Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Research Articles

Load-sharing biomechanics of lumbar fixation and fusion with pedicle subtraction osteotomy

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is an invasive surgical technique allowing the restoration of a well-balanced sagittal profile, however, the risks of pseudarthrosis and instrumentation breakage are still high. Literature studied primary stability and posterior instrumentation loads, neglecting the load shared by the anterior column, which is fundamental to promote fusion early after surgery. The study aimed at quantifying the load-sharing occurring after PSO procedure across the ventral spinal structures and the posterior instrumentation, as affected by simple bilateral fixation alone, with interbody cages adjacent to PSO level and supplementary accessory rods. Lumbar spine segments were loaded in vitro under flexion–extension, lateral bending, and torsion using an established spine tester. Digital image correlation (DIC) and strain-gauge (SG) analyses measured, respectively, the full-field strain distribution on the ventral surface of the spine and the local strain on posterior primary rods. Ventral strains considerably decreased following PSO and instrumentation, confirming the effectiveness of posterior load-sharing. Supplemental accessory rods considerably reduced the posterior rod strains only with interbody cages, but the ventral strains were unaffected: this indicates that the load transfer across the osteotomy could be promoted, thus explaining the higher fusion rate with decreased rod fracture risk reported in clinical literature.

The effect of pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of severe Scheuermann thoracolumbar kyphosis on sagittal spinopelvic alignment

PurposeTo analyze how pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) treatment of severe Scheuermann thoracolumbar kyphosis (STLK) using pedicle screw instrumentation affects sagittal spinopelvic parameters.BackgroundThe medical literature on the post-surgical effects of treatments such as Ponte osteotomy is limited, but suggests few effects on spinopelvic profiles. Currently, there is no research regarding changes in sagittal spinopelvic alignment upon PSO treatment in STLK patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study on 11 patients with severe STLK. These patients underwent posterior-only correction surgeries with PSO and pedicle screw instrumentation between 2012 to 2017 in a single institute. Patients were measured for the following spinopelvic parameters: global kyphosis (GK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TL), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tile (PT), sacral slope (SS), and administered a Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22) pre-operation, post-operation and at final follow-up.ResultsGK improved from a median of 74.1° to 40.0° after surgery, achieving a correction rate of 48.8% with a median correction loss of 0.8°. TK, TL and LL all showed significant difference (P < 0.05) and SVA improved 22.7 (11.6, 30.9) mm post operation. No significant difference was found in pelvic parameters (PI, PT, SS, all P < 0.05). The absolute value of LL- PI significantly improved from a median of 26.5° pre-operation to 6.1° at the final follow-up. 72.7% in this series showed an evident trend of thoracic and lumbar apices migrating closer to ideal physiological segments after surgery. Self-reported scores of pain, self-image, and mental health from SRS-22 revealed significant improvement at final follow-up (all P < 0.05).ConclusionsPSO treatment of severe STLK with pedicle screw instrumentation can improve spine alignment and help obtain a proper alignment of the spine and the pelvis.

Multilevel Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Correction of Severe Rigid Adult Spinal Deformities: A Case Series, Indications, Considerations, and Literature Review.

Rigid and ankylosed thoracolumbar spinal deformities require three-column osteotomy (3CO) to achieve adequate correction. For severe and multiregional deformities, multilevel 3CO is required but its use and outcomes are rarely reported. To describe the use of multilevel pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with severe, rigid, and ankylosed multiregional deformity. Retrospective review of 5 ASD patients who underwent multilevel PSO for the correction of severe fixed deformity and review the literature regarding the use of multilevel PSO. Five patients presented with spinal imbalance secondary to regional and multiregional spinal deformities involving the thoracolumbar spine. All patients underwent a single-stage two-level noncontiguous PSO, and 2 of the patients underwent a staged third PSO to treat deformity involving a separate spinal region. Significant radiographic correction was achieved with normalization of spinal alignment and parameters. Two-level PSO was able to provide greater than 80 degrees of sagittal plane correction in both the lumbar and thoracic spine. Two patients experienced new postoperative weakness which recovered to preoperative baseline at 3 to 6 mo follow-up. At most recent follow-up, 4 of the 5 patients gained significant pain relief and had improved functionality. Noncontiguous multilevel PSO is a formidable surgical technique. Additional risk (compared to single-level 3CO) comes in the form of greater blood loss and higher risk for postoperative weakness. Nonetheless, multilevel PSO is feasible and effective for correcting severe multiplanar and multiregional ASD, and patients gain significant benefits in increased functionality and pain relief.

