Pembrolizumab Group Research Articles

Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma receiving immune check point inhibitors

Real-world data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. This study included 42 patients with aUC who received second-line or later pembrolizumab (n = 19), maintenance avelumab followed by first-line chemotherapy (n = 13), or adjuvant nivolumab after radical surgery (n = 10). Time-course changes in the domains and scales related to HRQoL were evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-G, and SF-8 questionnaires during ICI therapy. Anchor-based approaches for minimally important differences were determined as ‘improved’, ‘stable’, and ‘deteriorated’. We found significant improvements after the start of pembrolizumab treatment on many scales. Almost none of the scales changed significantly in the avelumab and nivolumab groups. Approximately 80% of the pembrolizumab group had deteriorated social/family well-being in FACT-G. Approximately 60% of the patients in the avelumab group had deteriorated general health and vitality in SF-8. In the nivolumab group, none of the scales deteriorated in > 50% of the patients. Deterioration of physical function in the SF-8 was associated with occurrence of treatment-related adverse events ≥ grade 2 during ICI therapy (P = 0.013). Our findings demonstrated that majority of patients with aUC who received ICI therapy had a stable HRQoL, which was consistent with evidence from clinical trials.

Calibrating Observational Health Record Data Against a Randomized Trial

The conditions required for health record data sources to accurately assess treatment effectiveness remain unclear. Emulation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with health record data and subsequent calibration of the results can help elucidate this. To pilot an emulation of the KEYNOTE-189 RCT using a commercially available electronic health record (EHR) data source. This retrospective cohort study used an EHR database spanning from April 2007 to February 2023. Follow-up began on treatment initiation and proceeded until an outcome event, loss to follow-up, end of data, or end of study period (640 days). The population-based cohort was ascertained from EHRs provided by 52 health systems across the US. Eligibility criteria were defined as closely as possible to the benchmark RCT. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer initiating first-line treatment for metastatic disease were included. Patients with evidence of squamous non-small cell lung cancer, primary nonlung malignant neoplasms, or identified EGFR/ALK variations were excluded. Data were analyzed from June to October 2023. Initiation of first-line pembrolizumab and chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone. Chemotherapy in both groups was defined as a combination of pemetrexed and platinum-based (carboplatin or cisplatin) therapy. Outcomes of interest were 12-month survival probability and mortality hazard ratio (HR). A total of 1854 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [9.6] years; 971 [52.4%] men) were eligible, including 589 patients who initiated pembrolizumab and chemotherapy and 1265 patients who initiated chemotherapy only. The cohort included 364 Black patients (19.6%) and 1445 White patients (77.9%). The 12-month survival probabilities were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.54-0.65) in the pembrolizumab group and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.55-0.62) in the chemotherapy-only group, compared with 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64-0.74) in the KEYNOTE-189 pembrolizumab group and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.42-0.56) in the KEYNOTE-189 chemotherapy-only group. The mortality HR was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.78-1.16), compared with 0.49 (95% CI, 0.38-0.64) in the KEYNOTE-189 RCT. In this cohort study piloting an RCT emulation, results were incongruous with the benchmark trial. Differences in patient treatment and data capture between the RCT and EHR populations, confounding by indication, treatment crossover, and accuracy of captured diagnoses may explain these findings. Future feasibility assessments will require data sources to have important oncology-specific measures curated.

Adjuvant treatment for renal cell carcinoma: current status and future

Purpose of review Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is resistant to chemotherapy. Adjuvant interferon and tyrosine kinase inhibitors were ineffective. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), however, have shed new hope in this setting. In the current review, updated evidence of adjuvant therapy in RCC is summarized. Recent findings KEYNOTE-564 demonstrated survival benefits of adjuvant Pembrolizumab in RCC. EAU guidelines now recommend adjuvant pembrolizumab to ccRCC patients at an increased risk of recurrence, as defined in the study. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly longer for the Pembrolizumab group than placebo group [DFS 77.3 vs. 68.1%; hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.68; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.53–0.87; P = 0.002]. From its updated analysis, at median follow up of 57.2 months, overall survival (OS) benefit of Pembrolizumab was demonstrated (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44–0.87; P = 0.005). A number of other adjuvant ICI trials have though been negative. Summary Pembrolizumab is currently the only adjuvant therapy for RCC showing survival benefits, amid a number of negative trials on adjuvant immunotherapy. Currently, there is no role for adjuvant tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and radiotherapy for RCC. Meanwhile, a multidisciplinary approach and shared decision-making should be adopted.

ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: a randomised, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab or placebo plus adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provides clinically meaningful benefit as first-line therapy for advanced (locoregional extension and residual disease after surgery)/metastatic/recurrent mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer, with greater magnitude of benefit in the dMMR phenotype. We evaluated the addition of pembrolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy (with/without radiation therapy) among patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer without any residual macroscopic disease following curative-intent surgery. We included patients with histologically confirmed high-risk [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I/II of non-endometrioid histology or endometrioid histology with p53/TP53 abnormality, or stage III/IVA of any histology] endometrial cancer following surgery with curative intent and no evidence of disease postoperatively, with no prior radiotherapy or systemic therapy. Patients were randomised to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) for six cycles added to carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo every 6 weeks (Q6W) for six cycles per treatment assignment. Radiotherapy was at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoints were investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 1095 patients were randomised (pembrolizumab, n= 545; placebo, n= 550). At this interim analysis (data cut-off, 4 March 2024), 119 (22%) DFS events occurred in the pembrolizumab group and 121 (22%) occurred in the placebo group [hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.32; P= 0.570]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year DFS rates were 75% and 76% in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. The hazard ratio for DFS was 0.31 (95% CI 0.14-0.69) in the dMMR population (n= 281) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.91-1.57) in the pMMR population (n= 814). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 386 of 543 (71%) and 348 of 549 (63%) patients in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. No treatment-related grade 5 AEs occurred. Adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy did not improve DFS in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, all-comer endometrial cancer. Preplanned subgroup analyses for stratification factors suggest that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved DFS in patients with dMMR tumours. Safety was manageable. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04634877; EudraCT, 2020-003424-17. Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Observation in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma.

Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma is an aggressive disease with high rates of relapse. Whether pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy would be effective in patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is unknown. In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks for 1 year or to undergo observation. Randomization was stratified according to pathological stage, centrally tested programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status, and previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The coprimary end points were disease-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We considered the trial to be successful if either disease-free survival or overall survival was significantly longer with pembrolizumab than with observation. A total of 702 patients underwent randomization; 354 were assigned to receive pembrolizumab, and 348 were assigned to observation. As of July 5, 2024, the median duration of follow-up for disease-free survival was 44.8 months. The median disease-free survival was 29.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.0 to 40.7) with pembrolizumab and 14.2 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 20.2) with observation (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.90; two-sided P = 0.003). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of attribution) occurred in 50.7% of the patients in the pembrolizumab group and in 31.6% of the patients in the observation group. Among patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery, disease-free survival was significantly longer with adjuvant pembrolizumab than with observation. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and others; Alliance A031501 AMBASSADOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03244384.).

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-671): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

At the first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-671 trial, adding perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved event-free survival in participants with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report overall survival and health-related quality of life outcomes from the second interim analysis. KEYNOTE-671 was a global phase 3 trial done at 189 medical centres. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2) NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to four cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery and 13 cycles of adjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks) or to four cycles of neoadjuvant placebo (administered intravenously every 3 weeks) plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery and 13 cycles of adjuvant placebo (administered intravenously every 3 weeks). Randomisation was done centrally using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by disease stage, PD-L1 expression, histology, and geographical region in blocks of four. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments; local pharmacists were unmasked to support treatment preparation. The dual primary endpoints were overall survival and event-free survival evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03425643, and is ongoing but closed to enrolment. Between May 11, 2018, and Dec 15, 2021, 797 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=397) or the placebo group (n=400). Median study follow-up at the second interim analysis was 36·6 months (IQR 27·6-47·8). 36-month overall survival estimates were 71% (95% CI 66-76) in the pembrolizumab group and 64% (58-69) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·56-0·93]; one-sided p=0·0052; threshold, one-sided p=0·0054). Median event-free survival was 47·2 months (95% CI 32·9 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 18·3 months (14·8-22·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·59 [95% CI 0·48-0·72]). In the as-treated population, grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 179 (45%) of 396 participants in the pembrolizumab group and in 151 (38%) of 399 participants in the placebo group. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) participants in the placebo group. The significant overall survival benefit of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone coupled with a manageable safety profile support the use of perioperative pembrolizumab in patients with resectable, early-stage NSCLC. Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Comparative Efficacy of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy Versus Continued Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma With No Progression After 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching

IntroductionIn cases of metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma with no disease progression after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, including platinum agents, treatment options include continuation of chemotherapy or switching to maintenance therapy with avelumab. This study compared the treatment outcomes of avelumab maintenance therapy with those of pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma using propensity score matching. Patients and MethodsBetween January 2017 and December 2022, 243 patients with metastatic and unresectable urothelial carcinoma were treated with either avelumab or pembrolizumab at the Yamaguchi University Hospital and its affiliated institutions. We retrospectively compared the oncological outcomes and adverse events by aligning patient characteristics and treatment backgrounds using propensity score matching. ResultsThe analysis compared 36 cases receiving avelumab maintenance therapy after chemotherapy to 49 cases where patients, after receiving 4 courses of chemotherapy including platinum-based agents without disease progression, were subsequently administered pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment following disease progression. Using propensity score matching, 27 cases from each group were selected for comparison. From the initiation of prechemotherapy to disease progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors, the median progression-free survival was 20.7 and 23.3 months in the avelumab and pembrolizumab groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference observed (P = .358). However, avelumab tended to have a lower rate of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment compared to pembrolizumab. ConclusionProgression-free survival was similar for avelumab maintenance therapy and the sequence of continued chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab after no disease progression at four chemotherapy courses. Avelumab may require less high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, potentially enhancing safety.

The addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not increase the risk of developing postoperative anastomotic leakage for ESCC: an analysis from a prospective cohort

BackgroundTo compare the difference of postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) rate between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with pembrolizumab and NCRT group, and investigate the risk factors of developing AL for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC).Materials and methodsThe GF was contoured on the pretreatment planning computed tomography and dosimetric parameters were retrospectively calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent risk predictors for the entire cohort. A nomogram risk prediction model for postoperative AL was established.ResultsA total of 160 ESCC patients were included for analysis. Of them, 112 were treated with NCRT with pembrolizumab and 44 patients with NCRT. Seventeen (10.6%) patients experienced postoperative AL with a rate of 10.7% (12/112) in NCRT with pembrolizumab and 11.4% (5/44) in NCRT group. For the entire cohort, mean, D50, Dmax, V5, V10 and V20 GF dose were statistically higher in those with AL (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor length (p = 0.012), volume of GF (p = 0.003) and mean dose of GF (p = 0.007) were independently predictors for postoperative AL. Using receiver operating characteristics analysis, the mean dose limit on the GF was defined as 14 Gy.ConclusionBased on our prospective database, no significant difference of developing AL were observed between NCRT with pembrolizumab and NCRT group. We established an individualized nomograms based on mean GF dose combined with clinical indicators to predict AL in the early postoperative period.

Randomized trial of anetumab ravtansine and pembrolizumab compared to pembrolizumab for mesothelioma

PurposeThe mesothelin-targeting antibody-drug conjugate anetumab ravtansine was evaluated in combination with the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab based on the common expression of mesothelin and reports of activity in mesothelioma. Patients and methodsA phase 1 safety run-in of the combination of anetumab ravtansine (6.5 mg/kg iv q3weeks) and pembrolizumab (200 mg, IV q3weeks) was conducted, followed by a phase 2 randomization to the combination or pembrolizumab alone at medical centers across the United States and Canada in the National Cancer Institute’s Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network. Patients with pleural mesothelioma that expressed mesothelin and had previously received platinum-based therapy were eligible. ResultsIn phase 1 (n = 12) only one dose limiting toxicity was observed and the rules for dose reduction were not met. In phase 2, there was no difference in the confirmed response rates between the combination group (n = 18, 2 partial responses [PR], 11 %) and the pembrolizumab group (n = 17, 1 PR, 6 %; z = -0.5523, p = 0.29116). The median PFS was 12.2 months (95 % CI 5.1–not evaluable [NE]) for the combination, and 3.9 months for pembrolizumab (95 % CI 2.1-NE)(HR=0.55, p = 0.20). Patients with high baseline levels of soluble mesothelin who received anetumab ravtansine had a median PFS of 5 months. ConclusionsThe numeric difference in PFS between treatment groups was not statistically significant, likely related to a smaller than planned sample size. High levels of soluble mesothelin should potentially be considered to select against the use of mesothelin-targeting therapies in development that are neutralized by soluble mesothelin.

Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): long-term, health-related quality-of-life results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

In the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 study, adjuvant pembrolizumab improved recurrence-free survival and distant-metastasis-free survival in patients with resected stage III melanoma. Earlier results showed no effect of pembrolizumab on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Little is known about HRQOL after completion of treatment with pembrolizumab, an important research area concerning patients who are likely to become long-term survivors. This study reports long-term HRQOL results. This double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial compared adjuvant pembrolizumab with placebo in patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated stage IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC resected cutaneous melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or 0, recruited from 123 academic centres and community hospitals in 23 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a minimisation technique stratified for stage and geographical region to receive 200 mg of intravenous pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 18 doses. Investigators, patients, and those collecting or analysing data were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint of the trial was recurrence-free survival (reported elsewhere). HRQOL was a prespecified exploratory endpoint, measured with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. All patients with a baseline HRQOL evaluation available who were alive 108 weeks from randomisation were included in this analysis of long-term HRQOL. Long-term HRQOL included assessments measured every 6 months between 108 weeks and 48 months after randomisation. The threshold of clinical relevance for all HRQOL scales used was an average change of 5 points. The trial is ongoing, recruitment is completed, and HRQOL data collection is finalised. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362594, and EudraCT, 2014-004944-37. Between Aug 26, 2015, and Nov 14, 2016, 1019 patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=514) or placebo (n=505). Completion of the HRQOL evaluation at baseline exceeded 90% (481 [94%] patients in the pembrolizumab group and 467 [92%] in the placebo group), and ranged between 60% and 90% for post-baseline timepoints. Among patients with a baseline HRQOL evaluation, 365 (39%) were female and 583 (61%) were male. The mean change from baseline to long-term HRQOL was -0·56 (95% CI -2·33 to 1·22) in the pembrolizumab group and 1·63 (-0·12 to 3·38) in the placebo group. The difference between the two groups was -2·19 (-4·65 to 0·27, p=0·081). Differences for all other scales were smaller than 5 and not statistically significant. Adjuvant pembrolizumab did not have a significant impact on long-term HRQOL compared with placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma. These findings, together with earlier results on efficacy and HRQOL, support the use of pembrolizumab in this setting. Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Clinical Outcomes of Enfortumab Vedotin in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma With Prior Avelumab Versus Pembrolizumab Therapy.

This study retrospectively evaluated whether enfortumab vedotin (EV) monotherapy is effective as a late-line treatment according to prior treatment type in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). We assessed consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in the Kyushu study population with lower and upper urinary tract cancer treated with EV monotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy failure between December 2021 and March 2024. In particular, patients receiving avelumab maintenance or pembrolizumab therapy before EV for advanced UC were analyzed and compared according to the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of the 80 enrolled patients, 31 and 49 received avelumab and pembrolizumab before EV therapy, respectively. The avelumab and pembrolizumab groups had comparable objective response rates (48.4% vs. 44.9%, p=0.820) and disease control rates (77.4% vs. 67.3%, p=0.448). These two groups showed no significant difference in PFS from the initiation of EV (median: 6.4 months vs. 4.2 months, p=0.184); meanwhile, the avelumab group had better OS from the initiation of EV than the pembrolizumab group (median: 16.0 months vs. 10.2 months, p=0.019). Moreover, the median OS after first-line chemotherapy initiation was longer in the avelumab group than in the pembrolizumab group (40.3 months vs. 24.7 months, p=0.054). On multivariate analysis, avelumab maintenance therapy before EV reduced the mortality risk by 47% (95% confidence interval=0.27-1.03; p=0.059). EV monotherapy after avelumab maintenance therapy provides favorable survival outcomes in patients with advanced UC.

Comparison of platinum combination chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab versus platinum combination chemotherapy plus nivolumab-ipilimumab for treatment-naive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Japan (JCOG2007): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and an antibody to PD-1 or to its ligand PD-L1, with or without an antibody to CTLA-4, has improved the survival of individuals with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomised controlled trial has evaluated the survival benefit of adding a CTLA-4 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy plus a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. This open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted at 48 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older with previously untreated advanced NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with known driver oncogenes were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (four cycles) plus pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab group) or platinum-based chemotherapy (two cycles) plus nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivolumab-ipilimumab group). The primary endpoint was overall survival and assessed in all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial is registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCTs031210013, and is now closed to new enrolment and is ongoing. Between patient accrual initiation on April 6, 2021, and discontinuation of the trial on March 30, 2023, 11 (7%) of 148 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group had a treatment-related death. Because of the high number of treatment-related deaths, patient accrual was terminated early, resulting in 295 patients (236 [80%] male and 59 [20%] female) enrolled; the primary analysis was done on the basis of 117 deaths (fewer than the required 329 deaths). By May 25, 2023 (data cutoff), overall survival did not differ significantly between the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and the pembrolizumab group (median 23·7 months [95% CI 17·6-not estimable] vs 20·5 months [17·6-not estimable], respectively; hazard ratio 0·98 [90% CI 0·72-1·34]; p=0·46). Non-haematological adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 87 (60%) of 146 patients in the nivolumab-ipilimumab group and 59 (41%) of 144 patients in the pembrolizumab group. The pembrolizumab group tended to have a better quality of life compared with the nivolumab-ipilimumab group. The safety and efficacy data suggest an unfavourable benefit-risk profile for nivolumab-ipilimumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy relative to pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC, although a definitive conclusion awaits an updated analysis of overall survival. The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.

●Introduction: Pembrolizumab have been approved for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. However, the results of several clinical trials are not entirely consistent, and the dominant population of first-line immunotherapy for advanced GC/GEJ still needs to be precisely determined. ●Purpose: The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced GC/GEJ. ●Methods: We conducted computerized searches across multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. We established the inclusion criteria to comprise randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of pembrolizumab in late-stage GC/GCJ cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of outcome measures using STATA 14.0 software. ●Results: A total of six studies involving 1,448 cases were included in this analysis. The results of the meta-analysis indicate that, when compared to chemotherapy, patients in the pembrolizumab group experienced a significant reduction in the risk of mortality in terms of overall survival (OS) (HR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.65-0.79, p&lt;0.01). In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), pembrolizumab was associated with a similar PFS as compared to chemotherapy (HR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.73-1.07, p=0.206). Subgroup analyses based on PD-L1 expression levels indicated a significantly longer PFS with pembrolizumab in subgroups of patients with PD-L1 CPS≥10, but not in these with PD-L1 CPS≥1 and PD-L1 CPS≥5. Subgroup analyses based on distinct geographical regions revealed a comparable effect of PFS in patients residing in Asia or the USA. Subgroup analysis based on tumor sites consistently demonstrated a similar effect of PFS in patients with EC/GEJ tumors and GC patients. ●Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that pembrolizumab led to a significant extension in OS and ORR, along with a favorable tolerability profile compared to chemotherapy. Furthermore, the observed survival benefits were particularly pronounced in subgroup patients with a CPS of ≥10. Given the potential limitations inherent in our study, it is imperative to underscore the necessity for further large-scale RCTs to corroborate our results. ●Keywords: gastro-esophageal junction cancer, meta-analysis, chemotherapy, pembrolizumab.

What prognostic factors have impacted the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent or metastatic oral cancer?

