POP-Q Research Articles

Importance of vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - retrospective study.

To compare the subjective and objective results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) with and without the introduction of a vaginal packing one year after surgery.Methodology:This is a retrospective cohort study of 125 women after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy operated on in 2013-2016 with complete annual follow-up. Patients with a total hysterectomy were excluded from the study. Basic patient characteristics, preoperative POP-Q and surgery data were collected. The subjectiveoutcome of the surgery was assessed using the PGI-I (patient global impression of improvement). The anatomicoutcome of the surgery was evaluated using the composite definition of surgical failure based on POP-Q (Ba ≥ -1, C ≥ -3, Bp ≥ -1). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they had vaginal packing after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed usingc2, Wilcoxon and Fischer test according to the distribution of normality.Results:A total of 125 women were enrolled in the study; 48 (38.4%) after LSC, 58 (46.4%) with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy and 19 (15.2%) after sacrohysterocolpopexy. Vaginal packing was introduced for 24-48 hours after surgery in 86 (68.8%) women. The groups did not differ in age, body mass index, smoking or preoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. We did not observe statistically significant differences in PGI-I first year after surgery. The difference in anatomic surgical failure did not reach statistical significance, although more failures were observed in the group without packing (12.8 vs. 3.5%; P = 0.09). The mean C-point value one year after surgery was lower in the non-tamponade group (-7 vs. -7.5; P < 0.009). No mesh extrusion or serious complications were recorded in the monitored group.Conclusion:Vaginal packing after LSC probably does not affect patient satisfaction after surgery, however, it may be associated with better anatomicaloutcome one year after the surgery. The results of the study must be confirmed by a more detailed prospective evaluation.

Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

Study ObjectiveTo investigate whether minimally invasive Sacrohysteropexy (SH) is non-inferior to Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) with uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) in women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse. DesignProspective, randomized, non-inferiority study SettingTertiary university-based hospital. PatientsA total of 146 patients with uterovaginal prolapse between July 2016 and August 2019. InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either laparoscopic or robotic SH surgery or VH with USLS surgery. Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary outcome was prolapse recurrence at 1 year after surgery, defined as prolapse ≥ stage 2 evaluated using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system, bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms, or retreatment for prolapse. The secondary outcomes included operation time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, operation-related complications, pain intensity, quality of life, and activities of daily living. Of 146 women who underwent randomization, 73 in the SH group and 73 in the VH with USLS group were analyzed. SH was non-inferior for recurrence compared with VH with USLS (16.4% vs.15.8%, 95% confidence interval: -13.0%, 14.2%). Operating duration and transvaginal length were significantly longer in the SH group, while there were no significant differences in the estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, or postoperative complication rates. Although perioperative pain intensity was greater from 1 week to 1 month in the SH group, the quality of life and activities of daily living did not differ between the groups throughout postoperative year 1. ConclusionLaparoscopic or robotic SH was non-inferior to VH with USLS for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse at the 1-year follow-up.

Results of the laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy techniques done for uterine prolapse

Background/Aim: Sacrocolpopexy is considered the gold-standard surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse. This technique can be performed using a laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic lateral suspension has emerged as a new alternative pelvic organ prolapse surgery method. This study aims to compare the postoperative anatomical improvement and sexual function outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (Group 1) versus laparoscopic lateral suspension (Group 2) for pelvic organ prolapse at our institution. Methods: Group 1 consisted of 14 patients, while Group 2 comprised seven patients. Relevant data were collected using the Turkish-validated Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), A Simple Questionnaire to Screen for Sexual Dysfunction, and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) questionnaires. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of the preoperative stage of uterine prolapse (2.6 (0.8) vs. 2.7 (0.7) [P=0.534]). The postoperative period was significantly longer in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (1,014.7 (348.8) days vs. 598.4 (276.5) days [P=0.013]). In the POP-Q evaluation, point C was measured as -6.6 (1.1) cm in Group 1 and -5.2 (1.5) cm in Group 2, indicating a statistically more proximal location (P=0.037). The total vaginal length was greater in Group 1 than in Group 2, but this difference was not statistically significant (8.7 (1.2) cm vs. 8.1 (1.3) cm, [P=0.343]). There was no statistical difference between the groups in terms of uterine prolapse stages and sexual function during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Laparoscopic lateral suspension is an alternative method for patients with uterine prolapse, offering comparable anatomical and sexual outcomes to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Comparison of Surgical Outcome of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy between the Novice and Experienced Surgeon in Laparoscopic Surgery

We retrospectively analyzed the safety and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) by the novice surgeon (performed ＜5 laparoscopic surgery). Between November 2017 and December 2020, there were 15 cases in which the novice surgeon performed part of LSC, 8 cases in which the novice performed all of LSC, and 50 cases in which the experienced surgeon (performed ＞100 laparoscopic surgery) performed all of LSC. We compared surgical outcome of the 50 cases operated by the experienced surgeon and 23 cases operated by the novice. The laparoscopic time was longer when performed by the novice than by the experienced surgeon (median 208 minutes vs 189 minutes, p＝0.039). Cases of pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) stage 4 were operated more often by the experienced surgeon than by the novice (28% vs 4.8%, p＝0.027). There were no significant differences in the complications and recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q≧2). The LSC process was divided into five steps. The laparoscopic time of all steps was longer when performed by the novice than by the experienced surgeon except the step of lifting up the sigmoid colon and hysterectomy. As the number of cases performed by the novice increased, the laparoscopic time of all steps decreased. The short-term surgical outcomes for cases operated by the novice and experienced surgeon were comparable when the novice avoided cases of POP-Q stage 4. LSC has been said to be difficult, but in this study, even novice surgeons in laparoscopic surgery may be able to perform LSC by accumulating cases. Although this study is not generalizable due to limitations, we believe it will inspire many young doctors to perform LSC.

Establishing a Rat Model of Pelvic Organ Prolapse with All Compartment Defects by Persistent Cervical Tension

Introduction and HypothesisWe hypothesized that applying cervical suction and persistent tension can develop a novel and efficient rat model of pelvic organ prolapse.MethodsFifteen rats underwent pilot testing to optimize the protocol. Sixteen rats were subjected to pelvic organ prolapse induction by cervical suction and constant traction, while five rats served as controls. The pelvic organ prolapse rats were assessed by a Rat Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system at different time points, and their diet, urine, and stool were monitored for 21 days. The pelvic organ prolapse rats were also evaluated for urinary incontinence, urinary retention, leak point pressure, and vaginal histopathology at 21 days after operation.ResultsThis rat model demonstrated pelvic floor prolapse in anatomic level, as well as physiological variations (urine incontinence, urinary retention) and pathological changes (collagen fracture, decreased collagen density).ConclusionsThis is the first establishment of the pelvic organ prolapse rat model with all compartment defects, which provides a valuable tool for elucidating pelvic organ prolapse mechanisms and evaluating potential interventions.

Detrusor underactivity in symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse.

The aim of this study was to assess the detrusor underactivity (DUA) prevalence of females with symptomatic anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to evaluate the relationship between DUA and POP stage. This was a prospective study recruiting women with symptomatic anterior POP. Patients with symptomatic stage 2-4 POP quantification system (POP-Q) who underwent urodynamics (UD) between January 2018 and April 2021 were included. Data on 330 women (mean age 63.7 ±18.4 years old) with anterior vaginal wall defect were enrolled. Concomitant apical defect (uterine/vaginal vault) requiring surgical correction was diagnosed in 38 women (11.5%). DUA was found in 166 females (50.3%). In DUA women, POP-Q stage 2 was found in 45.2%, stage 3 in 50.9% and stage 4 in 76.5%. Only stage POP-Q stage 4 showed a statistically significant difference between DUA and non-DUA females (p 0.006). In women with symptomatic POP, regardless of the POP-Q stage, the chance of DUA occurrence was high. DUA was diagnosed in approximately half of the women undergoing UD for symptomatic POP, and it was three-fold higher in cases of POP-Q stage 4. Due to the high incidence of DUA in POP-Q 4 stage, it may be advantageous to identify and treat prolapse before they progress to stage 4.

