Pedicle Screw Fixation Technique Research Articles

OLIF联合后路经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定技术与传统TLIF治疗腰椎滑脱症的近期疗效对比

OLIF联合后路经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定技术与传统TLIF治疗腰椎滑脱症的近期疗效对比

Design, Fabrication, and Preliminary Validation of Patient-Specific Spine Section Phantoms for Use in Training Spine Surgeons Outside the Operating Room/Theatre.

Pedicle screw fixation (PSF) demands rigorous training to mitigate the risk of severe neurovascular complications arising from screw misplacement. This paper introduces a patient-specific phantom designed for PSF training, extending a portion of the learning process beyond the confines of the surgical room. Six phantoms of the thoracolumbar region were fabricated from radiological datasets, combining 3D printing and casting techniques. The phantoms were employed in three training sessions by a fifth-year resident who performed full training on all six phantoms; he/she placed a total of 57 pedicle screws. Analysis of the learning curve, focusing on time per screw and positioning accuracy, revealed attainment of an asymptotic performance level (around 3 min per screw) after 40 screws. The phantom's efficacy was evaluated by three experts and six residents, each inserting a minimum of four screws. Initial assessments confirmed face, content, and construct validity, affirming the patient-specific phantoms as a valuable training resource. These proposed phantoms exhibit great promise as an essential tool in surgical training as they exhibited a demonstrable learning effect on the PSF technique. This study lays the foundation for further exploration and underscores the potential impact of these patient-specific phantoms on the future of spinal surgical education.

Review of currently used classifications for pedicle screw position grading in cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine

Pedicle screw fixation technique has been established as the safe standard for instrumentations in all spinal regions. However, the screw position is sometimes suboptimal. Cortical breaches may occur in different regions of the vertebrae. In addition to compromising bone purchase, pedicle perforations may endanger neural, vascular, and visceral structures. Moreover, a mispositioned screw can result in a greater risk of instrumentation failure. The accuracy of screw insertion has become a frequent topic of recent publications on spine surgery. Despite that, there is no unified way of reporting pedicle screws position. Several different scales are used. Given the multitude of used classifications and rarity of reported complications exact clinical relevance of pedicle screw misplacements remain unclear. In this article, the authors review types of scoring systems and propose a structured way for pedicle screw position grading based on a combination of the most used classifications.

Development of a Pedicle Screw Fixation Simulation Model for Surgical Training Using a 3-Dimensional Printer

Training surgeons in pedicle screw fixation (PSF) techniques during actual surgery is limited because of patient safety, complications, and surgical efficiency issues. Recent technical developments are leading the world to an era of personalized three-dimensional (3D) printing. This study aimed to evaluate the educational effect of using a 3D-printed spine model to train beginners in PSF techniques to improve screw accuracy and procedure time. Computed tomography (CT) scan data were used in a 3D printer to produce a life-size lumbar spine replica of L1-3 vertebrae. Four residents performed PSF thrice. Each resident performed 18 screw fixations on both sides (6 screws per trial). The time to complete the procedure and pedicle violation was recorded. The average time for the 3 procedures was 42.1±2.9 minutes, 38.8±3.3 minutes, and 32.1±2.5 minutes, respectively. Furthermore, the average pedicle screw score for the 3 procedures was 13.0±0.8, 14.5±0.6, and 16.0±0.8, respectively. As the trial was repeated, the procedure time decreased and the accuracy of screw fixation tended to be more accurate. It was possible to decrease the procedure time and increase accuracy through repeated training using the 3D-printed spine model. By implementing a 3Dprinted spine model based on the patient's actual CT data, surgeons can perform simulation surgery before the actual surgery. Therefore, this technology can be useful in educating residents to improve their surgical skills.