The Sagittal Parameters and Efficacy of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Kyphosis Under Different Lumbar Sagittal Morphologies.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the changes in sagittal parameters and the efficacy of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and kyphosis under different lumbar sagittal morphologies and to explore the effect of sagittal morphology on the selection of PSO levels.MethodsA total of 24 patients with AS and thoracolumbar kyphosis (TK) who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between 2008 and 2019 were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups: a lumbar lordosis group (n = 14) and a lumbar kyphosis group (n = 10). Changes in sagittal parameters, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for lumbar pain before and after operation were compared between the two groups to evaluate postoperative efficacy.ResultsThe preoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) was −29.29 ± 5.40 (lordosis) and 13.50 ± 3.65 (kyphosis) (P < 0.01), and the preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was 171.35 ± 25.46 (lordosis) and 223.58 ± 21.87 (kyphosis) (P < 0.01). Preoperative global kyphosis (GK) was 75.71 ± 5.26 (lordosis) and 86.30 ± 10.32 (kyphosis) (P < 0.05). All patients in the lordosis group underwent PSO surgery at the twelfth thoracic vertebra (T12) or the first lumbar spinal vertebra (L1), while all patients in the kyphosis group underwent the surgery at the second or third lumbar spinal vertebra (L2 or L3). The differences in postoperative GK, LL, and SVA between the two groups were not significant (P > 0.05). The JOA scores of the two groups increased from 13.00 ± 0.83 (lordosis) and 11.30 ± 0.93 (kyphosis) before surgery to 21.00 ± 0.67 and 19.70 ± 0.60 after surgery (P < 0.05).ConclusionPreoperative lumbar sagittal morphology needs to be considered when selecting the optimal osteotomy plane. An osteotomy can achieve the greatest success in patients with lumbar kyphosis at L2/L3; for patients with lumbar lordosis, it can achieve satisfactory outcomes at T12/L1.

Commentary: Multilevel Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Correction of Severe Rigid Adult Spinal Deformities: A Case Series, Indications, Considerations, and Literature Review.

Commentary: Multilevel Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Correction of Severe Rigid Adult Spinal Deformities: A Case Series, Indications, Considerations, and Literature Review Timothy Y Wang, MD, Timothy Y Wang, MD Department of Neurological Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina Correspondence: Timothy Y. Wang, MD, Department of Neurological Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3087, Durham, NC 27710, USA. E-mail: Timothy.wang@duke.edu Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Khoi D Than, MD Khoi D Than, MD Department of Neurological Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Operative Neurosurgery, Volume 20, Issue 4, April 2021, Pages E262–E263, https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa430 Published: 29 December 2020 Article history Received: 20 October 2020 Accepted: 23 October 2020 Published: 29 December 2020

One\u2010level mini\u2010open pedicle subtraction osteotomy for treating spinal kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