Методы коррекции сочетанных форм генитального пролапса лапароскопическим доступом

Aim: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combined technique — pectopexy, and the most common — laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse correction. Patients and Methods: the study included 32 female patients with a similar nosological form of pelvic organ prolapse. All the subjects were divided into two groups depending on the surgical treatment method. Group 1 (main group) included 14 female patients who had a combined laparoscopic correction of pelvic organ prolapse with transverse and longitudinal fixation of synthetic implants — combined pectopexy. Group 2 (control group) included 18 female patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy. Comprehensive clinical and instrumental examination of female patients was performed before and within 24 months after surgery. Results: there were no intraoperative complications in female patients of both groups. In all cases, the surgical intervention result was recognized as positive both according to the patient assessment and medical researcher assessment. There was a significant improvement in indicators reflecting the central compartment condition (apical prolapse), as well as the anterior and posterior vaginal walls. All female patients showed an improvement in their life quality. The patients also showed positive tendency according to pelvic ultrasound after surgery. No pelvic mesh complications were reported. The parameters of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system assessment did not differ significantly in female patients from both groups 1, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up after surgery. Conclusion: based on the obtained follow-up data, correction of central, posterior and partially anterior prolapse was achieved in patients after combined transverse and longitudinal fixation of synthetic implants. Pectopexy is safe and comparable to sacrocolpopexy, which is currently considered the most common surgery, gives a positive effect in correcting pelvic organ prolapse and improves the life quality of female patients. KEYWORDS: genital prolapse, combined laparoscopic surgery, mesh implants, surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic pectopexy, life quality. FOR CITATION: Pyatkina A.N., Bryunin D.V., Chushkov Yu.V. Laparoscopic correction methods of pelvic organ prolapse. Russian Journal of Woman and Child Health. 2024;7(1):18–25 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2618-8430-2024-7-1-3.

Transperineal Ultrasound Evaluation of Bladder Parameters in Patients with Apical Prolapse Undergoing Lateral Suspension or Sacropexy.

and hypothesis.We evaluated different bladder parameters using Transperineal Ultrasound (TPUS) in patients with apical pelvic organ prolapse undergoing lateral suspension or sacropexy. We included 73 cases with 37 cases in lateral suspension (LS) group and 36 cases in sacropexy group. We enrolled cases with apical prolapse stage 2 or higher according to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). Evaluation done of all cases using TPUS preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 18months follow-up visits. In LS group we found significant differences postoperatively in bladder neck height (Dy distance) at Valsalva and rest (P value < 0.001 in both) and in β angle at Valsalva and rest (P value < 0.001 in both). There was significant improvement in PVR (P value < 0.001). In sacropexy group we found no significant differences postoperatively in bladder neck height at Valsalva (P value 0.07) or in β angle at Valsalva (P value 0.097). There was significant improvement in PVR (P value 0.006). In between the 2 groups, there was better improvement in LS group than sacropexy group in bladder neck height at rest (P value 0.001) and in β angle both at Valsalva and rest (P value < 0.001 & 0.002 respectively). There was no significant difference in PVR, bladder wall thickness or bladder neck funnelling. LS and sacropexy showed good postoperative improvement in somebladder parameters using TPUS with better improvement in bladder neck height in LS. Clinical trial ID: NCT03772691.

Levator Ani Avulsion in Ultrasound Increases Recurrence in Sacrospinous Fixation.

Pelvic floor translabial ultrasound (TLUS) can identify levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and ballooning, which some studies have shown to be possible risk factors for prolapse recurrence. Our group uses TLUS to counsel patients preoperatively. If any of these risk factors exist, we offer sacrocolpopexy over vaginal repair. However, some patients, even though they have these possible risk factors, prefer to undergo vaginal surgery. The objective of this study was to determine if TLUS LAM avulsion and/or ballooning are risk factors for composite outcome recurrence in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse. This was a retrospective observational study. All patients with vaginal apical repair with sacrospinous ligament fixation with preoperative TLUS were included. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for composite outcome that included TLUS risk factors, age, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System measurements and stage, and variables with P < 0.1 in the univariate analysis. Eighty-two patients were included. All patients had symptomatic vaginal bulge; 65.4% had stage III prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in 54.3%. Median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range, 8-35 months); 19.8% had LAM avulsion, and 43.2% had ballooning. Anatomic recurrence rate was 23.5%, symptomatic was 22.2%, and reoperation was 1.2%. The composite recurrence rate was 29.6%. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, unilateral/bilateral avulsion in TLUS was found to be a significant risk factor for composite outcome with an odds ratio of 4.33 (confidence interval, 1.219-15.398; P = 0.023). Composite outcome of recurrence in our study was 29.6%. Avulsion on TLUS increased the risk of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse by fourfold.