Biomechanical investigation of the hybrid modified cortical bone screw–pedicle screw fixation technique: Finite-element analysis

BackgroundHybrid fixation techniques including the both modified cortical bone trajectory (MCBT) and traditional trajectory (TT) at the L4 and L5 lumbar segment are firstly proposed by our team. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate and provide specific biomechanical data of the hybrid fixation techniques including the MCBT and TT.MethodsFour human cadaveric specimens were from the anatomy laboratory of Xinjiang Medical University. Four finite-element (FE) models of the L4–L5 lumbar spine were generated. For each of them, four implanted models with the following fixations were established: TT-TT (TT screw at the cranial and caudal level), MCBT-MCBT (MCBT screw at the cranial and caudal level), hybrid MCBT-TT (MCBT screw at the cranial level and TT screw at the caudal level), and TT-MCBT (TT screw at the cranial level and MCBT screw at the caudal level). A 400-N compressive load with 7.5 N/m moments was applied to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation, respectively. The range of motion (ROM) of the L4–L5 segment and the posterior fixation, the von Mises stress of the intervertebral disc, and the posterior fixation were compared.ResultsCompared to the TT-TT group, the MCBT-TT showed a significant lower ROM of the L4–L5 segment (p ≤ 0.009), lower ROM of the posterior fixation (p < 0.001), lower intervertebral disc stress (p < 0.001), and lower posterior fixation stress (p ≤ 0.041). TT-MCBT groups showed a significant lower ROM of the L4–L5 segment (p ≤ 0.012), lower ROM of the posterior fixation (p < 0.001), lower intervertebral disc stress (p < 0.001), and lower posterior fixation stress (p ≤ 0.038).ConclusionsThe biomechanical properties of the hybrid MCBT-TT and TT-MCBT techniques at the L4–L5 segment are superior to that of stability MCBT-MCBT and TT-TT techniques, and feasibility needs further cadaveric study to verify.

Percutaneous cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional open pedicle screw fixation for type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit.

Retrospective matched-cohort comparative study. Cortical bone trajectory screw (CBT) technique is a new insertion technique in terms of fixation strength and less invasiveness. The purposes of this study were to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous CBT fixation (PCBT) with traditional open posterior pedicle screw fixation (OPPS) technique. Between September 2019 and October 2020, patients undergoing posterior stabilization were matched for age, sex, diagnosis, fractured level, and AO classification. 24 control patients with OPPS were identified and appropriately matched to 24 consecutive patients with PCBT technique. Clinical outcomes and radiographic assessments including vertebral wedge angle (VWA) and sagittal index were recorded and compared between the two groups. Incision length, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in the PCBT group were significantly better than the OPPS group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores 5days after operation for PCBT patients were significantly lower than those for OPPS patients (P = 0.003), but these differences lost significance at last follow-up. There was no significant difference in VWA and sagittal index between OPPS and PCBT group (P > 0.05). While no complications were noted in the PCBT group, there were four cases with complications in the traditional OPPS group. The present study showed that PCBT is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficits. This new surgical treatment was more minimally invasive, yet yielded equivalent or superior clinical and radiographic outcomes compared to the traditional open pedicle screw fixation surgery.

Safety and Efficacy of Intraoperative Doppler Sonography-Assisted Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation-A Retrospective Comparison with Conventional Pedicle Screw Implantation.

A Retrospective Cohort Study. To introduce a new Doppler sonography-assisted pedicle screw fixation technique that enables vertebral artery (VA) monitoring during surgery and compares the accuracies of Doppler sonography-assisted cervical pedicle screw fixation and the conventional technique. This retrospective study was performed on 164 consecutive patients that underwent pedicle-based screw fixation from C2 to C6 between January 2013 and August 2020. Surgery was performed without intraoperative Doppler sonography in 84 cases (the Control group) or with intraoperative Doppler sonography in 80 cases (the Doppler group). Proper positioning of pedicle screws was graded, and the incidences of VA injury and screw breach in the Control and Doppler groups were compared. Three hundred and ninety-nine screws were placed in the 164 patients (Doppler, 186 screws; Control, 213 screws). The percentages of well-positioned screws in the two groups were significantly different (Doppler, 97.8%; Control, 85.0%). There were two cases of VA injury in the Control group, an incidence of 2.4%, but no case in the Doppler group. Doppler sonography can be used intraoperatively to help guide the trajectory of the cervical pedicle screw insertion. It can detect the VA inside the screw trajectory and may reduce the risk of VA injury during cervical pedicle screw fixation.

Biomechanical analysis of a newly developed interspinous process device conjunction with interbody cage based on a finite element model.

PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects of a newly developed interspinous process device (IPD), called TAU. This device was compared with another IPD (SPIRE) and the pedicle screw fixation (PSF) technique at the surgical and adjacent levels of the lumbar spine.Materials and methodsA three-dimensional finite element model analysis of the L1-S1 segments was performed to assess the biomechanical effects of the proposed IPD combined with an interbody cage. Three surgical models—two IPD models (TAU and SPIRE) and one PSF model—were developed. The biomechanical effects, such as range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), disc stress, and facet loads during extension were analyzed at surgical (L3-L4) and adjacent levels (L2-L3 and L4-L5). The study analyzed biomechanical parameters assuming that the implants were perfectly fused with the lumbar spine.ResultsThe TAU model resulted in a 45%, 49%, 65%, and 51% decrease in the ROM at the surgical level in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively, when compared to the intact model. Compared to the SPIRE model, TAU demonstrated advantages in stabilizing the surgical level, in all directions. In addition, the TAU model increased IDP at the L2-L3 and L4-L5 levels by 118.0% and 78.5% in flexion, 92.6% and 65.5% in extension, 84.4% and 82.3% in lateral bending, and 125.8% and 218.8% in axial rotation, respectively. Further, the TAU model exhibited less compensation at adjacent levels than the PSF model in terms of ROM, IDP, disc stress, and facet loads, which may lower the incidence of the adjacent segment disease (ASD).ConclusionThe TAU model demonstrated more stabilization at the surgical level than SPIRE but less stabilization than the PSF model. Further, the TAU model demonstrated less compensation at adjacent levels than the PSF model, which may lower the incidence of ASD in the long term. The TAU device can be used as an alternative system for treating degenerative lumbar disease while maintaining the physiological properties of the lumbar spine and minimizing the degeneration of adjacent segments.

Factors important in bone union after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the cortical bone trajectory technique

The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique has developed as an alternative to the traditional pedicle screw fixation technique due to its minimum invasiveness for screw insertion and rigid fixation for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, the factors contributing to bone union after CBT-PLIF is a controversial subject. The aim of this study was to investigate factors important to bone union after CBT-PLIF. We analyzed 69 consecutive patients who underwent single-level CBT-PLIF from October 2011 to December 2016 and were followed for over two years. Bone union was evaluated using computed tomography (CT) and dynamic assessment in the radiograph within two years after CBT-PLIF. The following factors that may influence bone union were investigated: age, gender, bone mineral density (BMD), cage materials [polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) or titanium (Ti)], vertebral-slip (neutral), translational motion (flexion/extension), angular motion (flexion/extension), screw depth into the vertebral body (% depth), interval of bilateral screw heads, and cage position. The bone union rate at the two-year follow-up was 88.4% (61/69). A univariate analysis revealed that variables with values of P<0.20 were age (P<0.01), gender (P=0.07), cage material (P=0.18), vertebral slip (neutral) (P=0.14), % depth (P=0.086), and cage position (P<0.01). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that factors related to bone union were young age (P<0.01), Ti cage (P<0.01), small vertebral slip (neutral) (P<0.01), high % depth (P<0.01), and anterior cage position (P<0.01). For CBT-PLIF, deeper screw insertion into the vertebral body, anterior cage placement, and Ti cage usage may be important surgical techniques to achieve a successful bone union.