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely adapted for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (RM-HNC), and various studies on its prognostic factors have been reported. We aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors of ICI treatment for RM oral cancer (RM-OC) in a retrospective study. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients with RM-OC treated with ICIs (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) at our department from May 2017 to February 2023. The objective response rate (ORR) for ICI treatment and the relationship between several potential prognostic factors, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed statistically. ResultsThe investigation enrolled 31 patients, 16 with nivolumab and 15 with pembrolizumab. There were no significant differences in the ORR or disease control rate between the nivolumab and pembrolizumab groups (p = 0.4578 and 0.2524). In multivariate analysis, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) exhibited statistical correlations with PFS, whereas the use of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and PNI demonstrated statistical associations with OS. ConclusionOur findings imply that the use of antibiotics and PPIs, which can modify the gut microbiota, may also serve as a prognostic determinant for ICI treatment in RM-OC, consistent with previous studies. Additionally, PNI may be essential in affecting the survival rates of both PFS and OS and could be an exceedingly valuable inflammatory biomarker for RM-OC.

Efficacy and side effects of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A meta‑analysis.

Recently, the treatment plan of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was regarded as a promising treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). However, the efficacy and side effects of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy still lack evidence-based medical evidence to support. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the hot issue. By searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, any randomized clinical studies of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC met the inclusion criteria were included. The quality of the literature was evaluated and the data was extracted. A correlative software was also used to analyze the data and to draw a conclusion. After screening 14,015 studies, four studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy alone group, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly longer. In programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 subgroup and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 subgroup analyses, the results showed that the response rate (RR) and complete response rate (CR) were both higher in pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group compared with chemotherapy alone group. There were not significant differences in the CR, the treatment-related adverse events, succumbed to drug-related events and succumbed to immune-mediated events between the two groups. However, the effect events such as the treatment-related adverse events led to discontinuation, the 3-5 treatment-related adverse events and the immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions were more common in pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group. In conclusion, the current meta-analysis revealed that, in treating advanced GC/GEJC, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had improved therapeutic efficacies than chemotherapy alone, as evidenced by the significantly longer OS. Furthermore, the patients in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 subgroup and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 subgroup appeared to benefit from pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy treatment because of higher RR and CR. However, side effects such as the treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation, the 3-5 treatment-related adverse events, and immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions deserved more attention.

Intravesical local administration of pembrolizumab for treatment of bladder cancer: A novel strategy to minimize toxicity.

e14687 Background: A major hallmark of bladder cancer (BCa) is a higher treatment success rate than prostate cancer following stimulation of innate anti-tumor immune response either by intravesical BCG or to FDA approved intravenous anti-PD1 checkpoint antibody (pembrolizumab) approved for BCG resistant BCa since 2021. However, injected pembrolizumab is characterized by a markedly higher incidence (66%) of serious adverse events than the median duration of complete response of ~40% for non-muscle invasive BCa (NMIBC) and 15-20% for invasive BCa. Since the toxicity (fatigue, Pneumonitis and diarrhea) of injected pembrolizumab is linked to systemic breakdown of T-cell mediated immune surveillance we enquired whether analogous to BCG, pembrolizumab can be administered intravesically to safely induce a localized anti-tumor response in mouse model of BCa. Methods: Six weeks old female mice of B6D2F1 strain (n=10) were ad libitum fed carcinogen, N-butyl-N-4-hydroxybutyl nitrosamine (BBN) in drinking water (0.05% w/v) for 12 weeks. The presence of BBN evoked tumor was ascertained by unenhanced T2 weighted MRI at week 11 prior to single intravesical dosing by 24G transurethral catheter under isoflurane anesthesia of 0.1mL vehicle (sterile water) with or without 0.3mg of Pembrolizumab (Lipella Pharmaceuticals). 6 weeks later, T2 weighted MRI was repeated together with T1 mapping by ICE-MRI prior to organ harvest. Results: BBN feeding evoked multiclonal tumors (red*) of comparable size on T2 weighted MRI at week 11 but repeat MRI 7 weeks after treatment revealed that tumor progression and perivesical invasion noted in vehicle group was arrested in pembrolizumab group. Longest dimension of BBN tumor in vehicle treated mice was ≥ 1mm longer (p&lt;0.05) than in pembrolizumab treated mice. T1 mapping revealed thickened bladder wall missed by T2 MRI. Conclusions: These findings on single intravesical dose of pembrolizumab (10mg/kg) in mice are consistent with human study on multiple intravesical dosing of BCG plus pembrolizumab (1-2mg/kg) in BCG resistant NMIBC patients. Intravesical pembrolizumab mirrors the limited systemic uptake of radiolabelled antibodies together with substantially higher ingress into tumor foci. The tumor selective ingress for BCa immunotherapy without any toxicity will be enhanced with Lipella Pharmaceutical’s liposomal delivery of Pembrolizumab.

Immunotherapy related patient-reported outcomes from five randomized controlled trials in patients with triple negative breast cancer: A systematic review.

e23167 Background: Immunotherapy (IO) has improved clinical outcomes in patients with early-stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) receiving neoadjuvant therapy and certain patient subsets in the metastatic setting. This study aims to evaluate IO-related Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) in patients older than 65 years. Methods: We searched Medline ALL (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Central (Wiley), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The searches combined terms reflecting (1) the immune checkpoint inhibitors atezolizumab, durvalumab, and pembrolizumab; (2) breast cancer; and (3) randomized controlled trials. Results were limited to items published in English from 2013 through September 2023. We excluded review articles and clinical trial records without results. Two independent reviewers (C.S. and M.L.) screened the studies using the systematic review management tool Covidence, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer (W.I.Z.). We included studies that reported on PRO in adults with TNBC receiving any of the three immunotherapies of interest. Results: Five publications composed of two peer-reviewed papers and three abstracts were identified, including 3878 total patients and 3184 with PRO. Three pembrolizumab studies had 2643 total patients (2056 with PRO) and two atezolizumab studies (IMPASSION 130, IMPASSION 031) had 1235 total patients (1128 with PRO). The PRO analysis in KEYNOTE 522 included 1145 patients in the neoadjuvant phase and 847 in the adjuvant phase. The PRO analysis in KEYNOTE 355 included total 847 patients and 317 with Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥10. No study specified PRO data for patients older than 65 years. Baseline completion rates for all studies were &gt; 80%. All studies used standardized PRO instruments, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC- QLQ C30) and its Breast Cancer Module (QLQ-BR23), the Functional Assessment of Cancer-Therapy-General (FACT-G GP5), and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-D5). All studies showed no statistical difference, or clinical meaningful decline in PRO endpoints between patients who received chemo with IO versus chemo with placebo, during and post treatment follow up. The PRO analysis from KEYNOTE 119, which included total 594 patients of which 187 had CPS ≥10, demonstrated that patients receiving single agent chemotherapy had worse PROs related to systemic therapy side effects and hair loss while the pembrolizumab group had decreased worry about future health. None included subgroup analysis by age, including patients older than 65 years. Conclusions: Our systematic review demonstrates that in both early and advanced TNBC, IO did not worsen PRO. Prospective and retrospective data in IO-related PRO in older patient population are needed.

Systemic inflammatory markers in neoadjuvant pembrolizumab therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: Prognostic insights and nomogram construction.

e12649 Background: Systemic inflammatory markers derived from peripheral blood cells, such as the neutrophils and lymphocytes ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR), have shown promise as prognostic markers. Currently, neoadjuvant treatment (NACT) for early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) involves the addition of an immune therapy, and little is known about the variation of these markers in this specific context. Methods: This study evaluated two groups who received NACT for eTNBC in a single third-level cancer center. The first received NACT with EC X4 and a weekly paclitaxel regimen, the second pembrolizumab and NACT. A total of 70 patients were included, 37 patients in the pembrolizumab group. NLR was defined as the absolute blood neutrophil count (N) divided by the absolute lymphocyte count (L), dNLR was defined as the N divided by the derived L (absolute leukocyte count — N), PLR was defined as the absolute platelet count divided by the L, LMR was defined as the L divided by the absolute monocyte count. Association between systemic inflammatory markers and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed using statistical tests. Inflammatory markers were evaluated at the time of diagnosis, at the time of chemotherapy regimen change, and 1 week before surgery. The χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used for correlation and Student’s t-test to compare different groups. Results: The pCR rates were 60,6% in the standard therapy and 77,8% in the pembrolizumab. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups. NLR, dNLR, PLR and LMR at 6 months showed significant differences compared to baseline levels. dNLR in the immunotherapy group, at the end of therapy, showed statistical significance with the Welch Two Sample t-test with p-value = 0.001. Variables were weighted with respect to the type of treatment and the outcome was assessed as pCR. On the basis of these data, a nomogram was constructed to predict the likelihood of achieving pCR in patients undergoing neoadjuvant pembrolizumab therapy. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of systemic inflammatory markers as prognostic indicators in patients with eTNBC undergoing NACT. dNLR is a novel biomarker associated with clinical outcome in solid tumors. In this study, for the first time, a correlation was found between the use of pembrolizumab and the change in dNLR and consequently its impact on pCR. A nomogram was constructed to predict the outcome of pCR. [Table: see text]

Comparative efficacy of six programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors in first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

e14702 Background: All six programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, and camrelizumab) have been used as first-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the comparative efficacy of these different drugs remains unclear. Methods: Retrospective collection of patient data from the First, Third, and Fifth Medical Centers of the Chinese PLA General Hospital who received PD-1 inhibitors (monotherapy or combination therapy) from June 2015 to April 2023. Analysis of patient clinical characteristics, treatment response, and survival outcomes was conducted, with the primary endpoints being overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: 913 patients were included and divided into 6 groups: nivolumab (123, 13.5%), pembrolizumab (421, 46.1%), sintilimab (239, 26.1%), tislelizumab (64, 7.0%), toripalimab (39, 4.3%), and camrelizumab (27, 3.0%). Median PFS was 16.0, 16.1, 18.4, 16.9, 23.7, and 12.8 months, and median OS was 33.7, 36.1, 32.5, not reached, 30.9, and 46.0 months for the nivolumab, sintilimab, pembrolizumab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, and camrelizumab groups, respectively. PFS and OS did not differ among the different PD-1 inhibitor groups (all P&gt;0.05). There were differences in ORR among the different PD-1 inhibitors (P&lt;0.05), but no differences in DCR (P&gt;0.05). Conclusions: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, and camrelizumab exhibit similar efficacy in first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Safety of pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in a pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trials of melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundThe safety profile of adjuvant pembrolizumab was evaluated in a pooled analysis of 4 phase 3 clinical trials. MethodsPatients had completely resected stage IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC melanoma per American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition, criteria (AJCC-7; KEYNOTE-054); stage IIB or IIC melanoma per AJCC-8 (KEYNOTE-716); stage IB, II, or IIIA non–small cell lung cancer per AJCC-7 (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091); or postnephrectomy/metastasectomy clear cell renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence (KEYNOTE-564). Patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg up to 200 mg for pediatric patients) or placebo every 3 weeks for approximately 1 year. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized for patients who received ≥ 1 dose of treatment. ResultsData were pooled from 4125 patients treated with pembrolizumab (n = 2060) or placebo (n = 2065). Median (range) duration of treatment was 11.1 months (0.0–18.9) with pembrolizumab and 11.2 months (0.0–18.1) with placebo. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 78.6 % (1620/2060) of patients in the pembrolizumab group (grade 3–5, 16.3 % [336/2060]) and 58.7 % (1212/2065) in the placebo group (grade 3–5, 3.5 % [72/2065]). Immune-mediated AEs (e.g. adrenal insufficiency, hypophysitis, and thyroiditis) occurred in 36.2 % (746/2060) of patients in the pembrolizumab group (grade 3–5, 8.6 % [177/2060]) and 8.4 % (174/2065) in the placebo group (grade 3–5, 1.1 % [23/2065]). Of patients with ≥ 1 immune-mediated AE or infusion reaction, systemic corticosteroids were required for 35.2 % (268/761) and 20.2 % (39/193) of patients in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. ConclusionsAdjuvant pembrolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile that was comparable to prior reports in advanced disease.