You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Urodynamic Testing1 Apr 20112162 EMG LAG TIME AS A SPECIFIC FINDING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY BLADDER NECK DYSFUNCTION Steven Weissbart, Leslie Schlachter, and Neil Grafstein Steven WeissbartSteven Weissbart New York City, NY More articles by this author , Leslie SchlachterLeslie Schlachter New York City, NY More articles by this author , and Neil GrafsteinNeil Grafstein New York City, NY More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2399AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES A key finding on videourodynamic studies (VUDS) in primary bladder neck dysfunction (PBND) is a prolongation of the time between the start of a voluntary detrusor contraction and the start of urine flow. A voluntary detrusor contraction is immediately preceded by pelvic floor relaxation, which may be seen on pelvic floor electromyography (EMG). It has, therefore, been suggested that measuring the EMG lag time, i.e. the time interval between pelvic floor relaxation and the start of urine flow, could be a minimally invasive alternative to VUDS to diagnose PBND. In addition, EMG lag time measurement might serve as a noninvasive modality for monitoring a patient's response to treatment with alpha-blockers. One critique of the use of prolonged EMG lag time to diagnose PBND is that this finding may also be present in all causes of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but there is no study to date that has examined this possibility. In this study, we compare the EMG lag times in patients who underwent VUDS prior to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for BOO secondary to BPH with the EMG lag times in patients with PBND. METHODS Pelvic floor EMG lag time was measured in 16 patients who underwent VUDS prior to TURP for BOO caused by BPH. VUDS were conducted using a Laborie Aquarius TT system. Pelvic floor EMG activity was measured with patch electrodes placed at the 3- and 9-o'clock positions at the margin of the external anal sphincter. A Student's t-test was used to compare the mean EMG lag time in this cohort of patients with a previously reported mean EMG lag time for patients with PBND. RESULTS The mean age of patients who underwent VUDS prior to TURP for BOO caused by BPH was 68 (range, 60–79). The mean bladder outlet obstructive index on preoperative VUDS was 54.6. Operative findings in all patients at the time of TURP included prostatic tissue causing bladder outlet obstruction. Surgical pathology of the TURP chips revealed BPH in all specimens. Mean EMG lag time in our cohort of patients with BOO caused by BPH was 4.05 ±1.37 seconds (95% CI). The mean EMG lag time previously reported in a published cohort of patients with PBND was 23.9 seconds. A Student's t-test revealed a significantly lower EMG lag time in the patients with BOO caused by BPH compared to the published cohort of patients with known PBND (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that the EMG lag time is not prolonged in patients with BOO secondary to BPH. Thus, EMG lag time prolongation remains a unique urodynamic finding in patients with PBND. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e865 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Steven Weissbart New York City, NY More articles by this author Leslie Schlachter New York City, NY More articles by this author Neil Grafstein New York City, NY More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract