You have accessJournal of UrologySexual Function/Dysfunction/Andrology: Surgical Therapy II1 Apr 2015PD40-01 3 YEAR OUTCOMES OF THE ZEN TRIAL: THE MEDTRONIC ZOTAROLIMUS-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF ED IN MALES WITH SUB-OPTIMAL RESPONSE TO PDE5 INHIBITORS Tobias Kohler and Irwin Goldstein Tobias KohlerTobias Kohler More articles by this author and Irwin GoldsteinIrwin Goldstein More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2435AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES We report 3 year safety, feasibility and outcomes of zotarolimus−eluting stent implantation in focal atherosclerotic lesions of the internal pudendal arteries (IPAs) among men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and a suboptimal response to phosphodiesterase−5 inhibitors. METHODS We performed a prospective, multicenter, single-armed safety and feasibility trial of 30 male subjects > 18 years with atherosclerotic ED and a suboptimal response to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. A novel combination of clinical, duplex ultrasound, and invasive angiographic factors were used to determine eligibility for stent therapy. Key inclusion criteria included IIEF-6 < 21 with at least 4 weeks of PDE5i use, ultrasound PSVs < 30 cm/sec bilaterally, and angiographic stenosis of one or both IPAs. Key exclusion criteria included non-vascular causes of ED, venous leak as seen on penile Doppler (EDV > 5 cm/sec), and non target lesions of > 70% stenosis in common iliac or common penile artery. The primary safety end point was any major adverse event 30 days after the procedure. The primary feasibility end point was improvement in the IIEF-6 (Erectile Dysfunction Domain) score of 4 points or more. RESULTS A total of 383 subjects were screened of which there was a 92% screen failure rate. Forty-five lesions were treated with stents in 30 subjects. Procedural success was 100% with no major adverse events through follow-up. The primary feasibility end point (IIEF-6 +4) was achieved by 81% of intention-to treat subjects (17/21) at 1 year, 58% (11/19) at 2 years and 39% (5/13) at three years. 5 patients were stented outside the pudendal artery. Per protocol outcomes revealed IIEF improvement by 4 points in 84% (16/19)at 1 year, 61% (11/18) at 2 years and 36% (4/11) at 3 years. Changes in IIEF6 scores from baseline for the per protocol group were + 18.6 (95% CI = 11.8-25.5) at one year, + 14.7 (6.3-23.2) at 2 years, and + 7.8 at 3 years (-0.3 - 16). Mean peak systolic velocity on penile Doppler increased from 16.4 cm/s at baseline to 32.4 cm/sec at 1 year. Angiographic binary restonosis (>50% lumen diameter stenosis) was found in 11/32 lesions (34.4%). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with ED and limited response with pharmacologic therapy, percutaneous stent revascularization of the internal pudendal artery is safe and appears promising. However, significant challenges remain in determining and screening for the appropriate patient treatment population, optimizing procedural techniques for placement, and preventing stent restenosis. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e835 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Tobias Kohler More articles by this author Irwin Goldstein More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract