Penicillin Allergy Research Articles

Documented Penicillin Allergies on Antibiotic Selection at Pediatric Emergency Department Visits.

Penicillin or amoxicillin are the recommended treatments for the most common pediatric bacterial illnesses. Allergies to penicillin are commonly reported among children but rarely true. We evaluated the impact of reported penicillin allergies on broad-spectrum antibiotic use overall and for the treatment of common respiratory infections among treat-and-release pediatric emergency department (ED) visits. Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients receiving antibiotics during a treat-and-release visit at a large, pediatric ED in the northeast from 2014 to 2016. Study exposure was a reported allergy to penicillin in the electronic medical record. Study outcomes were the selection of broad-spectrum antibiotics and alternative (second-line) antibiotic therapy for the treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) and group A streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis. We used unadjusted and adjusted generalized estimating equation models to analyze the impact of reported penicillin allergies on the selection of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We used unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models to determine the probability of children with a documented penicillin allergy receiving alternative antibiotic treatments for AOM and GAS. Among 12,987 pediatric patients, 810 (6.2%) had a documented penicillin allergy. Penicillin allergies increased the odds of children receiving a broad spectrum versus narrow spectrum antibiotic (adjusted odds ratio, 13.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.34-16.18). In our adjusted logistic regression model, the probability of children with a documented penicillin allergy receiving alternative antibiotic treatment for AOM was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and for GAS was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). Antibiotic stewardship efforts in pediatric EDs may consider the delabeling of penicillin allergies particularly among children receiving antibiotics for an acute respiratory infection as a target for intervention.

Safety of Cefazolin Perioperative Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients With Penicillin Allergy: A Retrospective Chart Review

Introduction: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is crucial in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs). First-generation cephalosporins are commonly first line, but issues arise when patients report a penicillin allergy. Although up to 10% of Americans report a penicillin allergy, up to 95% are not truly allergic. Even patients with true penicillin allergy likely tolerate cephalosporins due to low cross-reactivity. Nevertheless, providers are less likely to prescribe cefazolin for these patients, increasing the risk of SSI. We seek to characterize the pattern of perioperative antibiotic use and rate of reaction in plastic surgery patients who endorse a penicillin allergy. Method: This was a single-center retrospective chart review of adults who received body contouring plastic surgery from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. The presence of reported penicillin allergy and administration of cefazolin versus alternative agent were evaluated, and the outcome was measured in number of anaphylactic reactions and SSI events. Results: The study included 457 patients in total; 437 (96%) were female; 106 (23%) had listed allergy to penicillin, cephalosporin, or both - 17 (16%) were listed as having anaphylaxis to penicillin, 62 (58.5%) endorsed a nonanaphylactic allergic reaction to penicillin, 8 (7.5%) endorsed an allergy without a documented reaction to penicillin, and 19 (18%) reported a prior cephalosporin allergy. All patients with a beta-lactam allergy who received cefazolin perioperatively did not have any anaphylaxis events. Three patients who received clindamycin and 1 patient who received cefazolin developed SSI postoperatively. Conclusion: Cephalosporins should be the first line for appropriate patients with a penicillin allergy, as alternative agents have increased SSI risk.

Drug allergy in older adults: A study from the United States Drug Allergy Registry

BackgroundOlder adults have an increased risk of adverse drug reactions and negative effects associated with alternative antibiotic use. Although the number of antibiotic allergies reported increases with age, the characteristics and outcomes of older adults receiving drug allergy assessment are unknown. ObjectiveTo assess the characteristics and outcomes of drug allergy evaluations in older adults. MethodsWe considered patients aged above or equal to 65 years enrolled in the United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR), a US multisite prospective cohort (January 16, 2019 to February 28, 2022). Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. ResultsOf 1678 USDAR participants from 5 sites, 406 older adults aged above or equal to 65 years (37% 65-69 years, 37% 70-74 years, 16% 75-79 years, and 10% ≥80 years) received 501 drug allergy assessments. USDAR older adults were primarily of female sex (69%), White (94%), and non-Hispanic (98%). Most USDAR older adults reported less than or equal to 1 infections per year (64%) and rated their general health as good, very good, or excellent (80%). Of 296 (59%) penicillin allergy assessments in USDAR older adults, 286 (97%) were disproved. Other drug allergy assessments included sulfonamide (n = 41, 88% disproved) and cephalosporin (n = 20, 95% disproved) antibiotics. All 41 drug allergy labels in USDAR participants aged above or equal to 80 years and all 80 penicillin allergy labels in USDAR men aged above or equal to 65 years were disproved. ConclusionOlder adults represented a quarter of USDAR participants but were neither racially nor ethnically diverse and were generally healthy without considerable antibiotic need. Most older adults presented for antibiotic allergy assessments, the vast majority of which were disproved. Drug allergy assessments may be underutilized in the older adults who are most vulnerable to the harms of unconfirmed antibiotic allergy labels.

The Penicillin Allergy Decision Rule—Something New for Penicillin Allergy

The Penicillin Allergy Decision Rule—Something New for Penicillin Allergy

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Guidelines for Gynecologic Oncology: Addressing Implementation Challenges - 2023 Update

ABSTRACT Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Guidelines in 2016 has resulted in an approximate decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS), reduction in complications and readmission, and cost saving. Recent publications however have demonstrated that barriers and gaps in understanding may result in many ERAS recommendations being poorly adhered to in gynecologic oncology patients. The aims of this second update to the ERAS Society Guidelines for gynecologic oncology is to summarize and update the evidence investigating specific implementation challenges to increase ERAS uptake and improve clinical outcomes for patients. A literature search was conducted for topics specified to 9 ERAS implementation challenges identified: perioperative oral intake safety, preoperative medication importance, penicillin allergies, intraoperative analgesia, how to manage urinary drainage, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, postoperative opioid prescription practices, same-day discharge programs, and how can I overcome barriers to ERAS implementation. The quality of evidence and recommendations was evaluated, and recommendations graded as strong or weak based on quality, balance between desirable and undesirable effects on holistic clinical outcomes, and on values and preferences of practitioners. Regarding perioperative oral intake safety, patients should be encouraged to consume clear liquids in 2 hours before surgery and preoperative carbohydrate loading improves satisfaction and comfort. Optimal preoperative medications include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and gabapentinoids. Patients with penicillin allergies should receive standard surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. For intraoperative analgesia, wound infiltration with local anesthetic and TAP block are preferred over thoracic epidural analgesia. Indwelling bladder catheters should be removed as early as possible in the postoperative period such as on the day of surgery for minimally invasive procedures and no later than postoperative day 1 for laparotomy. Patients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism should receive dual prophylaxis with compression and medications, and extended chemoprophylaxis should be prescribed to those with high-risk criteria or after laparotomy. Multimodal opioid-reduction is critical for all patients, and decreased postdischarge opioid proscribing is improved with a team approach and does not affect pain control or patient satisfaction. Patient controlled analgesia is a last resort for those requiring repeated treatment with intravenous opioids. Multidisciplinary same-day discharge programs should be considered in minimally invasive surgeries, and implementation requires a multidisciplinary team approach with patient education, case selection, and ERAS principles. Overcoming barriers to ERAS principles is more successful with changes at the management level and education. Communication of the economic benefits of ERAS to administrators may be a strong incentive to garner support. Although the evidence level varied between moderate and strong for each of these recommendations, the recommendation grade for each was strong. This updated ERAS guideline focuses on addressing implementation challenges and controversial aspects of ERAS defined by a stakeholder clinician group and offers suggestions based on objective data for overcoming these barriers.

Impact of an Inpatient Allergy Guideline on β-Lactam and Alternative Antibiotic Use.

A guideline identifying when inpatients with penicillin or cephalosporin antibiotic allergy labels (PCAAL) can receive β-lactam antibiotics increased β-lactam receipt at a large northeastern US health care system. To report outcomes of implementing a similar guideline and electronic order set (OS) at an independent academic health care system. Penicillin/cephalosporin receipt (percentage of inpatients receiving full doses) and alternative antibiotic use (days of therapy per 1000 patient-days [DOT/1000PD]) were compared over 3 periods before (February 1, 2017, to January 31, 2018) and after guideline implementation (February 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019), and after OS implementation (February 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020) among inpatients with PCAAL admitted on medical services with access to guideline/OS and education (Medical-PCAAL, n= 8721), surgical services with access to guideline/OS without education (Surgical-PCAAL, n= 5069), and obstetrics/gynecology services without interventions (Ob/Gyn-PCAAL, n= 798) and inpatients without PCAAL admitted on the same services (Medical-No-PCAAL, n= 50,840; Surgical-No-PCAAL, n= 29,845; Ob/Gyn-No-PCAAL, n= 6109). χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables, and analysis of variance was used to compare continuous and interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) to investigate the guideline/OS implementation effect on penicillin/cephalosporin receipt. In the Medical-PCAAL group, penicillin/cephalosporin receipt increased (58%-68%, P < .001), specifically for cefazolin (8%-11%, P= .02) and third- to fifth-generation cephalosporins (43%-48%, P= .04), and aztreonam use decreased (12 DOT/1000PD, P= .03). In the Medical-No-PCAAL group, penicillin/cephalosporin receipt increased (88%-90%, P= .004), specifically for penicillin (40%-44%, P < .001), without changes in aztreonam use. Significant changes were not observed in these outcomes on surgical or obstetrics/gynecology services. Per ITSA, guideline/OS implementation was associated with increased penicillin/cephalosporin receipt in the Medical-PCAAL group only. Guideline and OS implementation was associated with improved antibiotic stewardship on inpatient services that also received allergy education.

Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center.

The Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at Nebraska Medicine collaborated with a board-certified allergist to develop a penicillin allergy guidance document for treating inpatients with self-reported allergy. This guidance contains an algorithm for evaluating and safely challenging penicillin-allergic patients with beta-lactams without inpatient allergy consults being available. Following multi-disciplinary review, an order set for beta-lactam graded challenges (GC) was implemented in 2018. This contains recommended monitoring and detailed medication orders to challenge patients with various beta-lactam agents. Inpatient orders for GC from 3/2018-6/2022 were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate ordering characteristics, outcomes of the challenge, and whether documentation of the allergy history was updated. All beta-lactam challenges administered to inpatients were included, and descriptive statistics were performed. Overall, 157 GC were administered; 13 with oral amoxicillin and 144 with intravenous (IV) beta-lactams. Ceftriaxone accounted for the most challenges (43%). All oral challenges were recommended by an Infectious Diseases consult service, as were a majority of IV challenges (60%). Less than one in five were administered in an ICU (19%). Almost all (n = 150, 96%) were tolerated without any adverse event. There was one reaction (1%) of hives and six (4%) involving a rash, none of which had persistent effects. Allergy information was updated in the electronic health record after 92% of the challenges. Both intravenous and oral beta-lactam graded challenges were implemented successfully in a hospital without a regular inpatient allergy consult service. They were well-tolerated, administered primarily in non-ICU settings, and were often ordered by non-specialist services. In patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy, these results demonstrate the utility and safety of a broadly adopted beta-lactam GC process.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on peripartum antibiotic prescribing in patients with penicillin allergy

Beta-lactam antibiotics (eg, penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems) are preferred for group B streptococcus prophylaxis, intra-amniotic infection, and cesarean surgical site infection prophylaxis. Non-beta-lactam alternatives are associated with inferior efficacy and contribute to higher rates of surgical site infection and longer lengths of stay. Most patients who report a penicillin allergy can tolerate penicillins without any adverse reaction. There are low rates of cross-reactivity between penicillins and other beta-lactams, including cephalosporins and carbapenems. Efforts to evaluate penicillin allergy and promote the use of beta-lactams are needed. This study aimed to evaluate whether an antimicrobial stewardship intervention improved the use of first-line antibiotics for peripartum indications in patients with a reported penicillin allergy, following updates to institutional guidelines. This was a retrospective study of adult patients presenting for vaginal or cesarean delivery at 2 hospitals within a healthcare system. Patients received at least 1 dose of antibiotics for a peripartum indication between May 1, 2018, and October 31, 2018 (preintervention group) and May 1, 2020, to October 31, 2020 (postintervention group). The stewardship intervention bundle, which was implemented between March 2019 and April 2020, included updates to institutional antibiotic guidelines, reclassification of severe penicillin allergy, development of obstetrical prophylaxis and treatment order sets, promotion of allergy referral services, and establishment of a physician champion. The primary outcome was the composite rates of patients with reported penicillin allergy who received a preferred antibiotic for a peripartum indication. The secondary measures included maternal and neonatal outcomes. A total of 192 patients with a history of documented penicillin allergy were evaluated (96 patients in the preintervention group and 96 patients in the postintervention group). Hives were the most commonly reported index symptom in both groups (40/96 [41.7%] vs 39/96 [40.6%]; P=.883). After stewardship interventions, there was a significant increase in the rate of preferred antibiotic use (33/96 [34.3%] vs 81/96 [84.3%]; P<.001). The effect was the greatest in patients with nonsevere allergy (14/76 [18.4%] vs 68/82 [82.9%]; P<.001). There was no difference in the rates of postpartum endometritis, 30-day readmission, 90-day surgical site infection, or neonatal early-onset sepsis between the pre- and postintervention groups. Of note, 1 patient in the postintervention group experienced itching, and another patient developed a rash, both of which resolved with medical management. A comprehensive antibiotic stewardship intervention was associated with a 50% increase in the use of preferred antibiotics for peripartum indications in patients with penicillin allergy. Allergic reactions with first-line beta-lactams were minimal and manageable.

Rupioid psoriasis: A complex, multifactorial presentation

Introduction: Secondary syphilis, also termed the great mimicker due to its vast array of clinical presentations, is associated with skin manifestations including rupioid, macular, psoriasiform, and condylomatous lesions. On clinical examination alone, it can be difficult to differentiate between rupioid syphilis and rupioid psoriasis, especially among cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis co-infection; however, histologic examination can aid in their differentiation. Additional testing such as serum rapid plasma reagin (RPR), anti-HIV antibody, rheumatoid factor, and fungal cultures should be performed to exclude other causes of rupioid lesions. Case Report: A 19-year-old HIV-positive male developed numerous hyperkeratotic skin lesions involving the head, trunk, and extremities over a 4-week period. His RPR was positive (1:64), suggesting a diagnosis of rupioid syphilis. The patient was treated with doxycycline, given a reported history of penicillin allergy. Rapid plasma reagin titers decreased to 1:2 following treatment; however, the skin eruption did not improve. A biopsy of a lesion demonstrated psoriasiform acanthosis with confluent hyperkeratosis, clusters of intracorneal neutrophils, and negative spirochete immunostaining. Based on histopathology and clinical presentation, a diagnosis of rupioid psoriasis was favored. The patient was started on targeted anti-psoriatic therapy with apremilast and maintains close follow-up with his dermatologist every three months. Conclusion: Although the patient’s presentation was initially presumed to be secondary to syphilis, his lack of response to treatment prompted further workup to assess the etiology of the patient’s skin findings more accurately. In doing so, a diagnosis of rupioid psoriasis was favored based on the histologic findings observed.

Oral challenge vs routine care to assess low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospital patients (ORACLE): a pilot randomised controlled trial

BackgroundSelf-reported penicillin allergies are highly prevalent in hospitalised patients and are associated with poor health and health service outcomes. Critically ill patients have historically been underrepresented in prospective delabelling studies in part due to concerns around clinical stability and reliability of penicillin skin testing. Allergy assessment tools exist to identify low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes and facilitate direct oral challenge delabelling. PEN-FAST is a clinical decision rule that has been validated to predict true penicillin allergy in a cohort of non-critically ill patients. There is however limited evidence regarding the feasibility, safety and efficacy of direct oral challenges and the use of delabelling clinical decisions rules in the intensive care setting.MethodsCritically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with low-risk penicillin allergy phenotypes (PEN-FAST score < 3) will be randomised 1:1 to direct oral penicillin challenge (single dose 250 mg oral amoxicillin or implicated penicillin) or routine care, followed by a 2-h observation period. Patients will receive a second oral challenge/observation prior to hospital discharge (with subsequent observation for 2 h). An assessment for antibiotic-associated adverse events will also be undertaken at 24 h and 5 days post each challenge/observation and again at 90 days post-randomisation. The primary outcome measures are feasibility (proportion of eligible patients recruited and protocol compliance) and safety (proportion of patients who experience an antibiotic-associated immune-mediated adverse event or serious adverse event).DiscussionWe will report the feasibility and safety of point-of-care penicillin direct oral challenge in this first randomised controlled trial of low-risk penicillin allergy in critically ill hospitalised patients. Upon completion of the project, important findings will inform the design of planned large prospective multi-centre clinical trials in Australian and international ICUs, further examining safety and efficacy and exploring antimicrobial prescribing-related outcomes following penicillin oral challenge.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials RegistryRegistration Number: ACTRN12621000051842Date registered: 20/01/2021https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379735&isReview=true

Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Challenge in Patients With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy

Fewer than 5% of patients labeled with a penicillin allergy are truly allergic. The standard of care to remove the penicillin allergy label in adults is specialized testing involving prick and intradermal skin testing followed by an oral challenge with penicillin. Skin testing is resource intensive, limits practice to specialist-trained physicians, and restricts the global population who could undergo penicillin allergy delabeling. To determine whether a direct oral penicillin challenge is noninferior to the standard of care of penicillin skin testing followed by an oral challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy. This parallel, 2-arm, noninferiority, open-label, multicenter, international randomized clinical trial occurred in 6 specialized centers, 3 in North America (US and Canada) and 3 in Australia, from June 18, 2021, to December 2, 2022. Eligible adults had a PEN-FAST score lower than 3. PEN-FAST is a prospectively derived and internationally validated clinical decision rule that enables point-of-care risk assessment for adults reporting penicillin allergies. Patients were randomly assigned to either direct oral challenge with penicillin (intervention arm) or a standard-of-care arm of penicillin skin testing followed by oral challenge with penicillin (control arm). The primary outcome was a physician-verified positive immune-mediated oral penicillin challenge within 1 hour postintervention in the intention-to-treat population. Noninferiority was achieved if a 1-sided 95% CI of the risk difference (RD) did not exceed 5 percentage points (pp). A total of 382 adults were randomized, with 377 patients (median [IQR] age, 51 [35-65] years; 247 [65.5%] female) included in the analysis: 187 in the intervention group and 190 in the control group. Most patients had a PEN-FAST score of 0 or 1. The primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.5%) in the intervention group and 1 patient (0.5%) in the control group, with an RD of 0.0084 pp (90% CI, -1.22 to 1.24 pp). The 1-sided 95% CI was below the noninferiority margin of 5 pp. In the 5 days following the oral penicillin challenge, 9 immune-mediated adverse events were recorded in the intervention group and 10 in the control group (RD, -0.45 pp; 95% CI, -4.87 to 3.96 pp). No serious adverse events occurred. In this randomized clinical trial, direct oral penicillin challenge in patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy was noninferior compared with standard-of-care skin testing followed by oral challenge. In patients with a low-risk history, direct oral penicillin challenge is a safe procedure to facilitate the removal of a penicillin allergy label. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04454229.

Does thePenicillin Allergy Label Affect Outcomes of Complicated Odontogenic Infections?

Penicillins are a potent antibiotic in managing odontogenic infections, but 10% of the population is labelled as allergic to these drugs. This has limited their use and resulted in increased utilization of health care resources as well as complications associated with alternative antibiotics. The purpose of the study was to measure the association between patients labeled as penicillin allergic and treatment outcomes in a sample of patients treated for complicated odontogenic infections. Additionally, we sought to investigate antibiotic resistance patterns in these patients. A retrospective cohort study was performed at the Michigan Medicine health care system to include patients who were treated for complicated odontogenic infections by oral and maxillofacial surgery between 2016 and 2020. Complicated odontogenic infection was defined as any odontogenic infection requiring admission and surgical management in the operating room. The primary predictor variable was the penicillin allergy label, which was determined by chart review and not confirmed with formal testing.Outcomes were measures of disease severity. The primary outcome variable was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcome variables were ICU admission (yes/no), repeat computed tomography scan(s), repeat surgery (yes/no), and re-admission (yes/no). Co-variates included were age, sex (male/female), tobacco use status, diabetes, immunocompromised state, number of spaces involved, white blood cell count upon admission and insurance status. For our secondary aim, the primary predictor variable was again penicillin allergy and outcome variable was antibiotic resistance as determined by wound culture results following surgical intervention. Negative binomial regression and logistic regression analyses were performed.P < .05 was considered significant. A total of 150 patients met the inclusion criteria and of those 17.3% reported as penicillin allergic. Patients labelled as penicillin allergic did not differ significantly from patients without penicillin allergy label in terms of treatment outcomes. Age, diabetes, and immunosuppression were associated with an increased length of stay. Patients labelled as penicillin allergic were at significantly higher risk for antibiotic resistance (relative risk=2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.66 to 3.32; P<.001), specifically clindamycin resistance (relative risk= 3.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.93 to 5.18; P<.001). Penicillin allergy was significantly associated with clindamycin resistance. There were similar outcomes amongst patients with and without a penicillin allergy label despite antibiotic differences. Delabeling efforts for patients with a reported penicillin allergy must be considered and local nomograms for antibiotic selection should be used by providers when seeking alternative antibiotics.

In-Office Amoxicillin to Increase Graded-Dose Challenges at Initial Evaluation for Penicillin Allergy.

More than 90% of pediatric patients labeled with a penicillin allergy can tolerate subsequent treatment courses without reaction. Graded-dose challenges (GDCs) are an important tool to clarify reported penicillin allergy. To increase the use of same-day amoxicillin GDCs among patients with a low-risk penicillin allergy history who presented for outpatient allergy office evaluation from 2% to 15% and sustain for 6 months. New patients evaluated in an academic pediatric allergy clinic with a documented penicillin allergy were included, regardless of reason for referral. The percentage of these patients who were administered a GDC to amoxicillin at the initial evaluation was assessed over time. Multiple interventions were implemented to increase same-day GDC: amoxicillin, previously only available from pharmacy, was made available in clinic, and penicillin-allergic patients were scheduled earlier in the clinic session. The baseline rate of new patients with penicillin allergy who received a GDC increased from 2% to 18% after amoxicillin was stocked in the allergy clinic. GDCs further increased to 34% after penicillin-allergic patients were scheduled at a time conducive to challenge. Amoxicillin availability in the clinic setting increased the percentage of eligible patients who completed same-day GDCs. Scheduling adjustments further increased the ability to conduct GDCs. Proactive penicillin allergy delabeling efforts can be assisted through practical approaches in the outpatient setting.

Characterizing Antibiotic Allergy Labels in a Large UK Hospital Population to Inform Antimicrobial Stewardship and Delabeling Assessment Strategy.

Antibiotic allergy labels are important barriers to treatment and antimicrobial stewardship, but their prevalence in UK hospitals is poorly described. To ascertain the prevalence and characteristics of antibiotic allergy labels in a large UK hospital setting and estimate the proportion of penicillin allergy labels for which point-of-care (POC) delabeling assessment would be appropriate. Electronic health records data were analyzed from all patients treated at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in 2019. Validated POC delabeling risk stratification criteria were retrospectively applied to penicillin allergy labels. Recorded reactions to antibiotics were present in 11.8% of all patients (32,148 of 273,216), 16.3% of inpatients (13,874 of 85,230), and 9.7% of outpatients (18,274 of 187,986). Penicillins were the commonest reaction precipitant described (9.0% of patients; 24,646 of 273,216), followed by sulfonamides/trimethoprim (1.4%; 3869 of 273,216) and macrolides/lincosamides (1.3%; 3644 of 273,216). A total of 3.9% of inpatients had recorded reactions to >1 antibiotic class (3348 of 85,230). Cutaneous manifestations were the most commonly described reaction features (40.7% of labels; 15,821 of 38,902). Of 15,949 labels describing probable or possible penicillin "allergy" with sufficient detail to allow for the retrospective assessment of POC delabeling suitability, 1702 were deemed suitable for removal or downgrading of the label to "intolerance" without further investigation (10.7%), 11,887 were appropriate for POC assessment using an oral penicillin challenge (OPC) or OPC with prior bedside skin testing (74.5%), and 2360 were identified as unsuitable for any form of POC assessment (14.8%). Antibiotic allergy labels are highly prevalent in a UK hospital setting. A large proportion of penicillin allergy labels may be suitable for POC delabeling assessment.

Antibiotic prescription practices among dentists treating children in the UK

Introduction There are limited paediatric specific data on antibiotic prescribing practices, which have been cited as one of the causes of general overuse and misuse of antibiotics in young patients. The aim of this study was to investigate prescribing practices among dentists with an interest in paediatric dentistry in the UK. Methods A prospective cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry between February and May 2021. The questions and scenarios were based on antibiotic prescribing guidelines in the UK. Results Two hundred and six dentists completed the survey (45% response rate). Most participants (93%) conformed to guidelines and prescribed amoxicillin as a first-line antibiotic for an odontogenic infection. For patients with a penicillin allergy, 16% of dentists reported clindamycin as their first-choice antibiotic. Seventeen per cent of those surveyed stated that they would prescribe antibiotics for local swelling without any additional factors indicating a persistent or spreading bacterial infection. Further insights into prescribing practices for prophylaxis, paediatric doses and non-clinical factors are described. Conclusions Antibiotics are part of the armamentarium that dentists can use to treat patients. The results of this survey highlight some positive trends as well as some variation in prescribing practice that requires correction and discussion for future research.

Should Penicillin Allergy Testing Be Included as Part of Preoperative Testing?

Penicillin allergy is the most commonly reported drug allergy in the United States. Patients labeled with penicillin allergy are at risk of receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics for surgical site infection prophylaxis, which can lead to increased antibiotic resistance, higher morbidity, suboptimal antibiotic therapy, and higher medical costs. This study aimed to determine the true prevalence of penicillin allergy among surgical patients and to decrease the unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent urogynecologic surgery in 2017. In 2018, a quality initiative was started, and all patients reporting penicillin allergies were offered antibiotic allergy testing as part of their preoperative testing. In 2017, 15% of patients reported penicillin allergy and 52% of them received surgical prophylaxis with broad-spectrum antibiotics. In 2018, 463 patients underwent surgery, 55 of whom reported penicillin allergy and were offered penicillin allergy testing. 35 (64%) agreed to proceed with testing, and of those tested, 33 (94%) tested negative for penicillin allergy. 94% of patients with stated penicillin allergy who consented to allergy testing proved to have negative test. Penicillin allergy testing should be considered as part of preoperative management.

Second-Line Antibiotic Agents in Patient-Reported Penicillin or Cephalosporin Allergy Have No Negative Impact on Antibiotic Resistance After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to compare causative bacteria and their antibiotic resistance profiles in patients developing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimens in primary total hip (THA) and primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA/UKA). MethodsWe reviewed all cases of PJI occurring after primary THA and primary TKA/UKA, between 2011 and 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital. The standard preoperative prophylactic antibiotic for primary joint arthroplasty was cefuroxime and recommended second-line agent was clindamycin. Patients were divided by the replaced joint and analyzed independently. ResultsIn the THA group, culture-positive PJI was detected in 61 of 3,123 (2.0%) cefuroxime-administered cases and 6 of 206 (2.9%) noncefuroxime-administered cases. In the TKA/UKA group, culture positive PJI was identified in 21 of 2,455 (0.9%) cefuroxime-administered cases and in 3 of 211 (1.4%) noncefuroxime administered cases. The most commonly isolated bacteria in both groups were coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS). There were no statistically significant differences of pathogen spectrum depending on the preoperative antibiotic regimen detected. Antibiotic resistance of isolated bacteria was significantly different in 4 of 27 (14.8%) analyzed antibiotics in THA and in 3 of 22 (13.6%) analyzed antibiotics in TKA/UKA. In all cohorts, a high occurrence of oxacillin-resistant CNS (50.0 to 100.0%) and clindamycin-resistant CNS (56.3 to 100.0%) has been observed. ConclusionThe use of the second-line antibiotic did not influence the pathogen spectrum or antibiotic resistance. However, an alarmingly high proportion of CNS strains was resistant to clindamycin.

Removal of incorrect penicillin allergy labels in a UK hospital

ObjectivesPenicillin allergy records are common, often incorrect and are associated with broad spectrum antibiotic use. We piloted a pharmacist-led multidisciplinary penicillin allergy de-labelling daily ward round to determine the opportunity for penicillin allergy de-labelling in a UK hospital. MethodsA daily ward round, delivered by antibiotic pharmacists or junior doctors, identified adult medical and surgical patients between 7 November 2022 and 31 January 2023 with a penicillin allergy record that was preventing first-line penicillin use. An allergy history was taken before risk stratifying likelihood of future harm from penicillin re-exposure and an allergy testing method was determined (direct de-label on history alone or after direct drug provocation testing). After successful allergy de-label, the antibiotic was switched to a penicillin antibiotic. ResultsOf 7214 inpatients during the study period, 1133 (15.7%) had a penicillin allergy record. Of 285 allergy histories taken, 105 (36.8%) met high-risk criteria, 45 (15.8%) met low-risk criteria eligible for direct de-label and 73 (25.6%) met criteria eligible for direct drug provocation testing. We were unable to obtain a history for 61 (21.4%) patients. Of 45 low-risk patients eligible for direct de-label, 40 (88.9%) were de-labelled of whom 24 (53.3%) were switched to a penicillin antibiotic. Of 73 patients with a low-risk allergy history eligible for direct drug provocation testing, 16 (21.9%) received direct drug provocation testing, of whom 9 were switched to a penicillin antibiotic. Two direct de-label patients experienced harm (thrush within 5 days and delayed skin reaction after day 5); none of the direct drug provocation testing patients had a reaction by day 5. The switches resulted in reduced alternative antibiotic use by 173 Daily Defined Doses (DDDs). DiscussionPenicillin allergy de-labelling patient pathway delivered by pharmacists and junior doctors was safe and effective and well accepted by patients and the wider clinical teams.

Evaluating the PEN-FAST Clinical Decision-making Tool to Enhance Penicillin Allergy Delabeling

This cohort study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PEN-FAST as a clinical decision-making tool to enhance penicillin allergy evaluation.

Pregnant Patients with a Documented History of Penicillin Allergy and Associated Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes at a Tertiary Care Center.

Pregnant individuals are likely to need antibiotics during the peripartum period. For pregnant individuals who report a history of penicillin allergy, non-β-lactam antibiotics are often administered. Compared with first-line β-lactam antibiotics, alternative antibiotics can be less effective, more toxic, and more costly. It remains unclear if being labeled with a penicillin allergy is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all pregnant patients who delivered a viable singleton between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation at a large academic hospital from 2013 to 2021. We compared patients who had a documented penicillin allergy history in their electronic medical record versus those who did not and examined whether there were significant differences in maternal outcomes and neonatal outcomes. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Of 41,943 eligible deliveries included in the analysis, 4,705 (11.2%) patients had a penicillin allergy history documented in their electronic medical record and 37,238 (88.8%) did not. Even after adjusting for potential confounders, patients with a documented penicillin allergy had a higher risk of postpartum endometritis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.11) and a higher risk of their neonates having a postnatal hospital stay lasting more than 72 hours (aOR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.18). There were no significant differences seen in the other maternal and neonatal outcomes in both bivariable and multivariable analyses. Pregnant patients who are labeled as having a penicillin allergy are more likely to have postpartum endometritis, and neonates born to mothers who are labeled as having a penicillin allergy are more likely to have a postnatal hospital stay lasting more than 72 hours. There were no other significant differences seen in pregnant patients and their newborns whether they were labeled as having a penicillin allergy history or not. However, pregnant individuals with a penicillin allergy documented in their medical record were significantly more likely to receive alternative non-β lactam antibiotics, and may have benefitted from having more details of their allergy history available as well as proper allergy verification with testing. · It is unclear whether pregnant individuals labeled with penicillin allergies have worse obstetric outcomes.. · These individuals were significantly more likely to have endometritis and their newborns hospitalized for >72 hours.. · They were significantly more likely to receive alternative non-β lactam antibiotics than those without documented allergies..