Esophageal perforation following pedicle screw placement for the treatment of upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis: a case report and review of the literature

BackgroundThe technique of posterior pedicle screw fixation has already been widely applied in the treatment of upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis. However, lesions of tuberculosis directly invade the vertebrae and surrounding soft tissues, which increases the risk of esophageal perforation induced by the posterior pedicle screw placement. Herein, we report the first case of esophageal perforation following pedicle screw placement in the upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis, and describe the underlying causes, as well as the treatment and prognosis.Case presentationA 48-year-old female patient with upper thoracic spinal tuberculosis presented sputum-like secretions from the wound after she was treated with one-stage operation through the posterolateral approach. Endoscopy was immediately conducted, which confirmed that the patient complicated with postoperative esophageal perforation caused by screws. CT scan showed that the right screw perforated the anterior cortex of the vertebrae and the esophagus at the T4 level. Fortunately, mediastinal infection was not observed. The T4 screw was removed, Vacuum Sealing Drainage (VSD) was performed, and jejunum catheterization was used for enteral nutrition. After continuous treatment with sensitive antibiotics for 2.5 months and 5 times of VSD aspiration, the infected wound recovered gradually. With 18-month follow-up, the esophagus healed well, without symptoms of dysphagia and stomach discomfort, and CT scan showed that T2–4 had complete osseous fusion without sequestrum.ConclusionTuberculosis increases the risk of postoperative esophageal perforation in a certain degree for patients with upper thoracic tuberculosis. The damages to esophagus during the operation should be prevented. The screws with the length no more than 30 mm should be selected. Moreover, close monitoring after operation should be conducted to help the early identification, diagnosis and treatment, which could help preventing the adverse effects induced by the delayed diagnosis and treatment of esophageal perforation.

Reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous pedicle screws and instrumentational maneuvers: Technical strategy and radiological outcomes.

Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fracture is a common condition without a clear consensus on the best treatment approach. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) techniques are widely used in practice, while its ability to correct fracture deformity is relatively weak, especially for the central area of the endplate. In this study, we reported a novel technique to reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar burst fractures. The new reduction technique uses six percutaneous pedicle screws for the fractured vertebra and its adjacent vertebrae. Pedicle screws implanted in the two adjacent vertebrae were parallel to the superior vertebral endplate, as routinely required. Two monoaxial pedicle screws implanted in the fractured vertebra were placed toward the anteroinferior portion of the fractured vertebral body. After routine instrumentation and ligamentotaxis reduction, the bolt heads of the four screws implanted in the adjacent vertebrae were first tightened, and then the bolt heads of the screws implanted in the fractured vertebra were gradually tighten to elevate the collapsed endplate. A fundamental principle of this technique is to implant the pedicle screw in the fractured vertebra towards the anteroinferior portion of the vertebra in such a way that the angle between the pedicle screw and the rod is oblique on lateral fluoroscopy. As such, when the bolt heads were tightened, the pedicle screws can be swung up to reduce the endplate fragments. The novel technique was performed in 24 patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar AO type A3 fractures. The middle vertebral height ratio was significantly improved from 69.7%±7.6% after routine reduction to 85.1%±4.5% postoperatively (p<0.01). No complication was noticed for this new reduction technique. At 6-month follow-up, no significant correction loss of the middle and posterior vertebral height ratios, Cobb angle, and vertebral wedge angle was observed, while 5.8% of correction loss was observed for the anterior vertebral height ratio. The described reduction technique is simple, safe, and effective in reducing the collapsed central endplate in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Such a practical reduction strategy does not need additional medical costs.

Novel augmentation technique of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using hydroxyapatite granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis.

Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation has been commonly used for various spine surgeries. Rigid PPS fixation is necessary to decrease the incidence of screw loosening in osteoporotic spine. Recently, we have reported biomechanical advantages of augmentation technique using hydroxyapatite (HA) granules for PPS fixation in synthetic bone. However, its biomechanical performance in augmenting PPS fixation for osteoporotic spine has not been fully elucidated. The aim of the present study is to perform a cadaveric biomechanical analysis of PPS fixation augmented with HA granules. Thirty osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae (L1-L5) were obtained from 6 cadavers (3 men and 3 women; age 80 ± 9years; bone mineral density 73 ± 9mg/cm3). The maximal pullout strength and maximal insertion torque were compared between the screws inserted into the vertebrae with and without augmentation. In toggle testing, the number of craniocaudal toggle cycles and maximal load required to achieve the 2-mm screw head displacement were also compared. The maximal pullout strength in the screws augmented with HA granules was significantly greater compared to those without augmentation (p < 0.05). The augmentation significantly increased the maximal insertion torque of the screws (p < 0.05). Moreover, the number of toggle cycles and the maximal load required to reach 2mm of displacement were significantly higher in the augmented screws (p < 0.05). The PPS fixation was significantly enhanced by the augmentation with HA granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine. The PPS fixation augmented with HA granules might decrease the incidence of screw loosening and implant failure in patients with osteoporotic spine.

Evolution of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

Spine surgery has evolved over centuries from first being practiced with Hippocratic boards and ladders to now being able to treat spinal pathologies with minimal tissue invasion. With the advent of new imaging and surgical technologies, spine surgeries can now be performed minimally invasively with smaller incisions, less blood loss, quicker return to daily activities, and increased visualization. Modern minimally invasive procedures include percutaneous pedicle screw fixation techniques and minimally invasive lateral approach for lumbar interbody fusion (i.e., minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, extreme lateral interbody fusion, oblique lateral interbody fusion) and midline lumbar fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws. Just as evolutions in surgical techniques have helped revolutionize the field of spine surgery, imaging technologies have also contributed significantly. The advent of computer image guidance has allowed spine surgeons to advance their ability to refine surgical techniques, increase the accuracy of spinal hardware placement, and reduce radiation exposure to the operating room staff. As the field of spine surgery looks to the future, many novel technologies are on the horizon, including robotic spine surgery, artificial intelligence, and machine learning to help improve preoperative planning, improve surgical execution, and optimize patient selection to ensure improved postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. As more spine surgeons begin incorporating these novel minimally invasive techniques into practice, the field of minimally invasive spine surgery will continue to innovate and evolve over the coming years.

Biomechanical study of C1 posterior arch crossing screw and C2 lamina screw fixations for atlantoaxial joint instability

BackgroundThe biomechanics of C1 posterior arch screw and C2 vertebral lamina screw techniques has not been well studied, and the biomechanical performance of the constructs cannot be explained only by cadaver testing.MethodsFrom computed tomography images, a nonlinear intact three-dimensional C1-2 finite element model was developed and validated. And on this basis, models for the odontoid fractures and the three posterior internal fixation techniques were developed. The range of motion (ROM) and stress distribution of the implants were analyzed and compared under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.ResultsAll three kinds of fixation techniques completely restricted the range of motion (ROM) at the C1-2 operative level. The C1-2 pedicle screw fixation technique showed lower and stable stress peak on implants. The C1 posterior arch screw + C2 pedicle screw and C1 pedicle screw + C2 lamina screw fixation techniques showed higher stress peaks on implants in extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.ConclusionsAs asymmetrical fixations, C1 posterior arch screw + C2 pedicle screw and C1 pedicle screw + C2 lamina screw fixations may offer better stability in lateral bending and axial rotation, but symmetrical fixation C1-2 pedicle screw can put the implants in a position of mechanical advantage.

Interspinous Process Fixation Device Versus Extended Pedicle Screw Fixation for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease: 3-Year Retrospective Study

In the present study, we compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of an interspinous process fixation device (IFD) with those of extended pedicle screw fixation (PSF) for symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion. The data from 109 patients with ASD treated with IFD (n= 48) or extended PSF (n= 61) from January 2009 to January 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical outcomes were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index. The radiographic outcomes included the fusion rate, incidence of cage subsidence, and additional radiographic ASD. The mean incision length, operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the IFD group (P < 0.001). Postoperative back and leg pain were relieved in both groups (P < 0.001). The mean preoperative VAS scores were 8.3 ± 1.3 and 8.5 ± 1.1 in the IFD and PSF groups and had improved to 2.8 ± 1.1 and 2.7 ±1.2 after 36 months, respectively (P < 0.001). At 36 months postoperatively, 10 of the 56 patients (17.9%) in the PSF group had developed additional radiographic ASD compared with 2 of 44 patients (4.5%) in the IFD group. Our results have demonstrated that in the treatment of symptomatic ASD, comparable clinical and radiologic outcomes can be achieved using IFD, which has a shorter skin incision, shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter hospital stay than the extended PSF technique. Although not statistically significant, the IFD resulted in a lower ASD incidence compare with the PSF technique. Thus, IFD might be an alternative surgical method for symptomatic ASD after lumbar spine fusion.

Posterior screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine: a technique and literature review.

Posterior cervical spine fixation is a key component in achieving spinal arthrodesis for treating various cervical spine pathologies including neoplastic, inflammatory, traumatic and degenerative diseases. Historically, various wiring techniques had played major roles in posterior cervical spine fixation. Today, posterior cervical screw fixation is utilized by most spine surgeons instead of wiring for its superior biomechanical strength. A review of lateral mass, pedicle, intralaminar and transfacet screw fixation techniques in the subaxial cervical spine is presented in a detailed fashion. A comparison among different posterior cervical subaxial fixation techniques is also included. Although the safety of freehand techniques was demonstrated in the majority of the existing studies, real-time navigation is becoming increasingly utilized for cervical screw insertion, especially for cervical pedicle screws, where the freehand technique is technically demanding and may carry a higher risk of neurovascular injury. Several different posterior screw fixation techniques exist for the subaxial cervical spine with generally low complication rate. Spine surgeons should be familiar with these techniques and choose the optimal technique based on each patient's individual anatomy and surgical needs.

Less Invasive Surgery is Feasible in the Management of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures in Isolated and Polytrauma Injury.

Less invasive stabilization systems (LISSs) have gained popularity. However, limited quality of life (QOL) and clinical outcome data exist for trauma patients treated with LISSs. The objective of this study is to describe QOL and outcome for posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Between January 2006 and December 2011, data from all patients treated with a posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation technique for thoracolumbar fractures were collected and analyzed. Sixty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Additional vertebral reduction and cement augmentation was used in 25 patients, when there was more than 50% of vertebral body comminution. Mean follow up of 19 months (range = 6-49 months). Fifty-one percent of the study population consisted of polytrauma patients, with 22% having injury severity score ≥ 15. In 6 cases (8.7%) there were perioperative complications. Response rate for the follow-up health survey was 78%, with a satisfactory overall median EuroQuol score of 0.811 (Q1-Q3 95% confidence interval = 0.709-0.897). Posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation proves to be effective in the management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures, with a good overall functional outcome. Percutaneous techniques that reduce perioperative morbidity are an alternative approach well suited for damage control orthopaedics, as long as there are no neurological deficits. Especially in polytrauma patients with spine fractures, the spinal column can be stabilized in an emergency setting, while limiting the risks of "a second hit" at the patients' already frail condition. 3.

Four Year Experience of Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: An Australian Prospective Analysis

Abstract INTRODUCTION Robot-assisted surgery has emerged as an innovative and minimally-invasive technique, touted as superior to the traditional free-hand technique of pedicle screw fixation in spinal fusion surgery. Complications of misplaced pedicle screws include inadequate fixation and surgical failure requiring revision, neural injury, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, vascular injury, and facet joint trauma with sequela of adjacent segment disease. Literature reports an incidence of pedicle screw misplacement in up to 10% with free-hand technique. Robot-assisted surgery has reported superiority with increased accuracy of pedicle screw placement and reduced complication rates. This prospective multi-institutional single cohort analysis reports the outcomes in robot-assisted spinal fusion surgery in Melbourne, Australia over 4 yr. METHODS Data was prospectively collected from 2015 to 2019 from robot-assisted spinal surgeries performed by 2 surgeons across 2 institutions. Postoperative spinal computed tomography (CT) scan was compared to preoperative CT based planning to determine the accuracy of pedicle screw placement to 0.1 mm. Accurate pedicle screw placement was defined as within 2.0 mm from the target. Intraoperative radiation exposure time, operative time and length of hospital stay were also collected. RESULTS The total number of cases was 164 and the total number of screws placed was 744. Accurate pedicle screw placement was 98.65%. Average intraoperative radiation exposure time was 9.9 s. Average operative time for single-level surgery was 74 min. The average length of hospital stay was 2.4 d. CONCLUSION The authors conclude that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement is a safe and highly accurate adjunct to spinal surgery. While robot-assisted spinal surgery significantly improves patient outcomes with reduced patient morbidity and revision rates, it has limitations in primary capital expenditure, consumable costs and, in training and accreditation. It is the authors’ opinion that the robot-assisted spinal surgery technique requires nuanced patient selection and expertise in the traditional free-hand method is still essential in the event of technological failure.

Biomechanical effects of posterior pedicle fixation techniques on the adjacent segment for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a biomechanical analysis

Posterior pedicle fixation technique is a common method for treating thoracolumbar burst fractures, but the effect of different fixation techniques on the postoperative spinal mechanical properties has not been clearly defined, especially on adjacent segments. A finite element model of T10-L2 with moderate T12 vertebra burst fracture was constructed to investigate biomechanical behavior of three posterior pedicle screw fixation techniques. Compared with traditional short-segment 4 pedicle screw fixation (TS-4) and intermediate long-segment 6 pedicle screw fixation (IL-6), mono-segment 4 pedicle screw fixation (MS-4) provides a safer surgical selection to prevent the secondary degeneration of adjacent segments in the long-term.

Evaluation of Multi-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography in In vivo Simulation of Individualized Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement at C3-C7 in Chinese Healthy Population.

Background:Cervical pedicle screw fixation through posterior approach has shown greater cervical stability advantage. The cervical pedicle screw fixation technique through posterior approach is demanding. The key to the technique is the choice of point and angle of screw entrance. The angle of screw placement is variable. Morphometric measurements of the cervical pedicle are a prerequisite for individualized screw. CT imaging has become the most reliable and important means to obtain cervical pedicle's measurement data and morphology in vivo. This study explores the feasibility and application of precise in vivo measurements by multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) for individualized cervical transpedicular screw placement at C3–C7 in Chinese healthy population.Materials and Methods:80 adults who underwent cervical examination by enhanced and nonenhanced computed tomography angiography, respectively, were selected and submitted to bone algorithm reconstruction for slice thickness and interval of 0.75 mm to acquire clear images and detailed bone structures. Simulation of individualized screw placement was performed with a 4.0 mm diameter screw with the help of postprocessing workstation. Pedicle transverse angle (PTA) and sagittal angle (PSA) were measured using the single- and double-line methods (analog nailing, 4.0 mm in diameter) in 160 pairs of C3–C7 pedicles, setting positive and negative values for cranial direction and foot side PSAs, respectively. Comparison of the measured change scope in PTA and PSA between the two methods was carried out; the range was defined as the error range.Results:Significantly, different results (P < 0.05) were obtained between the single- and double-line methods in the error ranges of PTA and PSA in C3–C7 pedicles. Interestingly, the double-line method was better in simulating the actual needs of individualized nailing. The mean values of PTA and PSA were 42.9°, 45.5°, 42.4°, 37.1°, 29.0° and 8.4°, 5.0°, −4.0°, and −7.8°, −8.1°, respectively, with the double-line method.Conclusion:MSCT reconstruction techniques can determine the direction and required parameters for individualized screw placement. In addition, accurate in vivo measurements of PTA and PSA, particularly PSA, provide the orthopedic surgeon with theoretical guidance and reliable basis in screw placement.