total of 238 cycles of T-DXd were administered (median 11.5 cycles; range 4-42). With longer follow-up, no new safety signals were observed. The most common grade 3 adverse event (AE) was fatigue (n=3; 20%). A total of 8 serious AEs were reported in 8 patients. Grade 2 interstitial lung disease and a grade 3 symptomatic drop of left-ventricular ejection fraction were observed in one patient each. QoL and neurocognitive functioning were maintained over the entire treatment duration and a significant deterioration of global QoL was observed upon progression (p=0.036). Most patients received TTC (n=5) or local therapy (n=4) as next subsequent treatment line. Ancillary biomarker studies are ongoing, and results will be presented at the meeting. Discussion In TUXEDO-1, T-DXd yielded prolonged intra- and extracranial disease control in patients with active HER2-positive breast cancer BM. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. T-DXd did not impair QoL and neurocognitive functioning was maintained. Results therefore support the concept of ADCs as systemic therapy for active BM. Citation Format: Rupert Bartsch, Anna Sophie Berghoff, Julia Furtner, Maximilian Marhold, Elisabeth Sophie Bergen, Sophie Roider-Schur, Angelika Maria Starzer, Maximilian Mair, Heidrun Forstner, Beate Rottenmanner, Marie-Bernadette Aretin, Karin Dieckmann, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath, Helmuth Haslacher, Georg Widhalm, Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu, Christoph Minichsdorfer, Thorsten Fuereder, Thomas Szekeres, Leopold Oehler, Birgit Gruenberger, Georg Pfeiler, Christian F. Singer, Ansgar Weltermann, Luzia Berchtold, Matthias Preusser. FINAL OUTCOME ANALYSIS FROM THE PHASE II TUXEDO-1 TRIAL OF TRASTUZUMAB-DERUXTECAN IN HER2-POSITIVE BREAST CANCER PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE BRAIN METASTASES [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-04-05.

Abstract PO1-29-03: Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of TQ-B211 (a Trastuzumab Biosimilar) Plus Docetaxel versus Herceptin® Plus Docetaxel for HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: a Double-blind, Randomised, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial

Abstract Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women worldwide. In China, the incidence of breast cancer has been steadily increasing. Approximately 30% of human breast cancers exhibit human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity, which is closely associated with tumor aggressiveness, high recurrence rate and high mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of TQ-B211 (a trastuzumab biosimilar) compared to the reference trastuzumab in combination with docetaxel as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Methods: This randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase III equivalence study enrolled HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients aged 18-75, ECOG PS ≤1, no prior systemic chemotherapy, biologic, or targeted therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease, and at least one measurable lesion (RECIST 1.1). The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the experimental group received TQ-B211 (8 mg/kg iv on day 1, cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg q3w for cycles 2-8) in combination with docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 2, cycle1, followed by 75 mg/m2 on day 1 for cycles 2-8), while the control group received Herceptin® in combination with docetaxel. For subjects who completed 8 cycles of treatment without disease progression and demonstrated tolerability, they were subsequently administered TQ-B211 as monotherapy until disease progression or unsuitable for further treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was ORR up to week 24 (ORR24w). Equivalence was declared if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of relative ratio (RR) value was within the range of 0.8 to 1.25. Secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DoR); progression-free survival (PFS); disease control rate (DCR); overall survival (OS), safety and immunogenicity. Results: Between December 6, 2018 and July 31, 2021, a total of 386 patients (pts) were enrolled (192 pts in the TQ-B211 group and 194 pts in the Herceptin® group). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the ORR24w of the TQ-B211 group was 67.19% (95% CI: 60.55, 73.83), while the ORR24w of the Herceptin® group was 65.98% (95% CI: 59.31, 72.65). The RR of the confirmed ORR24w between the two groups was 1.02 (90%CI, 0.90, 1.15), which fell entirely in the predefined equivalence margins (0.8, 1.25), indicating comparable efficacy of the two drugs. In the ITT population, the DCR of the TQ-B211 group and the Herceptin® group were 83.85% (78.65, 89.06) and 78.35% (72.56, 84.15) respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.1940). By the data cutoff date of October 31, 2021, the median PFS was not statistically different (P=0.6834); the median OS was not reached in both groups (P=0.9246). Additionally, the data results of the per-protocol (PP) population were similar to those of the ITT population. In total, similar rates of treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events (41.05% vs. 46.39%) occurred in the TQ-B211 and Herceptin® groups, respectively. The incidence and magnitude of immunogenicity were low in both of the two groups (ADA: 0.53% vs. 0%, Nab: both negative). Conclusion: Equivalence for efficacy was demonstrated between TQ-B211 and Herceptin® on the basis of ORR24w. Safety and immunogenicity were comparable. Citation Format: Xichun Hu, Qingyuan Zhang, Shusen Wang, Tao Sun, Xiaohua Zeng, Weimin Xie, Zhongsheng Tong, Hui Cao, Huihua Xiong, Xiuwen Wang, Jin Yang, Shuqun Zhang, Ying Wang, Chunhong Hu, Kaijian Lei, Binlin Ma, Wei Liu, Zhiyong Yu, PeiJian Peng, Hongwei Yang, Zhijun Yuan, Xiaojia Wang, Xujuan Wang, Hong Wang, Yongqian Shu, Nanlin Li, Wenbin Yue, Jingfen Wang, Daqing Wang, Zhiguo Luo, Junyang Mo, Yarong Li, Lili Sheng. Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of TQ-B211 (a Trastuzumab Biosimilar) Plus Docetaxel versus Herceptin® Plus Docetaxel for HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: a Double-blind, Randomised, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-29-03.

Abstract PO1-27-01: Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of TQB2440 versus the Reference Pertuzumab for the Treatment of HER2-Positive Early or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Controlled Phase 3 Trial

Abstract Background: Pertuzumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the extracellular dimerization domain II of HER2. On September 30, 2013, the FDA have granted accelerated approval of a pertuzumab regimen for neoadjuvant treatment of patients (pts) with high-risk, HER2-positive early stage breast cancer. TQB2440 is a pertuzumab (Perjeta®, Roche) biosimilar. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TQB2440 and the reference pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel in pts with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 study, eligible pts were aged 18-75 with operable HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or ISH+) clinical stage II-IIIC breast cancer negative for ER/PR and had an ECOG PS of 0-1. The pts were randomly assigned to receive either TQB2440 or the reference pertuzumab (Perjeta®) (840 mg on day 1, cycle 1, followed by 420 mg on cycle 2-4, q3w) added to trastuzumab (8 mg/kg on day 1, cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg for cycles 2-4, q3w) + docetaxel (75 mg/m2, cycle 1-4, q3w). The pts then underwent surgery followed by adjuvant treatment with FEC regimens (fluorouracil 600 mg/m², epirubicin 90 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², cycle 5-7, q3w), then TQB2440 (840 mg on day 1, cycle 8, followed by 420 mg on cycle 9-20, q3w) + trastuzumab (8 mg/kg on day 1, cycle 8, followed by 6 mg/kg for cycles 9-20, q3w) or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was total pathologic complete response (tpCR) by independent review committee (IRC). Equivalence was established if the 90% confdence intervals (CIs) of the relative ratio [RR] within the interval of 0.76 to 1.32. Secondary endpoints included breast pathologic complete response (bpCR) by IRC, tpCR &amp; bpCR by investigator, breast conserving surgery (BCS) rates, objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), OS and safety. Results: Between October 21, 2020, and November 21, 2022, 412 pts were enrolled (TQB2440 group, n=207; the reference pertuzumab group, n=205). Data cutoff was November 30, 2022. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the tpCR by IRC of the TQB2440 group and the reference drug group were 58.94% and 58.05%, respectively. The RR was 1.02 (90% CI, 0.89, 1.16), which was within the predefined equivalence interval of 0.76 to 1.32. There was no statistically significant difference in the bpCR by IRC between the TQB2440 group and the reference pertuzumab group (67.63% [95% CI, 60.80%, 73.95%] vs. 63.90% [95% CI, 56.92%, 70.48%], P=0.4249). The BCS rate also comparable between the two groups with 13.04% (95% CI, 8.77%, 18.41%) vs. 13.17% (95% CI, 8.86%, 18.58%) (P=0.9695). Additionally, the results of the PP (per-protocol) population were similar to those of the ITT population. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and grade ≥3 TRAEs were similar between the TQB2440 group and the reference pertuzumab group with 79.71% vs. 75.98% and 49.28% vs. 41.67%, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer, TQB2440 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and similar safety to the reference pertuzumab. Clinical trial information: NCT05985187. Research Sponsor: Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd Citation Format: Qingyuan Zhang, Shusen Wang, Nanlin Li, Qiao Cheng, Yu ren, Xuchen Cao, Jianjun Huang, Caigang Liu, Hongwei Yang, Limin Wei, Zhangjun Song, Huadong Zhao, Fangling Ning, Xiaojia Wang, Dehong Zou, Xiaohua Zeng, Jie Hao, Yunjiang Liu, Huijuan Wang, Nie Jianyun, Liang Li, Lina Liu, Tao Sun, Xiaobo Hu, Zhenhua Zhai, Huihua Xiong, Yuanqi Zhang, Enxiang Zhou, Jing Sun, Zhenhai Cai, Antai Zhang, Shui Wang, Junyang Mo, Qun Su, Xiuheng Qi, Guoren Zhou, Shuqun Zhang, Guozhong Cui, Wei Wang, Mingjiang Fan, Xinyu Qian, Xinhong Wu, Zhihong Wang, Jiuda Zhao, Yonghui Luo, Yanming Zhang, Fuguo Tian, Jiye Zhang, Dongning Chai, Qingshan Li. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of TQB2440 versus the Reference Pertuzumab for the Treatment of HER2-Positive Early or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Controlled Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-27-01.

Abstract GS02-06: Recurrence-free survival following sentinel node-positive breast cancer without completion axillary lymph node dissection – first results from the international randomized SENOMAC trial

Abstract Background The omission of a completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer has been demonstrated to yield survival outcomes non-inferior to routine cALND in breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast irradiation (ACOSOG Z0011 and IBCSG 23-01 trials), and to axillary radiotherapy (RT) regardless of breast surgery (EORTC AMAROS trial). Mainly due to the under-representation of mastectomy patients, and a limited number of observed events compromising statistical power, the international randomized SENOMAC trial was initiated in 2015. The main aim of this non-inferiority trial was to address knowledge gaps relating to individuals treated by mastectomy, those with larger tumors and those with SLN extracapsular extension. Method The SENOMAC trial (NCT 02240472) enrolled patients with cT1-3cN0 primary breast cancer and 1-2 SLN macrometastases at 67 sites in five countries between January 27, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Participants were randomized 1:1 between cALND (standard) and omission of cALND (intervention). Stratification was per country. Breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy were eligible surgical interventions. Preoperative axillary ultrasound was mandatory; patients with non-palpable suspicious axillary lymph nodes, even if proven metastatic by biopsy, were eligible. SLN extracapsular extension was allowed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was dictated by national guidelines and not by the trial protocol. Statistical sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome overall survival. Non-inferiority was defined as a 5-year overall survival not worsened by more than 2.5% when refraining from cALND after the observation of 190 all-cause deaths in a target sample size of 3000 included patients. In the present analysis, the pre-specified secondary outcome of recurrence-free survival is reported. Results Out of 2766 randomized individuals, 2539 comprised the per-protocol population: 1204 in the standard and 1335 in the intervention group. Median follow-up was 37.1 months (1.5-75.0) and median age at inclusion 61 years (range 20-94). Most tumors belonged to the luminal subtype (93.6%); tumor stage was T1 in 1358 (53.5%), T2 in 1034 (40.7%) and T3 in 146 participants (5.8%). Out of 347 participants with suspicious lymph nodes on ultrasound, 36 had confirmed non-palpable metastasis. SLN extracapsular extension was reported in 866 (34.1%). The breast was conserved in 1621 (63.8%) and a mastectomy performed in 918 (36.2%) patients. Most patients (2127, 83.8%) received radiotherapy including nodal target volumes. In 34.1% of the standard group, additional non-SLN metastases were identified on cALND. Overall, 104 recurrences were reported, 54 (4.5%) in the standard and 50 (3.7%) in the intervention group. Of these, 11 recurrences were found in the ipsilateral axilla: 5 (0.4%) and 6 (0.5%), respectively. Recurrence-free survival did not differ between groups (country-adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65-1.20). Conclusion Despite extended inclusion criteria, there was no difference in recurrence-free survival whether cALND was omitted (intervention) or not (standard). Patients undergoing mastectomy will specifically be addressed in subgroup analyses. Long-term follow-up is crucial considering the high proportion of luminal cancers. Citation Format: Jana de Boniface, Tove Tvedskov, Bergkvist Leif, Jan Frisell, Yvette Andersson, Sara Alkner, Malin Sund, Roger Olofsson Bagge, Dan Lundstedt, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Michalis Kontos, Toralf Reimer, Birgitte Offersen, Thorsten Kühn, Lisa Rydén, Peer Christiansen. Recurrence-free survival following sentinel node-positive breast cancer without completion axillary lymph node dissection – first results from the international randomized SENOMAC trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS02-06.