Preoperative, Intraoperative and Postoperative Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System and Surgical Outcome

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common disease of middle aged and elderly women with an incidence of 7-10% and life time risk for surgery 11 to 20%. Assessing pelvic organ prolapsed in an objective, reproducible and applicable method is essential to have successful surgical outcome. Aim of the study was preoperative, intraoperative pre and postsurgical as well as postoperative assessment of pelvic organ prolapse by POP- Q system in patients undergoing reconstructive surgery and measure optimum surgical outcome stage 0 (Q&lt;-1), Tvl &gt; 4 cm and Genital hiatus (3 to 3.4cm) to prevent recurrence (POP-Q stage &gt; -1) and dyspareunia (Pb d”3 cm). Methods : This was hospital based Prospective study done with 250 patient diagnosed as pelvic organ prolapse at OPD. Excluding 14 patients 236 had surgery in Chattagram Metropolitan Hospital during January 2010 to December 2019. POP-Q measurement was done with Valsalva before anesthesia, intraoperative after anesthesia pre and postsurgical and postoperatively in follow up visit within three months of surgery by same surgeon. All POPQ measurement were done by same surgeon using a wooden Spatula marked in cm (POP-Q popsicle stick). All measurement were recorded in grid form and preoperative &amp; presurgical POP-Q staging was done. The result was then summarized as mean and SD for numerical variable and percentage for categorical variable. Result : A total 236 patient had surgery, 233 had vaginal hysterectomy with Apical vaginal suspension with uterosacral ligament and sacrospinous fixation was done in 3 patients with vault prolapse. Mean age was 51 ± 5SD years (51 to 60 years 51%), 84% sexually active, low socioeconomic group (68%), multiparous 100% mean parity 4 ± 2SD (e” 6 62%), 95% had vaginal delivery with history of home delivery 89%, resuming house hold work within two weeks of delivery in 97% cases. Most were postmenopausal 96%. All intraoperative presurgical measurement except Pb and Tvl showed significant higher descent as compared to preoperative finding before anesthesia, mean difference were Aa 0.7, Ba1.6, C 1.6, Ap 0.25 Bp 1.6 D1.6 Gh. 8cm with highest descent in Ba C, D Bp. Immediate postsurgical measurement all patient showed optimum anatomical outcome (stage 0). But follow up within 3 month (10 to 90 days) 13 patient showed satisfactory anatomical outcome (stage 1 Q&lt;-1)) with no recurrence (Q&gt;-1) nor dyspareunia. Total vaginal length and Pb no change in measurement before and after anesthesia but Tvl reduced by 2.3 cm and Pb increased by .3cm postsurgical. Presurgical measurementof Gh increased by. 8cm but reduced to 3.5 cm postsurgical. No significant difference in postsurgical intraoperative measurements during follow up within 3 months except Gh (3.2 cm) which is narrower even with valsalva menovure. Conclusion : POP-Q technique in assessment of Pelvic organ prolapse was anatomically site specific and is with good reproducibility and less intra and inter observer variation. Significant difference in descent alert surgeon to plan surgical technique to have optimum anatomical outcome and prevent recurrence and dysparunea. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2022; Vol. 37(2): 109-118

A feasibility study of three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the vagina under distension.