BackgroundTo report a mini-open pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) technique, to summarize the 2-year follow-up results of 25 patients, and to describe a modified operating table which allows the osteotomy to be closed in a more controllable manner.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with AS who received one-level mini-open PSO between July 2015 and January 2018. The 25 patients with complete medical records and 2-year radiographic follow-up were included in the analysis. Estimated blood loss, operation time, incision length, complications, bed rest period, and length of hospitalization were extracted from the medical records and recorded.ResultsThe mean age of the 25 patients (22 males and 3 females) was 39.5 years. The average global kyphosis(GK) decreased from 70.2° before surgery to 22.3° after surgery; the average C7- sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA) decreased from 15.5 cm before surgery to 5.1 cm after surgery; the average pelvic incidence(PT) decreased from 37.8° before surgery to 22.5° after surgery. The average length of the incision was 10.2 cm. The average surgical time was 263.0 min, the average estimated blood loss was 840.0 ml, and the average time to mobilization was 4.1 days.ConclusionsThe current report shows that one-level PSO can be performed through an incision of about 10 cm. The one-level mini-open PSO could be superior to traditional PSO surgery with respect to cosmetic outcomes. Further comparative studies are necessary to evaluate the current and conventional techniques.

Heel Lift for Skiing to Compensate for Corrected Sagittal Vertical Axis After Spinal Surgery: A Case Report.

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and pedicle subtraction osteotomy are common procedures to correct adult spinal deformities. Little is known about returning postoperatively to a high-performance sport such as skiing after spinal surgery. We report a case of an alpine skier who underwent a LLIF procedure combined with a posterior corrective osteotomy and posterior instrumentation, who had difficulties returning to skiing postoperatively because of new spinal biomechanics. The case report describes the possible consequences of spinal sagittal deformity surgery on postoperative skiing. A 63-year-old man with a complex lumbar spinal surgery history showed severe adjacent segment degenerative spondylolistheses at L1-L2 and at L5-S1. A lateral approach at L1-L2 combined with a posterior corrective osteotomy at L3 and instrumentation from T10 to the pelvis were performed. At his 1-year follow up, he made excellent progress and returned to skiing. However, he reported that skiing did not feel the same, and his center of gravity felt as if it shifted backwards. Consequently, he placed a 2-cm wedge in his ski binding, which improved his skiing experience. Sagittal vertical axis changes after spinal surgery affect the biomechanics of the entire body. After surgery, the body's ligaments, muscles, and fascia adapt to the new body posture. Activities such as skiing, where body posture plays an essential role, are particularly affected by spine surgeries. Surgeons should discuss this issue before spinal surgery with patients, especially if patients are involved in high-intensity sports.

Reducing revision rates following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy surgery: a single-center experience of trends over 7years in patients with Adult Spinal Deformity.

This is a single-center, retrospective study. To assess if implemented changes to clinical practice have reduced mechanical complications following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) surgery. Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is increasing in prevalence with concurrent increasing demands for surgical treatment. The most extensive technique, PSO, allows for major correction of rigid deformities. However, surgery-related complications have been reported in rates up to 77% and especially mechanical complications occur at unsatisfactory frequencies. We retrospectively included all patients undergoing PSO for ASD between 2010 and 2016. Changes to clinical practice were introduced continuously in the study period, including rigorous patient selection; inter-disciplinary conferences; implant-material; number of surgeons; surgeon experience; and perioperative standardized protocols for pain, neuromonitoring and blood-loss management. Postoperative complications were recorded in the 2-year follow-up period. Competing risk survival analysis was used to assess cumulative incidence of revision surgery due to mechanical complications. The Mann-Kendall test was used for analysis of trends. We included 185 patients undergoing PSO. The level of PSO changed over the study period (P < 0.01) with L3 being the most common level in 2010 compared to L4 in 2016. Both preoperative and surgical corrections of sagittal vertical axis were larger towards the end of the study period. The 2-year revision rate due to mechanical failure steadily declined over the study period from 52% in 2010 to 14% for patients treated in 2016, although without statistically significant trend (P = 0.072). In addition, rates of mechanical complications steadily declined over the study period and significant decreasing trends were observed in time trend analyses of overall complications, major complications and rod breakage. We observed decreased risks of revision surgery due to mechanical complications following PSO in patients with ASD over a 7-year period. We attribute these improvements to advancements in patient selection, surgical planning and techniques, surgeon experience and more standardized perioperative care. III.

Risk factors for blood transfusion in adolescent patients with scoliosis undergoing scoliosis surgery: a study of 722 cases in a single center

BackgroundTo assess the risk factors for blood transfusion in a great number of adolescent cases with different types of scoliosis who received scoliosis surgery.MethodsData of patients who were diagnosed as scoliosis and received one-stage posterior correction and spinal fusion from January 2014 to December 2017 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients’ demographic characteristics, segments of spinal fusion, Cobb angle of the major curve,osteotomy pattern, preoperative and postoperative levels of hemoglobin, and allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) were recorded and analyzed.ResultsIn this study, 722 cases with adolescent scoliosis were included, of whom 32.8% (237/722) received ABT. Risk factors included diagnosis: neurofibromatosis (OR = 5.592), syndromic (OR = 3.029),osteotomy: Ponte osteotomy (OR = 5.997), hemivertebrae resection (OR = 29.171), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO)(OR = 8.712), vertebral column resection (VCR)(OR = 32.265);fusion segments (OR = 1.224) and intraoperative blood loss (OR = 1.004). In the subgroup analysis of cases with idiopathic scoliosis, Ponte osteotomy (OR = 6.086), length of segments of spinal fusion (OR = 1.293), and intraoperative blood loss (OR = 1.001) were found as risk factors for ABT. Results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that length of segments of spinal fusion equal to 11.5 vertebrae was the best cutoff value for cases with idiopathic scoliosis who did not receive osteotomy in both ABT group and non-ABT group. In the subgroup analysis of congenital scoliosis, Ponte osteotomy (OR = 5.087), hemivertebra resection (OR = 5.457), PSO (OR = 4.055), VCR (OR = 6.940), and intraoperative blood loss (OR = 1.004) were risk factors for ABT.ConclusionsMethod of diagnosis, osteotomy pattern, segments of spinal fusion, and intraoperative blood loss were risk factors for ABT in cases with adolescent scoliosis. In cases with idiopathic scoliosis, Ponte osteotomy and segments of spinal fusion longer than 11.5 vertebrae were risk factors for ABT. In cases with congenital scoliosis, osteotomy pattern was the main risk factor for ABT.Level of evidenceLevel III.

Characterization of Patients with Poor Risk for Clinical Outcomes in Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Deformity Surgery.

Retrospective review of 159 surgically treated consecutive adult symptomatic lumbar deformity (ASLD) (65 ± 9 years, female: 94%) from a multicenter database. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of the risk of a poor clinical outcome in ASLD surgery. Poor-risk patients with ASLD remain poorly characterized. ASLD was defined as age >40 years with a lumbar curve ≥30° or C7SVA ≥5 cm and Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS22) pain or function <4. Poor outcome was defined as 2y SRS22 total <4 or pain, function or satisfaction ≤3. The outcomes of interest included age, sex, body mass index, bone mineral density, Schwab-SRS type, frailty, history of arthroplasty, upper-instrumented vertebral, lower-instrumented vertebral, levels involved, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, lumbar interbody fusion, sagittal alignment, global alignment and proportion (GAP) score, baseline SRS22r score, estimated blood loss, time of surgery, and severe adverse event (SAE). Poisson regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risks for poor clinical outcome. A patient was considered at poor risk if the number of risks was >4. All SRS22 domains were significantly improved after surgery. In total, 21% (n = 34) reported satisfaction ≤3 and 29% (n = 46) reported pain or function ≤3. Poisson regression analysis revealed that frailty (odds ratio [OR]: 0.2 [0.1-0.8], P = .03), baseline mental-health (OR: 0.6 [0.4-0.9], P = .01) and function (OR: 1.9 [1.0-3.6], P < .01), GAP score (OR: 4.6 [1.1-18.7], P = .03), and SAE (OR: 3.0 [1.7-5.2], P < .01) were identified as independent risk for poor clinical outcome. Only 17% (n = 6) of the poor-risk patients reached SRS22 total score >4.0 at 2 years. The overall clinical outcome was favorable for ASLD surgery. Poor-risk patients continue to have inferior outcomes, and alternative treatment strategies are needed to help improve outcomes in this patient population. Recognition and optimization of modifiable risk factors, such as physical function and mental health, and reduced SAEs may improve overall clinical outcomes of ASLD surgery.Level of Evidence: 3.

Joint Pathologies as a Covert Risk Factor for Rod Fracture after Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Adult Spinal Deformity

Joint Pathologies as a Covert Risk Factor for Rod Fracture after Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Adult Spinal Deformity

Asymmetric pedicle subtraction osteotomy (APSO) for neglected pediatric complex spinal deformities requiring three column osteotomies (3CO). Minimum 3 years results regarding the correctional efficacy and complications

Asymmetric pedicle subtraction osteotomy (APSO) for neglected pediatric complex spinal deformities requiring three column osteotomies (3CO). Minimum 3 years results regarding the correctional efficacy and complications

Asymmetric Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Correction of Concurrent Sagittal-Coronal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity

Lau, Darryl; Haddad, Alexander F BS; Deviren, Vedat MD; Ames, Christopher P MD Author Information

The contribution of pre-existing spinal pseudarthrosis to the surgical correction for thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis

The correction of global kyphosis (GK) for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with pre-existing pseudarthrosis were frequently over 45°. Mismatch between kyphosis correction of GK and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) may be ascribed to contribution of pseudarthrosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate surgical outcomes of PSO away from the level of pseudarthrosis and to elucidate the contribution of pre-existing spinal pseudarthrosis in surgical correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis caused by AS. Eighteen AS patients with pre-existing pseudarthrosis were included. PSO outside the level of pseudarthrosis were performed for all the patients. The average follow-up period were 29 months. Radiographs were analyzed for correction and complications. Significant improvement in all sagittal parameters were found postoperatively without obvious correction loss at the final follow-up. Local kyphosis (LK) improved from 23.88° preoperatively to 12.67° postoperatively with a mean correction of 11.47°. Average correction of per PSO segment, GK and sum of disc wedging within fused region (SDW) were 33.53°, 49.27° and 4.00°, respectively. PSO away from the level of pseudarthrosis, but with posterior instrumentation crossing it was a feasible method and was able to maintain sustained surgical outcomes. Regarding GK correction, PSO accounted for 68.1% while pre-existing pseudarthrosis provided 23.3%, which resulted from anterior column opening postoperatively. Thus, extra kyphosis correction attributed to pre-existing pseudarthrosis should be considered for surgical-decision making to prevent overcorrection.

On the pedicle subtraction osteotomy technique and its modifications during the past two decades: a complementary classification to the Schwab's spinal osteotomy classification.

To propose a complementary classification to the Schwab's osteotomy classification that would regroup together under a common umbrella different published pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) variations that are commonly used, to have a common language and complete the spine surgeon's armamentarium when dealing with rigid spinal deformities. The 2 general types corresponding to the grades 3 and 4 of the Schwab classification were separated into 6 gradual subtypes (grades 3A, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B, 4C). The classification is based on the amount of resected pedicle, the inclusion or not of the disc above, and the location of the axis of rotation. Based on the proposed classification, a reliability study was performed using 18 cases that were classified by 8 readers with expertise in the management of adult deformities with the use of osteotomies. Clinical cases were classified according to the 6 grades proposed in the classification. The intra-rater reliability for the classification was "almost perfect agreement" with a Fleiss kappa coefficient average of 0.92 (range 0.85-1.00). The inter-rater reliability was "almost perfect agreement" with a coefficient average of 0.90 for the 2 readings that were done at an interval of 2weeks. The developed classification proved to be reliable and intuitive. It is an original way to display a catalog of different available PSO modifications including the original technique, in a logical and gradual order to help the surgeons in their decisions and show them that between a grade 2 osteotomy and a grade 5 osteotomy, many intermediate options are available. Further work with a treatment algorithm for clinical practice based on the current classification may be developed in the future.

