(Proquest Information and Learning: ... denotes non-USASCII text omitted.) In 2002, more than two million college students were estimated to be enrolled in some form of online learning, triple the number from just four years before.1 By the year 2005, it is estimated that more than 90 percent of U.S. colleges and universities will be offering online learning options.2 This shift toward interactive communication technologies in higher education may not be a bad thing at all for the cause of learning. Yet how can we tell when, as one of the premiere researchers in the field has noted,3 too little theory development and empirical research has been focused on communication technology in education? Communication technology is becoming especially popular in journalism and mass communication education. In addition to communication technology, active learning and team learning have been identified as the three principal pedagogical trends in communication education.4 The emphasis on active and team learning is made inevitable by the changing demands of the job market. Employers across a range of fields state that communication skills, problem-solving ability and teamwork are the most important qualities they look for in new college graduates.5 This lines up with our view that we are in the business of teaching future communication and information professionals how to write, think critically, work in a team environment and effectively utilize communication technology. In this article, we report research undertaken in a telecommunications management course that brought together all three of the trends mentioned above. The general research question investigates how communication technology can facilitate team learning. The justification for this question is that team learning, an example of what Moore calls learner-learner interaction, is said to be the third and often neglected essential element of distance education course design. Moore, a pioneer in distance education research, claims that independent learners must have the traditional learner-content and learner-instructor interactions, but also peer group interaction to fully stimulate a rich learning experience.6 After reviewing a selected portion of the research literature related to our question, we describe the quasi-experiment designed to observe the interaction among the pedagogies of team learning, active learning (in this case, thecase method) and computer-mediated learning. Finally, we report the results and conclude with implications both for teaching and learning as well as for future research on mass communication education and computer-enabled pedagogies. Previous Research The fast-growing body of research on online teaching and learning is still too new and diffuse to suggest whether online learning or the traditional classroom is better for educational outcomes. This question has been posed before of other communication technologies adopted for educational purposes. The mail was being used to mediate distance education as early as the 1840s in England.7 Since then, virtually every communication technology has been integrated into education. A vast body of published work on the efficacy of communication technologies in education has developed over the last seventy-five years. A 1999 compilation analyzed the results of more than 350 studies on distance education uses of communication technologies ranging from early radio, telephone and television to fax, e-mail, video conferencing and computers.8 The studies included in the report had been conducted between 1928 and 1999. The conclusions of this report were that there is essentially significant difference between face-to-face and mediated instruction. This so-called no significant difference phenomenon implies that the technology is neutral and the efficacy of education is in the teaching. Simply put, there is good teaching and bad teaching and it has nothing to do with the technology. …