The distension properties of the vagina are critical to its function including support of surrounding organs, childbirth, and intercourse. It could be altered by many pathophysiological processes like pregnancy, radiotherapy, and reconstruction surgery. However, there are no clinically available diagnostic tools capable of quantifying the distension properties of the vagina. A proof-of-concept study was designed to assess the feasibility of a novel three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging technique that allows quantitative evaluation of the vagina under distension. Patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were recruited for the study. An ultrathin, oversized bag was inserted into the vagina and filled with water using a modified urodynamics system. The instilled water volume and intravaginal pressure were continuously recorded. At maximum vaginal capacity, 3D transintroital ultrasound of the distended vagina and surrounding pelvic structures was performed. Exams were performed in duplicate for each patient, two hours apart (round A and round B). Following the development of a 3D surface model of the distended vagina from each scan, several measurements were obtained, including cross-sectional area, anteroposterior (AP) length and lateral width in the plane of minimum hiatal dimensions (PMHD), AP and lateral diameter at the pubic symphysis (PS) level, maximum and minimum diameter, and maximum vertical length. To assess repeatability between measurements in two rounds, the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for each measurement. Correlations between physical measurements including the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system and vaginal diameter measurements, and obtained metrics were also assessed. Sixteen patients with POP (average age 69 years) completed both rounds of imaging. There was sufficient echogenicity on 3D transintroital ultrasound of the distended vaginal wall to establish boundaries for 3D surface models of the vagina. Overall, all metrics had good or excellent reliability (ICC=0.77-0.93, p<0.05; CV=3%-18%) except maximum diameter, which demonstrated only moderate reliability (ICC=0.67, p=0.092). Strong correlations were found between physical exam measurements including D point of POP-Q, introitus diameter and lateral diameter at apex, and maximum vaginal capacity, maximum vertical length, lateral diameter at PS, minimum diameter, and distended PMHD measurements. The results demonstrated that this system could generate 3D models of the shape of the distended vagina and provide multiple metrics that could be reliably calculated from automated analyses of the models. A novel system for evaluation of the distension properties of the vagina was developed and preliminary evaluation was performed. This system may represent a technique for evaluation of the biomechanical and structural properties of the vagina.

A comparison between the vaginal patch plastron associated with the anterior sacrospinous fixation and the Uphold™ LITE vaginal support system for the treatment of advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to compare efficacy and safety of the vaginal patch plastron (VPP) associated to the anterior sacrospinous fixation (SSLF-A) with a TVM procedure (Uphold™ LITE support-system) for the treatment of the advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse.Study design.Single-center retrospective study. Women with symptomatic anterior prolapse ≥ III stage according to the POP-quantification (POP-Q) system and submitted to the VPP associated with the SSLF-A or to the Uphold™ procedure were included. Primary outcome was to compare objective and subjective cystocele relapse and reoperation rate at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcome was to describe peri- and postoperative complications. Pearson chi-square test and exact Fisher test were adopted for categorical variables, while intergroup Mann-Whitney U test and intragroup Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for continuous variables; the statistical analysis was conducted at 95 % confidence level. ResultsFifty-five women in VPP-group and 118 women in Uphold-group were included. At 6-month follow-up, objective anterior relapse in VPP-group (3/55, 5.4 %) was like Uphold-group (5/118, 4.2 %; p = 0.71), as well as objective apical relapse (0/55, 0 % vs 3/118, 2.5 %; p = 0.55); no significant difference emerged in bulge symptoms (1/55, 1.8 % vs 5/118, 4.2 %; p = 0.67). At 12-month follow-up women were telephonically investigated; no significant difference emerged in bulge symptoms (1/55, 1.8 % vs 6/118, 5.1 %; p = 0.43). Reoperation rate for the composite outcome POP relapse, stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and remotion of the TVM resulted lower in the VPP group (1/55, 1.8 % vs 13/118, 11 %; p = 0.03). Post-operative buttock pain (32/55, 58.2 % vs 24/118, 20.3 %; p < 0.0001) and post-operative urinary retention (16/55, 29.1 % vs 6/118, 5.1 %; p < 0.0001) were higher in VPP-group, with a complete resolution between 2 and 3 weeks after treatment. ConclusionVPP associated with SSLF-A was as effective as Uphold™ LITE support-system for both anterior and central compartment prolapse treatment at 6- and 12-month follow-up. VPP-group presented a lower reoperation rate for the composite outcome prolapse relapse repair, SUI, and removal of the mesh.

Impact of preoperative pelvic floor muscle function on the success of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Introduction and hypothesisThe objective of this study was to identify the potential characteristics of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in the preoperative assessment that could be associated with post-surgical prolapse severity. We hypothesized that the same variables, if identified, could be addressed in preoperative rehabilitation to improve surgical results.MethodsThis was a single-center prospective observational study that included women who underwent surgical pelvic organ prolapse repair between 2020–2022. Genital prolapse was evaluated according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. All the participants underwent a PFM assessment, including a vaginal digital assessment and manometry (Peritron™ 9300 V) before surgery and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Several PFM variables were recorded: vaginal resting pressure, vaginal pressure during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), area under the curve during a 10-second MVC, ability to correctly contract the PFMs, and reflexive activation during cough and relaxation. The primary endpoint of the analysis was objective surgical success defined as POP-Q 0 or 1 at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, a change in pelvic floor muscle function was recorded during postoperative visits.ResultsA total of 106 females were included in the study. Fifty-one were lost during the 6-month follow-up, which is a major limitation of the study. None of the examined parameters evaluating PFM were associated with surgical success. No statistically significant difference was found in MVC and PFM endurance before and after surgery. Post-surgery, a significant change was observed in the vaginal resting pressure and the ability to correct PFM activation and relaxation.ConclusionsPreoperative PFM function is not associated with surgical success 6 months after surgery.

A randomized controlled study comparing the objective efficacy and safety of a novel self-inserted disposable vaginal prolapse device and existing ring pessaries.

ProVate is a novel, disposable, collapsible self-inserted vaginal device for the nonsurgical management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We assessed possible vaginal microflora changes and POP reduction using ProVate and a commercially available ring pessary (control). We performed post-hoc analysis of data obtained from an interventional, prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, statistically powered (noninferiority), home-use, cross-over study conducted at seven sites. Safety and performance data collected for both devices were analyzed to compare objective POP reduction (employing the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System [POP-Q]), safety (assessed by the incidence of adverse events [AEs]), and the rates of certain AEs. Eighty-five women with symptomatic POP were screened; 71 were randomized, and 58 completed the study per protocol. Forty-nine (90.7%) ProVate users experienced complete prolapse reduction (stage 0), 3 (5.6%) experienced reductions to POP-Q stage 1, and 2 (3.7%%) experienced reductions to stage 2. Collectively, 52/54 (96.3%) ProVate users experienced prolapse reduction to stage 0 or 1. In all, 47/57 (82.5%) control users experienced complete prolapse reduction, while 5 (8.8%), 4 (7.0%), and 1 (1.8%) experienced reductions to stage 1, 2, and stage 3, respectively. Collectively, 52/57 (91.2%) control users experienced reductions to either stage 0 or 1. In 53/54 (98.1%) ProVate and 55/57 (96.5%) control users, there was at least 1 POP-Q stage prolapse reduction, and in 32 (91.4%) ProVate and 31 (83.8%) control users who had stage ≥3 prolapse, there were at least three POP-Q stage reductions. In total, 26/71 (36.6%) ProVate and 22/64 (34.4%) control users in the safety population experienced AEs. The incidence of device-related AEs was 17/71 (23.9%) for ProVate and 13/64 (20.3%) for the control. Most AEs were minor, mild, and anticipated. Our analysis demonstrated that ProVate and the control are highly effective in reducing POP, and both are associated with comparably low numbers of AEs. However, ProVate has the advantage of being more user-friendly, suitable for home use, and expected to allow women with POP to practice better and easier self-care.

International Urogynecology consultation chapter 2 committee 3: the clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse including investigations into associated morbidity/pelvic floor dysfunction

Introduction and hypothesisThis manuscript from Chapter 2 of the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC) on Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) reviews the literature involving the clinical evaluation of a patient with POP and associated bladder and bowel dysfunction.MethodsAn international group of 11 clinicians performed a search of the literature using pre-specified search MESH terms in PubMed and Embase databases (January 2000 to August 2020). Publications were eliminated if not relevant to the clinical evaluation of patients or did not include clear definitions of POP. The titles and abstracts were reviewed using the Covidence database to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. The manuscripts were reviewed for suitability using the Specialist Unit for Review Evidence checklists. The data from full-text manuscripts were extracted and then reviewed.ResultsThe search strategy found 11,242 abstracts, of which 220 articles were used to inform this narrative review. The main themes of this manuscript were the clinical examination, and the evaluation of comorbid conditions including the urinary tract (LUTS), gastrointestinal tract (GIT), pain, and sexual function. The physical examination of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should include a reproducible method of describing and quantifying the degree of POP and only the Pelvic Organ Quantification (POP-Q) system or the Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (S-POP) system have enough reproducibility to be recommended. POP examination should be done with an empty bladder and patients can be supine but should be upright if the prolapse cannot be reproduced. No other parameters of the examination aid in describing and quantifying POP. Post-void residual urine volume >100 ml is commonly used to assess for voiding difficulty. Prolapse reduction can be used to predict the possibility of postoperative persistence of voiding difficulty. There is no benefit of urodynamic testing for assessment of detrusor overactivity as it does not change the management. In women with POP and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the cough stress test should be performed with a bladder volume of at least 200 ml and with the prolapse reduced either with a speculum or by a pessary. The urodynamic assessment only changes management when SUI and voiding dysfunction co-exist. Demonstration of preoperative occult SUI has a positive predictive value for de novo SUI of 40% but most useful is its absence, which has a negative predictive value of 91%. The routine addition of radiographic or physiological testing of the GIT currently has no additional value for a physical examination. In subjects with GIT symptoms further radiological but not physiological testing appears to aid in diagnosing enteroceles, sigmoidoceles, and intussusception, but there are no data on how this affects outcomes. There were no articles in the search on the evaluation of the co-morbid conditions of pain or sexual dysfunction in women with POP.ConclusionsThe clinical pelvic examination remains the central tool for evaluation of POP and a system such as the POP-Q or S-POP should be used to describe and quantify. The value of investigation for urinary tract dysfunction was discussed and findings presented. The routine addition of GI radiographic or physiological testing is currently not recommended. There are no data on the role of the routine assessment of pain or sexual function, and this area needs more study. Imaging studies alone cannot replace clinical examination for the assessment of POP.

Clinical Profile of Patients of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Associated Factors.

Prolapse is among the most common indication for gynaecological surgery. It is difficult to estimate prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse even in developed countries due to lack of epidemiological studies. This study was done to find the prevalence, risk factors and common presenting complaints of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Women with pelvic organ prolapse visiting Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital during 4 months duration in 2021 were approached and after obtaining an informed consent, all the patient information on various risk factors and clinical profile(age,parity,body mass index,smoking etc.) for pelvic organ prolpase were collected in a pre-developed proforma. Pelvic Organ Prolapse was classified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. Data analysis was done using statistical package for the social sciences-25. Ethical approval was taken from Institutional Review Committee- National Academy of Medical Sciences. Out of 58 cases enrolled in the study, prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was found to be 1.28%. Women belonging to age group ≥ 49 years was 91.4%. Bulge symptom was the most common presenting complain among the women, 98.3%. 50% of women (n=29) were grand multipara. 53.4% (n=31) of women had delivered their first baby before 20 years of age. Multiparity,vaginal birth and menopausal age were the common risk factors. Menopausal age, multi-parity, vaginal births, age at first vaginal delivery of less than 20 years were significant risk factors for development of prolapse. Bulge symptom was the most common presenting complaint. However,Smoking habit, overweight were not related to pelvic organ prolapse.

Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically assessed and staged commonly by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic floor is an emerging modality for anatomical and functional assessment of the pelvic floor and staging of POP. The purpose of this study was to correlate the dynamic MRI findings with POP-Q examination for the staging of POP in each pelvic compartment by comparing various anatomic points. A prospective observational study of the comparative cross-sectional design was conducted among patients who underwent MRI of the pelvic floor and POP-Q at our institute. A total of 50 patients were included. Anatomical landmarks in the three compartments were analyzed in relation to standard reference lines on dynamic MRI and compared with POP-Q measurements. Most of our patients had multicompartment disease (70%). When compared to POP-Q, MRI has a strong correlation for quantification of anterior (0.723) and middle (0.525) compartments and a weak correlation (0.232) for posterior compartment prolapse. POP-Q examination is based on the various points within the vaginal canal, and all the points do not represent a true anatomic landmark. MRI, on the other hand, is based on a true anatomical plane and gives detailed information about various structures in all three compartments. Thus, MRI also helps bridge the gap between various referring specialties in treating pelvic floor disorders.

Long-term outcomes and quality of life after Manchester procedure for pelvic reconstructive surgery in women with cervical elongation

ObjectiveNative-tissue techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) repairs, such as the Manchester Procedure (MP), have recently been revitalized. However, there are conflicting opinions regarding correcting cervical elongation support by the MP, and the risk of possible poor outcomes and postoperative complications.Therefore, this study aimed to investigate anatomical and patient-reported outcomes during one year after MP. DesignProspective cohort study. SettingThis study was conducted on women who underwent the MP for cervical elongation between 2010 and 2020. PatientsWomen with apical compartment prolapse up to stage 3 due to cervical elongation. InterventionsManchester Procedure. MeasurementsPre and postoperative evaluations by POP Quantification (POP-Q) system were performed, and patients filled out the quality-of-life questionnaires including Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Short Form 20 (PFDI-20), and POP/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) before and 12 months after the procedure. Anatomical outcomes were measured by POP-Q and the changes in POP-related symptoms were evaluated and reported. Main Results33 participants were recruited in the study. Significant anatomical improvements were obtained in all compartments after the surgery. After 12 months in POP-Q examination, the mean (±SD) of Ba was changed from +1.82 (±1.71) to −1.18 (±1.50), C was changed from −1.25 (±2.81) to −6 (±1.82), and D from −6.30 (±1.42) to −7.1 (±1.25) respectively (P < 0.001). POP-Q stage 0–1 was obtained inof7% in the apical compartment (C < −1), but only in 45.4% in the anterior compartment (Ba < −1). A significant reduction in symptom scores was obtained for PFDI-20 (P < 0.01) and PISQ-12 (P = 0.011). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the MP provides adequate apical support with improvement in anatomic and subjective findings for patients with cervical elongation.

Simulación de soporte apical al evaluar el prolapso del compartimiento anterior y posterior

Objective: To evaluate whether simulated correction of apical prolapse determines the reduction or disappearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse, using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) system. Methods: Cross-sectional study. The population consisted of patients who attended to the Hospital Universitario de Caracas with pelvic organ prolapse stage II or greater and who had involvement of the apical compartment between 2021 and 2022. The selection of the sample was made in a non-probabilistic, sequential way. Each patient underwent POPQ before and after simulation of apical support with the posterior blade of a standard Graves speculum. The Aa Ba Ap and Bp points were evaluated before and after simulation and the proportion of patients in whom the stage of anterior or posterior prolapse changed when simulating apical support was also determined. Results: We included 100 patients, most of them with prolapse stage III and IV. After apical support, the anterior compartment points were corrected to a value between 0 to -2 or -3 in most cases (p&lt; 0.05). The points corresponding to the posterior vaginal wall changed to -3 in most patients (p&lt; 0.05). The prolapse stage of the anterior compartment, changed to stage ≤ II in 99 % of cases (p&lt; 0.05), and in 100% in the posterior compartment (p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Simulation of apical support during POPQ demonstrated correction of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse in a high percentage of patients.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using a meta-analysis method. MethodsAll articles about LUSLS published in English from Jan. 2010 to Jan. 2020 were retrieved using a computer from search engines, including PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese Medical Journals. Meta-analysis was performed by two evaluators using RevMan 5.3 software according to the inclusion criteria. ResultsA total of five studies were finally included, with 361 LUSLS cases and 361 control cases. LUSLS group showed a shorter operation duration (SMD-1.96; 95% CI = −3.90- −0.03; P = 0.05), more POP-quantification system (Q) (I) (SMD1.64; 95% CI = 1.05–2.56; P = 0.03), than the control group, with significant differences. There was no difference in the complication incidence, hospital stay, POP-Q>=II between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionLUSLS was a safe and effective treatment for POP. Patients had higher postoperative satisfaction, shorter operation duration and satisfactory outcome. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are required in the future to make the results of the meta-analysis more accurate.