Can spinal deformity patients maintain proper arm positions while undergoing full-body X-ray?

The compliance rate of arm positioning during full-body X-rays varies depending on operative status (preoperative vs postoperative), age, and diagnosis. Retrospective cohort. Despite the importance of patients maintaining arms in the same position in preoperative and postoperative standing films, patients are known to have their arms in varying positions, confounding radiographic interpretation and making global sagittal and coronal spinal balance assessment variable and potentially less reliable. This study seeks to examine arm position compliance among adult and pediatric surgical spinal deformity patients undergoing total body X-rays over the course of 4years (2015-2018). A retrospective radiographic review was performed on 382 spinal deformity patients from July 2015 to July 2018. The study's dependent variable of interest was standardized arm position (fingers on the clavicles with shoulders in 45° of forward elevation while the patient is in a free-standing posture) observed during full-body X-rays obtained for spinal deformity evaluation. Deviations and compliance to the standard protocol for full-body X-ray arm positioning was recorded and analyzed across various independent factors, including year of surgery, pre- and postoperative periods, type of spine surgery, and patient age. Chi-square and Cochran-Armitage analyses were performed to study categorical and trends, respectively. The overall compliance rate for maintaining standardized arm position was 90% for all 370 patients (277 adult and 93 pediatric), in preoperative and postoperative setting. Adults were more likely to follow protocol than pediatric patients (92.9% vs. 82.4%, P value = 0.003). The postoperative setting observed a significantly lower overall compliance rate when compared to the preoperative period (67.8% vs. 87.0%, P value < 0.0001). Patients undergoing neuromuscular scoliosis (73.3%), vertebral column resection (VCR) (70%), and growing rod lengthening (GRL) (57.1%) had the lowest overall compliance rate in the preoperative setting. In the postoperative setting, patients with GRL, VCR, revision congenital scoliosis, congenital scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis, and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) surgeries were compliant less than or equal to 50% of the time. From 2015 to 2018, there was an overall statistically significant increase in compliance rate (61.1% to 90.6%). Over the study period, adult patients became significantly more compliant to protocol. This was not observed in the pediatric population. This study documented the patient compliance rate of maintaining standardized arm position during full-body X-rays of spinal deformity patients. The overall compliance rate was 90.0% for all patients in the preoperative and postoperative setting. Risk factors for lower compliance rates included patients that were pediatric, postoperative, neuromuscular, and those who underwent a complex vertebral osteotomy or GRL. There was a trend showing improved compliance rate throughout the 4-year study period, which highlights the importance of having an ancillary staff who is comfortable with a consistent standard of care protocol. These results should help other centers optimize arm positioning in their patients undergoing full-body X-rays in the future.

Multistage Hybrid Approach to Management of Significant Sagittal Malalignment: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches for the correction of adult spinal deformity have gained popularity in the past decade. MIS approaches can result in decreased hospitalization times and decreased morbidity. However, compared to open techniques, MIS approaches are challenging in the setting of fixed sagittal deformity and strategic surgical staging. Combined MIS and miniopen techniques are described as "hybrid" techniques. We report on the surgical approach for a fixed sagittal deformity using both MIS and miniopen techniques, specifically a miniopen pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and an anterior column release (ACR). The patient gave written informed consent for surgical treatment; institutional review board approval was not required. The patient first underwent the placement of percutaneous modular pedicle screws from T12 to the pelvis as well as a mini-PSO across the previously fused L5 vertebral body, with the placement of a temporary rod. The following day, the patient underwent lateral transpsoas interbody fusion and ACR at L2/3; a percutaneous rod was then passed from T12 to the pelvis for segmental fixation. The patient recovered well and was discharged home without complication 6 d after the initial day of surgery. The combined use of surgical staging and traditional open techniques in a selective, minimalistic fashion and adherence to minimally invasive principles provide for a powerful set of surgical techniques that capitalize on less invasive approaches to deformity management. Used with permission from Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.

骨粗鬆症性椎体骨折による局所後弯変形に対して後方椎体骨切り術（PSO）に前方支柱再建術を追加した二症例

骨粗鬆症性椎体骨折による局所後弯変形に対して後方椎体骨切り術（PSO）に前方支柱再建術を追加した二症例

Super-Pedicle Osteotomy for Correction of Focal Thoracolumbar Kyphosis

Focal thoracolumbar kyphotic deformities require operative correction through osteotomies to restore normal spinal balance. Traditional osteotomies, such as the pedicle subtraction osteotomy, that are often used in the lumbar spine are less useful in the thoracolumbar region. The super-pedicle osteotomy is a pedicle-sparing wedge osteotomy that can be used for correction of kyphosis in patients with thoracolumbar deformities. A retrospective review was conducted of 9 consecutive cases using the super-pedicle technique. Clinical data regarding patient age at presentation, etiology of deformity, symptoms, neurological status at presentation, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, type of surgery performed, estimated blood loss during surgery, and complications up to last follow-up were recorded. The primary parameter of interest was the angle at the planned osteotomy site before and after correction. Nine patients with an average age of 64 years were included. All 9 patients had focal thoracic kyphosis either at T11-T12 or T12-L1. All patients underwent thoracolumbar operations with super-pedicle osteotomies at their main level of kyphosis. Estimated blood loss was 600 mL. Average correction at the osteotomy site as measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs was 31°. At an average follow-up of 338 days, no patients experienced rod fracture, but 1 patient required extension of fusion for proximal junctional kyphosis. In this small series of patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis, the super-pedicle osteotomy technique was clinically useful. More robust examination is required to determine the safety, utility, and durability of this osteotomy technique.

Comprehensive In Silico Evaluation of Accessory Rod Position, Rod Material and Diameter, Use of Cross-connectors, and Anterior Column Support in a Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Model: Part II: Effects on Lumbosacral Rod and Screw Strain.

In silico finite element study. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of six construct factors on rod and screw strain at the lumbosacral junction in an in silico pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) model: traditional inline and alternative Ames-Deviren-Gupta (ADG) multi-rod techniques, number of accessory rods (three-rod vs. four-rod), rod material (cobalt-chrome [CoCr] or stainless steel [SS] vs. titanium [Ti]), rod diameter (5.5 vs. 6.35 mm), and use of cross-connectors (CC), or anterior column support (ACS). Implant failure and pseudoarthrosis at the lumbosacral junction following PSO are frequently reported. Clinicians may modulate reconstructs with multiple rods, rod position, rod material, and diameter, and with CC or ACS to reduce mechanical demand. An evaluation of these features' effects on rod and screw strains is lacking. A finite element model (T12-S1) with intervertebral discs and ligaments was created and validated with cadaveric motion data. Lumbosacral rod and screw strain data were collected for 96 constructs across all six construct factors and normalized to the Ti 2-Rod control. The inline technique resulted in 12.5% to 51.3% more rod strain and decreased screw strain (88.3% to 95%) compared to ADG at the lumbosacral junction. An asymmetrical strain distribution was observed in the three-rod inline technique in comparison to four-rod, which was more evenly distributed. Regardless of construct features, rod strain was significantly decreased by rod material (CoCr > SS > Ti), and increasing rod diameter from 5.5 mm to 6.35 mm reduced strain by 9.9% to 22.1%. ACS resulted in significant reduction of rod (37.8%-59.8%) and screw strains (23.2%-65.8%). Increasing rod diameter, using CoCr rods, and ACS were the most effective methods in reducing rod strain at the lumbosacral junction. The inline technique decreased screw strain and increased rod strain compared to ADG. N/A.